Transcript Folie 1 - PEMPAL

PEMPAL PCOP Leadership Group – Videoconference 23 April 2009
Presentation of the Results
REPF Republic of Tajikistan
Institute of Public Management
Prof. Andreas Bergmann
[email protected]
Robin Braun
[email protected]
Building Competence. Crossing Borders.
Program
 Introduction
 Overview of IPSAS
 REPF Report on the Enhancement of Public
Sector Financial Reporting - Toolkits
 Current Situation of Accounting in Tajikistan
 Potential In-Country-Value-Added Through
Adopting IPSAS
 Recommendations
 Open Issues / Discussion
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
2
Overview of IPSAS
Rationale for and History of IPSAS
 IPSAS - International Public Sector Accounting Standards
 1998: another Financial Crisis
 Subsequently: Funding from International Organzations
made available in order to develop International Public
Sector Accounting Standards
• Cash Basis Standard
• Accrual Basis Standards
 Objective: Move from Cash Basis to Accrual
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
3
Overview of IPSAS (2)
Core Differences between the Economics of the Public and the
Private Sector = Public Sector Specific Issues: The only
reason to depart from the IAS/IFRSs
• Service potential instead of cash generation
• Importance of non-exchange transactions
• Political control of assets and liabilities
• The prominence of the budget
• State owned Enterprises
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
4
REPF Report – Content
Content
 I Introduction
 II Institutional Framework
 III Accounting Standards as Designed – Comparison with Accrual
Basis IPSAS
 IV Accounting Standards as Designed – Comparison with Cash
Basis IPSAS
 V Accounting Standards as Practiced
 VI Potential In-country value added through adopting IPSAS
 VII Recommendations
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
5
Current Situation of Accounting in Tajikistan
Institutional Framework
 Statutory Framework: tradition of written laws and rules
 Some large SOE are implementing IFRS, but not yet there
 Accounting training/education programs exist
• especially at lower to intermediate level: high numbers of graduates
 Budget System
• Cash basis
 Government Financial Statistics (GFS)
• Statistics in TJ based on GFS 1986
• GFSM2001 (=accrual!) currently being implemented
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
6
Current Situation of Accounting in Tajikistan (2)
Institutional Framework
 Monitoring and enforcement
• Weak institutional arrangements to monitor or enforce nationals standards
• Internal Audit
- Technically feasible but capacity constrained (MoF)
- Some co-ordination issues with inspectorates in LM
• External audit (joint with Anti-Corruption Agency)
- Audit of financial reports is not main task
- Independence, though improved, is still insufficient
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
7
Current Situation of Accounting in Tajikistan (3)
Institutional Framework
 Quality and availability of financial reports
• Prepared and presented according to current rules
• Possible weaknesses may be undetected due to constraints in internal
and external audit
 Information Technology
• No overall IT-system
• Much manual work even in central line ministries and certainly in
oblast/rayon
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
8
Current Situation of Accounting in Tajikistan (4)
Accounting Standards as Designed – Comparison with
Accrual Basis IPSAS (1 to 26)
 Financial Reporting
• Statement of financial position and statement of revenues and expenses
 modified accrual, partial compliance with accrual IPSAS
• Consolidation financial statements and budgets of all BO‘s. But: SOE‘s
are not consolidated  partial compliance with accrual IPSAS
• Most but not all qualitative characteristics applied  partial compliance
• Budget comparison (cash basis)  full compliance with accrual IPSAS,
because budget is not required to be accrual
Bottom line:
Typical modified accrual format, quite advanced in some aspects
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
9
Current Situation of Accounting in Tajikistan (5)
Accounting Standards as Designed – Comparison with
Accrual Basis IPSAS
 Revenues and expenses
• Revenue from cash and non-cash exchange when transaction occurs
 partial compliance with accrual IPSAS
• Foreign exchange transactions (but not carrying amounts) at current
exchange rates  partial compliance with accrual IPSAS
• No rules on leases  not in compliance with IPSAS
Bottom line:
Some shortcomings, especially for transfers and taxes substantial effects
are likely
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
10
Current Situation of Accounting in Tajikistan (6)
Accounting Standards as Designed – Comparison with
Accrual Basis IPSAS
 Fixed assets
• Simple asset accounting in place, measured at cost and depreciated over
useful life  full compliance with accrual IPSAS
• Treatment of inventories (stocks) less rigorous  partial compliance
• Simplified and limited impairment testing  partial compliance
Bottom line:
Almost full compliance with IPSAS, differences in details rather than
substantive matter
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
11
Current Situation of Accounting in Tajikistan (7)
Accounting Standards as Designed – Comparison with
Accrual Basis IPSAS
 Financial Assets
• Accounting unclear and presentation not compliant with accrual IPSAS
• Ambiguities include substantial transactions with SOE‘s
 Financial Liabilities
• Same as Financial Assets  not compliant with accrual IPSAS
• Borrowing cost expensed when they occur  full compliance with accrual
IPSAS
Bottom line:
Area of the most important shortcomings, effects very substantial
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
12
Current Situation of Accounting in Tajikistan (8)
Cash Basis
 Cash Basis IPSAS as a benchmark
• Presentation partly based on cash basis, but in some aspects also on
accrual basis, especially fixed assets
• Cash Basis does not require accrual treatment for transactions  full
compliance in respect of Revenues and Expenses
• Current fixed asset practise exceeds requirement
• Current treatment of financial assets and liabilities is compliant with Cash
Basis IPSAS, despite obvious shortcomings
Bottom line:
Compliance would be easier to achieve, but not necessarily addresses all
relevant issues
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
13
Current Situation of Accounting in Tajikistan (9)
Cash Basis
 Cash Basis IPSAS has even more rigorous requirement in
some respect
• Incremental/stepped approach not envisioned (1 standard!)
• Presentation of payments made by donors („donor reporting“), only
required under Cash Basis IPSAS!
• Consolidation of entities which are on accrual, by then possibly IFRS;
reconciliation to Cash Basis required
… both to be audited, also for completeness!
Bottom line:
Compliance very hard to achieve, even harder than accrual basis
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
14
Current Situation of Accounting in Tajikistan (10)
Bottom line
 RoT is on modified accrual basis
• Strength in presentation and fixed asset accounting
• Main shortcomings in the area of financial assets/liabilities and the
relationship with SOEs
• The gap to full compliance with Accrual IPSAS is substantial
• Incremental/stepped improvement possible
 Compliance with Cash Basis IPSAS is (at least) equally
challenging, namely because of particularities of Cash
Basis Standard
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
15
Potential In-Country-Value-Added Through
Adopting IPSAS
 Improved Reporting  information for decision makers
 Accrual Basis IPSAS
• Incremental improvement, areas with major weaknesses first
• Existing strengths (e.g. fixed assets) are preserved
• However, full compliance with all standards not to be achieved
quickly/easily
 Cash Basis IPSAS
• No improvement in some areas of weakness, e.g. financial
assets/liabilities
• Full compliance not to be achieved quickly/easily
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
16
Potential In-Country-Value-Added Through
Adopting IPSAS (2)
 Training/capacity bulding
• Few highly qualified individuals available, but requirement is more on
lower to intermediate level  in line with current development
• Further training efforts necessary, but they obviously become more
effective if knowledge can be used/applied
 Synergies with IFRS adoption by SOEs
 Reputation effects
• Improvements will improve reputation, both in country and with donors
• However, reputation risk if goals are not achieved (e.g. qualified audit
opinion)
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
17
Recommendations (1)

Maintain cash basis for budgeting

Improve accounting and reporting

Ranking of the three alternatives

•
Best: Incremental (stepped) adoption of Accrual IPSAS, first in
important/critical areas
•
Second best: Full adoption of Cash Basis IPSAS
•
Third: Full adoption of Accrual Basis IPSAS
Implementation needs to be coordinated closely with
project on budget classifications/chart of accounts and
enhancement of IT used
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
18
Recommendations (2)
Type of Organization
Basis of Accounting
Standard to be adopted
Budget Organizations
(BO)
Accrual Basis of Accounting
(Cash Basis of Budgeting)
Accrual Basis IPSAS
State-owned-Enterprises
(SOE)
Accrual Basis of Accounting
IFRS/IAS
Large Private Enterprises
Accrual Basis of Accounting
To be determined, not
subject of this study (usually
IFRS/IAS)
Small Businesses
Accrual Basis of Accounting, if
formal book-keeping required
To be determined, not
subject of this study (usually
simplified rules based on the
tax legislation)
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
19
Recommendations (3)

Partial adoption of Accrual IPSAS should include the
following steps:
•
Step 1: Presentation and Financial Transactions (IPSAS 1, 15, 23
transfers only, 24)
•
Step 2: Assets (IPSAS 12, 16, 17)
•
Step 3: Consolidation (IPSAS 6, 7, 8)
•
Step 4: Adoption of the IPSAS with lower priorities

Accounting reform needs to be embedded in other PFM
reforms
•
IT improvements/Chart of Accounts/GFS
•
Internal and external auditing
•
Financial control
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
20
Open Issues
Discussion
PEMPAL TCOP 23 April 2009
21