Transcript Document

Practical Property Licensing

Ian Wright Environmental Health Service Manager Oxford City Council

Setting the scene - Oxford

28% stock in PRS

Least affordable City in the UK

Large numbers of HMOs in Oxford >5,000

– Worst housing stock in the city – Management problems e.g. waste, ASB – Article 4 introduced February 2012 •

Longstanding priority issue

– HMO Team since late 1980’s – Registration Scheme introduced in 1999 – Bid to CLG in 2007 – Corporate Priority - Meeting Housing Need •

Cross party political support

Key aims of Licensing

Improve property conditions

Improve management of HMOs

Improve knowledge and relationship with landlords

Improved property standards

Certification required with licence application

Every HMO inspected before a licence is issued

Minimum standards for facilities and amenities

Licence conditions attached to the majority of licences

Reinspections are carried out to check compliance

Fit and Proper landlords

Licensing requires fit and proper test

Bad landlords forced out or forced to improve

Fit and Proper landlords

Good landlords get rewarded, e.g. Accreditation

Good landlords want to see bad landlords dealt with effectively

Enforcement outcomes

• 4 demolitions of unlawful dwellings • 57 prosecutions with in excess of £100K fines • 23 Formal cautions • 4 Interim Management Orders • 1 Rent Repayment order • Protection from Eviction Act 1977 • 5 cases • 2 Landlords have gone to prison • 6 weeks (suspended) & 3 months • Fines/ costs awarded of £26k

Improved communication

Knowledge and contact with landlords significantly improved

Improved knowledge of PRS sector

Wider audience for events and newsletters

Dealing with community concerns

Impacts so far

3,500 licensed

>95% need additional work

Significant investment into the sector

Politicians, residents & sector view in Oxford – getting better

– Now more business as usual for landlords – Residents like greater accountability – Passing the new term test – Investors looking for compliance

Impacts so far

Poor compliance on reinspection

– 1397 revisits sampled – Only 40% fully complied – 15.5% had outstanding licence conditions and required additional licence conditions required – 4% referred for enforcement •

Representations from landlords now declined

– Lessons learned •

Appeals to Tribunal

Future issues

Continues to be a tough sector to regulate

– No end in sight to regular prosecutions – Continue to deal with unlicensed HMOS •

Concern over migration into unlicensed stock

Increasing deterrent effect – POCA, RRO

Unlikely to end licensing after 5 years

QUESTIONS?