Transcript Review in slides_India

HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV and AIDS
Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Review in slides
India
1
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Content
Basic socio-demographic indicators
HIV prevalence and epidemiological status (2002-2008)
Populations at higher risk
Women and young people
Estimated HIV prevalence and reported HIV/AIDS cases
Risk behaviors (2001-2006)
Populations at higher risk
Young people and general population
Vulnerability and HIV knowledge (2001-2006)
Economics of AIDS (2003)
National Response (2001-2009)
Archives
2
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Basic socio-demographic indicators
2
Total population (in thousands)
1,214,464 (2010)
Annual population growth rate
1.3 (2010-2015)
Population aged 15-49 (thousands)
647,003 (2008)
Percentage of population in urban areas
30 % (2010)
Crude birth rate (births per 1,000 population)
22.8 (2008)
Under-5 mortality rate (per 1,000 live births)
69 (2008)
Human development index (HDI) - Rank/Value
119/0.519 (2010)
Life expectancy at birth (years)
64.4 (2010)
Adult literacy rate
62.8% (2005-2008)
Ratio of girls to boys in primary and secondary education (%)
92 (2007)
GDP per capita (PPP, $US)
3,270 (2009)
Per capita total health expenditure (Int.$)
109 (2007)
2
6
1
3
4
5
5
5
3
3
4
Source:1. UNFPA The State of World Population 2010
2. UN Statistics Division 2010: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/socind/population.htm
3. World Bank World Development Indicators & Global Development Finance ;http://databank.worldbank.org/ddp/home.do?Step=12&id=4&CNO=2
4. WHO World Health Statistics 2010
3
5. UNDP Human Development Report 2010
6. UN Population Division - Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision, Population Database
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence and
epidemiological status
4
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Populations at Higher Risk
5
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Up to 2008
6
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among different population
groups, 2007-2008
8
7.4
7.2
% 7
6
5.1
5
3.6
4
3.6
3
2.5
2
1
0.5
0
MSM
IDU
FSW
STD
patients
Migrants
Truckers
ANC
attendees
Source: HIV sentinel surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007-2008
7
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among FSWs in selected
states, 2007-2008
20
17.9
18
16
%
14
13.1
12
9.7
10
8.9
8
6
7.2
5.1
6.5
5.9
5.3
4
2
0
Source: HIV sentinel surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007-2008
8
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among IDUs in selected states,
2007-2008
30
%
24.4
25
20
17.9
16.8
15
13.8
10.1
10
8.6
7.2
7.9
7.8
7.5
7.3
5
0
Source: HIV sentinel surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007-2008
9
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among MSMs in selected
states, 2007-2008
20
17.6
18
17
16.4
16
%
14
11.8
12
11.7
10
8
8.4
7.4
6
7.9
7.4
6.6
5.6
4
2
0
Source: HIV sentinel surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007-2008
10
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
MSM
IDU
FSW
Districts with HIV prevalence higher than 15%
among most at risk populations, 2007-2008
East Godavari
West Godavari
Khammam
Pune
Thane
Kolhapur
Churachandpur
Mumbai
Delhi North
Churachandpur
Churachandpur
Aizawl
Mumbai Suburban
Amritsar
Chennai
Krishna
Hyderabad
Warangal
Cuddapah
Delhi Northeast
Rajkot
Bangalore
Pune
Imphal West
15.6
16.5
15.6
%
59.2
32.4
18
19.6
42.4
20
28
18
16.1
24.4
30.4
27.2
15.5
41.2
17.5
17.2
30
15.6
17.6
15.2
16.4
0
10
20
30
Source: HIV sentinel surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007-2008
40
50
60
70
11
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Up to 2007
12
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
State-wise estimated adult HIV prevalence,
2006 & 2007
Manipur
Nagaland
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Maharashtra
Tamil Nadu
West Bengal
Gujarat
Delhi
Chhattisgarh
2007
Kerala
2006
Haryana
Orissa
Bihar
Rajasthan
Jharkhand
Madhya Pradesh
Note: The estimated figures derived from Spectrum
Package
Punjab
Uttar Pradesh
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Source: HIV sentinel surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007-2008
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
13
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Trends of HIV prevalence among most at risk
populations, 2003-2007*
* 3 years moving
average based on
consistent sites: IDU13, MSM- 7, FSW-22
Source: HIV sentinel surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007-2008
14
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Trends of HIV prevalence among FSWs in
groups of states, 2003-2007*
* 3 yr moving average based on consistent sites : South 4 (AP, TN, Kar, Mah): 7 sites, NE 2 (Mani, Naga): 2 sites,
North 4 (Guj, Rak, Ori, WB): 7 sites
Source: HIV sentinel surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007-2008
15
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Trends of HIV prevalence among IDUs,
selected states, 2003-2007*
* 3 years moving average based on consistent sites: Manipur: 3 sites, Meghalaya: 1site, Mizoram: 1 site, Mumbai : 1 site,
Nagaland: 5 sites, West Bengal: 1 site
Source: HIV sentinel surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007-2008
16
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Trends of HIV prevalence among MSMs in
selected states, 2003-2007*
* 3 years moving average based on consistent sites: AP+TN : 3sites, Goa: 1 site, Bangalore: 1site, Delhi: 1site, Manipur: 1 site
Source: HIV sentinel surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007-2008
17
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Trends of HIV prevalence among STD clinic
attendees, 2003-2007*
* 3 years moving average based on consistent sites: All India: 157 sites, South 4 (AP, TN, Kar, Mah): 36 sites, NE 2 ( Mani, Naga) :
3 sites, Mizoram: 1site, Gujarat : 8 sites, Chhattisgarh: 3 sites.
Source: HIV sentinel surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007-2008
18
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Up to 2006
19
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among different population groups,
India, 2006
(%)
8
6.4
7
6
6.9
4.9
5
3.7
4
3
2
1
0.6
0
ANC settings
STD patients
FSWs
MSM
IDUs
Source: National AIDS control Organization (NACO), HIV Sentinel Surveillance and HIV Estimation, 2006
20
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among most-at-risk populations in
Maharashtra state, 2003-2006
(%) 60
54.3
50
41.7
40
29.2
30
23.6
22.9
20.4
20
19.6
18.8
15.6
12.8
11.2 10.4
10
0
IDUs
2003
MSM
2004
Source: NACO, HIV Sentinel Surveillance and HIV Estimation, 2006.
FSWs
2005
2006
21
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among most-at-risk populations in
Tamil Nadu state, 2003-2006
(%) 70
63.8
60
50
39.9
40
30
20
24.2
18
6.8 6.2 5.6
4.2
10
8.8
4 5.5 4.6
0
IDUs
MSM
2003
2004
Source: NACO, HIV Sentinel Surveillance and HIV Estimation, 2006.
FSWs
2005
2006
22
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among most-at-risk populations in
Manipur state, 2003-2006
(%) 35
29.2
30
25
24.5
24.1
21
19.8
20
14
15
15.6
12.8 12.4
10.4
10
11.6
10
5
0
IDUs
2003
MSM
2004
Source: NACO, HIV Sentinel Surveillance and HIV Estimation, 2006.
FSWs
2005
2006
23
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among high-risk populations, Surat,
Gujarat 2003-2006
(%) 18
15.6
16
13.2
14
12
10
8
12.8
11.8
8.8
8.1
8
6.3
6
4
2
0
2003
STI patients
2004
2005
FSWs
2006
MSM
Source: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, NACO, Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report, 2006
24
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among FSWs, by State, 2006*
Kerala
Jammu & Kashmir
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Chandigarh
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Delhi
Orissa
Bihar
Madhya Pradesh
Haryana
Pondicherry
Uttar Pradesh
Punjab
Chattisgarh
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
West Bengal
Gujarat
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Mizoram
Manipur
Nagaland
Maharashtra
0
0
0
0.4
0.7
0.7
0.9
1
1
1.1
1.1
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.4
2
2.6
4.6
6.1
6.4
7.3
8.6
10.4
11.6
16.4
19.6
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
(%)
*The required sample size for each high-risk group site was 250. Sites reporting data for less 75% of this sample were
excluded from analysis.
Source: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, NACO, Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report, 2006
25
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among FSWs in Southern states
(combined) by age, 2003-2006*
(%) 25
20
15
10
5
0
2003
2004
15-24 yrs
2005
2006
25+ yrs
*Includes only those sites from which there was consistent data available for 2003 to 2006. Total number of sites 9.
Source: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, NACO, Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report, 2006
26
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among FSWs in West Bengal,
2003-2006*
(%) 12
10
8
6
4
2
0
2003
2004
Kolkata
Bardhman
2005
Jalpaiguri
2006
Medinipur
*Includes only those sites from which there was consistent data available for 2003 to 2006.
Source: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, NACO, Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report, 2006
27
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among IDUs, by State, 2006*
Tripura
Haryana
Sikkim
Bihar
Jharkhand
Nagaland
Kerala
Mizoram
Karnataka
Assam
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Delhi
Orissa
Punjab
Chandigarh
Manipur
Maharashtra
Tamil Nadu
0
0
0.2
0.2
0.4
2.4
3
3.1
3.6
4
4.6
4.6
10
10.4
13.8
17.6
19.8
20.4
24.2
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
(%)
*The required sample size for each high-risk group site was 250. Sites reporting data for less 75% of this sample were
excluded from analysis.
Source: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, NACO, Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report, 2006
28
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among IDUs in selected
Northern states, 2002-2006*
(%) 45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
2002
2003
Manipur
2004
Nagaland
2005
2006
Mizoram
*Includes only those sites from which there was consistent data available for 2002 to 2006
Number of consistent sites considered in Manipur=3, Nagaland=3 and Mizoram=1.
Source: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, NACO, Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report, 2006
29
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among MSM and IDUs in
Chandigarh, 2004-2006
20
17.6
16
12
9.2
8
4
4.8
4.8
1.6
1.4
0
2004
2005
MSM
2006
IDU
Source: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, NACO, Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report, 2006
30
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among MSM, by State, 2006*
Churu (Rajasthan)
Malappuram (Kerala)
Ernakulam (Kerala)
Patna
Kasaragod (Kerala)
Kangra (HP)
Kamrup (Assam)
Kollam (Kerala)
Kannur (Kerala)
Delhi - West
Delhi - North West
Pondicherry
Chennai
Dearjeeling
Rupnagar (Punjab)
South Goa
Chandigarh
Villupuram (TN)
Vadodara
Mumbai
Kolkata
Krishna (AP)
Imphal West
Surat
Rajkot (Gujarat)
Banglore
Pune
Delhi - North East
0
0
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.8
0.8
1.6
2
2
2.4
4.4
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
6.8
6.8
7.6
8.4
10.2
10.4
12.8
14
19.2
23.6
32.8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
(%)
*The required sample size for each high-risk group site was 250. Sites reporting data for less 75% of this sample were
excluded from analysis.
Source: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, NACO, Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report, 2006
31
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among MSM in selected sentinel sites,
2004-2006
(%)
14
12
11.8
10.9
9.5
10
8
6
4
2
0
2004
2005
2006
Year
Source: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare and National AIDS Control Organization, Annual HIV
Sentinel Surveillance Country Report, 2006
32
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Percentage of reported STI symptoms among clients
of female sex workers and female sex workers
Clients of female sex workers
Female sex workers
60
56
60
53
50
50
40
26
23
30
25
%
%
30
23
46
44
40
34
30
50
30
20
20
10
10
0
0
Brothel
based
Non-brothel
based
2001
2006
Total
Brothel
based
Non-brothel
based
2001
Total
2006
Source: Behavioral Surveillance Survey among Clients of Female Sex Workers and Female Sex Workers, 2006
33
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Percentage of MSM with self reported STI
symptoms in the last 12 months
70
60
50
40
%
30
2001
2006
20
10
0
Symptoms include Genital ulcer/sore,
burning pain during urination
Source: Behavioral Surveillance Survey among MSM and IDUs, 2006
34
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Percentage of IDU with self reported STI
symptoms in the last 12 months
50
40
30
%
20
10
0
2001
2006
Symptoms include Genital ulcer/sore,
burning pain during urination
Source: Behavioral Surveillance Survey among MSM and IDUs, 2006
35
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Percentage of adult (15-49) yr with reported STI
symptoms in the last 12 months, 2006
7
6
5
%
4
3
2
1
0
Genital discharge
Genital ulcer/sore
Male
Discharge or ulcer or
both
Female
Source: Behavioral Surveillance Survey among General Population, 2006
36
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Women and Young People
37
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Selected districts with HIV prevalence higher
than 3% among ANC attendees, 2007-2008
Krishna (AP)
3.5
Chikmagalur (KTK)
3.5
%
Gulbarga (KTK)
5
Sangli (MHS)
3.3
Churachandpur (MNP)
3
Chandel (MNP)
3
AP= Andhra Pradesh, KTK= Karnataka,
MHS= Maharashtra, MNP= Manipur,
TN= Tamil Nadu
Ukhrul (MNP)
6
Tuensang (Nagaland)
5.6
Coimbatore (TN)
4.3
Namakkal (TN)
3.3
Salem (TN)
4.3
Viluppuram (TN)
3.5
0
1
2
Source: HIV sentinel surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007-2008
3
4
5
6
7
38
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Newly identified districts with HIV prevalence ≥ 1%
among ANC attendees, 2007-2008
Patna(Bihar)
%
1
Banka (Bihar)
1.2
Sitamarhi (Bihar)
1.3
Jangir-Champa (Chhattisgarh)
1
Amreli (Gujarat)
1
Kasaragod (Kerala)
1.3
Indore(Madhya Pradesh)
2
Deogarh (Orissa)
1
Darjiling ( West Bengal)
2
0
0.5
Source: HIV sentinel surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007-2008
1
1.5
2
2.5
39
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Trends of HIV prevalence among ANC attendees
in selected high prevalence states, 2003-2007*
* 3 years moving average based on consistent sites: India- 360 sites, South 4 ( AP, TN, Kar, Mah) -219 sites, NE 3 (Mani, Naga,
Mizo) – 28 sites
Source: HIV sentinel surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007-2008
40
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among pregnant women in selected
districts of Tamil Nadu compared with state average,
2003-2006*
(% ) 3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
2003
State average
2004
2005
Namakkal
2006
Tiruchirapalli
*Includes only those sites from which there was consistent data available for 2003 to 2006
Number of consistent sites considered in Tamil Nadu 56. District prevalence reflects both rural and urban areas.
Source: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, NACO, Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report, 2006
41
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among pregnant women in selected
districts of Maharashtra compared with state average,
2003-2006*
(%) 4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
State average
Chandrapur
Sangli
Kohlapur
Satara
Hingoli
*Includes only those sites from which there was consistent data available for 2003 to 2006
Number of consistent sites considered in Tamil Nadu 70. District prevalence reflects both rural and urban areas.
Source: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, NACO, Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report, 2006
42
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among pregnant women in selected
districts of Andhra Pradesh compared with state average,
2003-2006*
(%) 3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
2003
2004
2005
State average
Prakasam
West Godavari
East Godavari
2006
*Includes only those sites from which there was consistent data available for 2003 to 2006
Number of consistent sites considered in Andhra Pradesh 43. District prevalence reflects both rural and urban areas.
Source: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, NACO, Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report, 2006
43
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among pregnant women in selected
districts of Karnataka compared with state average,
2003-2006*
(%) 5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
2003
State average
2004
Bagalkot
2005
Belgaum
2006
Koppal
Hassan
*Includes only those sites from which there was consistent data available for 2003 to 2006
Number of consistent sites considered in Karnataka 53. District prevalence reflects both rural and urban areas.
Source: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, NACO, Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report, 2006
44
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among pregnant women in Orissa and
Rajasthan (combined) by age, 2003-2006*
(%) 0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
2003
2004
2005
15-24 yrs
25+ yrs
2006
*Includes only those sites from which there was consistent data available for 2003 to 2006
Number of consistent sites considered in Orissa=5, Rajasthan=6. District prevalence reflects both rural and urban areas.
Source: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, NACO, Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report, 2006
45
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among pregnant women by age group,
2006
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
15-19
20-29
30-44
45-49
Source: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, NACO, Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report, 2006
46
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among pregnant women in Southern states,
2003-2006*
(%) 1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2003
Andhra Pradesh
2004
Karnataka
2005
Maharashtra
2006
Tamil Nadu
*Includes only those sites from which there was consistent data available for 2003 to 2006
Number of sites 222 (Andhra Pradesh=43; Karnataka=53; Maharashtra=70; Tamil Nadu=56)
Source: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, NACO, Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report, 2006
47
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among pregnant women in Southern
states (combined) by age, 2003-2006*
(%) 1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2003
2004
15-24 yrs
2005
2006
25+ yrs
*Includes only those sites from which there was consistent data available for 2003 to 2006
Number of sites 222 (Andhra Pradesh=43; Karnataka=53; Maharashtra=70; Tamil Nadu=56)
Source: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, NACO, Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report, 2006
48
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among young people aged 15-24,
by age and residence, 2005-2006
(%) 0.30
Female
0.2
0.20
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.10
Male
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
15-19
15-17
18-19
20-24
20-22
23-24
15-24
Rural
Urban
Age / Residence
Source: IIPS, National Family Health Survey round III, 2005-2006
49
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among young people aged 15-24 in
selected states, 2005-2006
(%) 0.6
Female
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
Male
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.0
0
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Maharashtra
Manipur
Tamil Nadu
State
Source: IIPS, National Family Health Survey round III, 2005-2006
50
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Estimated HIV prevalence and
reported HIV/AIDS cases
51
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Trend of adult HIV prevalence and number of
PLHIV ( Total & female), 2002-2007
3
0.5
Estimated no of PLHA (millions)
2.5
0.4
0.35
2
0.3
1.5
0.25
0.2
1
0.15
0.1
0.5
Estimated adult HIV prevalence (%)
0.45
0.05
0
0
2002
2003
Total PLHA
2004
Female PLHA
Source: HIV sentinel surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007-2008
2005
2006
2007
Adult HIV prevalence
52
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Estimated adult HIV prevalence, 2007
0.6
%
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.0
Adult (Male &Female)
Adult Male
Source: HIV sentinel surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007-2008
Adult Female
53
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Distribution of PLHIV among high HIV burden
states, 2007
20%
20%
4%
Maharashtra
Andhra Pradesh
6%
21%
Karnataka
West Bengal
8%
Tamil Nadu
Gujarat
10%
11%
Uttar Pradesh
Rest of states
Source: HIV sentinel surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007-2008
54
Source: Technical Report, India HIV Estimates 2006, NACO, National Institute of Medical Statistics, 2006
Himachal Pradesh
Assam
Jammu & Kashmir
Arunachal Pradesh
Meghalaya
Uttaranchal
Sikkim
Haryana
Uttar Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Jharkhand
Tripura
Punjab
Kerala
Bihar
Rajasthan
Chhatisgarh
Orissa
Delhi
West Bengal
Chandigarh
A & N Islands
Tamil Nadu
Gujarat
Pondicherry
Goa
Mizoram
Maharashtra
Karnataka
Andhra Pradesh
Nagaland
Manipur
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
HIV prevalence among adult (15-49) yr in various
states, 2006
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
55
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Estimated HIV prevalence by sex, 2002-2006
Female
Male
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Source: Technical Report, India HIV Estimates 2006, NACO, National Institute of Medical Statistics, 2006
56
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
% distribution of reported HIV cases by age, 2002-2006
100%
2.6
2.7
5.8
2.5
2.5
90%
80%
70%
60%
>=50
50%
88.7
89.2
89.8
90.4
91.2
15-49
40%
<15
30%
20%
10%
3.2
3
3.4
0%
2002
2003
2004
3.8
3.6
2005
2006
Source: Technical Report, India HIV Estimates 2006, NACO and National Institute of Medical Statistics
57
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Reported cumulative HIV/AIDS cases, 2003-2006
124995
Cumulative Number
140000
120000
100000
80000
78229
61201
60000
40000
20000
0
2003
2004
2006
Year
Source: National AIDS Control Organization at www.nacoonline.org
58
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
Estimated HIV prevalence in selected states, 2005
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
Low estimate
0.6
0.5
High estimate
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0
Andhra
Kanataka
Maharashtra
Tamil Nadu
Source: Dandona L., Lakshmi V., Kumar G. A. and Dandona R. Is the HIV burden in India being overestimated?
BMC Public Health 2006;6:308
59
HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific
THANK YOU
slides compiled by www.aidsdatahub.org
Data shown in this slide set are comprehensive to the extent they are available from country
reports. Please inform us if you know of sources where more recent data can be used.
Please acknowledge www.aidsdatahub.org if slides are lifted directly from this site
60