Transcript PowerPoint-esitys
Public Acceptance of Nuclear Power
Ms Tellervo Taipale Programme Manager, Communication WANO Paris Centre Responsible energy Seminario ”Retos energéticos en el siglo XXI: la energia nuclear como paerte de la solucion” Santander, 22 July 2005 Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Ms Tellervo Taipale
Finnish Public Information Manager TVO, Olkiluoto NPP, for 7 years Communication Manager WANO Paris Centre since May 2004.
Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
World Association of Nuclear Operators Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Why did WANO begin?
After the accident at the Chernobyl NPP in 1986, nuclear operators world-wide realised that international cooperation was needed to ensure that such an accident can never happen again.
WANO was formed in 1989 by nuclear operators world-wide. Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
The WANO Mission To maximise the safety and reliability of the operation of nuclear power plants by exchanging information and encouraging communication, comparison and emulation amongst its members.
Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Introduction to the Finnish Nuclear Industry Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Nuclear Power Plants in Finland Olkiluoto NPP, TVO OL1 BWR 840 MW, 1978 OL2 BWR 840 MW, 1980 Both Westinghouse Atom Loviisa NPP, Fortum LO1 PWR 488 MW, 1977 LO2 PWR 488 MW, 1979 Responsible energy Olkiluoto
Helsinki
Loviisa Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Teollisuuden Voima Oy, TVO TVO • Privately owned generating company • Personnel about 600 • Revenue some EUR 200 mill.
• Sells electricity only to the shareholders at cost basis • Two existing NPP units (OL1 and OL2, total annual output about 14 TWh) • Third NPP unit under construction (OL3).
Subsidiaries • Posiva Oy for Nuclear waste management • TVO Nuclear Services Oy for know-how consulting.
Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Electric Power Supply in Finland 2004* Coal 18.2 % Oil 2.1 % Net imports 5.6 % Hydro 17.0 % Wind 0.1 % Peat 7.5 % Natural gas 11.6 % Biomass 11.7 % Waste 1.1 % *by energy sources.
In total 86.8 TWh.
Responsible energy Nuclear 25.1 % Teollisuuden Voima Oy
80 60 40 TWh 120 100 20 0 1930 Electricity Consumption in Finland 40 50 60 70 Statistic 80 90 Forecast 96 TWh 20 2000 2010 2020 0 80 60 40 TWh 120 106 TWh 100 Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Nuclear Waste Management
Government
Regulations
Teollisuuden Fortum Power Voima and Heat Ministry of Trade and Industry
Licensing
POSIVA STUK- Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority
Supervision
Research Institutes Universities Consultants, Contractors
Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Current Nuclear Waste Management Nuclear waste Low Level Waste (LLW) Intermediate Level Waste (ILW) Spent fuel Funds collected for future costs.
LLW and ILW Underground repositories at the NPP sites.
Spent fuel Interim storages at the NPP sites Construction of the underground site started.
Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Repository for LLW and ILW at Olkiluoto
Control building Transport tunnel Research tunnel Shaft Silo for LLW
Responsible energy
Excavation tunnel Silo for ILW
Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Responsible energy How is a new NPP unit possible?
Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Arguments for the new NPP Unit • Covers partly the additional electricity demand and replaces old power plants • Enables, together with renewables, the fulfilment of the Kyoto commitments • Secures stable and predictable electricity price • Reduces the dependence on electricity import Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Nuclear Licensing Process in Finland
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Ministry of Trade and Industry DECISION IN PRINCIPLE Government Parliament CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Government
Responsible energy
OPERATING LICENSE Government
Interest groups: • politicians • authorities and regulators • trade unions • public etc.
Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Circulation of newspapers per 1,000 persons in different countries in 2001 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Finnish people are 3 rd in the world and 1 st in EU in reading newspapers.
Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Number of mediahits Nov 2000 - July 2002 Number
6,000 5,000 5323 4,000 3681 3888 3,000 2,000 1,000 1884 1035 336 793 1260 898 780 702 294 346 494 383 532 375 1587 1983 1039 387 0 N ov em D be ec r em be Ja r nu ar Fe y br ua ry M ar ch A pr il M ay Ju ne Ju ly A ug S us ep t te m be O r ct ob N er ov em D be ec r em be Ja r nu ar Fe y br ua ry M ar ch A pr il M ay Ju ne Ju ly
Responsible energy Total number of mediahits 28,000 Lähde: Observer Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Milestones of the OL3 Project 2000-2009 • Application for Decision in Principle – Nov 2000, decision and ratification - May 2002 • Investment decision and plant contract – Dec 2003 • Start-up of site preparation – Dec 2003 • Construction licence – Feb 2005 • Start-up of civil construction – Spring 2005 • Start-up of installation – Autumn 2006 • Start-up of operation – Spring 2009.
Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Acceptance of Nuclear Power 1982 - 2004
% 60 50 40 positive 46% 30 20 negative 25 % 10 0 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 19992000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Responsible energy Source: Suomen Gallup Oy / TNS Gallup Oy Finnish Energy Industries Federation Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Attitudes Towards the Use of Various Energy Forms in Electricity Generation in 2003
Wind power Wood/bioenergy Hydro power Natural gas Peat Nuclear power Coal Oil 6 5 0 % 66 46 43 21 40 37 11 86 82 7 28 29 32 63 5 52 9 3 2 28 12 4 3 3 4 9 11 16 15 26 20 % 40 % 60 % 80 % 100 %
Responsible energy Source: Finnish energy attitudes 2003
Increase Suitable Don't know Decrease
Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Responsible energy Olkiluoto in 2009 Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Olkiluoto 3 unit • Supplier: Consortium Framatome ANP and Siemens • Reactor type: EPR (PWR) • Net electrical output 1,600 MW • Estimated annual production 13 TWh • Operating personnel 150 • Investment cost EUR 3 billion.
Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Nuclear Waste Management in the future Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Final Disposal for Spent Fuel after 2020 Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Process for Final Disposal of Spent Fuel The application submitted to the Government in May 1999 • general hearing • statements requested Statements in November 1999 – January 2000 • about 20 statements of authorities and municipalities • statement of STUK • statement of the Eurajoki municipality (votes 20-7) Decisions • • decision of the Government in December 2000 ratification by the Parliament in May 2001 (votes 159-3).
Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
”It is safe to dispose of nuclear waste in the Finnish bedrock” – Opinions in the Whole Country
100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0 % 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 disagree don't know agree
Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
% 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0 %
Responsible energy ”It is safe to dispose of nuclear waste in the Finnish bedrock” – Opinions at Eurajoki
disagree don't know agree
Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Responsible energy Conclusions Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Tools for communication • • • • • Tools for communication Clear messages from different directions Keep it simple “Open doors policy” for visitors Information available for those who are interested Publications, Press Conferences and Press Releases, www sites etc.
Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
For Public Acceptance • • • • • • Public acceptance needs Trust Transparency Long term work Proper arguments, clear messages No accidents “Together for nuclear safety”, one of WANO slogans.
Responsible energy Teollisuuden Voima Oy
Responsible energy Thank you for your attention Teollisuuden Voima Oy