Transcript Spatial ACC Z500 - University of Utah
The Role of Initial and Boundary Conditions for Sub-Seasonal Atmospheric Predictability
Thomas Reichler Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego La Jolla, CA (now at: NOAA-GFDL / Princeton University, Princeton NJ)
Outline
1. Motivation and Goal 2. Methodology 3. Predictability • temporal evolution • horizontal distribution • vertical structure 4. The initial condition effect and the Antarctic oscillation 5. Summary
Elements of predictability
Physical model Initial conditions (ICs) Boundary conditions (BCs)
S
(
x
,
t
)
f
IC
(
x
, 0 );
BC
(
x
,
t
);
ME
Goal of this study
Sub-seasonal (2 weeks to 2 months) predictability of the atmosphere
= IC (weather) + BC (climate) prediction problem ICs BCs
initially very strong, but rapid decrease in time classical predictability range: ~ 2 weeks beyond that: weak or zero IC influence!?
persistent features (e.g. blocking, major modes, stratosphere) periodic features (e.g. MJO) effects are weak, require long time averaging recent studies: mostly seasonal and longer, impacts of ENSO sub-seasonal range: relatively short averaging period ocean & land tropics & extratropics
Outline
1. Motivation and Background 2. Methodology 3. Predictability
•
temporal evolution
•
spatial distribution
•
vertical structure 4. The initial condition effect and the Antarctic oscillation 5. Summary
Experimental Design
AGCM with prescribed SSTs Different “qualities” of ICs and BCs, find out how important they are Base runs • observed (2x) or climatological SST • continuously over many years • to produce ICs for subsequent experiments Experiments • branching off from base runs • 107 days: DJFM and JJAS (start on the 15 th ) • 10-20 members, from perturbed ICs (breeding) • 22 years (1979-2000) • different combinations of ICs and BCs
Experiments
•
S
(
x
,
t
)
f f
BC
BC
(
x
,
t
);
B C
;
IC
(
x
, 0 );
IC
I C
ME
i
;
ME
• experiments
ICBC iBC BC IC CC ICBC-r rean
BC
IC
BC’
0 0
IC’
0
0
i
0
ME
0
(IC’=0: initial conditions from base run with BC’=0)
Verification Strategy
verification 10-member ensemble-mean of experiment against 1 member of “observation” “observation” a. one realization of ICBC (perfect model skill) repeat 20 times and average no model errors > upper limit of predictability (this is what I mostly show) b. NCEP reanalysis (real world skill) measure of skill correlation of geopotential spatial or temporal (year-to-year)
The Model
•
NCEP seasonal forecasting model (e.g. Kanamitsu et al. 2002)
•
originates from MRF, similar to reanalysis-2 model • T42 (300km) L28 • RAS Convection: Moorthi and Suarez (1992) • SW: Chow (1992) • LW: Chow & Suarez (1994) • Clouds: Slingo (1987) • Gravity wave drag: Alpert et al. (1988) • 2-layer soil model: Pan & Mahrt (1987) • Orography: smoothed • Ozone: zonal mean climatology
10
extratropical tropopause
18
Outline
1. Motivation and Background 2. Methodology 3. Predictability
•
temporal evolution
•
spatial distribution
•
vertical structure 4. The initial condition effect and the Antarctic oscillation 5. Summary
Classical predictability
evolution of spatial AC for global Z500 during DJFM CC vs. CC (IC’=0, BC’=0) lead time (days) lead time (days)
Effects of IC’
evolution of spatial AC for global Z500 during DJFM 30 day averages
IC vs. IC CC vs. CC
initial condition effect has very long time scale anomalous initial conditions (IC’) lead to prolonged predictability possible reason: excitation of low frequency modes by BC’
Effects of IC’ and BC’
evolution of spatial AC for NH Z500 during DJFM verified against ICBC instantaneous 30 days 90 days lead time (days) lead time (days) lead time (days) 4 weeks ICs dominate for first 4 weeks (3 weeks during ENSO, 5 weeks during neutral)
Southern Hemisphere
evolution of spatial AC for SH Z500 during DJFM verified against ICBC instantaneous 30 days 90 days 7 weeks
Tropics
evolution of spatial AC of tropical Z200 during DJFM verified against ICBC instantaneous 30 days 90 days 3 weeks
Summary: Effects of IC’ and BC’
Time scale for: IC = BC 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 NH PNA SH TROP DJFM JJAS
Effect of model uncertainty
evolution of spatial AC of NH Z500 during DJFM ICBC/ICBC vs. ICBC-r/reanalysis 90 days averages
= model error
Outline
1. Motivation and Background 2. Methodology 3. Predictability
•
temporal evolution
•
horizontal distribution
•
vertical structure 4. The initial condition effect and the Antarctic oscillation 5. Summary
Horizontal structure I
January monthly mean (week 3-6), Z500, temporal correlation
Pacific North American region (PNA) ICBC Tropics Antarctica longitude Pacific South American region (PSA)
Horizontal structure II
January monthly mean (week 3-6), Z500, temporal correlation
ICBC iBC BC IC
Effects of persistence
persistence Z500 (Jan) ICBC NA PNA persistent boundary forcing SO NAO AAO IC IC atmospheric persistence
Outline
1. Motivation and Background 2. Methodology 3. Predictability
•
temporal evolution
•
horizontal structure
•
vertical structure 4. The initial condition effect and the Antarctic oscillation 5. Summary
Vertical structure I
ICBC: temporal correlations of monthly and zonal mean geopotential
Jan Feb Mar
latitude latitude latitude
ICBC IC ICBC BC ICBC
Vertical structure II
Jan Feb Mar
Vertical structure III: neutral ENSO
Jan Feb Mar ICBC IC ICBC BC ICBC
Outline
1. Motivation and Background 2. Methodology 3. Predictability
•
temporal evolution
• •
spatial distribution vertical structure 4. The initial condition effect and the Antarctic oscillation 5. Summary
Antarctic Oscillation (AAO)
January, Z500 ICBC-A EOF1 (59%) ICBC-B (0.81) IC (0.80) BC (0.10)
AAO index (Jan 1) and forecast skill (Jan)
spatial AC for SH Z500 during January, verified against ICBC ICBC (0.53) IC (0.75) El Nino La Nina iBC (0.05) BC (-0.15)
AAO index (Jan 1) AAO index (Jan 1)
Outline
1. Motivation and Background 2. Methodology 3. Predictability
•
temporal evolution
• •
spatial distribution vertical structure 4. The initial condition effect and the Antarctic oscillation 5. Summary
Summary
The effects of ICs on forecast skill • were detectable for ca. 8 week, • were more important than BCs for ca. 4 weeks, • were particularly important over Antarctica, the Tropics, and the lower stratosphere.
Regions of large skill coincided with regions of major modes.
Total skill (ICBC) can be understood as the sum of IC and BC produced skill (ICBC=BC+IC).
IC produced skill came mostly from atmospheric persistence in relationship with major modes.
Conclusion: Do not underestimate the importance of ICs for seasonal to sub-seasonal forecasts.
Scale variations
Saturation of spectral error energy globally, Z500, DJFM 4-10 10-20 20-40 40-100 Maximum gain from ICBC n (total) m (zonal)
ICBC IC ICBC BC ICBC
Perfect ENSO JFM Z
JAN FEB MAR
ICBC BC ICBC JAN
Real world JFM Z
FEB MAR
ICBC IC ICBC BC ICBC JUL
Perfect JAS Z
AUG SEP
ICBC
Vertical structure II
Jan Feb Mar IC iBC ICBC BC ICBC
latitude latitude latitude
Predictability of MJO
30-70 day filtered 200 hPa velocity potential
~ 4 weeks lead time (days)
• initial conditions are crucial • boundary conditions are important
NH
Real world, Z500, DJFM
verified against NCEP/NCAR reanalysis 30 days 90 days = model error SH
significant IC influence
Temporal correlation: Z500
JAN (week 3-6) FEB (week 7-10) MAR (week 11-14)
Perfect world: JFM
Zonal mean temporal correlation: Z500
JAN FEB MAR
BC ICBC ICBC IC
Perfect world: JAS
Zonal mean temporal correlation: Z500
JUL AUG SEP
IC ICBC ICBC BC
Real world: JFM
Zonal mean temporal correlation: Z200
JAN FEB MAR
BC ICBC
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0 -0.2
JAN FEB MAR ICBC IC BC BC1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0 -0.2
JAN FEB MAR ICBC IC BC BC1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0 -0.2
JUL AUG SEP ICBC IC BC BC1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0 -0.2
JAN FEB MAR ICBC IC BC BC1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0 -0.2
JAN FEB MAR ICBC IC BC BC1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0 -0.2
JUL AUG SEP ICBC IC BC BC1
Outline
I. Introduction II. Experimental Design III. Results a. Time evolution of skill and scale variations b. Regional variations and vertical structure c. Antarctic oscillation d. Tropical predictability IV. Summary
time (d) 107
U850 (10N-10S)
temporal correlation
ICBC IC BC-ICBC 0 Atl Ind W Pac Atl Atl Ind W Pac Atl Atl Ind W Pac Atl