Transcript Decent Living Level SPII Presentation

Towards a Decent Living
Level Seminar
The Parktonian Hotel
Braamfontein, Johannesburg
30 July 2014
Objective of Project
• It is hoped that this work can contribute to
locating the discussion of a decent living level in
people’s lived realities.
• As SPII has indicated in past policy briefs, we
believe that undertaking a national qualitative
and quantitative study and the development of
adequate household budgets or minimum
income standards would dramatically advance
our knowledge in this field.
• We hope that this is something that the National
Planning Commission would lend its support to
Methodology
This piece of work uses a qualitative approach to ascertain
detailed descriptions of:
• people’s perceptions, knowledge, and experiences about
poverty and inequality,
• their aspirations in terms of improving their living
conditions,
• the notion of what people think should constitute a
minimum wage, and
• their opinion on what should constitute a decent living
level, and its cost in South Africa.
Methodology Cont.
• The focus groups explored the following questions:
– Are there people in South Africa that are poor and who
are they? Are there people in South Africa that are rich
and who are they? Why are people poor or rich?
– In South African society when we say a person, family
or household is poor what do you understand this to
mean?
– What are the things that one would require to live a
decent standard of living in South Africa? How much
would they cost?
– In the past 12 months what do you think have been
the major causes of the increasing cost of living in
South Africa?
– What do you think should be a national minimum wage
for South Africa if one was to be introduced in 2014?
Methodology Cont.
• Structured questionnaire provided lists of essentials
ranging from the number of meals per day to household
goods and services to other activities that may depict a
decent living standard.
• To reach a consensus on what essentials were required
to make up a decent living level, focus group participants
were asked to vote on essentials.
• All items attracting support from at least 50% of the
participants were recorded.
• Respondents were asked to add to the list of perceived
essentials provided by the facilitators and to cost value
and thresholds per person per month
Methodology
• Study was never intended to be representative, but
merely indicative if there is general consensus on the
components of a decent standard of life
• A further limitation of the study is that the focus groups
were not considered from random samples, but were
conducted in communities in which SPII and partners had
already worked which advanced access to participants.
Cont.
• The focus groups were undertaken with 83 participants in
the following areas:
• a peri-urban area -Evaton
• informal settlement -Zandspruit
• a formal established black African township – Alexander
• a rural community, Giyani, in Limpopo
• SAWID (South African Women in Dialogue) hosted a
focus group with women in Sandton
• Data collection involved three months of fieldwork
between February and April 2014 using focus group
discussions, which was facilitated with questionnaires
and subsequently transcribed and analysed
Findings - Overall
• Overall impression from study was that poverty experienced as
a dreadful disease in the life of many people. Not having
enough, or not having anything at all, is a regular challenge
inherent in our society today. Poverty is seen as a social
problem that affects every individual in society, but partly due
to the contested nature of poverty ‘belongs’ to a selected few.
• Participants feltthat in South Africa, poor people are
predominantly black and that the majority of rich are white.
• Government employees and business owners categorized
among rich people while poor people are associated as being
low income earners such as artisans, farm workers and
domestic workers.
• The Giyani youth suggested that white people (due to
accumulated resources) have a strong culture of saving,
investing and have fixed assets which exempts them from
absolute poverty compared to the black majority, who usually
borrow due to a lack basic income.
Findings - Causes
• People working in government who indulge in nepotism, bribery and
corruption seen to be much better off - in fact, rich - compared to
everyone else in the community who have to continue to struggle
with poverty and making a better life for themselves.
• Reflections from the group discussions indicate that most people
cannot meet their basic needs and lack basic infrastructures in their
communities.
• For me from what I understand about poverty in South Africa, it’s not
about people not having food to eat or something, rather it’s about
low incomes which a majority of working South Africans get paid and
they contribute towards a situation in which people struggle to meet
their daily needs. For example, cost of public transport is very high
and people have children to support and take to school, but their
salaries/wages are still very low not keeping up with the increasing
cost of living. That’s why a majority of South Africans are unhappy
with the low wages and most people do not even like the kind of jobs
that they find, it’s just about survival that people settle for anything as
long as they can survive. Alex Focus Group
Findings – Rural reflection
• Women in Giyani spoke about the need to change traditional
gender roles.
• People in rural areas believed that poverty was worse than in
urban areas.
• Some women reflected that although there is a need for an
extra income in the household, their husbands wouldn’t allow
them to work. Reasons were given such as ‘other men will see
you’ and that ‘other men might take her’
• There has been an increase in rural to urban migration
because more job opportunities exist in the cities.
• Women also noted that men, especially those who work in the
cities (Johannesburg), tend to have city- based families and
these deplete the money that they are able to send home.
Findings – Minimum Wage
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Revealed a gap between current wages and those that were viewed as
a living wage.
All focus groups held most workers are under- paid, settling for less, just
to make ends meet or as a participant said “working to work”.
Minimum wages in sectoral determination reveals that half of South
African workers earned below R3500 per month in 2012.
Of all the focus groups held, it was found that the older men and women
group proposed a minimum wage level of at least R2, 500 per month,
but preferably R4 000.
On the other hand, no member of the Youth focus group thought that
they should earn anything less than R5 000 per month given the present
cost of living in the country today.
The Youth focus group in Evaton’s raised the social value of specific jobs
in society; Teachers, nurses and social workers were believed to have
an important role to play in the growth and development of the country
and they should earn a salary that affirms this social value.
Also, police officers needed to earn good salaries to avoid being corrupt
because their current salaries are seen to make them vulnerable to
corruption
Findings – Essential Goods for a DLL
• The need for money, food and jobs topped the lists of the
majority of the participants and various other basic needs were
identified. However, the responses were subjective reflecting
the age differences between youth focus group and older men
and older women.
• The study revealed people’s awareness of vulnerability in
difficult situations. The culture of saving is seen as very
important by most participants. Unplanned events such as
funerals, hospitalization and accidents could happen and the
expenses are usually unaffordable. It was suggested that each
household should have savings for emergencies of between
R500-R1000 per month for ‘rainy days’.
• clothing came out as important essential required for decent
living standard. There is a wise saying that you are ‘addressed
as you are dressed’. Most young people preferred to purchase
new clothes and dress elegantly compared to the older focus
groups members..
Findings – Basic Items
• Food: maize meal, red meat, cabbage, spinach, beetroot,
cooking oil, oranges banana, apple and lettuce
• Non-food items: electricity, transport, education, clothing, a
television set, fridge and personal hygiene costs.
• A question is whether these foods items listed are considered
as nutritious. A regular diet should be comprised of 40-50%
carbohydrate (bread, rice), 30-40% protein (diary, meat,
chicken, and fish) and 20% fat.
• Food security was seen as difficult to achieve without a fridge
and a source of electricity for its preservation. About half of the
respondents (50%) strongly agreed that having three meals a
day with fruits and vegetables (costing, ideally, a median of R2
900 per month) is important to have a decent standard of
living, while only about 10% proposed that two meals per day
would provide decent living (at a cost range of between R900R1650 for food and R150-R1500 for fruits and vegetables per
month)
Recommendations for poverty alleviation
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Introduce minimum wage level
Increased social grants to cover needs
Skills acquisition programmes
Job provision/creating employment opportunities
Improved educational system
Access to information - critical
Provision of basic social amenities
Reduction in taxes of the poor
Increased exportation of goods and services (i.e. greater
market access)
Increase recycling of products
Family planning
Spiritual guidance
Increase rural development