Transcript The most valuable & in house resource of Clean Water and

STOP CALLING IT
WASTEWATER!!!
Invaluable, In-house Resource for Clean
Water + Energy
“Industrial & Municipal Waste Water”
Sudeep Sangameswaran
Managing Director - Paques Environmental Technology India Pvt Ltd
Date : 12 Dec. 2014
16-7-2015
Place : India Habitat Center, New Delhi
“Sustainable Clean Ganga Mission With Proven Innovation”
Who is Paques?
• Family owned business
• Founded in 1960
• Number of employees : ~400
• Operations in The Netherlands, China, Brazil, India and Sales Office in Canada
• Worldwide presence through network of partners
• Innovative biological applications for Wastewater and Gas
• 2011: Skion GmbH, the investment firm of German entrepreneur Susanne Klatten (BMW,
ALTANA, SGL) purchases into Paques
• 2011: JV with Shell for Biological Desulphurization of Gas
16-7-2015
Paques focus on Research & Development
• Global leader in Anaerobic
Wastewater Treatment
• Driven by innovation
• >2000 reference plants
• >60 countries
• Long
Standing
Education-
Research-Industry Coop
16-7-2015
Water Stress by Population Growth
12
Africa
Asia
Europe
Billion
9
Latin America
+ caribbean
6
North America
Oceania
World
3
0
1950
1980
2010
2040
2070
2100
16-7-2015
Source: United Nations Population Division;
World Population Prospects, The 2010 Revision
Water Scarcity 1961-90
16-7-2015
Water Scarcity 2020s
16-7-2015
Water Scarcity 2050s
16-7-2015
Global Energy Demand
Global energy demand increases in mtoe (million tons of oil equivalent) by onethird from 2010 to 2035, with China & India accounting for 50% of the growth
(credit: International Energy Agency)
http://cleantechnica.com/2014/07/01/bnef-renewable-energys-about-to-dominate-global-powerinvestments/global-power-demand-growth/
16-7-2015
4.0 billion barrels of Oil in 2050
Biofuels
Hydroelectric
Solar, Wind, Geo
Nuclear Electric
Coal
Natural Gas
80 -
Shale/Tar Sands
Crude Oil
60 -
Peaking
Fossil Fuels
Billion Barrels of Oil
Equivalent per Year
100 -
New Technologies
Largely sustainable
Growing Energy Demand
40 -
20 -
1920
1940
1960
1980
16-7-2015
Sources: Lynn Orr, Changing the World’s Energy Systems, Stanford University Global Climate & Energy Project
(after John Edwards, American Association of Petroleum Geologists), SRI Consulting
2000
2020
2040
Over 45 Countries in the world are already consuming over
60% of the total Energy from renewable resource
10
In Current Problems…..lie future solutions..
11
Evolution of Environmental attitudes
India
Source of
Profits
Exceed
Legislation
Acceptance of
Legislature
Downplay /
Trickery
Denial
Ignorance
Europe
12
50’s
60’s
70’s
80’s
90’s
2000
Industrial Wastewater is a resource...
13
....Innovating with NATURE aids this quest..
14
…Biotechnology – using nature to make
the difference…
Anaerobic wastewater
& gas treatment
• savings on operational costs
with production of green energy
• Reduce freshwater intake
• reduction in emissions
• recover valuable elements
• reduction on discharge costs
• smaller footprint
• minimize neutralization costs
15
...and tying these innovations to the Market
Technology
Entrepreneurship
16
Market
Innovations need Scale-up…
Industrial scale
Pilot scale
Labarotory scale
17
Research /Batch test
Innovation…treating industrial effluent discharge in
Rivers
Paper Industry - Germany
Paper Industry - UK
18
DIP Industry - China
Innovation - Thiopaq Technology
Bioconversion of H2S to Sulphur
19
Effluent Treatment Plant – Brewery, Netherlands (Capacity 2.2 MLD)
Innovation – Integrating Next Gen Technologies with Client Needs
20
NaOH
Gasholder
Flare
10 m³
320 m³/h
HCl
Gas
scrubber
200 m³/h
1 m³
1 m³
Pressure safety
relief
Defoam
Biogas
to boiler
CLEAN ENERGY
* Biogas recirculation
Biofilter
14 m²
*
150 m³
Diversion
tank
Cyclone tank
4 m³
To sewer
SOURCE –
INDUSTRIAL
WASTE
WATER
Influent
Fine screen 0.5 mm
in existing sewer channel
Buffertank
500 m³
PA-tank
500 m³
IC Reactor
Circox
Filter 230 m³
385 m³
D= 5 m
Sludge
21
Effluent
CLEAN WATER
Biopaq®IC - Typical Comparison with
Other Conventional Technologies
S.N.
Parameters
Biopaq®IC
Conventional UASB
Conventional Hybrid
1
COD Reduction
70% to 90%
70% to 90%
70% to 90%
2
Biogas Generation (CH4)
0.32 m3/KG COD
Reduce in a Day
0.25 to 0.3 m3/KG
COD Reduce in a Day
0.2 to 0.28 m3/KG COD
Reduce in a Day
3
Shock Loads Handling
Yes
No
No
4
Endurance
Over 15 Years
5 to 7 Years
3 to 5 Years
5
Volumetric Loading Rate
20 to 35
4 to 6
3 to 5
6
Foot Print Area m2
(per 10 Tons of COD)
17 to 20 m2
225 to 335 m2
400 to 600
7
Sludge Type
Granular
Flocculent
Flocculent
8
Stage of Operation
Two
One
One
9
Typical ROI (Years)
1.5 to 2.5 Years
1.8 to 2.8 years
2 to 3 Years
22
Note : Per MLD Cost is not feasible as different industry type has different COD Load and the
capital cost of Anaerobic Technology has to linked with Flow and COD Concentration
Innovation Anammox®
23
SAVE ENERGY
SAVE ENVIRONMENT
A brief history of Anammox
•
•
•
•
Discovery of nitrogen gap by Gist Brocades in 1989
Discovery of Anammox by TU Delft in 1996
Anammox technology licensed to Paques in 1998
First full-scale reactor built by Paques in 2002
Conventional
NH4+
a
aeration
(4.6 kg O2/kg N)
NO3-
Anammox
NH4+
NH4+
methanol
(2.3 kg/kg N)
N2
24
CO2 emissi
emission (3,5 kg/kg N)
aeration
(1.8 kg O2/kg N)
NO2methanol
(0 kg/kg N)
N2
CO2 emission
emissi (0,4 kg/kg N)
Innovation - Advanced Integrated Anaerobic Treatment
CLEAN ENERGY
Food Wastewater, Case Olburgen WWTP
CLEAN
WATER
SOURCE –
INDUSTRIAL
WASTE
WATER
25
Innovation - Economical & Aesthetic Decentralized
Sewage Treatment using Combination Technologies
Sewage Treatment Plant of EMASA, in “Balneário Camboriú-SC”, with capacity for 6,000 inhabitants. The plant
already incorporates the unit for tertiary-level treatment (removal of nitrogen and phosphorus and suspended
solids).
26
UBOX ® REACTOR
OPERATION
AIR
4
AEROBIC
BIOGAS
Without
H2S
5
TREATED
SEWAGE
1.
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
2.
THREE-PHASE SEPARATOR
3.
AERATION SYSTEM
4.
HIGH SEDIMENTATION RATE
5.
GAS SCRUBBER
‘
3
Flare
RAW
SEWAGE
27
2
ANAEROBIC
1
Biopaq®UBOX v/s Conventional Technologies
S.N.
Parameters
Biopaq®UBOX
Conventional ASP
Conventional SBR
1
BOD Reduction
90%
85%
95%
2
Biogas Generation (CH4)
Yes
No
No
3
Power Consumption
214 KW/Day
400 KW/Day
423 KW/Day
4
Sludge Production
Less
More
More
5
Foot Print Area m2 /MLD
204
2000
800
6
Per MLD Capital Cost (E&M +
Civil) (INR Cr)
1.5
1
1.25
7
Per MLD Power Cost
2.34
4.24
4.64
Future Perspective
29
Industries & Pollutants in Ganga
Key pollutants
Type of Industry
Nos.
Bio degradable
Ammonia
COD
Municipal sewage
32
Sugar & Distillery
67
Chemical & Fertilizer
18
Phosphate
BOD
Textile , Dying & bleaching
58
Food & Dairy
29
Pulp & Paper
24
Tannery
439
Others
14
Circle of Paques expertise
30
TDS
TSS
Non biodegradable
COD
Heavy
metals
Odour
Colour
Advantages of handling pollutants at source
• Recovery of valuable resources from waste.
• Ease of handling smaller volume of concentrated streams.
• Accountablity
• Ease of monitoring
• Proven global practice.
31
Key Takeaway – Innovate in India with proven global
technologies to leapfrog our Environmental Compliance –
DO NOT REINVENT THE WHOLE WHEEL !!!
32
GANGA…..
33
Thank you
34