The role of antifungal drug monitoring

Download Report

Transcript The role of antifungal drug monitoring

The role of antifungal therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)?

Dr Livingstone Chishimba BSc, MBChB, MRCP University Hospital of South Manchester The University of Manchester 1

Outline

• PK affects the antifungal effect • Potential indications for TDM-

general

• Implications of TDM – Itra,vori, posa, • Efficacy and safety • Studies and evidence • Clinical implication 2

Issues

• • Why monitoring?

• Who to monitor?

• What? When? Where ?

• What action?

clinically relevant ?

– exposure–response relationships – exposure–toxicity relationships 3

TDM-which drugs?-general

• • • – compounds with ; a narrow therapeutic window • Warfarin, theophyllins variable pharmacokinetics (PK) – itra physiological instability 4

Clinical objectives of TDM

Optimise efficacy Minimise toxicity

Clinical use of TDM

• drug-drug interactions • check compliance • change of dosage • patient failing therapy 6

• Itraconazole • Voriconazole • Posaconazole

Antifungal TDM

Itraconazole

Itraconazole 8

Two formulations of itraconazole

Capsules Excipients differ between generic formulations, and systemic exposure may differ Cyclodextrin excipient 20-50% higher bioavailability Suspension 9

Itraconazole exhibits nonlinear PK

Time to steady state ~14 days Once linear clearance achieved, t 1/2 ~24 hours Hours Barone JA et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993; 37: 778 10

Itraconazole: PK and variability

• • • • Itraconazole poorly soluble at physiological pH Absorption of itraconazole tablets is variable; requires acidic environment, which is often absent in critically ill patients Increased bioavailability with food and cola Itraconazole suspension is often poorly tolerated (gastrointestinal), leading to compliance problems 11

Variability in itraconazole PK affects the antifungal effect

Significant relationship between drug level and fungal burden Peak itraconazole concentrations (mg/L) Berenguer J et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38: 1303 12

Itraconazole: dose-response relationship in rabbits with IA 13 Berenguar et al, AAC 1994;38:1303-8

Itraconazole: incidence of proven invasive fungal infections

Capsules Solution • Itraconazole trough concentrations of <0.5 mg/L associated with higher mortality (p= 0.039) • Easier to get better levels with suspension Total Favours itraconazole Favours control Glasmacher et al JCO 2003 14

Toxicity and itraconazole concentrations

100 80 60 40 20 0 0

25 NOTE that the highest quintile consists of values ≥ 25.6 mg/L. The line is a logistic regression fit to the individual measurements.

15 Lestner, Clin Infect Dis 2009 In press

Itraconazole: concentration-toxicity relationship • 216 patients • mostly capsules A range of AE, most common: •Fluid retention •Gastrointestinal intolerance Trough itraconazole concentrations (mg/L) Lestner JM et al. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49: 928 16

Itraconazole: concentration-toxicity relationship

Probability of toxicity low<17.1>high Trough itraconazole concentrations (mg/L) Lestner JM et al. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49: 928 17

Voriconazole

Voriconazole • Displays nonlinear PK in adults, with saturable clearance • Disproportionate changes when dose altered • ~5 days to achieve steady state concentrations • Exhibits linear PK in children • Children may metabolise more quickly • Dose escalation may be required Trifilio SM et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 1793

Voriconazole - metabolism • • • • • 98 % metabolised by liver Primarily metabolised by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4, less by CYP2C9.

– – Genotype status for CYP2C19 and/or co-administration of drugs that modulate CYP2C19 or CYP3A4 activities do affect voriconazole plasma levels.

PC BRASS, OAK DEVICESS 3-5% caucasians, 15-20% Asians have genetic polymorphism of CYP2C19 - slow metabolisers Cirrhosis / prior alcohol abuse, likely predictors of slow metabolisers 20 Voriconazole datasheet

Therapeutic drug monitoring may be useful to optimise therapy for individual patients

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 A “fast’ metaboliser with relatively low concentrations, who is failing therapy Dosage escalation from 200 mg bd to 300 mg bd 2 9 5 8 8 7 1 1 6 1 4 5 1 7 4 2 0 3 2 3 2 2 6 1 2 9 0 3 1 9 3 4 8 T i m e (h o u rs ) 21

A “slow’ metaboliser: dosage escalation may be too risky and this could be prevented with TDM

9 8 7 6 3 2 5 4 1 0 0 Dosage escalation from 200 mg bd to 300 mg bd 2 9 5 8 8 7 1 1 6 1 4 5 1 7 4 2 0 3 2 3 2 2 6 1 2 9 0 3 1 9 3 4 8 T i m e (h o u rs ) 22

Voriconazole: exposure-response relationships

• • There have been REAL difficulties linking drug exposure with effect because: – Good PK was not done in the trials (trough, random, mean levels) – Assessing patient outcome is really tough • Random levels of < 2.05 mg/L associated with poorer outcome (Smith et al AAC 2006) 15% of patients in recent studies have no detectable levels of drug in serum! (Trifilio et al 2007) 23

Efficacy and safety of voriconazole

• 26 patients (ABPA, n=21, SAFS=5) • Poor relationship between dose and – Clinical efficacy • ?Good relationship between – Dose, TDL and AEs Chishimba L, denning D et al 2011 (unpublished data) 24

Chishimba L, denning D et al 2011 (unpublished data) 25

Posaconazole

Posaconazole • Displays linear PK with dosages of 50-800mg • Saturation of absorption above 800mg/day • ~7-10 days to achieve steady state concentrations • Minimal differences between peak and trough levels • Similar blood concentrations found in juveniles with comparable efficacy and safety Courtney R et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47: 2788 Krishna G et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51: 812

Posaconazole as salvage therapy for invasive aspergillosis: exposure-response relationship 28 Walsh TJ et al. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: 2

Posaconazole: concentration-response relationship from prophylaxis studies

Clinical failure of 25% at levels of 0.71mg/L Clinical failure: • death • fungal infection • drug stopped • use of other antifungals http://www.fda/cder/foi/nda/2006/022003s000_Noxafil_ClinPharR.pdf. 2005

Antifungal TDM-Which drug to monitor?

Necessary • Itraconazole • Voriconazole (especially IV, children, complex case) • Flucytosine 30

Antifungal TDM-Which to drug to monitor?

Desirable • Posaconazole (probably) Unnecessary • Amphotericin B • Echinocandins (not much data though) • Fluconazole (unless short gut and oral administration, or compliance) 31

Itraconazole TDM: clinical practice • • • Targets – HPLC: >0.5 mg/L – Bioassay >5 mg/L Low levels with capsules usually due to suboptimal absorption – Administer with food or cola – Stop H2 antagonists, PPIs – Check for drug interactions (rifampicin, phenytoin, carbamazepine).

– Can increase from 200 mg b.i.d to 300 mg b.i.d

Change to suspension – Monitor compliance – Understand variance 32

Voriconazole TDM in clinical practice • Target: pre-dose (only) should be monitored – greater than 1.0 and less than ~5.5mg/L • Monitor for duration of therapy • Give loading dose – preferably iv • Look for and expect nonlinear behaviour when adjusting dose 33

Posaconazole TDM in clinical practice • Targets not well defined – Trough >0.5mg/L prophylaxis – Trough 0.5-1.5mg/L therapy • Absorption affected by a number of factors: – frequency of dosage (saturable) – food, gastric pH and mucosal health • Side effects: – insufficient data to determine if dose-dependent • To increase levels: – may not be any benefit going >800mg/day – fractionate dose – give with fatty food 34 Andes D et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 24

Take home message • • • • • • Linear PK: itra and posa None linear PK: vori Dose alteration not only on TDL but on clinical response, Aes Consider drug interactions – PPI, antiepileptics , macrolides time-diet timing etc if not able to achieve TDL but clinical outcome most important.

– frequency of dosage (saturable) – food, gastric pH and mucosal health but much more work required using population PK modelling to reach the goal of truly individualising therapy!