3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I

Download Report

Transcript 3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I

Discrete Structures

Chapter 3: The Logic of Quantified Statements 3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I

… it was not till within the last few years that it has been realized how fundamental any and some are to the very nature of mathematics. – A. N. Whitehead, 1861 – 1947

3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I 1

Definitions

• Predicate – A

predicate

is a sentence that contains a finite number of variables and becomes a statement when specific values are substituted for the variables.

• Domain – The

domain

of a predicate variable is the set of all values that may be substituted in place of the variable.

• Premises – All statements in an argument and all statement forms in an argument form are called

premises

except for the last one..

3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I 2

Example – pg. 106 # 3

• Let

P

(

x

) be the predicate “

x

> 1/

x

”.

a. Write

P

(2),

P

(1/2),

P

(-1),

P

(-1/2), and

P

(-8), and indicate which of these statements are true and which are false.

, b. Find the truth set of

P

(

x

) if the domain of

x

is the set of all real numbers.

c. If the domain is the set + of all positive real numbers, what is the truth set of

P

(

x

)?

3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I 3

Quantifiers

We can obtain statements from predicates by adding quantifiers or words that refer to quantities.

• • The symbol  denotes “for all” and is called the

universal quantifier

.

The symbol  denotes “there exists” and is called the

existential quantifier

.

3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I 4

Definitions

• • Let

Q

(

x

) be a predicate and

D

the domain of

x

: Universal Statement – A

universal statement

is a statement of the form “ 

x

D

,

Q

(

x

).” It is defined to be true iff

Q

(

x

) is true for all

x

in

D

. It is defined to be false iff

Q

(

x

) is false for at least one

x D

. A value for

x

for which

Q

(

x

) is false is called a counterexample to the universal statement.

in Existential Statement – A

existential statement

is a statement of the form “ 

x

D

such that

Q

(

x

).” It is defined to be true iff

Q

(

x

) is true for at least one

x

in

D

. It is false iff

Q

(

x

) is false for all

x

in

D

. 3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I 5

Formal Versus Informal

• When working with mathematics, it is important to be able to translate between formal (symbols) to informal (words) and visa versa.

3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I 6

Example – pg. 107 # 15

• Rewrite the following statements informally in at least two different ways without using variables or quantifiers.

a.

b.

  rectangles a set

A x

,

x

is a quadrilateral.

such that

A

has 16 subsets.

3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I 7

Example – pg. 108 #28

Rewrite each statement without using quantifiers or variables. Indicate which are true and which are false, and justify your answers as best as you can.

• • • • • Let the domain of

x

courses, be the set

D

of objects discussed in mathematics let Real(

x

) be “

x

let Pos(

x

) be “

x

is a real number”, is a positive real number”, let Neg(

x

) be “

x

is a negative real number”, and let Int(

x

) be “

x

is an integer.” a. Pos(0) b.

x

, Real(

x

)  c.

d.

x

, Int(

x

)  

x

s.t. Real (

x

Neg( ) 

x

) Real(

x

).

 ~Int (

x

Pos( ).

x

).

3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I 8