Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and

Download Report

Transcript Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and

Comparison between Valve Sparing
Aortic Root Replacement and
Modified Bentall
Allan Stewart, MD., Jonathan A. Yang, MD; Mark J.
Russo, MD/MPH; Alexander Iribarne, MD; Brendan F.
Scully; Rachel Easterwood; Craig R. Smith, MD; Division
of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Columbia University Medical
Center, New York, NY
Aortic Insufficiency & Root Aneurysm
• Different treatment options exist
• Bentall Procedure1
– Several modifications
• Valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR)
– Sir Magdi Yacoub, Tirone David
• We have performed both at our Institution
since 2005
1. Bentall H, De Bono A. A technique for complete replacement of the ascending aorta. Thorax. 23(4):338-9.
Methods
• Retrospective study
• Peri-Operative and short-term data
• VSRR via the re-implantation method
described by David, et al1
• Modified Bentall Procedures – novel
composite biologic graft
1. David TE, Feindel CM. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending
aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992 April; 103(4):617-21.
Valve-Sparing Root Replacement
BioRoot
Edwards Perimount Valve
ATS 3f Valve
BioRoot
Results
Valve-Sparing
BioRoot
Root Replacement
Number of patients
111
175
Mean Age in years (Range)
55
63
Pre-Op AI 2+
75 (67.6%)
145 (82.6%)
Mean Cardiopulmonary
150.845.6
153.755.5
Bypass Time (min)
Mean Aortic Cross-Clamp
112.433.4
108.934.8
Time (min)
Post-Op AI 2+
0%
0%
Need for Re-op for AVR
2 (1.8%)
0 (0%)
30-day Mortality
1 (0.9%)
2 (1.1%)
p
<0.0001
0.0044
0.6
0.4
0.8
Pre-Treatment Decisions
Replace
Repair
“Real-time” Repair Algorithm (AI + Aneurysm)
Reimplantation
Can valve be
Repaired?
Ye
s
Should it be
Repaired?
Ye
s
Repair
Remodeling
N
o
Should it be
Replaced?
N
o
Ignore
Ye
s
BioRoot
Replace
Mechanical
Conduit
When Should We Repair?
• Aortic Leaflet Integrity
– Reliable valve-sparing results with:
• supple leaflets
• normal annular size
• Bicuspid and tri-leaflets have good 10-year data
– High Failure Rates with:
• Severe AI
• Multi-leaflet Prolapse
• Multiple Fenestrations
When Should We Replace?
• Marked leaflet Asymmetry
• Multiple leaflet Fenestrations
• “Broken leaflets”
• Bicuspid Patients
–
–
–
–
Significant Thickening
Prolapse
Calcification
Multiple Fenestrations
• Connective Tissue Patients
– Data is unclear
– Be cautious in repairing
attenuated & severely prolapsed
valves
Conclusions
•
•
•
•
•
Similar operative times
Low rates of post-op AI, repeat AVR and mortality
Similar short-term outcomes
Reproducible and safe
Need to delineate proper guidelines for
indications
• Follow-up needed to assess long-term outcomes