Transcript Accountability 101 - ESC-20

Accountability 101
Accountability Calculations
Federal Accountability
State Accountability
# Students Met Standard
# Students Tested
If the Standard is not met:
• Apply Required Improvement
• Recalculate Using TPM
• Use Exceptions
Note: Can use any combination
of the three provisions, but can only use one
provisions for a single indicator.
# Students Met Standard
# Students Tested
If the Standard is not met:
• Calculate Performance
Improvement/Safe Harbor
– Compare Met Standard Rate for 2009 and
2010 (without TPM)
– A 10% Reduction of Failures and Meeting
the Other Measure for the Group or
showing any improvement.
•
Recalculate Using TPM
State Potential Measures - 35
All
Students
African
American
Hispanic
White
Economically
Disadvantaged
Reading/ELA
x
x
x
x
x
Mathematics
x
x
x
x
x
Writing
x
x
x
x
x
Science
x
x
x
x
x
Social Studies
x
x
x
x
x
Completion Rate
x
x
x
x
x
Dropout Rate
x
x
x
x
x
Reviewing and analyzing a State Data Table.
[Review a sample data table with the group.]
AYP Potential Measures - 29
All
Students
African
American
Hispanic
White
Eco Dis.
Special
Ed
LEP
Reading/ELA
Performance
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Reading/ELA
Participation
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Mathematics
Performance
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Mathematics
Participation
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Graduation/
Attendance
x
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
= Used for other measure
Reviewing and analyzing an AYP Data Table.
[Review a sample data table with the group.]
Additional Features
for TAKS Measures
State*
AYP
• Required Improvement (RI)**
• Performance Improvement/
• Texas Projection Measure (TPM)
Safe Harbor **
• Exceptions Provision (EP)
• Texas Projection Measure (TPM)
*Only one feature can be used
per measure; however, different
features can be used for different
measures.
**Without TPM
Performance Indicators
• Students must have been enrolled the full
academic year: snapshot and test date.
• The scores are summed across grades by
subject.
Where does it all come from?
USDE
NCLB
IDEA
AYP
Where does it all come from?
Texas Education Code
State
Accountability
NCLB
IDEA
Test All Students
Include SWD
Uniform Assessment
Reading
Mathematics
Cap on Alternate
Assessments
Review Specific
Student Groups
Additional
Accountability:
State Performance
Plan Ratings
Review Other Areas
NCLB, IDEA, TEC = TAKS
Uniform Assessment
System:
TAKS
TAKS (Accommodated)
TAKS-Modified
TAKS-Alternate
All TEKS-Based
Differences in
Standards
AEIS Data
• Districts and campuses receive AEIS System Reports
in November of each year for the prior year’s results.
• The Accountability Rating System (State
Accountability) reviews a subset of AEIS indicators
with specific performance standards.
• School Report Cards, (available on the web through
the AEIS site, by year starting with 1997-98) are sent
out to parents by their children's schools. These
show a subset of the performance, staff, and
financial measures in the AEIS reports.
Accountability Rating System (State)
• How does this system work?
– Rating Labels
•
•
•
•
Exemplary
Recognized
Academically Acceptable
Academically Unacceptable
– 35 Potential Measures
• Minimum Size Criteria
– Other…See Mini-Chart
– Information is reported through
‘Data Tables’…. District & Campus
Performance Standard Continuum
• Beyond the All Students, does the indicator’s group
size meet minimum size criteria?
• If yes, was the standard met?
• If no, was required improvement met?
• If no, was the standard met with TPM applied?
• If no, can an ‘Exception’ be applied?
– Are there enough exceptions to move the campus to AA?
– Was the exception used for the same measure the prior
year? If so, it cannot be used again the subsequent year.
Performance Standard Continuum
• Students must have been enrolled the ‘full academic
year’ –snapshot date (last Friday in October) & test
date to be included in accountability measures. This
is called the accountability sub-set.
Required Improvement
(State)
• Required Improvement Calculations are applied if the standard is
not met.
• RI = The amount of gain required to reach the standard in two
years.
• Can be used to move from Unacceptable to Acceptable or
Acceptable to Recognized.
• The gain from 2009 must allow the indicator to reach the
standard if the gain were repeated the next year.
• There is no floor when moving to Acceptable. The rating must be
within 5 points to move to Recognized.
• Required Improvement is always reviewed first. If it cannot
increase the indicator rating, TPM is applied, followed by
Exceptions, if applicable.
Texas Projection Measure (TPM)
• Identifies if student is projected to pass next high stakes test at 5th,
8th or 11th grade.
• Only available for students in grades 3-10 who:
• Test on TAKS, TAKS-Acc, TAKS-LAT
• Have scored results this year for both Reading and Math
• Test in the same language
• TPM is not available for:
• 7th Grade Writing
• 8th Grade Science (2009 only, available in 2010)
• All 11th Grade Subjects
• TPM can increase the campus rating to Acceptable, Recognized or
Exemplary.
• If applying TPM does not raise the indicator rating, Exceptions are
reviewed, if applicable.
Exceptions
Academically Acceptable AND Recognized
Exemplary
Performance Floor:
Academically Acceptable –
5 points for all subjects.
Performance Floor:
The measure must be no more than 5
percentage points below the Exemplary
standard for all subjects
Recognized – The measure must be no more than 5
percentage points below the Recognized standard for all
subjects.
# of measures
1-4
5-8
9-11
12-15
≥ 16
# of exceptions
# of measures
0
1
2
3
4
Exceptions may not be used for the same indicator two
consecutive years.
1-9
≥ 10
# of exceptions
0
1
‘Passing & Preparedness’
2100 Scale Score
– Passing
Standard
2400 Scale Score
– Commended
Performance
2200 Scale Score
– Higher
Education
Readiness
Component
(HERC)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
• Federal System which incorporates our state
assessments, plus graduation, attendance,
and participation.
AYP Standards &
Comparison to State Standards Across Years
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010- 2011- 2012- 201311
12
13
14
State
AYP
State
AYP
State
AYP
AYP
AYP
AYP
AYP
Reading/
ELA
70
60
70
67
70
73
80
87
93
100
Mathematics
50
50
55
58
60
67
75
83
92
100
Calculations
Participation
• Participation of all students enrolled
on the day of testing (plus make-ups)
Performance
• Students enrolled the full academic
year
• Snapshot + Test Date
Meet the Absolute Standard
• Reading/ELA – 67%
• Mathematics – 58%
OR Meet Performance Improvement/Safe Harbor
• a 10 percent decrease in the percent counted as not proficient from the
prior year
• – AND –
• meet the absolute standard or show any improvement on the other
indicator.
Minimum Size Criteria
Performance
Participation
• ‘All Students’ is
Evaluated
• Students Groups:
50/10%/200
• ‘All Students’ –
District or
Campus must
have 40 students
• Student Groups:
50/10%/200
Other Measure
• Graduation – 40
students in the
class
• Attendance –
7,200 days (40
students x 180
days)
Other AYP Information
• TAKS (Accommodated) is combined with the TAKS results
• TAKS-M is used for performance (with a 2% cap)
• TAKS-Alt is used for performance (with a 1% cap)