Transcript Document

Barb Funk
Mid-East Career and Technology Centers
[email protected]



Ohio TIF Districts will implement Ohio
Teacher Evaluation System in 2012-2013
USDOE allow flexibility, with a phase-in of
student growth measures
Gave Mid-East the opportunity to work
through some of the challenges and
opportunities

In 2011, ODE “OTES Pilot Program”
◦ Building Directors selected 3 individuals to
participate
◦ Attended state sponsored training
 Union president
 Two Building Directors
 OAC/TIF Coordinator
 Executive Director



All teachers will be evaluated using the
Teacher Performance side of the OTES
framework
All administrators evaluating teachers and
principals will be credentialed evaluators
All teachers will develop and monitor one
Student Learning Objective

In Spring 2012, Mid-East CTC developed an
OTES team
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦

Executive Director
Building Directors
New Asst. Director-primary role is evaluation
Asst. Director - role Curriculum and OAC/TIF
Teacher Volunteers
Added our trained teacher mentors
Developed our Professional Development Plan

In July 2012, ODE sponsored -SLO
development grant
◦ CT instructor and OAC/TIF Coordinator to this training (Ohio
Valley ESC and Muskingum Valley ESC)

In August 2012, Mid-East began SLO PD
with leadership teams creating a teacherled training model for future use
Transformation Team
Strategic Compensation Team
OTES Team
Formative Instructional Practices Team
Assessment/Literacy Tech Team
HSTW Site Coordinators
All Administrators

Write and monitor one SLO

Pilot the SLO process


Allow for multiple opportunities for teachers
to collaborate, discuss their questions and
concerns
Share promising practices with one another

September 14th-Professional Development
◦ AM Focus on Teacher Performance – OTES Model
 Shifts in our current evaluation tool and the OTES
rubric
 Self-Assessment and Teacher Evidence
 Viewed videos of teachers and used pieces of the
rubric
◦ PM focus on Student Growth – Student Learning
Objectives
 Achievement Vs. Progress



Complete the SLO Process
Follow the developed calendar or timeline
Attend Professional Development
◦ 1st Quarter: Rubric / Writing SLOs Focus
◦ 2nd Quarter: Monitoring Focus
◦ 3rd Quarter: CIA Focus
◦ 4th Quarter: Growth Target Data Focus and
Reflection
Mid-East Career and Technology Centers-SLO Timeline
Sept
Sept
Complete Needs Assessment
Determine student group
Sept
Align to standards and create Student Learning Objective
Sept – Oct
Develop/choose Beginning of the Year Assessment (Pre-assessment)
Sept – Oct
Analyze and document Pre-Assessment Results
Sept – Oct
Create Growth Target
October 19
Deadline: Complete and submit SLOs
Sept – Apr
Monitor student progress toward Student Learning Objective and share
at Department and Collaborative Meetings
Nov – Jan
Complete Revision Requests from SLO review
2nd Semester
Key Date: New Student Enrollment cut-off
Jan 21 – Feb 4
Request your own Revision
TBD
Administer Post-Assessments
May 15
Deadline: Complete Final Submission Form
Students enrolling after the 2nd semester begins will not be included in the data.
Students with attendance below 85% will not be included in the data.
Teacher Name: Jim O'Neill
School: Mid East CTC - Zanesville Campus
SLO: Powerline I
Assessment Name:
Student Name
Baseline
Growth Target
Final Score
Met Target
28
64
80
Yes
20
60
48
No
44
72
76
Yes
28
64
76
Yes
12
56
48
74
84
Yes
20
60
44
No
28
64
52
No
40
70
88
Yes
32
66
84
Yes
28
64
60
No
Growth Target=(100-PT)/2+PT
Target Met=If(Baseline cell number>=final score cell number,
“Yes”, “No”)



Appropriate alignment to HB555 and ORC with
Value Added teachers
Categorize teachers into groups
Determine percentages to the three SG
categories

Determine how we will implement local
measures
◦ Shared attribution
◦ CT WebXams and Certifications appropriate
measure of student growth
◦ Team SLO
◦ Number of SLO

Balance of Fairness for Teachers
◦ Multiple Measure used to measure Student Growth
◦ Level of Rigor, Validity and Reliability

Determine Approval Process
◦ Who serves on the SLO Review Committee
Academic Courses
Value Added
Vendor Approved
LEA Decision (SLO)
A
B
C
English 10
Yes
English 11
Yes
English 12
No
Yes
Modified 11
No
Yes
Modified 12
No
Yes
Algebra I
Yes
Geometry
Yes
Algebra II
Yes
PreCalculus
Yes
Calculus
No
Yes
Advanced Math
No
Yes
Business Math
No
Yes
Financial/Consumer Math
No
Yes
College Math
No
Yes
Modified Math
No
Yes
Pre-Algebra
No
Yes
Academic Courses
Value Added
Vendor Approved
LEA Decision (SLO)
US History
No
Government
No
Recent Am. History
No
Yes
Modified Gov.
No
Yes
Biology
Yes
Chemistry
Yes
Advance Biology
No
Yes
Anatomy & Physiology
No
Yes
Forensic Science
No
Yes
Earth Science
No
Yes
Tech Science
No
Yes
Modified Biology
No
Yes
Modified Tech Science
No
Yes
Computers Apps
No
Yes
Workplace Skills
No
Yes
Public Speaking
No
Yes
CTE
No
Yes
Career Tech Instructors
Level I
Level II
WebXam
Certification SLO
AutoCraig
Reich
SLO
Yes
CarpRobby
Robinson
SLO
Yes
Yes
WeldDave
Irvin
SLO
Yes
Yes
DieselRob
Parker
SLO
Yes
Yes
CustoCarol
Riffle
SLO
No
No
Felver
SLO
No
No
Wilfong
SLO
Yes
Rosser
SLO
Yes
Price
SLO
Yes
DentalDonna
Keyes
SLO
Yes
HealthSamra
Mazzuli
SLO
Yes
Horstman
SLO
Yes
Smith
SLO
No
No
Kerns
SLO
No
No
Comm ArtBill
Koch
SLO
Yes
No
Career ConDave
Brown
SLO
X
X
Bld MaintCurtis
NRCBrian
CosmetoLenny
LPNCindy
Comp SupChris
BESTColleen
CBIEric
X
 Balancing
 Using
the Fairness for Teachers
the Right Measures
 Related as much as possible to the teacher
 A few reliable, valid measures
 Equitable weight of measures
 Inform practice

Selecting and Approving Assessments
 Analyze assessment data to set the target






Past performance of students
Standardized assessment
Benchmark assessments
Pre-Assessments
Post-Assessments-Written, Portfolios, Authentic, Rubrics
“Stretch” Opportunities
 Plan how various assessment will be combined
 Work with teachers across districts to develop common
assessments

Build Assessment Literacy
 Engage in a focused study
Teacher-Made Assessments: How to Connect Curriculum,
Instruction and Student Learning by Christopher R. Gareis
and Leslie W. Grant
Developing and Selecting Assessments of Student Growth
for Use in Teacher Evaluations Systems by Joan Herman,
Margaret Heritage, and Pete Goldschmidt. Assessment
and Accountability Comprehensive Center.
Is This a Trick Question? A Short Guide to Writing Effective
Test Questions by Ben Clay. Kansas Curriculum Center