Transcript Document

Workshop Evaluation
Worth the Effort!
NLTAPA Conference
Boise, ID
Evaluation Overview
• Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of a
training program.
Evaluation Overview
• Four-level model developed by Donald
Kirkpatrick (1998).
• Reaction
• Learning
• Behavior
• Results
Evaluation Overview
(continued)
• Each successive evaluation level is built on
information provided by the lower level.
Level 1
Level 2
Level 4
Level 3
Reaction (Level 1)
What they thought
and felt about the
training.
Level 1
Level 1
 Courses expanded, or condensed
 Instructors adjusted
 Courses removed from the program pending
further review
Courses expanded, or condensed
Stormwater
Management
Participant
Comments
(Fall 2010)
Too long and
too deep of
explanations.
Too much info
that doesn’t
concern our
needs.
Maintenance
section is too
repetitive.
Instructors Adjusted
Winter
Maintenance
Participant
Comments (Fall
2012)
•Instructor should be
someone that worked in
this field at public works
level.
•Instructor seems to
lack practical
experience in this field.
•Less talk about cost. More
on winter maintenance.
(That's what our bosses
are for– keeping cost
down.)
Courses Removed
• Make half days.
• Break into different sections.
• Break into different levels –
decision planning vs. on-going
Traffic Signals
Participant Comments maintenance.
(Fall 2012)
Learning – Level 2
Pre and Post Quiz
• Developed to evaluate the instruction and
content of our training programs
(NOT the student)
• Consists of 6 questions
• Note your answers on the back of the evaluation
sheet
Quiz Example Question
1.
Denying physical access to someone because of
their impairment is:
a.
Sometimes necessary
b.
Discrimination
c.
Permitted by law in certain circumstances
d.
Unimportant compared to making roads safe for cars
Learning
 Course content modified
 Quiz questions refined
“Un-Learning” in Winter Maintenance
Behavior - Level 3
 Enhanced skills and knowledge identified
on the job
o Newer process
o 6 month evaluation
Level 3
Results – Level 4
Cost savings of approximately $5,000
related to remediation of current
signage
$1,500 of savings in equipment
expenditures
$30,000 of expenses avoided that
might have been incurred if gas line
had to be relocated after completion
Lawsuits avoided
Questions ...
LTAP – Local Technical Assistance Program
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
Bureau of Planning and Research
400 North Street, 6th Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17120
• E-mail:
[email protected]
• Web Site: www.ltap.state.pa.us