GNSS Operational Implementation Activities

Download Report

Transcript GNSS Operational Implementation Activities

Federal Aviation
Administration
Newark Project
Overview
January 2009
BACKGROUND
• Continental Airlines Approached FAA in December
2007 to conduct a GBAS demonstration at Newark
• Initial Project Newark Briefing – Jan 2008
– Concept Proposed by Port Authority, Continental, Boeing, FAA,
and Honeywell
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
AOA-1 Briefing - May 2008
AOA-1 Supported Project – Jun 2008
Coordination Meeting NY TRACON – Jul 2008
Monthly Coordination Meetings – Aug to present
Port Authority Board Approved Funding – Dec 2008
Continental Management Approval – Dec 2008
FAA Project Scope Agreement – Dec 2008
Draft MOU Being Developed, Pending Coordination
Federal Aviation
Administration
2
Local Area Augmentation System
(LAAS)
•
•
•
•
•
Precision
Approach For
CAT- I, II, III
Multiple Runway
Coverage At An
Airport
3D RNP
Procedures
(RTA), CDAs
Navigation for
Closely Spaced
Parallels
Super Density
Operations
Federal Aviation
Administration
3
GBAS Pathway Forward
• Cat-I System Design Approval at Memphis – 2009
• Cat-III Prototype Validation by - 2010
• Cat-III System Design Approval by - 2012
Federal Aviation
Administration
4
LAAS/GBAS International Efforts
Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
Agana, Guam
Sydney, Australia
Malaga, Spain
Frankfurt, Germany
Bremen, Germany
Federal Aviation
Administration
5
Newark Project
MISSION
To conduct an operational demonstration
project using the satellite navigation
technology of the Local Area
Augmentation System (LAAS)
– Demonstrate the Operational Capabilities of LAAS in a
Complex Airspace Environment to Achieve Efficiency,
Safety and Capacity Enhancements
– To Support Aircraft/Airspace Separation in a Highly
Congested Area
SCOPE
PARTNERSHIP
A Single LAAS Unit Will Be Installed at
Newark Airport
Establish Agreement
•Port Authority of New York and New
Jersey (PANYNJ)
•Continental Airlines
•FAA
– Will Serve Multiple Runway Ends
– Reduce Ground Delay and Ground Stops
– Respond to Initiatives Recommended by the
PANYNJ Flight Delay Task Force Report
– Flight Test with Continental Airlines B-737’s
– Overlay of Existing ILS Procedures
Federal Aviation
Administration
6
Newark Project Partner Contributions
FAA
•Develop GLS Overlay Procedures
•Provide Data Collection Equipment
•Develop and Coordinate Prototype
Terminal Procedures
•Collect Data and Analyze Performance
•Support GBAS Facility and Service
Approval
Continental
•Equip 15 B-737NG Aircraft with LAAS Avionics
(STC)
•Support FAA Data Collection Activities
•Apply for Special Approval for LAAS Cat I
Operations
•Conduct Flight Test Operations
•Support Procedure Development and
Simulation
PANYNJ
•Procure the Honeywell SLS-4000 LAAS
•Complete Site Preparation
•Install SLS-4000 System
•Provide Maintenance and Support
•Complete Facility and Service Approval for
Cat I Operations
Federal Aviation
Administration
7
KEWR RNAV (RNP) Y RWY 29 (VIA RWY 22L)
GIMEE
2500
GIMEE
GIMEE
3500
PFAF
(FAF)
EWRBB
3000
AYRON OM
1500
GP 2459
EWRBA
GP 2459
EWRBT
GP 2000
ARP
RW29
EWRAA
(FROP)
GP 823
KEWR RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 29 (VIA RWY 4R)
RW29
ARP
EWRAA
(FROP)
GP 823
EWRAT
GP 2000
(FAF)
EWRAC
3000
DOOIN
1700
DOOIN
3000
EWRAB
GP 2328
Animations
Federal Aviation
Administration
10
Federal Aviation
Administration
11
Questions?
Federal Aviation
Administration
12
Newark Team
• New York TRACON and Eastern Service Center ATC,
New York Tower Mgmt
• Newark Airport
• Teterboro User Group/Morristown User Group
• New York Eastern Region Helicopter Council
• Continental Airlines
• New York Port Authority
• Honeywell
• FAA GNSS Operational Implementation Team
• FAA Technical Center
• FAA RNP Office, AVN, AFS
Federal Aviation
Administration
13
Points of Contact
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
PANYNJ Port Authority – Tom Bock
NY TRACON – Tony Russo
NY Tower Management – Leo Prusak
Continental Airlines - Glenn Morse/Ron Renk
Newark Tower – Ed Masterson
AVN Procedures – Pete Gertz
AFS 400 – Katherine Majuskias
RNP Program Office – Nick Tolman
WJHTC – Paula Nourgas
Federal Aviation
Administration
14
Terminal Area Capacity Benefits
• Pre-defined Terminal RNAV/RNP Routes
• Can Develop Tubular Routes With Lateral
and Vertical Performance Requirements
• Enhanced Arrival Spacing and Timing
• Defined Sequencing and Merging Routes By
Type Aircraft With Deceleration Phases
• ILS Critical Area Elimination For Increased
Arrivals and Departures
• Optimum Flexibility For Dynamic Routing
Federal Aviation
Administration
15