Transcript Slide 1
The Dynamic Need for Multiracial Education and Ministry Christopher Edley, Jr., Dean of the University of California Berkeley School of Law “Race isn’t rocket science. Race is harder than rocket science.” 2 THE NUMBER OF DOCUMENTED U.S. IMMIGRANTS, IN MILLONS, BY DECADE (1820-2010) 12M 10.50 10M 9.08 8.80 8M 7.26 6M 5.25 4M 3.32 2.60 2M 1.71 .53 0 1820s 1830s 1840s 1850s 1860s 1870s 1880s 1890s 1900s 1910s 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s U.S. IMMIGRATION POLICY BEFORE AND AFTER THE REFORM ACT OF 1965 1492 to1965: 85% percent from Europe. The “Hart-Celler Act” in 1965: opened the door for the first time to large numbers of non-Europeans. 1966-2011: 85% non-European. FOREIGN BORN POPULATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. US: 40 million Russia: 12 million Germany: 10 million 21% of world’s total immigrants are in the U.S. THE DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSFORMATIONS OF HARRIS COUNTY (1960-2010) 4.5 4.0 7.7% Asians/Others Hispanics 3.5 3.0 6.3% Blacks Anglos 4.1% 40.8% 2.5 2.1% 22.7% 32.9% 19.1% 18.3% 18.4% 42.5% 33.0% POPULATION, IN MILLIONS 15.5% 2.0 0.8% 1.5 9.9% 0.3% 6.0% 1.0 0.5 19.7% 20.1% 19.8% 73.9% 69.2% 62.7% 54.0% 0.0 1960 (1,243,258) 1970 (1,741,912) 1980 (2,409,547) 1990 (2,818,199) SOURCE: US CENSUS. CLASSIFICATIONS BASED ON TEXAS STATE DATA CENTER CONVENTIONS. 2000 (3,400,578) 2010 (4,092,459) THE DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSFORMATIONS OF HARRIS COUNTY (1960-2010) 4.5 4.0 7.7% Asians/Others Hispanics 3.5 3.0 6.3% Blacks Anglos 4.1% 40.8% 2.5 2.1% 22.7% 32.9% 19.1% 18.3% 18.4% 42.5% 33.0% POPULATION, IN MILLIONS 15.5% 2.0 1.5 0.8% 9.9% 0.3% 6.0% 1.0 19.8% 0.5 73.9% 19.7% 20.1% 69.2% 62.7% 54.0% 0.0 1960 (1,243,258) 1970 (1,741,912) 1980 (2,409,547) 1990 (2,818,199) SOURCE: US CENSUS. CLASSIFICATIONS BASED ON TEXAS STATE DATA CENTER CONVENTIONS. 2000 (3,400,578) 2010 (4,092,459) THE DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSFORMATIONS OF HARRIS COUNTY (1960-2010) 4.5 4.0 7.7% Asians/Others Hispanics 3.5 3.0 6.3% Blacks Anglos 4.1% 40.8% 2.5 2.1% 22.7% 32.9% 19.1% 18.3% 18.4% 42.5% 33.0% POPULATION, IN MILLIONS 15.5% 2.0 1.5 0.8% 9.9% 0.3% 6.0% 1.0 19.8% 0.5 73.9% 19.7% 20.1% 69.2% 62.7% 54.0% 0.0 1960 (1,243,258) 1970 (1,741,912) 1980 (2,409,547) 1990 (2,818,199) SOURCE: US CENSUS. CLASSIFICATIONS BASED ON TEXAS STATE DATA CENTER CONVENTIONS. 2000 (3,400,578) 2010 (4,092,459) THE DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSFORMATIONS OF HARRIS COUNTY (1960-2010) 4.5 4.0 7.7% Asians/Others Hispanics 3.5 3.0 6.3% Blacks Anglos 4.1% 40.8% 2.5 2.1% 22.7% 32.9% 19.1% 18.3% 18.4% 42.5% 33.0% POPULATION, IN MILLIONS 15.5% 2.0 1.5 0.8% 9.9% 0.3% 6.0% 1.0 19.8% 0.5 73.9% 19.7% 20.1% 69.2% 62.7% 54.0% 0.0 1960 (1,243,258) 1970 (1,741,912) 1980 (2,409,547) 1990 (2,818,199) SOURCE: US CENSUS. CLASSIFICATIONS BASED ON TEXAS STATE DATA CENTER CONVENTIONS. 2000 (3,400,578) 2010 (4,092,459) THE DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSFORMATIONS OF HARRIS COUNTY (1960-2010) 4.5 4.0 7.7% Asians/Others Hispanics 3.5 3.0 6.3% Blacks Anglos 4.1% 40.8% 2.5 2.1% 22.7% 32.9% 19.1% 18.3% 18.4% 42.5% 33.0% POPULATION, IN MILLIONS 15.5% 2.0 1.5 0.8% 9.9% 0.3% 6.0% 1.0 19.8% 0.5 73.9% 19.7% 20.1% 69.2% 62.7% 54.0% 0.0 1960 (1,243,258) 1970 (1,741,912) 1980 (2,409,547) 1990 (2,818,199) SOURCE: US CENSUS. CLASSIFICATIONS BASED ON TEXAS STATE DATA CENTER CONVENTIONS. 2000 (3,400,578) 2010 (4,092,459) THE DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSFORMATIONS OF HARRIS COUNTY (1960-2010) 4.5 4.0 7.7% Asians/Others Hispanics 3.5 3.0 6.3% Blacks Anglos 4.1% 40.8% 2.5 2.1% 22.7% 32.9% 19.1% 18.3% 18.4% 42.5% 33.0% POPULATION, IN MILLIONS 15.5% 2.0 1.5 0.8% 9.9% 0.3% 6.0% 1.0 19.8% 0.5 73.9% 19.7% 20.1% 69.2% 62.7% 54.0% 0.0 1960 (1,243,258) 1970 (1,741,912) 1980 (2,409,547) 1990 (2,818,199) SOURCE: US CENSUS. CLASSIFICATIONS BASED ON TEXAS STATE DATA CENTER CONVENTIONS. 2000 (3,400,578) 2010 (4,092,459) The Demographic Revolution Will Continue Hi Dad! ETHNICITY BY AGE IN HARRIS COUNTY (2007-2011 COMBINED) 100 Anglos 90 Blacks 80 70 Hispanics 70 Asians/Others 60 60 PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS 50 45 42 40 30 20 25 27 23 20 18 22 15 10 10 10 2 5 6 0 AGES 65-95 (N=657) AGES 47-64 (N=1,119) AGES 30-46 (N=918) AGES 18-29 (N=569) ETHNICITY BY AGE IN HARRIS COUNTY (2007-2011 COMBINED) 100 Anglos 90 Blacks 80 70 Hispanics 70 Asians/Others 60 60 PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS 50 45 42 40 30 20 25 27 23 20 18 22 15 10 10 10 2 5 6 0 AGES 65-95 (N=657) AGES 47-64 (N=1,119) AGES 30-46 (N=918) AGES 18-29 (N=569) ETHNICITY BY AGE IN HARRIS COUNTY (2007-2011 COMBINED) 100 Anglos 90 Blacks 80 70 Hispanics 70 Asians/Others 60 60 PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS 50 45 42 40 30 20 25 27 23 20 18 22 15 10 10 10 2 5 6 0 AGES 65-95 (N=657) AGES 47-64 (N=1,119) AGES 30-46 (N=918) AGES 18-29 (N=569) 1999 Black: 32% Hisp: 18% Asian: 27% White: 23% 20 = move 2004 Black: 45% Hisp: 23% Asian: 32% White: 00% 21 RACE IN THE U.S. Classification of human groups as exclusive and discrete, based on n selected physical characteristics (e.g., skin color, hair type) Groups created or evolved distinct from one another Inheritable Outer physical characteristics tell us of inner realities Ranking, hierarchy 22 American Asian Indian White Black Hispanic 23 RACIALIZED SOCIETY Race matters profoundly for differences in life EXPERIENCES, life OPPORTUNITIES, and social RELATIONSHIPS. Rewards allocated UNEQUALLY by racial group. 24 RACE IN THE U.S. More of Society’s Rewards WHITES ASIANS Foreign American HISPANICS BLACKS Less of Society’s Rewards 45,000 Median Income of Males With Income in 2008 Dollars by Sex, Race and Hispanic Origin (1990 to 2008) 38,982 40,000 37,409 35,066 35,000 37,736 36,607 24,984 25,254 24,362 24,003 30,000 25,000 21,511 20,000 20,550 15,000 White non-Hispanic US DOLLARS 10,000 Black Asian 5,000 Hispanic 0 1990 2000 2005 2007 2008 26 80,000 Differential Returns on Education 70,000 60,000 50,000 White Black Latino Native Asian 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 High School Some College Associates Bachelors Grad/Prof 387 are white 9 are Asian 3 are Hispanic 1 is African American 0 are Native American Bill Gates Warren Buffet Larry Ellison Michael Dell Steve Balmer Paul Allen George Kaiser James Simons Christy Walton Charles Koch David Koch Jeff Ann John Bezos Chambers Paulson Jim Walton Alice Walton Robson Michael Sergey Walton Bloomberg Brin Donald Abigail Bren Johnson Phil Knight Len Steve Edward Philip Mark James Jack Blavatnik Cohen Johnson Anschutz Zuckerberg Goodnight Taylor Carl Icahn Ron Perelman Larry Page Rich Kinder Sheldon Adelson John Mars George Soros Jacqueline Mars Rupert Jim Blair Samuel Steve Murdoch Kennedy Okeden Newhouse Jobs 28 US IS RACIALIZED IN AT LEAST THE FOLLOWING AREAS (1) health (2) death (3) employment (4) marriage (5) occupation (6) life expectancy (7) crime (8) persnl & social identity (9) advertising (10) names (11) education (12) neighborhoods (13) auto loan rates (14) SES & spatial mobility (15) consumerism (16) respect (17) expectations (18) music (19) religion (20) cost of products (21) mortgage rates (22) history (23) TV watching (24) wealth (25) property values (26) politics (27) entrepreneur (28) access to hi-qual affdble products (29) self-esteem (30) mark-up prices (31) env polltion, haz waste (32) social networks (33) lunch tables (34) child poverty (35) standardized exams (36) language (37) crim. justice (38) generational mobility (39) respect 29 WEALTH DIFFERENCES 2002 Black Median Net Worth Hispanic Median Net Worth White Median Net Worth 6,000 8,000 90,000 White/Hispanic Ratio 11.25 (10.0 1988) White/Black Ratio 15.00 (11.8 1988) Source: 30 http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=race_wealth_and_intergenerational_poverty WEALTH DIFFERENCES OVER TIME Followed same 2000 black and white families from 1984 to 2007, examining changes in the racial wealth gap. Found a 4 fold-increase in the gap over this time. 31 Median Net Wealth 1984-2007 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 Dollars 60,000 Black Families 50,000 White Families 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 1984 1989 1994 1999 2003 2007 Source: Thomas Shapiro et al. May 2010. The Racial Wealth Gap Increases Fourfold. Institute on Assets and 32 Social Policy, Research and Policy Brief. Brandeis University. As of 2012 Whites have: 50% more wealth than Asians 18 times more wealth than Hispanics 20 times more wealth than African Americans Based on U.S Census Bureau Figures 34 A Real World Example: Milwaukee, 1971-1993 For Whites and Blacks, if in 1971 home worth $40,000 In 1993, that same house for Whites worth: $250,000 In 1993, that same house for Blacks worth: $32,000 Source: Sunwoog Kim. 2003. “Long-Term Appreciation of Owner-Occupied Single Family House Prices in Milwaukee Neighborhoods” Urban Geography 24(3): 212-231. 35 Emerson’s Neighborhood 80% African American 16% Latino 4% Other Source: 2010 U.S. Census Built/Purchased in 2006 $273,000 Sales Agreement Sept 2012 $225,000 Appraised/Sold Dec. 2012 Net Gain: $160,000 $-113,000 CIRCLE OF FRIENDS: PERCENT REPORTING MOST OR ALL THE SAME RACE Same R No Cong Interracial n ALL 83 70 36 2550 White 87 70 73 58 78 46 50 36 44 46 33 15 1615 Black Latino Asian All Differences significant at .05 level, one-tailed, using both ANOVA and chi-square tests. Exception: Blacks not in congregations and Blacks in Interracial congregations. 296 304 209 38 RACIAL COMPOSITION OF SOCIAL TIES, BY INTERRACIAL CONGREGATION CONTEXT Never Past Only Now Only Now & Past Mix marriage 1% 1% 17% 25% Both Friends Same 88% 82% 64% 42% Friends in Cong 88% 67% 28% 24% Circle of Friends 84% 64% 44% 25% Social Network 72% 57% 31% 9% 39 A. Social Ties Benefits B. Organizational Home for Multiracial families and people C. Group Formation and Solidarity D. Altered Racial Attitudes E. Reduced Inequalities—economic, social, spiritual 40 HOPWOOD V. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals denied that diversity impacts educational experience: “The use of race, in and of itself, to choose students simply achieves a student body that looks different. Such a criterion is no more rational on its own terms than would be choices based upon the physical size or blood type of applicants” TYPES OF DIVERSITY Structural Diversity Informal Interactional Classroom Diversity Tested uses two longitudinal databases: University of Michigan Cooperative Institutional Research Program (national) FINDINGS The three types of diversity associated with increased: Intellectual Engagement Academic Skills Citizenship Engagement Racial/Cultural Engagement Classroom diversity, diversity programming, opportunities for interaction, and learning across diverse groups of students in the college environment now constitute important initiatives to enhance the education of all students. WHY? SUBCULTURAL THEORY • Between-group contact leads to mutual influence, and hence innovation • Subcultural fusions lead to innovations • Thus creative force built into diverse organizations 44 WHAT I HOPE FOR MY SON . . . I see a day when seminarians will be trained in understanding race and ethnic relations, educated in cultural understandings, learn Biblical interpretation from great scholars around the world (rather than principally western thinkers), be trained in multiple styles of preaching, and weave throughout their courses methods of generating a united body through diversity. And I see the day this will be done with a diverse faculty, staff, and student body. EM 850 (3 Credit Hours) Race, Culture, and Ministry Houston Graduate School of Theology Dates: July 9-11, 2012 Course Description: An exploration into the topics of race, ethnicity, culture, and faith. The course will look at how these have become intertwined, the ways in which faith can be compromised, sociological realities, and biblical and theological models for restoring right relationships and structures. Course Outcomes: Upon completion of this course, students will: 1. Understand the linkages between race, ethnicity, culture, and religion. 2. Analyze biblical perspectives on the above issues. 3. Gain a theological and sociological grasp of multiracial/ethnic/cultural congregations. 4. Have a basic understanding of how to put into practice the course topics in the local church context. 5. Participate in group discussion regarding these often complex issues. Required Texts: Anderson, David A. Gracism: The Art of Inclusion. IVP, 2007. Boesak, Allan Aubrey, and Curtiss Paul DeYoung. Radical Reconciliation: Beyond Political Pietism and Christian Quietism. Orbis Books, 2012. Branson, Mark Lau, and Juan F. Martínez. Churches, Cultures, and Leadership: A Practical Theology of Congregations and Ethnicities. IVP Academic, 2011. DeYoung, Emerson, Kim, and Yancey. United by Faith: The Multiracial Congregations as a Response to the Problem of Race. Oxford University Press, 2003. Emerson, Michael O., and Christian Smith. Divided by Faith: Evangelical Religion and the Problem of Race in America. Oxford University Press, 2000. Rah, Soong-Chan. The Next Evangelicalism: Freeing Your Church from Western Cultural Captivity. IVP Books, 2009. Topic Coverage During Our Time Together: Monday: Race, Culture, and Religious Complexities Divided by Faith/Next Evangelicalism Tuesday: Multiracial Congregations and God’s Work United by Faith/Radical Reconciliation Wednesday: Intercultural Relations, Perspectives, Methods Gracism/Churches, Cultures, Leadership