Transcript Superstition as Science - Just Another Deisidaimon

Superstition as Science
Konrad Talmont-Kaminski
UMCS & KLI
First-footing
• It is lucky when a tall man walks into a
house first in the New Year
• Is this a scientific hypothesis?
• Why not?
• Is it something about the hypothesis?
• Is it something about
our attitudes?
• Is it something about
how it was reached?
Outline
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Elements of superstitions
Superstition, magic & religion
3 different views of superstition
Superstition as science
What is the difference?
Empirical limits
Conclusions
Elements of superstitions
• Superstitious
beliefs
• Superstitious
practices
• The link
between them
Elements of a superstition
• Superstitious belief
– ‘Action’
• Crossing fingers
• Can be just an event – Friday 13th
– ‘Effect’
• Potentially desirable or undesirable event
– Connection
• Causation/conjuration or
prediction/divination
– Explanation
• Luck
• No natural explanation
• Supernatural explanation
Elements of a superstition
• Superstitious practice
– Taking or avoiding the ‘action’
• Avoiding black cats
– Success uncertain
– Function
• Manifest
– To avoid or bring
about the ‘effect’
• Latent
– Can be very different
– First-footing again
• Predicting or causing?
Elements of a superstition
• The link between beliefs and
practices
– Generally problematic
– Focussing on practices
• Skinner’s behaviourism
• Beliefs secondary
– Focussing on beliefs
• Superstition satisfying internal needs
• Practices secondary
Superstition, magic & religion
• Magic & religion
• Magic &
superstition
• Religion &
superstition
Superstition, magic & religion
• Magic & religion
– E. Durkheim 1912
• Sacred vs. profane
• Religion
– Social function
• Magic
– Individual function
– D. S. Wilson 2002
• Evolutionary explanation of
religion
• Social function as group-selection
Superstition, magic & religion
• Magic & superstition
– Magic
• Traditional societies
– Superstition
• Modern society
– Relation?
• Different phenomena
• Same phenomenon / different contexts
– Education and superstition (Jahoda 1969)
– Jumper example
Superstition, magic & religion
• Religion & superstition
– Deisidaimonia
• Misplaced fear of daimons
• Theophrastus, circa 300 BC
– Superstition is false religion
• Worship of demons
• Aquinas, circa 1250 AD
– Atheist generalisation
• All religion is false
• Therefore, superstition is all religion
– Can differentiate religion & superstition
– Some religious practices superstitious
• Intercessory prayer
3 views of superstition
• Superstition as
fantasy
• Superstition as
rhetoric
• Superstition as
science
3 views of superstition
• Superstition as fantasy
– Attempted retreat from threatening/
uncontrollable reality
– Anxiety-reduction (Malinowski 1925)
– Retaining feeling of control (Case et all
2004)
– “The man under the sway of impotent
fury or dominated by thwarted hate
spontaneously clenches his fists and
carries out imaginary thrusts at his
enemy, muttering imprecations, casting
words of hatred and anger against him.”
– Malinowski “Magic, Science, and
3 views of superstition
• Superstition as rhetoric
– Attempted communication
– Use of language to induce motion in
things (Burke 1969)
– Costly signalling (Tambiah 1990)
– Accepting authority (Palmer 1989)
– “By communicating acceptance of a
supernatural claim one is
communicating a willingness to accept
the speaker’s influence unskeptically.” Palmer “The ritual taboos of fishermen”
3 views of superstition
• Superstition as science
– Attempt to understand/control
the world
– Primitive science (Frazer 1890)
– Adventitious reinforcement
(Skinner 1947)
– Biased cognitive heuristics
(Rozin & Nemeroff 1980)
– “Magic is a spurious system of natural
law as well as a fallacious guide of
conduct; it is a false science as well as
an abortive art.” - Frazer, Golden Bough
Superstition as science?
• Question of focus
• Primitive science
• Adventitious
reinforcement
• Biased cognitive
heuristics
Superstition as science?
• Question of focus
– Superstitious beliefs vs. scientific
beliefs
– Superstitious methods vs. scientific
methods
• Both options incomplete
– Would ‘superstitious’ beliefs be
scientific if arrived at scientifically?
– Could they be arrived at scientifically?
– Is there such a thing as ‘magical
thinking’?
– Or is it that thinking sometimes leads to
magical beliefs?
Superstition as science?
• Primitive science
– Tylor 1871, Frazer 1890, Levy-Bruhl
1910
– Superstition identified with primitive
societies/minds
– Science identified with modern
societies/minds
– Progress seen as directed
‘evolution’
– Enlightenment / Intellectualist
position
– Rationality expels superstition
Superstition as science?
• Adventitious reinforcement
– B.F. Skinner 1947, S. Vyse 1997
– Superstition in a pigeon
•
•
•
•
•
Skinner box
Operant conditioning
Independent reinforcement schedule
‘Superstitious behaviour’
“Operant conditioning is
not just for rats and
pigeons” - Vyse
Superstition as science?
• Adventitious reinforcement

– Matrix task
• 4 x 4 matrix
• Move dot from top left to
bottom right
• Task: Find out when points are gained
• Points awarded randomly
• Numerous theories put forward
– Similar situations
• Malfunctioning light switch
– Conditioning as basis for understanding
science?

Superstition as science?
• Biased cognitive heuristics
– Domain-specific
– Generally effective
– Systematically biased
– Heuristics and biases (Kahneman &
Tversky 1974)
– Bounded rationality (H. Simon 1972)
– Scientific methods as heuristics
(W. Wimsatt 2007)
– Contagion heuristic
• Rozin & Nemeroff 1980
What is the difference?
• Truth & empirical
adequacy
• Natural vs.
supernatural
• Sacred vs. profane
What is the difference?
• Truth & empirical adequacy
– Superstitions as false causal beliefs
• Often used definition
• Many false causal beliefs, some scientific
– Superstitions not just false but (known
to be) empirically inadequate
• Scientific beliefs rejected due to empirical
inadequacy
• Can not equate Newton’s physics with his
astrology
– Is ‘onto something’
– But superstitious beliefs ‘look different’
What is the difference?
• Natural vs. supernatural
– Superstitions as supernatural claims
– Problems
•
•
•
•
Vague concept
Circularity?
Distinction much later than category
Correlation between superstitious and
pseudoscientific beliefs
• Succubi become aliens
• Post hoc explanations
– Is ‘onto something’
What is the difference?
• Sacred vs. profane
– Durkheim
– Explaining a cognitive category in terms
of a social phenomenon?
– Is ‘onto something’
– But, again, superstitions ‘look different’
Empirical limits
• van Fraassen
• Observability &
superstitions
• Observability &
functions
• Agnosticism about
explanations
Empirical limits
• B. van Fraassen
– The Scientific Image 1980
– Limits of observability
•
•
•
•
Actual empirical limitations
Ability to discern small objects
Limits change over time
Agnosticism about unobservable
claims
• Challenging scientific attitudes
– Observable/detectable distinction
• Distinction generally rejected
• Is anything unobservable?
• Significance of social attitudes
Empirical limits
• Observability & superstitions
• How observable are superstitious
claims?
– Connections between ‘actions’ and
‘events’
• Observable as correlations
– Explanations for the connections
• The claims hard to observe
• Attitudes object to observation
• Render superstitious explanations
effectively unobservable
• ‘Superempirical’ rather than supernatural
Empirical limits
• Observability and functions
• Manifest and latent function
– Manifest function requires observability
– Religious connections unobservable
• Latent (social) function more important
– In superstitions only explanations
unobservable
– Scientists aim to make explanations
observable
– A vital difference
Empirical limits
• Agnosticism about explanations
• Scientific explanations?
– Scientists take realist view of
explanations
– Pursue evidence for their truth
– Agnosticism not justified
• Superstitious explanations
– Explanations in practically untestable
terms
– Testing of explanations discouraged
– Agnosticism is not enough
• Agnosticism about explanations is
Conclusions
•Similarities
–Methods: Use of
heuristics
–Beliefs: Often hard
to test explanations
put forward
•Differences
–Methods:
Development of new
heuristics
–Beliefs: A realist
attitude to
explanations leading
to pursuit of testing
Thank you
[email protected]
http://deisidaimon.wordpress.com