Transcript Slide 1

All-Fiber, Phase-Locked
Supercontinuum Source for Frequency
Metrology and Molecular Spectroscopy
Brian R. Washburn
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Optoelectronics Division 815.03
325 Broadway
Boulder, CO 80305
BRW 5/2003
Acknowledgments
S. A. Diddams, N. R. Newbury,
S. L. Gilbert, W. Swann
National Institute of Standards
and Technology
J. W. Nicholson and M. F. Yan
OFS Laboratories, USA
C. G. Jørgensen
OFS Fitel Denmark I/S,
Denmark
BRW 5/2003
Introduction:
Output
of a Mode-Locked
Laser
Output
of a Mode-Locked
Laser
Power
10 ns
Time
Domain
10 fs
time
Frequency
Domain
10 MHz
Power
0.1 THz
Frequency
Small Dt => Broad Spectral Coverage
BRW 5/2003
Microstructure
Fiber
Spectral Intensity (dB)
Ti:sapphire
Laser
0
Supercontinuum
-10
-20
-30
-40
600
800
1000
BRW 5/2003
1200
1400
Wavelength (nm)
Mode-Locked
Lasers
Nonlinear
Optical Fibers
Radio Frequency
Standards
Optical Frequency
Metrology
Molecular
Spectroscopy
BRW 5/2003
Outline
Part One: Mode-locked Fiber Lasers
• Compare/contrast fiber lasers to free-space
•
•
lasers
Fiber Dispersion and Nonlinearities
Mode-locking in fiber lasers
Part Two: Optical Frequency Metrology
• Components of the all-fiber supercontinuum
•
•
source
Phase-locking a fiber laser
System performance
Part Three: Molecular Spectroscopy
BRW 5/2003
Passively Mode-locked Lasers
CW
pu
Ultrashort
mp
Pulsed
Output
Ga
in
CW
pump
Ultrashort
Pulsed
Output
Elements of mode-locked lasers
–
–
–
–
Pump source
Gain element
Saturable absorber for mode-locking
Dispersion compensation for shortest pulses
BRW 5/2003
Fiber Lasers: Advantages and Disadvantages
• Advantages
–
–
–
–
–
Easy to align fiber laser cavity
Less sensitive to misalignment
Passive optical elements are inexpensive
Uses less power than Ti:sapphire laser
More compact
• Disadvantages
– More sensitive to environment (polarization)
– Optical fiber limits total laser power
– All fiber cavity limits ability to easily experiment
with laser design
– Careful dispersion and nonlinearity management is
needed for proper laser design
BRW 5/2003
Gain Medium: Erbium-Doped Fiber (EDF)
EDF Gain Bandwidth
-35
Power (dBm)
-40
-45
-50
-55
-60
-65
1530
1540
1550
1560
1570
Wavelength (nm)
•
•
Use a fiber that is highly doped with Er as the
gain element of the laser
This fiber exhibits normal dispersion : D=-70
ps/nm-km
BRW 5/2003
Power
Power
Power
Saturable Absorber for Mode-Locking
time
•
•
•
time
A saturable allows the laser cavity to “favor” high
peak power, ultrashort pulses
An absorber created by Kerr lensing is typically
used in solid state lasers
Fiber nonlinearities are used in fiber lasers
Need a complete understanding of fiber dispersion
and nonlinearities
BRW 5/2003
BRW 5/2003
Fiber Dispersion and Nonlinearities
Group Velocity Dispersion (GVD)
Normalized Power
1.0
Fiber
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
-400
-200
0
200
Time (fs)
400
Wavelength (nm)
Spectral Intensity
1350
1400
1450
1500
1550
1600 1650 1700
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
Frequency (1/fs)
0.10
0.15
BRW 5/2003
Fiber Dispersion and Nonlinearities
Self Phase Modulation (SPM)
Wavelength (nm)
1450
1500
1550
1600 1650 1700
1.0
Spectral Intensity
1400
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
Fiber
0.2
0.0
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
Frequency (1/fs)
Normalized Power
Spectral Intensity
1350
1350
1650 1700
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.15
0.15
Wavelength
(nm)
1450
1500 1550 1600
1400
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
Frequency (1/fs)
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
-400
-200
0
200
Time (fs)
400
BRW 5/2003
0.15
Characterizing Dispersion and
Nonlinearity in an Optical Fiber
Pi (r, ) = 0   Ej  0   Ej Ek El
(1)
ij
j
Dispersion
(3)
ijkl
jkl
Nonlinearity
• Assume single mode and no
•
•
birefringence
Concerned with phase matched
nonlinearities
Assumptions leads to SPM and
GVD only
BRW 5/2003
Characterizing Dispersion and Nonlinearity
in an Optical Fiber
2
0
T
LD 
2

() = n()
c
LNL
1

P0
n20

2
cr0
•
The dispersion length (LD) is the length of fiber where a
Gaussian pulse to temporally broadens by Sqrt(2)
•
The nonlinear length (LNL) is the length of fiber for which
a pulse gains a phase of 1 radian
BRW 5/2003
The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation
Nonlinearity
Dispersion
Absorption




E ( z, t )

i m1  m 
i  
2
=  E    m
E  i   1 
  E  R(t ') E ( z , t  t ') dt '  
m 
z
2
m ! t 
 0 t   0
 m=2
 
A beautiful equation which accurately describes
a highly nonlinear optical system
An understanding of this equation provides the
ability to design and predict the behavior of
active fiber devices
•
•
•
•
Fiber lasers
Erbium doped fiber amplifiers
Nonlinear loop mirrors/switches
TOADs
BRW 5/2003
Mode-locking in Fiber Lasers
•
Active Mode-locking
– Typically use AOM or Mach Zehnder to
achieve mode locking
• Sigma laser (Duling et al, Opt Lett Vol 21, 21 1996)
– Advantage: Can achieve high repetition rates
(10 GHz)
•
Passive Mode-locking
– Interferometric designs based on gain and
saturable absorber sections
• Figure eight lasers (Sacnac switch)
• Stretched Pulse Lasers
– Advantage: sub-picosecond, high energy
pulses
BRW 5/2003
Figure Eight Laser
Output
isolator
rejection port
PD
PC
PZT
PC
980 nm
pump
Er fiber
BRW 5/2003
Nonlinear Loop Mirror: Linear Operation
A
50/50
B
Gain
Linear Operation:
No phase shift between interferometer arms
BRW 5/2003
Nonlinear Loop Mirror: Nonlinear Operation
A
50/50
B
Gain
Nonlinear Operation:
Phase Difference: D  n2 (G  1) I (t ) L
BRW 5/2003
Figure Eight Laser Performance
3.0
isolator
PC
PZT
PC
Er fiber
correlation signal (a.u.)
rejection port
PD
AMP
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-750
-500
-250
0
250
500
750
980 nm
pump
time (fs)
Temporal FWHM <100 fs
Average Power= 100 mW
Center Wavelength= 1560 nm
BRW 5/2003
Stretched Pulse Laser
E
r
e
b
r fi
Normal Dispersion
Output
980 nm
pump
PZT
Isolator/
polarizer
PC
PC
Anomalous
Dispersion
BRW 5/2003
Nonlinear Polarization Rotation
QWP
Kerr
HWP
Polarizer
intensity
Polarizer
time
Ey
Ex
BRW 5/2003
Nonlinear Polarization Rotation
QWP
Kerr
HWP
Polarizer
intensity
Polarizer
time
Ey
Ex
BRW 5/2003
Nonlinear Polarization Rotation
QWP
HWP
Kerr
Polarizer
intensity
Polarizer
time
Ey
Ex
BRW 5/2003
Nonlinear Polarization Rotation
QWP
Kerr
HWP
Polarizer
intensity
Polarizer
time
Ey
Ex
BRW 5/2003
Nonlinear Polarization Rotation
QWP
Kerr
HWP
Polarizer
intensity
Polarizer
time
Ey
Ex
BRW 5/2003
er
b
i
f
Er
Output
980 nm
pump
PZT
Isolator/
polarizer
PC
intensity
Stretched-Pulse Operation
time
PC
BRW 5/2003
Stretched-Pulse Fiber Laser
WDM
980 nm
Pump
90/10
Splitter
EDF
Isolator
Output
Polarization
Controllers
Polarizer
Polarization
Controllers
BRW 5/2003
Stretched-Pulse Laser Performance
Temporal FWHM <100 fs
Average Power= 100 mW
Center Wavelength= 1560 nm
ber
i
f
r
E
PC
AMP
PZT
Isolator/
polarizer
PC
Normalized
Normalized AC
AC Intensity
Intensity
Output
980 nm
pump
1.0
1.0 AC FWHM 91 fs
Pulse FWHM ~ 60 fs
FWHM 743 fs
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
-1500
-1500
-1000
-1000
-500
-500
0
0
500
500
Delay
Delay(fs)
(fs)
1000
1000
1500
1500
BRW 5/2003
Part Two: Optical Frequency Metrology
Mode-Locked
Lasers
Nonlinear
Optical Fibers
Radio Frequency
Standards
Optical Frequency
Metrology
New way to connect microwave and optical
frequencies
BRW 5/2003
Electric Field from a Mode-locked Laser
Time domain (Pulses in time)
Df
E(t)
2Df
Carrier-envelope phase
slip from pulse to pulse
because group and
phase velocities differ
t
repetition
rate
Frequency domain (Comb of lines)
I(f)
0
fo = fr Df/2
repetition
frequency
fr
fn = nfr + fo
f
Stable frequency comb if
1) Repetition rate (fr)
locked
2) Offset frequency (f0)
(phase slip) locked
BRW 5/2003
Acoustic Frequency Metrology: Guitar Tuning
Known Frequency, fk
Unknown Frequency, fun
Df=0.5 Hz
Df=0.01 Hz
BRW 5/2003
Optical Frequency Metrology
fun
I(f)
fo = fr Df/2
RF Beat
repetition
frequency fr
f
0
fn = nfr + fo
1550 nm
Locking
Electronics
Cesium Time
Hydrogen
Standard
Maser
~9 GHz
10 MHz
193,548,387,096,774.2 Hz
10,000,000.0 Hz
Stability and accuracy
of RF standard passed
to optical frequencies
BRW 5/2003
Stabilize frequency comb by
Self-reference frequency locking
fr
I(f)
fo
f
0
fn = n fr + fo
x2
f2n = 2nfr + fo
fo
To Lock
comb to an
RF oscillator
•
Measure offset frequency fo as
shown and lock to zero
•
Phase-lock fr directly to an rf
synthesizer
BRW 5/2003
Supercontinuum Frequency Comb
0
E0()
F
0
0
0 Hz

Tuning Fork
? Hz
Tuning Fork
? Hz

Extended Ti:sapphire frequency comb
Ti:sapphire
gain bandwidth
upercontinuum
BRW 5/2003
A Fiber Laser-Based Frequency Comb
Translate Ti:Sapphire results to Fiber-based system
•
•
Most existing frequency combs limited to Ti:Sapphire
laser-based systems
No self-referenced frequency combs from a mode-locked
fiber laser in use
– Locking of a fiber laser to other stabilized sources have
been achieved*
– Until recently a full octave from fiber laser not available*
• A fiber-based frequency comb can provide
– Compact, inexpensive design
– Potential for stable “hands-free” operation
– Optical frequency metrology in the IR
* References
F. Tauser et al, Opt. Express 11, 594 (2003)
F.-L. Hong et al, Opt. Lett. 28, 1 (2003)
J. Rauschenberger et al., Opt. Express 10, 1404 (2002)
BRW 5/2003
All-Fiber Supercontinuum Source
Er fiber
980 nm
pump
isolator
Er fiber
Continuum after 20 cm
DF - HNLF
1480 nm HNLF
pump
SMF
pigtail
Supercontinuum Spectrum (dB)
1480 nm
pump
0
Octave of Bandwidth
-5
-10
-15
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400
Wavelength (nm)
BRW 5/2003
Highly Nonlinear Fiber (HNLF)
Index Profile
Dn ~ 0.2-0.3
F2 doped
radius
Dispersion (ps/nm
- km)
index
Ge doped
100
nonlinearity : 8 to 15 1/W-km
Effective Area : 13 mm2
loss : 0.7 to 1 dB/km
dispersion (1550 nm) :
-10 to +10 ps/nm-km
dispersion slope (1550 nm) :
0.024 ps/nm2-km
splice loss (to SMF) :0.18 dB
splice loss (to HNLF) :0.02 dB
Ti:sapphire laser
Er laser
50
0
HNLF dispersion
-50
microstructure fiber dispersion
-100
600
800
1000
1200
1400
wavelength (nm)
1600
1800
BRW 5/2003
f-to-2f Interferometer
1100 nm
/2
1100 nm
PD
SMF
polarizer
1100 nm
bandpass
10
-30
Repetition Rate, fr
0
-40
-10
-20
-50
Fundamental
optical filter
2200 nm
RF Spectral
Power
(dB)
Spectral
Power
(dBm)
SHG (LiIO3)
Optical Intensity (dBm)
f-to-2f interferometer
fr-f0 beat
SHG
-30
-60
fr+f0 beat
-40
-50
-70
-60
25
30
35
1000
40
45
1050
50
55
1100
60
65
1150
Frequency
wavelength(MHz)
(nm)
70
75
1200
An octave of supercontinuum allow the generation of CEO
beat frequencies with a SNR of 30 dB
BRW 5/2003
Phase-locked Frequency Comb
1480 nm
pump
Amplifier
Er fiber
1480 nm
pump
HNLF
SMF
isolator
rejection port
PD
PZT
PC
SHG (LiIO3)
2200 nm
1100 nm
/2
Oscillator
PC
f-to-2f interferometer
980 nm
pump
Er fiber
Locking
Electronics
1100 nm
PD
SMF
polarizer
1100 nm
bandpass
• Oscillator: 20 nm FWHM pulses, 50 MHz rep rate
• Amplifier: 100 mW output, FWHM < 100 fs
• Supercontinuum generation in highly nonlinear fiber (HNLF),
23 cm of length
• f-to-2f Interferometer
BRW 5/2003
Fiber Laser-Based Frequency Comb
f-to-2f interferometer
Supercontinuum Source
(all fiber)
BRW 5/2003
Frequency Stability
49872643.010
fr(Hz)
49872643.005
49872643.000
49872642.995
0.5 mHz standard deviation (Counter limited)
49872642.990
f0 (Hz)
64000000.1
64000000.0
63999999.9
10 mHz standard deviation
0
20
40
60
Time (minutes)
80
- Optical comb phase locked to RF source
- Any optical comb line known absolutely
by fn = nfr + fo
BRW 5/2003
Phase Noise Measurements
CEO Frequency Lock
-6
10
-4
1.6x10
-7
2
Phase Noise (rad /Hz)
-4
1.4x10
-8
10
-4
-9
1.2x10
-10
1.0x10
-11
8.0x10
10
-4
10
-5
10
-12
10
-5
6.0x10
-13
10
-5
4.0x10
-15
2.0x10
10
-5
10
-16
10
2
-14
Integrated Phase Noise (rad )
10
0.0
0
10
1
10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
6
10
Frequency (Hz)
•
•
CEO frequency lock : integrated phase error for 2.07
MHz signal (DC to 25 MHz) was ~10 mrad
Repetition rate lock : integrated phase error (DC to
25 MHz) was <1 mrad
BRW 5/2003
Mode-Locked
Lasers
Nonlinear
Optical Fibers
Radio Frequency
Standards
Optical Frequency
Metrology
Molecular
Spectroscopy
BRW 5/2003
Standard Reference Materials
Standards for
Wavelength
Division
Multiplexing
BRW 5/2003
Spectroscopy of Acetylene
Wavemeter Frequency
Uncertainty: ~1.8 MHz
Typical wavemeters:
~20 MHz
(0.15 pm at 1550 nm)
Reference:
Swann and Gilbert,
JOSA B Vol. 17,7, (2000)
BRW 5/2003
Metrology with Supercontinuum Comb
repetition
RF fBeat
frequency
r
2fr
fr
I(f)
fo = fr Df/2
fun
f
0
fn = nfr + fo
Fiber-based
Frequency Comb
Tunable CW
Laser
ESA
12C H
2 2
Computer
BRW 5/2003
Conclusions
•
Stabilized frequency combs have revolutionized
optical clocks
– Previous systems limited to 400 nm to 1300 nm
•
Fiber laser-based frequency comb demonstrated
– Potentially more robust than Ti:sapphire laser
based frequency comb
– Extend phase-lock frequency combs into the IR
•
Permit unprecedented accuracy in IR frequency
metrology
– Can lock frequency comb to Cesium time
standard or other atomic standard
BRW 5/2003
Thank you for your tim
Brian R. Washburn
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Optoelectronics Division 815.03
[email protected]
BRW 5/2003
EXTRA SLIDES
BRW 5/2003
Four-Wave Mixing and Self-Phase Modulation
Nonlinear effects in fused-silica are due to the (3)
susceptibility
(3)
Pi (r, t ) = 0    ijkl
(t  t1 , t  t2 , t  t3 )Ej Ek El dt1dt2 dt3
jkl
Four-Wave Mixing is the result of the instantaneous
component of (3) (Kerr effect)
• Four Wave Mixing (FWM)
- Specific conditions needed to
assure phase matching
• Self-Phase Modulation (SPM)
- Completely degenerate FWM
- Automatically phase-matched
(3)
Pi () = 0  ijkl
Ej Ek El
jkl
3
2
(3)
PSPM (t ) = 0  xxxx E E
4
Intensity dependent
BRW 5/2003
Transform
Limited
 =1550 nm
Solitons

?
SMF
Soliton Propagation
1.0
0.5
0.6
0.0
0.4
-0.5
Intensity
Phase
0.2
0.0
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
Time (fs)
-1.0
200
300
0.5
0.6
0.0
0.4
-0.5
Intensity
Phase
Chirp -d/dt
0.2
0.0
Temporal Phase
0.8
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
-1.0
200
300
400
Time (fs)
1.0
400
SPM
Only
Intensity
Phase
25
Chirp -d/dt
0.8
20
0.6
15
0.4
10
0.2
5
BRW 5/2003
0.0
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
0
Temporal Phase (radians)
0.8
Temporal Intensity
1.0
Temporal Phase (radians)
Temporal Intensity
Before Fiber
Propagation
Temporal Intensity
1.0
GVD
Only
1.0
After
Stimulated Raman Scattering (SRS)
Raman Gain in Fused-Silica SMF
0.04
2
m/W)
2
2
((t1 +t2 )/(t1 t2 ))exp(-t/t2)sin(t/t1)
-13
hR(t)=
1.0
0.8
Raman Gain gR, (x 10
Raman Response, hR (1/fs)
0.06
Peak at 13.2 THz
0.6
0.02
0.4
0.00
0.2
-0.02
-50
0
50
100
150
Time (fs)
•
•
•
200
250
300
0.0
0
6
12
18
24
30
Frequency Shift D, (THz)
36
SRS is from the non-instantaneous component of the (3)
susceptibility
SRS typically leads to a frequency downshift of the incident
light
The Raman gain curve (gR) characterizes the frequency
downshift (D) acquired by the incident light
BRW 5/2003
42
The NLSE
2
2

(PNL (r, t )  PL (r, t ))

E
(
r
,
t
)
2
 E (r, t )  0m0
= m0
2
t
t 2
Assumptions
1) The nonlinear polarization PNL(r,t) can be treated as a small
perturbation to PL(r,t).
2 The linear response is instantaneous.
3) The optical field maintains its polarization along the fiber
length so a scalar approach is valid
4) E(r,t) is quasi-monochromatic.
5) The slowly varying envelope approximation (SVEA)
6) The mode profile is single mode, specifically LP01
Nonlinearity
Dispersion
Absorption




E ( z, t )

i m1  m 
i  
2
=  E    m
E  i   1 
  E  R(t ') E ( z , t  t ') dt '  
m 
z
2
m ! t 
 0 t   0
 m=2
 
BRW 5/2003
Including SRS
To include the effect of SRS, the (3) susceptibility was
broken into fast (SPM) and slow (SRS) portions
R(t ) = (1  f R )(t )  f R hR (t ),
The measured Raman gain curve (gR) can be implemented
using
0
(3)
g R () =
f R  Im  F hR (t )
cn0
BRW 5/2003
Extended NLSE for Including SRS
Nonlinearity
Dispersion
Absorption




E ( z, t )

i m1  m 
i  
2
=  E    m
E  i   1 
  E  R(t ') E ( z , t  t ') dt '  
m 
z
2
m ! t 
 0 t   0
 m=2
 
R(t ) = (1  f R )(t )  f R hR (t ),
Nonlinearity
SPM
Raman Effect
Self Steepening



2 
i  
2
2
i E E 
E E  i  1 
  E  hR (t ') E ( z , t  t ') dt ' 
0 t
 0 t   0

• Describes spectral features developed over a frequency range
of up to a third of the carrier frequency .
• Uses the experimental nonlinear Raman response of fusedsilica
2
(
)
BRW 5/2003
Soliton Propagation
• Solitons are formed after a balance of GVD
and SPM
LD
N =
 an integer
LNL
2
2 N
2 N
PN =
= 3.11
2
T0
Dt 2
2
2
• Higher order dispersion and nonlinearities
cause soliton breakup
BRW 5/2003
Positive GVD
0
Negative GVD
1/(Dispersion Length), 2/T0
2
Pulse Propagation Regimes
+ GVD
SPM
Selfsteepening
SRS
+ GVD
SPM
Breakdown of
the SVEA
Include FWM
- GVD
SPM
- GVD
SPM
Selfsteepening
SRS
1/(Nonlinear Length), Po
SPM: Self-phase modulation
FWM: Four Wave Mixing
SRS: Stimulated Raman scattering
Analytic Solutions
 : Nonlinear Coefficient
GVD: Group velocity dispersion
BRW 5/2003
How to Choose Fiber Lengths?
• Need enough EDF to provide sufficient gain in
•
the laser cavity
Need enough SMF to provide adequate
nonlinear polarization
• Net cavity dispersion is anomalous:
– Soliton Regime
• Net cavity dispersion is slightly normal
– Stretched-pulse Regime
• Net cavity dispersion is strongly normal
– No mode-locking
BRW 5/2003
Soliton vs. Nonsoliton Regime
•
Sidebands (Kelly
sidebands)
indicative of
soliton
propagation
•
Inhibiting soliton
formation
increases spectral
bandwidth
BRW 5/2003
Femtosecond-Laser-Based Optical Synthesizer
m-wave
reference
Optical Synthesizer
I(f)
optical
reference
m-wave out
fo
fr

optical out
fn = nfr + fo
f
Sounds great, but can you do it?
– Ti:Sapphire femtosecond laser + novel nonlinear fiber (‘00)
D. J. Jones et al. Science 288, 635 (2000)
– Broadband Ti:Sapphire femtosecond laser (‘01/’02)
Morgner et al., PRL, 86, 5462,’01, T. Ramond et al., Opt. Lett
27, 1842
–
Femtosecond Er Fiber laser + novel nonlinear fiber (‘03)
Washburn et al., accepted to Opt. Lett, Oct. ‘03
BRW 5/2003
Details on Locking Electronics
f0 control
to current
source
Locking Electronics
error
Loop out
Phase
Filter
Detector
512
1.064 GHz
Syn. 2.078125 MHz
fr control
to PZT
HV
Source
Loop
Filter
64 MHz
from
f-to-2f
Syn. 1.0 GHz
Syn. ~49.8 MHz
from fr
• CEO Frequency Locking Electronics
• Repetition Rate Locking Electronics
BRW 5/2003
10
-5
Counted f0
Sys. noise floor
avg
Uncertainty
Normalized
(/f(/f) avg)
Frequency Uncertainty
Normalized Frequency
Frequency Stability verses Gate Time
10
10
10
10
10
10
-6
-7
-8
-9
-10
Counted Frep
System noise floor
-11
10
0
10
1
10
2
10
3
10
4
Gate Time (ms)
•
•
Time (ms) rate (F
Uncertainty on locked Gate
repetition
rep) is near the
system floor
Uncertainty on counted CEO beat (f0) is larger due to
linewidth of the beat
BRW 5/2003
Spectrum of Figure-Eight Laser
0.006
Power (mW)
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.000
1540
1560
1580
1600
Wavelength (nm)
BRW 5/2003
Spectrum of Stretched-Pulse Laser
Spectral Intensity
0.004
FWHM 19 nm
0.002
0.000
1500
1520
1540
1560
1580
1600
1620
Wavelength (nm)
BRW 5/2003