Strategies for Success
Download
Report
Transcript Strategies for Success
Strategies for
Success
Using Educational and Medicaid
Entitlements to Address Children’s
Behavioral Health Needs
Topics for Discussion
Preparing for the New Medicaid
Behavioral Health System
Accessing Educational Entitlements for
Children with Serious Emotional
Disturbance
Opportunities for the Coordination of
Community and School-Based Mental
Health Supports
Part I: Preparing for the New
Medicaid Behavioral Health System
Summary of Rosie D. v. Romney
The Pathway to Home-Based Services
New Service Descriptions
What this means for children and families
What this means for the parent advocate
Rosie D. v. Romney
The class action lawsuit filed in 2001 to compel provision
of intensive mental health treatment to Medicaid eligible
children in their homes and communities, thus avoiding
unnecessary hospitalization, or extended out-of-home
placement
Brought by the parents or guardians of eight children
with serious emotional, behavioral, or psychiatric
conditions representing a class of Medicaid-eligible
children who needed home-based services to be
successful in their communities
The Legal Claims
The federal Medicaid program mandates Early
Periodic Screening Diagnosis and Treatment –
EPSDT – for children under 21
EPSDT mandates screening and treatment
necessary “to correct or ameliorate a physical or
mental condition”
States must provide this treatment promptly and
for as long as needed
The Remedy
Court finds Massachusetts in violation of EPSDT
provisions of the Federal Medicaid Act
Court orders the State to develop in-home
services, including comprehensive care
coordination, screening, assessments, in–home
supports and crisis services
Plaintiffs and Commonwealth begin regular
implementation meetings
New Court-Ordered Services
Access to behavioral health screening
Comprehensive diagnostic assessments
Intensive Care Coordination
In-Home Therapy Services
In-Home Behavioral Services
Therapeutic Mentoring
Parent Partners
Mobile Crisis and Crisis Stabilization Units
Eligibility for Services
Any Medicaid-eligible child (MassHealth
Member) who is determined to have a serious
emotional disturbance (SED) is eligible for
intensive care coordination
SED is defined by two federal agencies which
use slightly different definitions
Any child who meets EITHER definition, as
determined by the mental health evaluation, is
eligible
Federal SAMHSA Definition of SED
From birth up to age 18
Who currently or at any time during the
past year
Has had a diagnosable mental, behavioral,
or emotional disorder
That resulted in functional impairment
which substantially interferes with or limits
the child's role or functioning in family,
school, or community activities.
Federal IDEA Definition of SED
A condition exhibiting one or more of the
following characteristics over a long period
of time and to a marked degree that
adversely affects a child’s educational
performance…
Federal IDEA Definition of SED
An inability to learn that
cannot be explained by
intellectual, sensory, or
health factors
An inability to build or
maintain satisfactory
interpersonal
relationships with peers
and teachers
Inappropriate behaviors
or feelings under normal
circumstances
General pervasive mood
of unhappiness or
depression
A tendency to develop
physical symptoms or
fears associated with
personal or school
problems
Co-morbidity and Dual Diagnosis
Children with SED, in addition to any other
disabling condition, such as autism spectrum
disorders, developmental disability or substance
abuse will be eligible for the Rosie D. remedy.
Children who meet medical necessity criteria for
the remaining in-home services can be eligible
without a finding of SED.
Pathway to Home-Based Services
Screening or Identification
Mental Health Evaluation
Referral for Care Coordination
Comprehensive Home-Based Assessment
Wraparound Treatment Planning
Delivery of Services
Screening or Identification
As
of January 1, 2008, primary care doctors/nurses
must offer voluntary screening for behavioral health
concerns at well child visits or upon request, using
one of several standardized screening instruments
Parents, state agencies, and other child serving
entities can also refer children in need of screening
Children with known conditions can bypass screening
and be referred directly to a mental health
professional for evaluation
MassHealth will be maintaining data on screenings,
referrals, and families ability to access treatment
Mental Health Evaluation
If a positive screen occurs, a referral can be made for a
mental health evaluation
Parents can also seek behavioral health evaluations
directly if a need has already been identified
As of November 30, 2008, all diagnostic evaluations will
incorporate the Child and Adolescent Needs and
Strengths (CANS) survey
The CANS includes a structured interview to assess and
child and family’s strengths and their service needs
State has trained mental health professionals in
hospitals, clinics and state agencies to use the CANS,
increasing rates and time for conducting evaluations
Intensive Care Coordination
Provided
by a regional network of Community Service
Agencies (CSAs)
Care coordinator works in partnership with family and
youth to ensure meaningful involvement in all aspects
of treatment
Facilitates completion of a comprehensive homebased assessment and development of a care
planning team including state agencies, schools and
other providers
Prepares and oversees implementation of a single
integrated treatment plan
Parents can self-refer or be referred by a mental
health clinician or other professional
Treatment Plan
Single
plan that is child/family centered
Integrates other agency/provider plans
Team determines the type, amount, intensity and
duration of home-based services
Components of plan include:
Treatment goals and objectives
Identification and role of specific providers
Frequency, intensity and location of service
delivery
Crisis plans
The Value of Wrap-Around
ICC team and in-home providers responsible for
Maintaining fidelity to several core principals:
strength-based
individualized
child-centered
family-driven
community-based
multi-system
culturally competent
Home-Based Service Descriptions
Mobile Crisis Services
Crisis Stabilization Units
In-Home Behavioral Services
In-Home Therapy
Therapeutic Mentoring
Parent Partners
Mobile Crisis Services
Mobile,
on-site, face-to-face response to
youth in crisis, available up to 72 hours
Delivered by a clinical/paraprofessional team
in the home or other community setting
Designed to assess, de-escalate and stabilize
a child in crisis, offering safety planning,
referrals and support to maintain the youth in
their natural setting
Crisis Stabilization Units
A community-based,
staff secure treatment
setting offering short term crisis stabilization
services for up to 7 days
Designed to facilitate immediate engagement
of family/caretakers in problem solving, skillbuilding, crisis counseling, service linkages
and coordination with existing providers
Focused on youth’s rapid return to the
community, avoiding a higher level of care
Behavior Management Therapy
and Behavior Monitoring
Clinical/paraprofessional
team addresses challenging
behaviors in the home and community which interfere
with youth’s successful functioning
Therapist provides behavioral assessment, develops
a behavior management plan with the family and
reviews effectiveness of the interventions
Behavior Monitor helps implement the plan, modeling
and re-enforcing behavior management strategies in
the home and community
In-Home Therapy Services
Includes
24/7 urgent response, flexibility in
scheduling, frequency and duration of sessions
Works to foster understanding of family dynamics,
develop strategies to address stressors, enhance
problem solving and communication skills, identify
community resources, address risk and safety
planning, coordinate care
Therapist works with youth and the family on
development of specific clinical treatment goals to
improve youth’s functioning
A paraprofessional may assist by supporting the
youth and family in day-to-day implementation of
treatment goals
Therapeutic Mentoring Services
Structured
one-to-one relationship between
paraprofessional and youth, addressing daily living,
social and communication skills in variety of home
and community settings
Includes coaching and training in age-appropriate
behaviors, problem-solving, conflict resolution and
interpersonal relationships using recreational and
social activities
Delivered pursuant to plan of care and supervised by
a clinician, focus on ensuring youth’s successful
navigation of various social contexts, skill acquisition
and functional progress towards treatment goals
Caregiver/Peer to Peer Support
Available through CSA’s and stand alone providers
Structured, one-to-one, strength-based relationship
with parent/caregiver of youth
Delivered by a family partner with experience caring
for a child with special needs and utilizing child and
family serving systems
Supports caregiver in addressing child’s behavioral
health needs by identifying formal and informal
supports, offering assistance in navigating childserving systems and fostering empowerment through
education, coaching and training
What this means for children and
their families
A new array of home and community–based
services
Supports available with the length and intensity
that youth with serious emotional disturbance
need
An approach which empowers families to direct
their own care
A process which coordinates all agencies and
providers in one team and produces one unified
treatment plan
What this means for parent
advocates
A new resource to help support children in their
homes/communities and in the least restrictive
educational environment
A team of community experts available to work
with/influence the school
A need for familiarity with eligibility requirements, steps
for referral, available services and the expectations of
wrap-around
An opportunity to help families successfully coordinate
community-based mental health services with goals and
services in the IEP
A legal entitlement beyond special education
Revised Implementation Timelines
July 1, 2009: Intensive Care Coordination,
Family Partners & Mobile Crisis
October 1, 2009: In-home Behavioral
Services and Therapeutic
Mentoring
November 1, 2009: In-Home Therapy
December 1, 2009: Crisis Stabilization Units
Part II: Accessing Educational
Entitlements for Children with SED
Sources of legal entitlement
Anatomy of the IEP
Knowing What Can be Provided
Using the Team Process
Options for Dispute Resolution
Sources of Legal Entitlement
Individuals with Disabilities Education
Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) 20 USC
Section 1400 et seq.
Code Federal Regulations 34 CFR 300
Chapter 766, codified at M.G.L. c. 71B
Code of Massachusetts Regulations
603 CMR 28.00
Bureau of Special Education Appeals,
Hearing Rules and Decision
Other State and Federal Case Law
The Broad Definition for Education
State and Federal case law has interpreted
■ Purely academic benefit is not the only measurement of
educational progress
■ Educational, social and emotional problems are often intertwined
and cannot be separated
■ Where behavioral disturbance interferes with the student’s ability
to learn and student needs highly structured activities during and
after school to receive an appropriate education, the IEP must
address such problems
■ Education is to be broadly defined to include not only traditional
academic skills but also basic functional life skills
The Range of “Related Services”
Related services means transportation and such developmental,
corrective, and other supportive services as are required to assist a
child with a disability to benefit from special education, and includes
speech-language pathology and audiology services, interpreting
services, psychological services, physical and occupational therapy,
recreation, including therapeutic recreation, early identification and
assessment of disabilities in children, counseling services, including
rehabilitation counseling, orientation and mobility services, and
medical services for diagnostic or evaluation purposes. Related
services also include school health services and school nurse
services, social work services in schools, and parent counseling and
training.
34 C.F.R. 300.34
Eligibility and Disability Definitions
Emotional Impairment: the student exhibits one or more of the
following characteristics over a long period of time and to a
marked degree that adversely affects educational performance:
an inability to learn that cannot be explained by intellectual,
sensory, or health factors;
an inability to build or maintain satisfactory interpersonal
relationships with peers and teachers;
inappropriate types of behavior or feelings under normal
circumstances;
a general pervasive mood of unhappiness or depression; or a
tendency to develop physical symptoms or fears associated
with personal or school problems (34 CFR §300.8(c)(4))
Eligibility and Disability Definitions
The determination of disability shall not be made
solely because the student's behavior violates
the school's discipline code, because the
student is involved with a state court or social
service agency, or because the student is
socially maladjusted, unless the Team
determines that the student has a serious
emotional disturbance
The Importance of “Effective Progress”
Massachusetts case law and regulations requires more
of a Free and Appropriate Public Education than simply a
student’s ability to benefit…
First Circuit defines FAPE to require “[D]emonstrable improvement
in the educational and personal skills identified as special needs –
as a consequence of implementing the proposed IEP.” Town of
Burlington v. Dep’t of Education 736 F.2d 773 (1st Cir. 1984)
Effective progress is defined as “documented growth in the
acquisition of knowledge and skills, including social/emotional
development, within the general education program, with or without
accommodations, according to chronological age and
developmental expectations, the individual educational potential
of the child, and the learning standards set forth in the
Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks and the curriculum of the
district. 603 CMR 28.02(17)
SED and the Anatomy of An IEP
Access to the Curriculum (A and B)
Individualized Goals
Are Social, Emotional and Behavioral Issues Addressed?
Are There Measurable and Objective Benchmarks
The Service Delivery Grid
Are Necessary Accommodations, Modifications, and Instructional
methods in Place?
Are Parent Training and Consultation Included?
Are the Right Professionals Responsible?
Extended Year/Day Services
Can FAPE be Delivered in a Regular School Day?
Is there a risk of regression?
Consider a Range of Educational
Services and Program Options
Home-based supports
Consultation with parent,
other faculty; providers
Related services
Speech / PT
OT (sensory
integration)
Counseling
Behavioral supports
Extended day/year
Specific accommodations
Specific curricula or
training programs
Instructional methods
language-based
Discrete trial training
Class size; ratios;
teacher qualifications;
peer groups
Multi-disciplinary
approaches across
settings
IEP Requirements (603 CMR 28.05)
The IEP shall include specially designed
instruction to meet the needs of the individual
student and related services that are necessary
to allow the student to benefit from the specially
designed instruction, or may consist solely of
related services that are necessary to allow the
student to access the general curriculum,
consistent with federal and state requirements.
At the Heart of the IEP Process
To develop an individualized education
plan with the Team to address the child’s
social, emotional, and behavioral needs in
the least restrictive environment possible
so that they may make effective progress
consistent with their individual potential.
Knowing What Can be Provided
BSEA Hearing Decisions: Eligibility
Student
with anorexia nervosa and co-morbid
disabilities did have serious emotional
disturbance and need for special education;
academic progress alone not a complete
measure of effective progress, including
progress towards independence
Dighton-Rehoboth Reg’l School District
#06-2145
Knowing What Can be Provided
BSEA Hearing Decisions: Unmet Service Needs
Student
with significant and continuing unmet deficits
regarding emotional regulation, social skills and
community/independent living skills which negatively
impacted her learning – ordered curriculum-based
social skills training, social skill group in the
community, an assessment of independent living
needs, a designated support person in school, and an
mechanism to consult weekly with Student’s therapist
In Re Boston Public Schools BSEA # 06-3610
Using the Team Process Effectively
Knowing when to Convene
New evaluations
Repeated suspensions
Risk of absence for medical reasons
Change in circumstances; regression
Comprehensive Educational Record Reviews
Past IEPs and progress reports
Report cards, MCAS testing
Incident reports, disciplinary records
Past educational testing; evaluations; observations
Using the Team Process Effectively
Requesting Appropriate and Timely Evaluations
Three year evaluations (can request early)
Functional behavioral assessments (across settings)
Psychological/educational assessments
Related Services (OT, Speech)
Identifying the Necessary School Staff
General education/special education/related service specialists
Inviting the Right Experts / Providers
Independent evaluators, therapists, counselors, pediatricians
Bringing State Agencies to the Table
Pooling knowledge and resources – applying joint pressure
Realizing Anticipated Educational and
Therapeutic Benefits
Regular communication with direct
providers/school staff
Exercising the right to parent/independent
observation in schools
Requesting consultation between school and
community providers to assist in measuring
progress
Careful consideration of confidentiality concerns
Common IEP Disputes
Finding of ineligibility
Failure to Implement IEP
Disputed Placement
Inappropriate or insufficient services
Social,
emotional, behavioral supports
Home based supports/training
Lack of measurable goals and objectives
Absence transitional goals/services
To Accept or Reject or Both
Weigh last accepted IEP versus any new
services within the proposed IEP
A decision to reject, in part, allows for the
application and enforcement of all other
accepted portions of the proposed IEP
After notice by school, BSEA will issue
parent rights information to family
Options for Dispute Resolution
Re-visit TEAM process
Issues not fully addressed or discussed
Independent or other evaluations not considered
Program Quality Assurance (DESE)
For complaints or technical assistance
BSEA mediation
Parties communicating well and in good faith
Mutual interest in less adversarial settlement process
File formal BSEA hearing request
Exhaustion of other less formal options
Availability of legal representation
Part III: Opportunities for
Coordinating Educational and
Behavioral Health Services
The Promise of the Children’s Behavioral
Health Initiative
How Schools and Students can Benefit
Preparing for Effective Collaboration
How You Can Help
Relevance of Rosie D. Reforms
Supporting the work of advocates and
professionals interacting with or serving
Medicaid-eligible children and their families
School districts and educational programs
Clinicians and mental health providers
Juvenile justice / DYS diversion programs
Benefits/Health law advocates
CHINS and child welfare agencies
Benefits for Schools and Students
Increased access to mental health expertise and
consultation to inform IEP development
Delivery of community-based services in school and
after-school settings
Availability to coordinate services across settings and
promote generalization of skills
Single point of contact for School through ICC team and
care coordinator
Additional services to support children’s success in
integrated programs and settings
How Schools Can Prepare
Develop local guidance on Rosie D. system reforms, including
model policies and procedures for effective collaboration with
parents and community-based providers
Partner with local CSA and participate in regional Systems of Care
Committees
Offer outreach, information and training on the scope of remedial
services, which students are eligible, how to facilitate referrals and
opportunities to coordinate educational supports with communitybased mental health services
■ Identify and fund infrastructure needed to establish successful
linkages with community-based mental health providers and support
increased communication and integration of services on behalf of
students
How Advocates Can Prepare
Consider both entitlement systems when
determining how best to support a youth and
family
Develop knowledge to assist with multi-system
navigation (Education/Medicaid/State Agencies)
Know where to seek additional information and
consultation when questions or disputes arise
Other Ways You Can Help
Consider where Rosie D. services could be useful in
your work and share those ideas with us
Help us identify and address obstacles
Assist to development of materials/resources relevant to
your field
Connect with other agencies/entities in your area who
might be interested in training on Rosie D.
implementation
Make your voice heard in ongoing implementation
Additional Information on CBHI
For more information, Rosie D. website: www.rosied.org.
News updates on recent developments.
An extensive library of documents from the case including
decisions, discovery documents, legal memoranda, status
reports, and much more.
Other information designed for families, providers or other
professionals.
MassHealth website: www.mass.gov
Managed Care and Customer Service contacts
Relevant applications and Forms
Information on CBHI service system
Mental Health and Special
Education Resources
Boston Bar Association’s Updated Guide to Mental
Health Services (www.bostonbar.org)
Center for Law and Education (www.cleweb.org)
Massachusetts Advocates for Children
(www.massadvocates.org)
Special Education Coalition
Department of Education Website
www.doe.mass.edu
Relevant statutes and regulations
Mediation and BSEA hearing forms
BSEA rules & hearing decisions
Directory of legal/advocacy services