ACES Thermoacoustic Presentation

Download Report

Transcript ACES Thermoacoustic Presentation

ThermoAcoustic Refrigeration
Dalhousie University
Mechanical Engineering
Team Members




Trevor Bourgeois
Mike Horne
Peter Smith
Erin MacNeil
Design Description





Thermoacoustic Refrigerator
Creates Cooling Using Speaker
No Environmentally-Harmful Refrigerants
Mechanically Simple
Relatively Compact and Lightweight
Conventional Refrigeration




Transfer of Heat from Low Temperature to High
Temperature Area
Common Method is the Vapor-Compression
Cycle
Refrigerant Continuously Compressed and
Expanded
Compressor Provides Work to Move Heat
“Unnaturally”
Conventional Refrigeration
Acoustic Waves



Transverse Pressure Waves
Moving areas of High and Low Pressure
Ideal Gas Law tells us:
–
Adiabatic Compression at constant volume causes
an increase in the temperature of an ideal gas.
PV
T 
mR
Standing Acoustic Waves



Maximum Pressure at Ends
Maximum Velocity in the Center
Balance between Velocity and Pressure
Pressure
Velocity
Pressure
Thermoacoustic Theory

Pressure acts as the carrying mechanism
–

Higher pressure = larger buckets
Velocity controls the speed
–
Higher velocity = quicker transfer
Pressure
Velocity
Pressure
Thermoacoustic Theory
Thermoacoustic Theory


Gas is adiabatically compressed and translated
Gas heats up to a temperature greater than the
local temperature of the stack.
STACK
GAS
PARCEL
Thermoacoustic Theory


Gas transfers heat to the stack
Gas cools down and its volume slightly
decreases
STACK
GAS
PARCEL
Thermoacoustic Theory


Gas moves back to original location returning
energy.
Gas undergoes adiabatic expansion cooling
down below local stack temp.
STACK
GAS
PARCEL
Thermoacoustic Theory


Heat is transferred from the stack to the gas.
Gas heats up and its volume increases
STACK
GAS
PARCEL
Thermoacoustic Theory
Components





Speaker
Gas
Tube
Stack
Heat Exchangers
Speaker

Considerations
–
–
–

Power Capacity
Frequency Response
Operate At One
Frequency
Choice
–
–
–
10 inch
Operates At Low
Frequencies
400 W Maximum Power
Gas

Considerations
–
–
–

Physical Properties
Sealing
Cost
Choice
–
–
Air
Atmospheric Pressure
Tube

Considerations
–
–
–
–

Length
Reflect Sound Well
Low Acoustic Losses
Does Not Transmit Sound
Choice
–
–
1.5” PVC Tube
Flat End
Stack

Considerations
–
–
–
–
–
–
Gap Size
Solid Thickness
Position
Length
Ability Of Sound To Pass Through
Physical Properties
Stack Designs
Heat Exchangers

Considerations
–
–
–
Rate Of Heat Transfer
Temperatures
Low Acoustic Impedances
Thermoacoustic Efficiency

Due to technical immaturity
–

Vapor
EFFICIENCY
–
Heat exchangers
Sub-systems
Thermoacoustic
Currently refrigerators
are well suited to proportional
20-30%
control
Less
Manufacturing



Simpler Than Current Model
All Parts Are Easily Obtainable
Sound Insulation
Is There a Need for our Product?

Stringent Environmental Regulations

Ozone-depleting Substances Regulations, 1998 were
made under CEPA in Dec. 1998

International action termed Montreal Protocol

Support of 165 Countries

Controls production and exchange of ozone depleting
substances
Effects of the Montreal Protocol

Increased price of refrigerants, and
refrigeration/cooling units

New cooling methods will be needed

Present steps taken by industry will not solve the
problems of the industry (band aid effect)

Thermoacoustic designs are not affected by these laws
Application of Thermoacoustics

Design be modified to suit many different cooling
situations
–
Refrigerators
–
Air Conditioning
–
Computer systems cooling
–
M.E.M.S cooling
–
Transport refrigeration and cold storage warehousing
Market Size

In America
–
–
–
1.6 Million Retail Food Refrigerators
540 000 Transport Refrigerators
537 Million ft3 of cold storage

830 000 refrigerators sold annually in Canada

70% of purchases are replacement
Primary Market:Home Refrigerators

Consumer Target Market
–
–
–
–
–

25-44 Years of age
married
home owners
high income
environmentally conscious
This group generally spend more on home
appliances
Customer Needs Evaluation








Efficiency
Life-span
Capacity (yes/no criterion)
Design and color
Quietness
Brand
Safety
Environmentally Friendly
Other Considerations

Low maintenance costs

Freezer size

Adjustable shelves

Icemaker

Ice water dispenser

Humidity control

Adjustable thermostat
Best of Class


Customer Needs Evaluation
–
Life Span
–
Safety
–
Environmentally Friendly
Other Considerations
–
Low Maintenance Costs
–
Adjustable Thermostat
Barriers to Thermoacoustic
Refrigeration




Lack of experts in the area
Lack of theoretical and background resources
Resistance from the industry itself
Major Players
–
–
–
–
–
Frigidaire
General Electric
Kenmore/Sears
Maytag
Whirlpool
Plan of Attack/Entering the Market



Direct attack will fail
Collaboration with brand names and
manufacturers
Financial backing for R&D is directly solved
Project Feasibility







Mechanical Simplicity (maintenance and operation)
Efficiency
Manufacturing
Diverse Applications
Proportional Control
Fulfills Identified Customer Needs
Overall cost will be more than competitive
Thank You

Questions??