Transcript Document
NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Assessing Technology tradeoffs for 65nm logic circuits D Pramanik, M Cote, K Beaudette Numerical Technologies Inc Valery Axelrad Sequoia Design Systems INTRODUCTION At the 65nm node interaction between process and design can lead to manufacturability crisis Methodology for assessing tradeoffs between device, circuit and process limits Use simulation tools to investigate different scenarios for optimum tradeoffs Electrical and Physical simulations NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPIE 2003 2/27/03 Technology variants Every Technology node has variants to address different market segment needs Transistors with different parameters are offered based on application needs Device specifications should drive manufacturability requirements that impact overall costs One size does not fit all !! NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPIE 2003 2/27/03 High Volume Market segments Low Power (Cellphones/PDA) Low operating voltage(<1V) Low operating frequency (<200MHz) High density Low active and standby current Low cost High Performance (PC/Server/Graphics ) Nominal operating voltage High operating frequency (>2GHz) High density NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPIE 2003 2/27/03 Technology Elements Row Cell Block Chip NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. MOSFET SPIE 2003 2/27/03 Design flow Architectural Design Design rules Device Models Device Simulation OPC Phase Shifting Functional specs Silicon Simulation RTL design SubW Libs. Silicon Silicon Verification Verification Synthesis Floorplanning Place and route LVS, DRC, Extract OPC Phase Shifting Silicon Verification NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Final Analysis & Verification SPIE 2003 2/27/03 Key formulas Device Ion = vsatW Cox(Vdd - Vdsat) Vdsat when L Ioff = 10 -6exp(-Vth/S) where S= 80mV/decade Circuit Delay time = ClVdd/Ion; Cl - avg load capacitance Dynamic power = nCl Vdd2f Vdd - Supply Voltage n - avg number of switching events L - Gate length W - Gate width Lithography Cox- Gate capacitance Min Pitch = k1l/NA Vth - Threshold voltage 2 DOF = k2l/NA Ion - Fully on current Ioff - Off state current NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPIE 2003 2/27/03 Device simulation Electrical Parameters L Gate Spacer xj tox Source Drain Vdd - Supply Voltage L - Gate length W - Gate width tox- Oxide thickness xj – Junction depth Ion - Fully on current Ioff - Off state current Transistor cross-section NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPIE 2003 2/27/03 Device currents vs L Type High Performance Low Power Vdd (V) L Ion Ioff (nm) (ma/mm) (A/mm) 0.9 20 - Short 30 0.91 37E-9 34 0.74 3E-9 40 0.6 3E-10 25 - Short 60 0.42 6E-11 65 0.385 3E-11 70 0.354 2E-11 0.9 NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPIE 2003 2/27/03 Device Characteristics 1.E-04 1.E-05 Ion vs Ioff characteristics for device technology Ioff(A/um) 1.E-06 1.E-07 1.E-08 1.E-09 Lo Pwr 1.E-10 Hi Perf 1.E-11 Gate oxide Lo Pwr - 16A Hi Perf - 13A 1.E-12 0 200 400 600 Ion(ma/um) 800 1000 1.E-04 Hi Perf 1.E-05 1.E-06 Ioff (A/ m m) Off state leakage vs Gate length for both device technologies Lo Pwr 1.E-07 1.E-08 1.E-09 1.E-10 1.E-11 1.E-12 0 NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 L ((mm) 0.1 0.12 0.14 SPIE 2003 2/27/03 Electrical criteria 65nm Active Aerial Image contours overlaid on drawn features showing CD variation along length of gate. CD at listed sites shown in table. Avg CD (excluding 4) = 61nm # CD (nm) 1 2 3 65 60 54 4 5 6 7 8 33 70 55 61 62 Use OPC to bring avg CD back to 65nm NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPIE 2003 2/27/03 Cell generation Technology file -process design rules and recommended rules Define architecture (cell height, power rails etc) Input circuit netlist Cell placed, routed and compacted View completed cell and if necessary modify, layout and re-compact NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPIE 2003 2/27/03 Same function ;Different Drive And 2X0 NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. And 2X4 SPIE 2003 2/27/03 Cell placement & Circuit Timing tg ti A B Timing delay between A and B is the sum of delays through individual cells(tg) and across interconnects (ti) NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPIE 2003 2/27/03 Lithography choices with 193nm Layout Att PSM NA 0.85 OAI Strong Phase shift Best contrast and DOF with Strong Phase shift NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPIE 2003 2/27/03 FullPhase layer generation Original Active and Poly layers Phase shift layers NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Trim layer SPIE 2003 2/27/03 Aerial Image using 193nm NA = 0.75; sigma=0.4; dose = 1X NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. NA = 0.75; sigma=0.4; dose = 3X SPIE 2003 2/27/03 Manufacturability analysis Analysis of simulated images show following areas of improvement Process Improved Depth of Focus (DOF) by changing poly pitch from 160nm to 180nm Better CD control - less OPC Electrical Poly contact pads shrink substantially leading to high contact resistance. Poly-contact overlap improved by going to larger contacts and larger poly extensions NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPIE 2003 2/27/03 Impact of Design rules Poly pitch – 160nm Contacts – 80nm Contact extension – 35nm Poly pitch – 180nm Contacts – 90nm Contact extension – 45nm NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPIE 2003 2/27/03 Simulation of new cells Defocus 0nm Cell with larger poly pitch and larger contact pads Defocus 100nm NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPIE 2003 2/27/03 Summary Simulation of device characteristics allow the circuit impact of lithography variations to be assessed Strong Alt PSM needed for printing poly features using 193nm Automated layout tools allow tradeoff between layout design rules , circuit density and manufacturability NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPIE 2003 2/27/03