Transcript Folie 1

Energy dependence of stopping
and the K/ ratio
(BRAHMS data)
• Stopping
• net proton rapidity spectra
• pbar/p vs s
• Kaon production
• K/ vs pbar/p
• Kaon slopes vs pbar/p
Dieter Roehrich
1
UiB
From SPS to RHIC
• Particle production increases
...
BRAHMS
NA49
AGS
• Projectile fragmentation region and central region
– overlap at SPS
– are well separated at RHIC
• Antiproton/proton ratio at midrapidity resp. netproton rapidity density change drastically with s
2
(Net)-proton rapidity distribution
• AGS energies
– centrality dependence
– energy dependence
B. Back et al., E917 Collaboration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 1970
3
(Net)-proton rapidity distribution
• SPS, 158 GeV/nucl., NA49 - central collisions
4
Rapidity distributions of produced hadrons at SPS
• Rapidity
distributions
of both
produced
hadrons
and
net-protons
peak at
(or near)
midrapidity
5
Net-proton rapidity distribution
dN
dy
• RHIC
• central Au+Au
• Npart=3578
BRAHMS, submitted
to PRL, nucl-ex/0312023
6
Stopping (1)
7
Stopping (2)
Net-baryon after
feed-down & neutron
corrections
Gaussians
in in
pz:pz:
Gaussians
2 2
 (m(Nmsinh(

y
)

p
)
sinh(
y
)

p
z z ) 
N
exp
  
 
exp
 
2 2
22pz pz
 
 

6 order polynomial
Rapidity loss:
(Npart= 357  10)
2
y  y p  y  y p 
N part

yp
0
y 
2.03  0.16
y 
2.00  0.10
y
dN( B  B )
dy
dy
8
Rapidity distributions at RHIC
Rapidity distributions of
• produced hadrons
peak at midrapidity
• net-protons peak at
forward midrapidity
9
SPS vs RHIC
dn/dy
net-protons
RHIC:
forward rapidity
(y4) at 200 GeV
SPS:
midrapidity at
40 AGeV/c
35-40
41
pions
80
100
10
How to compare SPS and RHIC data?
• use the
antiproton/proton ratio:
ratios at midrapidity
(SPS) and at different
rapidities (RHIC)
11
Kaon production
• K/ vs pbar/p
• Kaon slopes vs pbar/p
12
Kaon spectra at RHIC
AuAu 200 GeV
Fit: exponential
 m m
A exp  T

T 

AuAu 63 GeV
Top 5% central collisions
BRAHMS
preliminary
13
Kaon inverse slopes
Top 5% central collisions
14
K-/K+ vs pbar/p
62.4 GeV
15
K/ vs rapidity at 200 GeV
BRAHMS
• Indication of
divergence
at large y
16
K/ vs rapidity at 62.4 GeV
BRAHMS
preliminary
• Clear
splitting of
the ratio for
positive and
negative
particles
17
K/ vs s
• The Horn
18
K-/- vs pbar/p
K-
SPS- NA49
RHIC 62.4 GeV
BRAHMS preliminary
RHIC 200 GeV
BRAHMS
• SPS data
and RHIC
data
agree
at same
pbar/p
ratio
19
K+/+ vs pbar/p
• SPS data
and RHIC
data
agree
at same
pbar/p
ratio
K+
+
SPS- NA49
RHIC 62.4 GeV
BRAHMS preliminary
RHIC 200 GeV
BRAHMS
20
Kaon slopes vs s
• The Step
21
Kaon slopes vs pbar/p
T [MeV]
SPS - NA49
RHIC 62.4 GeV
BRAHMS preliminary
RHIC 200 GeV
BRAHMS
300
200
100
22
Summary
• Projectile fragmentation region and central region
overlap at SPS and are well separated at RHIC
• Antiproton/proton ratio at midrapidity changes
drastically with s
• Antiproton/proton ratio changes with rapidity at
RHIC energies
• Local systems (y1), characterized by the same
pbar/p ratio, show identical K-/K+ and K/ ratios
and kaon inverse slopes
• The right side of the ’horn’ seems to be
reproduced by going to forward rapidities at RHIC
23
24
Identified particle spectra
Top 5% central collisions
Pions: power law

p 
A1  T 
p0 

n
Kaons: exponential
Protons: Gaussian
 m m
A exp  T

T


 pT2 
A exp  
2
2



25