Transcript NAWCA

NAWCA
North American Wetlands
Conservation Act
North American Waterfowl Management
Plan
Found a need for funding to protect and restore wetlands
Envisioned a federal funding program
Developed a system to bring partners together to access
these funds (Joint Ventures)
NAWCA –
North American
Wetland Conservation Act
Establishment





Act passed in 1989
Currently authorized up to $75 Million
In addition to appropriations, program
funding comes sources such as fines,
Federal fuel excise taxes (for coastal
ecosystem projects) and interest.
FY 2008 total funding = $84.4 Million
Funds projects in CN, MX and the US
Act Implementation
Joint Ventures are the venue through which NAWCA
grants are run.
NAWCA proposals should be submitted with knowledge of the JV “responsible” for the project area.
JV’s rank multiple projects within same funding
cycle. Ranks contribute to funding decisions.
Types of Grants
Two types available:
Standard – $75,001 to $1 Million funding
(3 grants funded in NM)
Small – up to $75,000 funding
(0 grants funded in NM)
Standard Grant Requirements







1:1 match required. But best to propose at least a 2
non-federal: 1 federal dollar match.
High documented waterfowl use or the ability to
show that “they will come”
Partners are everything – you’ll need many with
several giving 10% of the request in match
Location, location, location
Putting land under perpetual easement or outright
purchase is highly valued by the grantor as are
Declining wetland types
Documented benefit to other wetland-dependent
birds and T&E species
Small NAWCAs are often better for
areas with isolated, small
or linear wetlands
$2.5 Million in FY 2008 for
Small Grants Program
= 33+ grants
Fewer requirements:
Much less writing; 5 pages maximum
Fewer overall match dollars needed
More emphasis on habitat than waterfowl
Smaller landscapes
Fewer partners
Works well with
riparian areas
Before you begin….
Potential Regulatory requirements after grant receipt:
Acquisition support letter
Historic Preservation Survey
Contaminants Survey
NEPA
U.S. Federal restrictions on purchases
JV
administrative
boundaries
Intermountain West
Playa Lakes
How grant funds may be spent





equipment expenses that are prorated;
material and supply costs;
annual payments for conservation
agreements of at least 15 years or for the
maximum duration allowed by State law;
restoration or protection costs; and
initial management costs.
Match Requirements




Must be at least 1:1 match. More non-federal to
federal is better
May use non-federal funds or in-kind contributed
no earlier than 2 years prior to the date the
proposal is submitted or during the 2-year grant
agreement period
Funds cannot have been used to match any other
federal funds
Must send letters from all contributors, noting
value of contribution, with the application
Potential Sources for matching funds
Bird habitat groups – DU, NWTF, PF, QU, etc.
City and County funds
Civic or community groups
NMDGF other state resource agencies (Forestry, State Parks)
Private landowners
RC & D’s
Soil and Water conservation districts
Sportsman’s clubs
Tourism groups or boosters
TNC, TPL and land trusts– acquisitions or easements
Tribal dollars
Universities and colleges
Volunteer efforts
Summary
Small NAWCA proposals make sense for our area:
1) relatively sparse populations; few corporations
2) few “easy” non-federal dollars
3) many private landowners
4) scattered or linear wetlands
5) few large concentrations of waterfowl
Talk to JV staff.
Playa Lakes
Intermountain West
www.pljv.org
www.iwjv.org
Deadline for small grants will be November 28
For further information check out:
www.fws.gov/birdhabitat/Grants/NAWCA/Small/index.shtm