Transcript Document

Practical Property Licensing

Ian Wright Environmental Health Service Manager Oxford City Council

Setting the scene - Oxford

•

28% stock in PRS

•

Least affordable City in the UK

•

Large numbers of HMOs in Oxford >5,000

– Worst housing stock in the city – Management problems e.g. waste, ASB – Article 4 introduced February 2012 •

Longstanding priority issue

– HMO Team since late 1980’s – Registration Scheme introduced in 1999 – Bid to CLG in 2007 – Corporate Priority - Meeting Housing Need •

Cross party political support

Key aims of Licensing

•

Improve property conditions

•

Improve management of HMOs

•

Improve knowledge and relationship with landlords

Improved property standards

•

Certification required with licence application

•

Every HMO inspected before a licence is issued

•

Minimum standards for facilities and amenities

•

Licence conditions attached to the majority of licences

•

Reinspections are carried out to check compliance

Fit and Proper landlords

•

Licensing requires fit and proper test

•

Bad landlords forced out or forced to improve

Fit and Proper landlords

•

Good landlords get rewarded, e.g. Accreditation

•

Good landlords want to see bad landlords dealt with effectively

Enforcement outcomes

• 4 demolitions of unlawful dwellings • 57 prosecutions with in excess of £100K fines • 23 Formal cautions • 4 Interim Management Orders • 1 Rent Repayment order • Protection from Eviction Act 1977 • 5 cases • 2 Landlords have gone to prison • 6 weeks (suspended) & 3 months • Fines/ costs awarded of £26k

Improved communication

•

Knowledge and contact with landlords significantly improved

•

Improved knowledge of PRS sector

•

Wider audience for events and newsletters

•

Dealing with community concerns

Impacts so far

•

3,500 licensed

•

>95% need additional work

•

Significant investment into the sector

•

Politicians, residents & sector view in Oxford – getting better

– Now more business as usual for landlords – Residents like greater accountability – Passing the new term test – Investors looking for compliance

Impacts so far

•

Poor compliance on reinspection

– 1397 revisits sampled – Only 40% fully complied – 15.5% had outstanding licence conditions and required additional licence conditions required – 4% referred for enforcement •

Representations from landlords now declined

– Lessons learned •

Appeals to Tribunal

Future issues

•

Continues to be a tough sector to regulate

– No end in sight to regular prosecutions – Continue to deal with unlicensed HMOS •

Concern over migration into unlicensed stock

•

Increasing deterrent effect – POCA, RRO

•

Unlikely to end licensing after 5 years

QUESTIONS?