Transcript Slide 1
Towards a New Social Contract Environment and Conservation Association Gala Dinner 27 March 2009 Dr. Anthony Turton Director: TouchStone Resources (Pty) Ltd [email protected] www.anthonyturton.com Images © National Geographic © AR Turton, 2009 Layout of Presentation • Does SA need to grow its economy? • What are the current natural resource constraints? • Our management problem is ... • Towards a New Social Contract ... • Conclusion Does SA need to grow the economy? • Yes..... • The hope of a generation of disenfranchised citizens culminated in the promise of democracy. • That promise has largely failed.... • Revolution of rising expectations. • If the demands of society exceed the capacity of the state to deliver, then anger is possible. What are the current natural resource constraints? • • • • Energy ... Water ... Our energy constraint is defined by water. The sulphur cycle is of particular importance – but is not debated / studied. • In a future scenario where we burn more coal, but possibly with less precipitation, what will happen to rainfall? • Acidification is our energy limitation ... SA’s Water Situation SA has a water constrained economy D. R. C. (1,534) The significance is that SA has generally lost its dilution capacity ANGOLA (1,050) NAMIBIA (254) N 500 km © P.J. Ashton TANZANIA (937) ZAMBIA (1,011) BOTSWANA (400) With linkages to energy, food security and human health Source: Peter Ashton In 2004 we had allocated 98% of the national water resource at a high assurance of supply SOUTH AFRICA (497) MOZAMBIQUE (969) MALAWI (1,014) Mean Annual Rainfall (mm) Propelling water quality management to a national strategic priority ZIMBABWE (652) SWAZILAND (788) LESOTHO (760) 2500 2000 1500 1250 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 Water Demand (109m3yr1)(billion m³/yr¹) QxF=Y 80 Q = volume of water available at national level at a high assurance of supply Y = volume of water needed at national level at a high assurance of supply to sustain the economy F = Flux value of water If Flux value of water = 1.7 38 x 1.7 = 64.6 Highest water use estimate Lowest water use estimate Total surface + groundwater resources (accessible with new technology) 60 Total surface resources (existing technology) 40 20 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 2035 Source: Pete Ashton, CSIR Science Scope (3)1 (200:19) Years Our Management Problem is... • Water is a flux, but we manage it as if it were a stock. • If we can recycle our national resource once, then we double the national stock. • The management objective should be to get the F value > 1 and ideally = 2. • Return flow management is so bad that the Flux value is currently about .8 • 38 x .8 = 30.4 (This is our problem). However ... • • • • • Beware of unintended consequences ... EDC’s Partially metabolized medication Microcystin We can never forget about our historic legacy ... • The Externalization of Costs as a legacy issue Microcystin Contamination Death caused by Cyanobacteria bloom partially The biochemistry of Microcystin was arising as a result of attempts acidic described in 1985 – it to isneutralize chemically water (AMD) from the coal mining industry. similar to Rinkhals venom – but no This means that environmental foris significant public domainremediation research AMD is not as simple as we thought it would be. being done on the linkage between chronic exposure and human health Microcystin Benchmark Finland’s worst case is +- 10 ug/l USA’s worst case is +- 60 ug/l RSA is currently at 10,000 ug/l This is a looming national crisis of note! Externalization of Costs Model Off-Balance Sheet Items Value Mine Closure Remediation Cost Externalized Costs Revenue V2 Dev Cost Profit V1 Balance Sheet Items Magnitude at Closure T1 © Adler et al., 2007 T2 Time Our National Dilemma is ... • We either increase the value of Q ... • Or we lower our economic growth aspirations ... (decrease the value of Y) • Or we increase the value of F ... • This is technology and capital intensive, so we need to reinvent relationships between public and private sectors & environment • In short we need a new social contract between water, energy and people. A New Social Contract? • Management of return flow is now VITAL • Increase the F value to the target of 1.7 by 2035 if we accept a low growth scenario. • Vigorous public debate about the Energy – Water – Food Security – Climate Change – Human Health nexus.... • Historic legacy issues HAVE to be dealt with ... • Corporations as Social Entrepreneurs Clearly what we did in the past to Damsour and manage water scarcity constraints to development hydrauliccannot be extrapolated into the future – we can no longer use inf’structure today’s science based on yesterday’s in experiences Southern to solve tomorrow’s Africa problems. Lake Chad Nile Congo (DRC) Congo Tanzania Angola Rovuma Mozambique Zambia Kunene Zambezi Zimbabwe Cuvelai Malawi Pungué Buzi Save-Runde Okavango/ Makgadikgadi South Africa and Zimbabwe are listed amongst the top twenty countries in the world in terms of the numbers of dams built (WCD 2000) Namibi a Botswana Limpopo Incomati Umbeluzi Maputo Orange Swaziland South Africa © P Ashton N Lesotho 0 25 0 Kilometres 50 0 A Key Element of the New Social Contract ... • Acid mine drainage ... • Estimated decant from Wits goldfields is in order of 345 Mpd (exact value unknown) • Current decant from Harmony = ±35 Mpd • Rest will happen in the next decade • It is radioactive, toxic and highly acidic • It is an emotive issue ... • When we solve AMD we can use mine voids for strategic storage ... So it is vital Conclusion • Water quality management will need a new strategic paradigm if we are to grow our economy. • National Water Quality Science, Technology and Policy Support Program – National Council of Provinces has already accepted this • Q x F = Y (38 x 2 = 76) • Clever companies will re-invent themselves and base their future viability on a New Social Contract Thank You QxF=Y F = 1.7 by 2035