Transcript Slide 1

Protecting the Public’s Health
from Disease, Disasters, and
Bioterrorism:
Where are the Children?
Daniel B. Fagbuyi, MD, FAAP
Medical Director, Disaster Preparedness and Emergency Management
Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC
Assistant Professor, Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine
The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
SITUATION:
•The US is not adequately prepared for
public health emergencies and
disasters that involve children
BACKGROUND:
•Children make up ~25% of the US population
•Most disaster plans fail to factor in children
“benign neglect”
BACKGROUND:
•Children have physiological, anatomical,
dermatological, immunological and
developmental/psychosocial unique
characteristics
Predisposition to higher risk during a
CBRNE (chem-bio-rad-nuc-explosive)
event
DOES SIZE MATTER?
ASSESSMENT:
•Day to day pediatric emergency preparedness
is lacking nationwide
Pre-hospital to In-patient critical care
•Baseline deficiencies in pediatric surge
capacity and healthcare system capability
abound
Pre-hospital to In-patient critical care
ASSESSMENT:
•Over 2/3rd of pediatric medications currently
being used are administered “off-label”
•SNS is devoid of adequate pediatric MCMs
compared to that of the adult
“BOOTS ON THE GROUND”,
DATA & FACTS
•Emergency department (ED)
overcrowding is a critical issue on the
national agenda
Further exacerbated by H1N1
pandemic
•The science of ED surge remains
relatively undeveloped
Nager AL, Khanna K. Emergency department surge: models
and practical implications. J Trauma. 2009;67(2
Suppl):S96-99
10
/1
2
10 /20
/1 09
3
10 /20
/1 09
4
10 /20
/1 09
5
10 /20
/1 09
6
10 /20
/1 09
7
10 /20
/1 09
8
10 /20
/1 09
9
10 /20
/2 09
0
10 /20
/2 09
1
10 /20
/2 09
2
10 /20
/2 09
3
10 /20
/2 09
4
10 /20
/2 09
5
10 /20
/2 09
6
10 /20
/2 09
7
10 /20
/2 09
8
10 /20
/2 09
9
10 /20
/3 09
0
10 /20
/3 09
1/
11 200
/1 9
/
11 200
/2 9
/
11 200
/3 9
/
11 200
/4 9
/
11 200
/5 9
/
11 200
/6 9
/
11 200
/7 9
/
11 200
/8 9
/
11 200
/9 9
11 /20
/1 09
0/
20
09
Patient Volume
H1N1 Impact on Children’s National
Emergency Department Patient Volume
450
400
Non-ILI
ILI
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Date
Daily Influenza-like illness (ILI) and Emergency Department (ED) volume
Fall’09 H1N1. Solid line represents ED baseline volume.
A Rapid Medical Screening Process
Improved Emergency Department
Patient Flow during Surge Associated
with Novel H1N1 Influenza Virus
Daniel B. Fagbuyi
Kathleen Brown, David Mathison, Jennifer Kingsnorth, Sephora Morrison,
Mohsen Saidinejad, Jeffrey Greenberg, Michael Knapp, James Chamberlain
Children’s National Medical Center
The George Washington University School of Medicine
Public Opinion on Children and
Disasters
AAP in partnership with Children’s Health Fund conducted a
public opinion poll on the use of resources related to disaster
planning and response specific to children’s issues.
Findings
• 76% of Americans agree that if resources are limited,
children should be given a higher priority for life-saving
treatments
• 75% believe that if tough decisions must be made, life-saving
treatments should be provided to children rather than adults
with the same medical condition
• 92% agree that if there were a terrorist attack, our country
should have the same medical treatments readily available for
children as are now available for adults
RECOMMENDATIONS:
•Reauthorization of PAHPA
Distinguish children as a separate population
from the broader “at-risk” individuals’
category
Ensure federal public health preparedness
programs, grants and planning include
performance measures for children
RECOMMENDATIONS:
•Ensure stockpile MCMs, equipment, and
supplies are appropriate for children
Achieve parity between medical
countermeasures developed and included in the
Strategic National Stockpile for children and
those for adults
Address Emergency Use Authorization barriers
and consider a pre-EUA process
RECOMMENDATIONS:
•Involve pediatrics experts at all levels of
planning and response
Expand pediatric subject matter expertise in
federal preparedness planning efforts e.g.
Federal Advisory Committees and Boards
RECOMMENDATIONS:
•Ensure state and local planning includes the
needs of children and families
•Ensure EMS agencies and hospitals are
prepared and can care for children
•Improve and ensure pediatric education and
training for all responders
RECOMMENDATIONS:
•Augment and foster the linkage between all
preparedness agencies and pediatric experts
•Encourage and improve individual
preparedness, including families and children
with special healthcare needs
RECOMMENDATIONS:
•Ensure funding for preparedness and
response are tied to addressing the pediatric
gaps identified
•Improve strategic communications/messaging
to parents/public, health professionals,
decision makers, and the media
RECOMMENDATIONS:
•Implement the recommendations from the
work of the National Commission on Children
and Disasters (October 2006)
•Address the need for real-time data collection
during public health emergencies
Take Home Points
•Children differ from adults in many
aspects
•Failure to account for these
differences will result in increase
morbidity and mortality
•Cost-benefit analysis should consider
life-years-saved vs. lives-saved
Take Home Points
•Remember the end-user and public
accountability
With Questions, Please Contact:
American Academy of Pediatrics
Washington Office
202/347-8600
Tamar Haro: [email protected]
Betsy Dunford: [email protected]
Please visit: www.aap.org/disasters
Protecting the Public’s Health
from Disease, Disasters, and
Bioterrorism:
Where are the Children?
Daniel B. Fagbuyi, MD, FAAP
Medical Director, Disaster Preparedness and Emergency Management
Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC
Assistant Professor, Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine
The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC