Transcript Document
Re-tooling Ann Arbor’s Storm Water Utility to
Address Changing Legal Precedents
Molly Wade, City of Ann Arbor, MI
John Aldrich, CDM
MWEA Annual
Conference
June 23, 2009
TFG
Agenda
TFG
Project Objectives
Public Engagement Process
Revenue Requirements and Cost of Service
Options
Equitable Stormwater Rate Structure
Utility Billing Database
Revenue Scenarios and Rate Analysis
Credit Provisions and Adjustments
Implementation Strategy
2
TFG
3
Ann Arbor’s Storm Water Utility
Formed in early 1980’s
Historically simple rate structure
$3.7 million revenue
Expanding service needs
TFG
Asset management
Capital improvements
NPDES permitting
Evolving legal requirements
Improved technologies for defining
imperviousness
4
Project Mission
Improve the existing stormwater utility to
address emerging City stormwater needs while
meeting rate design requirements:
TFG
The fees must serve a regulatory purpose
(rather than a revenue-raising purpose)
The fees must be proportionate to the
necessary cost of service
Property owners must be able to refuse or limit
their use of the service.
5
Stormwater Citizen Advisory Task Force
Members Represent Community Interest
Home Owners
Tenants / Landlords
Understand values/
interests of
stakeholders
Industrial
Commercial
Retail
Institutional
Schools
Churches
TFG
6
Role of the Storm Water Citizens Advisory
Task Force
Relay information about stormwater needs
Provide advice on stormwater utility implementation
issues:
Level of service goals
Policies
User Fee
Participate in Public Engagement program
TFG
Report to City Council
7
Level of Service Principles Developed by
Storm Water Citizens Advisory Task Force
Protect public health, safety, and welfare
Protect ecological health
Conduct comprehensive planning to determine
priorities
Encourage shared responsibility
Offer incentives to guide desired behaviors
Educate stormwater system users
Provide an understandable, equitable rate
structure
TFG
8
Elements of an Effective Storm Water
Management Program
Goals
Level of Service
TFG
Administrative Services
Public Engagement
Regulation and Enforcement
Operations and Maintenance
System Planning
Capital Improvements
Organization and Finance
Results:
-Flood Control
-Erosion Control
-WQ Enhancement
9
Level of Service Options Encompass the
Full Range of the Public Expectations
Table 3.
Level of Service Options for Ann Arbor Stormwater Management Program
Enforcement, Public
Engagement, &
Operations and
FInance
Maintenance
Level of Service
System Planning
Capital
Improvements
A
Comprehensive
Planning
Total Renewal
(20-year CIP)
Fully Preventive
/ 100% Routine
Proactive
B
Priority Planning
Partial Renewal
(50-year CIP)
Inspectionbased
Inspection-based
C
Reactionary
Planning
Current CIP
(100-year CIP)
D
No Planning
Emergency
Repairs (No CIP)
TFG
Only complaint- Only complaint-based
based response
response
Less than full
response
Less than full
response
10
Level of Service Options Encompass the
Full Range of the Public Expectations
Table 3.
Level of Service Options for Ann Arbor Stormwater Management Program
Enforcement, Public
Engagement, &
Operations and
FInance
Maintenance
Level of Service
System Planning
Capital
Improvements
A
Comprehensive
Planning
Total Renewal
(20-year CIP)
Fully Preventive
/ 100% Routine
Proactive
B
Priority Planning
Partial Renewal
(50-year CIP)
Inspectionbased
Inspection-based
C
Reactionary
Planning
Current CIP
(100-year CIP)
D
No Planning
Emergency
Repairs (No CIP)
TFG
Only complaint- Only complaint-based
based response
response
Less than full
response
Less than full
response
11
Estimated Allocation of Revenue
under LOS Options
Estimated Allocation of Revenue under LOS Options
$20.0
$18.0
Cost of Service ($M)
$16.0
$14.0
Capital Improvements
$12.0
System Planning
Organization & Finance
$10.0
Operation & Maintenance
Regulation
$8.0
Public Education
$6.0
Administration
$4.0
$2.0
$0.0
Existing LOS
TFG
LOS C
LOS B
LOS A
12
Level of Service Options Encompass the
Full Range of the Public Expectations
Table 3.
Level of Service Options for Ann Arbor Stormwater Management Program
Enforcement, Public
Engagement, &
Operations and
FInance
Maintenance
Level of Service
System Planning
Capital
Improvements
A
Comprehensive
Planning
Total Renewal
(20-year CIP)
Fully Preventive
/ 100% Routine
Proactive
B
Priority Planning
Partial Renewal
(50-year CIP)
Inspectionbased
Inspection-based
C
Reactionary
Planning
Current CIP
(100-year CIP)
D
No Planning
Emergency
Repairs (No CIP)
TFG
Only complaint- Only complaint-based
based response
response
Less than full
response
Less than full
response
13
Rate Study Fundamentals
Revenue Requirement Projections
Cost of Service Analysis
From Whom Should the Money be Collected?
Design of Recommended Rates
TFG
How Much Money is Needed?
How Should Stormwater Services be Priced?
14
Illustration of Functional Cost Allocation
Runoff Area
TFG
Customer
Specific
Public Ed
Billing
Regulation
CIP -- New
Service
2005/06
Costs: $206,000
$218,000
Administration
Operation & Maint.
System Planning
CIP – System Renewal
$3,304,000
16
Rate Model Options
TFG
Non-SF Residential Properties
All Properties
Level-of-Service / Geography
Base
Runoff Coefficient / Intensity of
Development Factor
Tiered Flat Fee
Flat Fee
All properties
All SF residential properties
Accuracy
Impervious Area Measurements
Level of Effort
17
The City’s current rate model is proportionate
to the runoff generated by each property.
Existing Rate Model
TFG
Non-SF Residential Properties
All Properties
Level-of-Service / Geography
Base
Runoff Coefficient / Intensity of
Development Factor
Tiered Flat Fee
Flat Fee
All properties
All SF residential properties
Accuracy
Impervious Area Measurements
Level of Effort
18
Impervious area used as the basis for an
equitable rate model and cash flow analysis.
Proposed Rate Model
TFG
Non-SF Residential Properties
All Properties
Level-of-Service / Geography
Base
Runoff Coefficient / Intensity of
Development Factor
Tiered Flat Fee
Flat Fee
All properties
All SF residential properties
Accuracy
Impervious Area Measurements
Level of Effort
19
Automated Impervious Area Using
Remote Sensing Classification
TFG
Use new 6-inch resolution
orthoimagery to yield 2-foot resolution
imperviousness map grid
All pavement and other travel ways
All buildings, including decks and
roof overhangs
Use Ann Arbor GIS data as
classification benchmark
Data Quality Assurance
Manual digitization
Field verification
Iterative geo-statistical analysis
20
Commercial and Multi-Family: PropertySpecific Impervious Area Measurement
Paved
Area
TFG
Building
Area
Runoff contribution is
typically larger than single /
double family residential
Fees per parcel are
generally larger
Inaccuracies are amplified
Relatively few parcels
require detailed validation
21
Statistical Evaluation of Residential
Properties Defines Categories
Single- and Two-Family Impervious Area Distribution
1000
900
800
2,187 sq. ft
Count of Parcels
700
600
4,161 sq. ft
500
Tier
Number of
Parcels
Average
Impervious
Area
Upper
400
0.21 acres
Large
2,843
0.12 acres
Average
13,781
0.07 acres
Small
3,243
0.04 acres
400
300
200
100
7,020 sq. ft
Sma ll
T ie r
Ave ra ge T ie r
La rge
T ie r
U ppe r T ie r
TFG
1,
00
0
1,
50
0
2,
00
0
2,
50
0
3,
00
0
3,
50
0
4,
00
0
4,
50
0
5,
00
0
5,
50
0
6,
00
0
6,
50
0
7,
00
0
7,
50
0
8,
00
0
8,
50
0
9,
00
0
9,
50
0
10
,0
00
50
0
0
Impervious Area (sq ft)
22
Online impervious area lookup
TFG
23
TFG
24
Updating Impervious Area Imagery
Present goal is to update every two to three
years
New construction during interim:
Residential: Classify as Tier 2
Commercial: Required to provide impervious
area during planning process
Share costs with other City units
Share costs with U of M
TFG
25
Ann Arbor’s Proposed Rate Model with
Existing Revenue Requirements
Proposed “Revenue-Neutral” Fees:
Rates for ALL Residential and Non-Residential Properties
– $5.92 / quarter / customer
– $251.44 / quarter / impervious acre
Cost recovery proportionate to runoff volume
Four residential tiers increase equity and distribution
Credit system recognizes stormwater management
Allows customers to control use of stormwater service
Automates impervious area updates
Disadvantages:
TFG
Non-stormwater: $0.27 / quarter / 1000 gal.
Reductions for on-time payment
Credits recognize on-site stormwater management
Advantages:
PLUS
More complex than existing system
Additional costs for future updates
26
Comparison of Rate Increases to
Reach LOS B
Comparison of Rate Increases to Reach LOS B
$800
$600
$500
$400
$300
Current Fiscal Year
Fee per Impervious Acre per Quarter
$700
LOS B
$200
$100
$2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Fiscal Year Ending
TFG
Continue Historic 11% Rate Increase to LOS B
Achieve LOS B by 2017
Maintain LOS B @ 4% for Interest and Inflation
Achieve LOS B by 2012
Achieve LOS B Immediately
27
Proposed Quarterly Credits for Single
and Two-Family Residential Properties
Quarterly Fee
in 2008
Fee for Residential - Avg. Impervious
28.46
Proposed Maximum Credits
o Rain Barrels (1 to 5)
$1.79
o Rain Garden
$2.80
o RiverSafe Home
$1.24
o Chapter 63 Detention Basin
$7.16
Fee With Maximum Credit
10 % Deduction for On-Time Payment
Minimum Charge
TFG
Maximum Percent Reduction
$15.47
$1.55
$13.92
51%
28
Proposed Quarterly Credits for Average
Commercial and non-Single and 2-Family
Residential Properties
Fee per Impervious
Acre in 2008
Impervious Area – Average Property
Quarterly Fee
0.75 acre
$239.11
Proposed Maximum Credits
o Community Partners for Clean Streams
$1.09
o Chapter 63 Detention Basin
$68.68
o Water Quality BMP
$14.21
Quarterly Fee With Maximum Credit
10 % Deduction for On-Time Payment
Minimum Charge
Maximum Percent Reduction
TFG
$155.13
$15.51
$139.62
42%
29
Right-of-Way Credit Provisions
TFG
Credits for Public Rights of Way
Streets generate stormwater
Streets receive stormwater services
Streets perform conveyance, storage, WQ, and
education functions for the stormwater system
Stormwater utility liable for cost of easements in
streets.
Credits available exceed stormwater costs for
Streets
30
Adjustment Provisions Recognize
Customer Actions
Adjustments:
Impervious area interpretations
Non-contributing areas
– Direct discharge to Huron River
– Discharges directly outside City limits
Retention of all stormwater
– About twice 100-year event volume plus freeboard
TFG
31
Implementation Plan For Stormwater
Rates
Stormwater Citizen Advisory Task Force
On-line access to parcel-specific
imperviousness
Internet-based credit applications
Media Communications (press, TV, radio, web)
Outreach through RiverSafe Home program,
presentations
WaterMatters and WasteWatcher articles
TFG
32
TFG
33
Rate Design Requirements for
Stormwater Service Fees
Are regulatory activities the primary purpose of
the funds (protect public health, safety, welfare,
meet regulatory obligations)?
TFG
All envisioned services are regulatory
Are the services provided proportional to the fees
charged?
Address through cost allocation
Address through rate structure options
Can customers control their use of the system
and fees charged?
Link to runoff generation
Address through credit and adjustment provisions
34
Questions and Answers
TFG
35