Transcript Annual Effects Committee Report

DEPS Effects
Committee
DEPS Effects Committee
Dave Hidinger
Committee Chairman
28 Mar 2011
Overview
• Key Activities
• Committee Goals & Structure
• Future Plans
Meeting Schedule
• Committee Meetings:
– 12 Apr 2010 (Systems Symposium)
– 3 Aug 2010 (DE T&E Conference)
– 15 Nov 2010 (Annual Symposium)
• Programs & Capabilities Conference 5-6 May 2010
• Legal and Policy Panel
– Organized by the Bio Effects S-C
– Held during DEPS Annual Symposium
2010 Key Activities
• Initial Goal Setting by Sub Committees
• DE Effects Survey
– Survey of DEPS members on several Effects-related topics
– Survey consolidated and managed by Interoperability S-C
– Results shared across S-Cs and presented at XXXX
• Programs and Capabilities Conference, 5-6 May 2010
• Panel Discussion at DEPS Annual Symposium
– “DE POLICY AND TRANSITION”
– Organized by Bio Effects S-C
Committee Structure
• HPM Effects
– Dave Shafer (AFRL)
– Steve Calico (LM)
• HPM M&S
– Tim Clarke (AFRL)
– J.Mark DelGrande (Tech Flow
Scientific)
• Laser Effects
– Nick Morley (AFRL)
– Javon Evanoff (Ball Aerospace)
• Laser M&S
– Linda Lamberson (AFRL)
– John Nugent (N-G)
• Bio Effects
− Roxanne Constable (AFMC)
− Rich Guthrie (LM)
• VV&A
− Gregory Brackett (AFRL)
− Maqsood Mohammed (AAC)
• Data Dissemination
− Richee Dameron (AFRL)
− Jim Rothenflue (LM)
• Interoperability
− Linda Lamberson (AFRL)
− Dave Hidinger (LM)
DEPS Effects
Committee
HPM Effects Subcommittee
Steve Calico
HPM Effects
Pre-Database Methodology
Purpose: Provide quality comprehensive effects
data for dissemination amongst the DoD and it’s
contractors
HPM Effects
System / Device Test Methodology
DEPS Effects
Committee
• Prior to populating a data base we must, of necessity, define our best
practices for data collection and logging. Then we can archive data for use
by the community at large
• Best practices must include:
• A definition of the test objective
• Target geometries and environment
• Sensor locations
• Instrumentation
• Wavelength
• Bandwidth
• Record type
• Waveform Description
• PE Independent Variable
• Effects quantifications
• JMEM definitions
• System effect
• Functional effect
• Time out of action
• Prediction-RFPROTEC?
• DOE (design of experiments) matrix
• ANODE ?
• Data processing and archiving
HPM Effects
Component/Element Methodology
Similarly when we evaluate components or elements we must
ensure proper methodology and techniques:
•A definition of the test objective
•Component geometries
• Environment Direct drive
and Free field
• Instrumentation
•Sensors/probes
•Wavelength
•Bandwidth
•Record type
•Semiconductor material (pin
parameters)
Operational parameters
Parasitic parameters (out of
band)
Rectification efficiency
DOE (design of experiments)
matrix
•ANODE
•Data processing and archiving
DEPS Effects
Committee
HPM Effects
Summary
Prior to defining the data base we must reach a consensus on the
instrumentation and data quality. At component level efforts measurement
precision is even more critical
A standard practices for test and measurement of HPM, HPRF, and WB
environments must be provided to ensure data quality and credibility
The field parameters for a data base will be developed based on the
standard practices, as well as requirements of analysis programs developed
specifically for these applications
The data base must be accessible
We have offered to incorporate both ANODE and RFPROTEC or potential the
JMEM version as the standards for analysis and prediction
HPM M&S
• We view our scope as effects-related M&S, specifically for counterelectronics applications, and not including ADS (human effects)
• We identified several near term and far term issues:
• Near term
• Time Out of Action: need to formalize the kinds of models and data
that are needed to predict TOA for various target sets
• Define requirements for wideband and low-frequency propagation,
environmental interaction and target interaction models for
engagement M&S
• Develop methodology for V&V of effects models that leads to
standard for effects tests and comparison of data with models
• Far term
• M&S support for BDA
• Predictive effects modeling
HEL Effects
• Develop, distribute, and assess results of a formalized survey to Industry
and Government
– Identify specific needs and expectations for effects data
– Define need for subcommittee and develop charter as necessary
– To be completed by 15 Feb10
• Recommend to Effects Committee improvements for inclusion in
collection standards, lethality conference, and data exchange and
publication policies
– Recommendation to be made at quarterly Effects Committee meetings
– Re-evaluate Collection Standards on a yearly basis
– Implement improvements as identified and necessary in Lethality Conference
• Promote DEPS Journal Submissions on laser effects research
– Recommend (as a minimum) at least one relevant laser effects submission to
the DEPS Journal per quarter
HEL M&S
1.
Survey DE community use of existing models to address the full kill chain
related to HEL weapons
–
–
2.
Look for opportunities to share lessons learned and learn from RF/HPM
modeling. Work closely with RF M&S Subcommittee.
–
3.
Initial e-mail survey to identify primary use of JTO models and determine
interest in online users forum
Survey to be completed before DEPS System Symposium
Initiate joint meeting/telcon to discuss lessons learned
Advocate for the establishment of a user group and technical forum/help
desk for models (initially focusing on JTO models).
–
–
–
Look into no-low cost options for online forum that is available to
government and industry users
Establish benchmark reference case(s) to help users learn models
Consider voluntary measures such as newsletter and availability of subject
matter experts as an interim solution to provide information to the DE
community.
Bio Effects Subcommittee
SCOPE
• INTEREST
– Bioeffects data production, including standards
– Database(s) for storage of DE bioeffects data, with particular emphasis
on the DE2IAC and other appropriate bioeffects database(s)
• OPERATIONAL
– Data dissemination through the database(s), meetings, and other
means
– Create opportunities for socialization of DE bioeffects with legal and
policy communities
– Support development of guidelines for validated simulation and
modeling of DE bioeffects
Bio Effects Subcommittee
OBJECTIVES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Determine the need for DE bioeffects data collection and storage
standardization & advocate solutions for these needs
Promote the broad dissemination of DE bioeffects data to appropriate
parties
Determine the current standards for use of DE effects data in modeling
and simulation and advocate standards where none exist
Taking other actions as appropriate to foster the production, storage,
distribution and correct use of trustworthy DE bioeffects information and
understanding
Increase the interaction between the technical/biological communities
and the policy/legal communities
Added in 2011
2010 GOALS (reference)
GOAL
Prepare, administer, tabulate, and assess
results from a poll of DE community
regarding DE Bioeffects data needs
Identify current modeling and simulation
approaches and standards in use by the
community
Sponsor and moderate bioeffects panel
discussion
SPECIFIC
MEASURABLE
RELEVANT
Poll results assessed
A poll to broad
community of users
List of M&S approaches
and/or standards with
preliminary quality
assessment
TIMELY
System Symposium
Supports goal #1
Poll results assessed
Annual Symposium
Launch
Effects Committee meeting
Preliminary list prepared Supports goal #4
System Symposium
Final list prepared
Annual Symposium
Sponsor panel discussion
Discussion occurs
with broad participation
Supports all goals
Hold at Annual Symposium
(particularly #2)
Bio Effects Subcommittee
ACCOMPLISHMENT for 2010
• SPONSORED “DE POLICY AND TRANSITION”
PANEL DISCUSSION at DEPS ANNUAL
SYMPOSIUM
– Covered all aspects of transition, including
bioeffects
– Provided interactive forum for discussing issues
Bio Effects Subcommittee
2011 GOALS
GOAL
SPECIFIC
MEASURABLE
RELEVANT
Develop poll
Prepare, administer, tabulate, and
assess results from a poll of DE
community regarding DE Bioeffects
data needs
Identify current modeling and
simulation approaches and standards
in use by the community
Poll the community of
users at a relevant DEPS
symposium (or more than
one)
List of M&S approaches
and/or standards with
preliminary quality
assessment
Adminster poll to DEPS
membership
Adminster poll to nonDEPS members
At System Symposium 2012
Supports objectives #1 and 4
Promote dissemination of bioeffects
and related (policy, legal, safety)
issues to the broader comunity
By 1QCY12
Poll results assessed
Annual Symposium 2012
Include questions in poll
Draft poll by Annual Symposium 2011
Admininster poll to all
parties
DEPS - System Symposium 2012
* Directly supports objective #4
non-DEPS - 1QCY 12
* Indirectly supports objectives
Preliminary list prepared #2 and #5
3QCY12
Final list prepared
Initiate at least one
session a year at one of
the DEPS primary
symposia (Systems or
Annual) devoted to
bioffects issues (includes
policy and legal)
TIMELY
Start at System Symposium 2011;
Draft complete at Annual Symposium 2011
Get on the schedule for a
2012 symposium
Create initial steering
* Directly supports objectives
committee to develop
#3, #5, and #6
Hold meeting
* Indirectly supports objectives
#1, #2, and #4
Create committee to
continue developing the
session
Annual Symposium
Get on the schedule for a 2012 symposium
Committee plans 2012 meeting
Meeting held
Committee works toward 2013 meeting(s)
VV&A
• Use a common approach where feasible and
diverge where necessary between HPM and HEL
VV&A
• Develop a simple but a robust method for VV&A
– Seek synergistic help from past and present committees
– Concentrate on selective portions of VV&A
– Develop a “standard” test protocol, if feasible
• Identify “turn key” simulation tools for Validation
– Exercise the methodology for the selected tools
– Identify and map validation Parameters
• Disseminate information to DEPS Committee
Data Dissemination
2010 Goals
1.
2.
3.
Build and distribute (as requested) a comprehensive list of all HELJTO material effects data summaries. In addition, the committee will
work towards getting these summaries all in one place so that we
can distribute as needed.
Devise a means of developing a list of all pertinent players who have
access to certain types of data/technical information. If we can build
an effective network of both Gov and Industry organizations along
with a synopsis of the type of data/technical information they either
administer or create, we believe this can be highly beneficial
throughout the community.
Develop a standard operating procedure for both Gov and Industry
members to visit our location so as to gain access to both SIPRnet
and the DE2AC repository. (This one is going to be tough as I have to
figure out how to allow people to use SIPR on a as needed basis.)
Data Dissemination
Five-Minute Overview
 Goals for the New YEAR (We are just getting a late start)
 Have everyone register with DTIC

Simpler than ever if you have a CAC card
 Develop intelink site on SIPRnet



Already created on for a DEPS short course
http://www.intelink.sgov.gov/sites/lwf101
Can be a Wiki, blog, information site, meeting site or
numerous other configurations
Anyone with SIPR will have access
DE2AC IAC
 Go to https://tems-iac.dtic.mil
 Use either CAC or previously created DTIC password
 User will gain access to all 12 DoD sponsored IAC
libraries
 Simple to navigate and there is a ton of information
Interoperability S-C
• Goal #1: Identify issues and problems that are being worked in multiple
Sub-Committees of the DEPS DE Effects Committee. When possible, this
will be proactive – our members will review and consider the issues being
discussed in each sub-committee, and attempt to predict if they are
applicable across multiple groups.
• Goal #2: Review the activities and issues developed in each of the other
sub-committees. Assign an Interoperability S-C member to each of the
other S-Cs, and ensure we are either attending or receiving a substantive
de-brief from each activity (telecon, meeting, etc …).
• Goal #3: Develop and maintain a Lessons Learned archive to allow each SC to access the results from the other S-Cs. This Archive will depend on
input from each S-C. Format and location of the archive is TBD.
Future Plans
• Establish Effects Committee Roster and Mailing
List
• Update and Improve DEPS Web Page
• Review and possibly revise S-C structure
– Too many groups, not enough activity
– Focus required to produce meaningful results
– SC Leadership – time to renew / change?
Future Plans (cont.)
• Identify and Prioritize areas of broad interest and
potential influence
– Not only do “we” care, but can we make a difference?
– Survey – good … Data Access – bad
• Consider additional PCCs … gather and evaluate
community feedback
– DEPS Board is planning 2-year cycle
– Topics and Management – a new subcommittee?
• Install Panel Discussion as an Annual Event
– Identify future topics
– Task to appropriate S-Cs