Transcript HSARPA Cyber Security R&D

Dept. of Homeland Security Science & Technology Directorate
Priorities in Security Research
Funding
ACM CCS
Washington, DC
October 26, 2004
Douglas Maughan, Ph.D.
Program Manager, HSARPA
[email protected]
202-254-6145 / 202-360-3170
Presentation Agenda



DHS Overview
Cyber Security R&D Overview
Cyber Security R&D Activities
 National


Strategy to Secure Cyberspace
Secure Domain Name System (DNSSEC)
Secure Protocols for the Routing Infrastructure
 DHS
/ NSF Cyber Security Testbed
 Large-scale Network Security Datasets
 Cyber Economic Assessment studies

“New” Activities
23 September 2004
2
General DHS Organization
Secretary (Ridge)
&
Deputy Secretary
(Loy)
Management
(Hale)
Border &
Transportation
Security
(Hutchinson)
Emergency
Preparedness
& Emergency
Response
(Brown)
• Coast Guard
• Secret Service
• Citizenship & Immigration & Ombuds
• Civil Rights and Civil Liberties
• Legislative Affairs
• General Counsel
• Inspector General
• State & Local Coordination
• Private Sector Coordination
• International Affairs
• National Capital Region Coordination
• Counter-narcotics
• Small and Disadvantaged Business
• Privacy Officer
• Chief of Staff
Information
Analysis &
Infrastructure
Protection
(Libutti)
Science &
Technology
(McQueary)
23 September 2004
3
Border and Transportation Security (BTS)

Mission: Securing our nation's air, land, and sea borders is a
difficult yet critical task. The United States has 5,525 miles of
border with Canada and 1,989 miles with Mexico. Our
maritime border includes 95,000 miles of shoreline. Each year,
more than 500 million people cross the borders into the U.S.,
some 330 million of whom are non-citizens.

CBP – Customs and Border Protection

ICE – Immigrations and Customs Enforcement

TSA – Transportation Security Administration

APHIS – Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

ODP – Office for Domestic Preparedness
23 September 2004
4
Emergency Preparedness & Response

Mission: Ensure that our nation is prepared for catastrophes whether natural disasters or terrorist assaults. Not only will the
EP&R Directorate coordinate with first responders, it will
oversee the federal government's national response and
recovery strategy.

FEMA – Federal Emergency Management Agency

NIRT – Nuclear Incident Response Teams

DES – Domestic Emergency Support

NDPO – National Domestic Preparedness Office
23 September 2004
5
Information Analysis and Infrastructure
Protection (IAIP)

Mission: Ensure the capability to identify and assess
current and future threats to the homeland, map those
threats against our vulnerabilities, issue timely
warnings and take preventive and protective action to
secure the national infrastructures.
 NCSD
– National Cyber Security Division
 NCS
– National Communications System
 PSD
– Physical Security Division
 ICD
– Infrastructure Coordination Division
Our main
internal
DHS
customers
23 September 2004
6
Science and Technology (S&T) Mission
Conduct, stimulate,
and enable research,
development, test,
evaluation and timely
transition of
homeland security
capabilities to federal,
state and local
operational end-users.
23 September 2004
7
S&T Organization Chart
Under Secretary
for Science & Technology
(McQueary)
Office of Plans
Programs and
Budgets
(Albright)
Homeland Security
Advanced Research
Projects Agency
(Oxford)
Office of Research
and Development
(McCarthy)
Office of Systems
Engineering &
Development
(Kubricky)
23 September 2004
8
Crosscutting Portfolio Areas

Chemical

Biological

Radiological

Nuclear

High Explosives

Cyber Security

USSS
 Paul
Mahon, Ptfl Mgr
23 September 2004
9
Execution
Science and Technology Directorate
Office of
Research
and
Development
•
•
•
Homeland Security
Advanced Research Projects
Agency
Systems
Engineering
&
Development
Centers
Fellowships
Scholarships
Stewardship of
an enduring
capability
Innovation,
Adaptation, &
Revolution
Development
Engineering,
Production, &
Deployment
23 September 2004
10
Legacy of HSARPA Name
How is it different from DARPA?

Differences
 85-90%
of funds for
identified DHS requirements
 10-15%
of funds for
revolutionary research

Breakthroughs,

New technologies and systems
 These
percentages likely to
change over time, but we
need to meet today’s
requirements
23 September 2004
11
Presentation Agenda



DHS Overview
Cyber Security R&D Overview
Cyber Security R&D Activities
 National


Strategy to Secure Cyberspace
Secure Domain Name System (DNSSEC)
Secure Protocols for the Routing Infrastructure
 DHS
/ NSF Cyber Security Testbed
 Large-scale Network Security Datasets
 Cyber Economic Assessment studies

“New” Activities
23 September 2004
12
Cyber Security R&D Portfolio: Scope

The Internet serves a significant underlying role in many
of the Nation’s critical infrastructures


Adversaries face asymmetric offensive / defensive
capabilities with respect to traditional warfare



Makes cyberspace an appealing battleground
Cyberspace provides the ability to exploit weaknesses in
our critical infrastructures


Communications, monitoring, operations and business systems
Provides a fulcrum for leveraging physical attacks
The most significant cyber threats to the nation are very
different from “script-kiddies” or virus writers
DHS S&T focus is on those threats and issues that warrant
national-level concerns
23 September 2004
13
Cyber Security R&D Center
Requirements
Pre R&D
R&D
Customers
Critical
Infrastructure
Providers
DNSSEC
Prioritize requirements
• NCSD
• NCS
• USSS
• National
Documents
Post R&D
Experiments
and
Exercises
Workshops
Customers
Customers
• NCSD
• NCS
• USSS
SPRI
Sector
Roadmaps
Solicitation
Preparation
Cyber Economics
Outreach –
Venture
Community
& Industry
Future Programs
Other Sectors
e.g., Banking
& Finance
BAA
SBIR
R&D
Coordination Government
& Industry
Critical
Infrastructure
Providers
Other Sectors
e.g., Banking
& Finance
Supporting Programs
PREDICT
DETER
23 September 2004
14
Post Research Activities

Experiments
 U.S.
/ Canada Secure Blackberry Experiment
3 phase homeland security deployment activity
 Includes industry participants from both countries

 Oil
and Gas Sector
Sector workshop in late July
 Expected to lead to technology pilot deployments

 Department
of Treasury
FS ISAC, FSSCC, Numerous sector participants
 Technology pilot organization in process

23 September 2004
15
Post Research Activities (continued)

Exercises
 National
Exercise Plan (managed by DHS ODP)
 National Cyber Security Exercise as part of NEP


Several regional cyber security tabletop exercises
Others
 U.S.
NORTHCOM
Unified Defense 05 / TOPOFF 3
 CWID 2005 (originally known as JWID)

23 September 2004
16
DHS S&T Commercial Outreach Strategy




Assist commercial companies in providing cyber security technology to
DHS and other government agencies
Assist DHS S&T-funded researchers in transferring cyber security
technology to larger, established security technology companies
Partner with the venture capital community to transfer technology to
existing portfolio companies, or to create new ventures
We will work with the VCs to:




Focus on bringing innovation to the marketplace
Accelerate development and deployment
Provide orders-of-magnitude leverage
of DHS R&D funding
Government
We will partner with the VCs,
not compete with them



Work with many VCs and
portfolio companies
Provide liaison and bridge activities
We do not invest for equity
Established
Commercial
Companies
DHS
Researchers
Emerging
Commercial
Companies
23 September 2004
17
Presentation Agenda



DHS Overview
Cyber Security R&D Overview
Cyber Security R&D Activities
 National


Strategy to Secure Cyberspace
Secure Domain Name System (DNSSEC)
Secure Protocols for the Routing Infrastructure
 DHS
/ NSF Cyber Security Testbed
 Large-scale Network Security Datasets
 Cyber Economic Assessment studies

“New” Activities
23 September 2004
18
Domain Name System and Security

Critical Internet infrastructure component
 Virtually

DNS database maps:
 Name


to IP address
(for example: www.isi.edu = 128.9.176.32)
 And

every Internet application uses the DNS
many other mappings (mail servers, IPv6, reverse…)
DNS threats identified in early 1990s
DNSSEC
 Cryptographic
signatures in the DNS
 Assures integrity of results returned from DNS queries

Protects against tampering in caches and during transmission
 End-system
checks the chain of signatures up to the root
23 September 2004
19
Activities To Date


Formation of ad-hoc government and industry
“steering committee”
Two workshops in early and late May
May: Amsterdam – as part of the RIPE agenda
 23 May: San Fran – affiliated with NANOG
 Attendees included: DNS software developers, DNS root
operators (U.S. and International), government network
operators, and numerous other stakeholders
3


Initial R&D Funding – NIST, industry
Future Activities
 Pilot
deployments of DNSSEC on .us and .gov network
23 September 2004
20
Secure Protocols for the Routing
Infrastructure (SPRI)



BGP is the routing protocol that connects ISPs and
subscriber networks together to form the Internet
BGP does not forward subscriber traffic, but it determines
the paths subscriber traffic follows
The BGP architecture makes it highly vulnerable to human
errors and malicious attacks against




Links between routers
The routers themselves
Management stations that control routers
Working with industry to develop solutions for our current
routing security problems and future technologies
23 September 2004
21
DHS / NSF Cyber Security Testbed


“Justification and Requirements for a National DDOS
Defense Technology Evaluation Facility”, July 2002
We still lack large-scale deployment of security technology
sufficient to protect our vital infrastructures



Recent investment in research on cyber security technologies by
government agencies (NSF, DARPA, armed services) and industry.
One important reason is the lack of an experimental infrastructure
and rigorous scientific methodologies for developing and testing
next-generation defensive cyber security technology
The goal is to create, operate, and support a researcher-andvendor-neutral experimental infrastructure that is open to a wide
community of users and produce scientifically rigorous testing
frameworks and methodologies to support the development and
demonstration of next-generation cyber defense technologies
23 September 2004
22
Architectural Plan





Construct a homogeneous emulation cluster based
upon University of Utah’s Emulab
Implement network services – DNS, BGP
Add containment, security, and usability features to
the software
Add (controlled) hardware heterogeneity
Connect to other government and industry testbeds
(once we have our act together)
23 September 2004
23
DETER Testbed Architecture
User
Internet
Ethernet Bridge
with Firewall
‘User’ Server
User
files
Control
DB
'Gatekeeper'
'Boss' Server
Image fills this entire area
User Acct &
Data logging
External
VLAN
Web/DB/SNMP,
switch mgmt
Boss
VLAN
Users
VLAN
Router
(OR originates at the upper
left corner of the area
with Firewall
…
outlined and
is sized to the full width or height of this
bounding box.)
Control Hardware
VLAN
Node Serial
Line Server
Control Network VLAN
Power Serial
Line Server
64 @100bT
Control ports
PC
PC
PC
Power
160Controller
64 x 4 @1000bT
Data ports
Switch Control Interface
Programmable Patch Panel (VLAN switch)
DETER Project – Feb 04
23 September 2004
24
DETER Testbed Status

Developed Draft Policy and Procedures
 Experiment
Definition
 Experiment Review Board
 Security Isolation Argument




Architecture Design Report
ISI and UCB Node Operational
Held first set of Experiments June 8, 2004
Workshop held yesterday
 In
conjunction with ACM CCS in Washington, DC
 Open to entire research community
23 September 2004
25
A Protected REpository for Defense of
Infrastructure against Cyber Threats

PREDICT Program Objective
“To advance the state of the research and commercial
development (of network security ‘products’) we need to
produce datasets for information security testing and
evaluation of maturing networking technologies.”

Rationale / Background / Historical:


Researchers with insufficient access to data unable to adequately test
their research prototypes
Government technology decision-makers with no data to evaluate
competing “products”
Bottom Line: Improve the quality of defensive
cyber security technologies
23 September 2004
26
Activities To Date

Industry Workshop (Feb. 11-12, 2004)




Begin the dialogue between HSARPA and industry as it
pertains to the cyber security research agenda
Discuss existing data collection activities and how they
could be leveraged to accomplish the goals of this
program
Discuss data sharing issues (e.g., technical, legal, policy,
privacy) that limit opportunities today and develop a plan
for navigating forward
Develop a process by which “data” can be “regularly”
collected and shared with the network security research
community
23 September 2004
27
Workshop Attendees (Feb. 11-12, 2004)











AOL
UUNET
Verio
XO Communications
Akamai
Arbor Networks
Riverhead Networks
System Detection
Cisco
Packet Clearing House
Symantec











USC-ISI
UC San Diego
Univ. of Washington
BBN Technologies
CERT/CC
LBNL
Internet2
CAIDA
Merit Networks
Citigroup
Cooley, LLC (Lawyer)
23 September 2004
28
Data Collection Activities

Classes of data that are interesting, people want
collected, and seem reasonable to collect
 Netflow
traces – headers and full packet (context dependent)
 Critical infrastructure – BGP and DNS data
 Topology data
 IDS / firewall logs
 Performance data
 Network management data (i.e., SNMP)
 VoIP (1400 IP-phone network)
 Blackhole Monitor traffic
 Packet
23 September 2004
29
Trusted Access Repository Process
PREDICT Coordination Center
(Government-funded, Externally hosted)
Institutional
Sponsorship
Data
Providers
Data
Listing
Researchers
Data
Hosting
Sites
Proposal
Review
Process
Accepted
Proposals
MOU / MOA
23 September 2004
30
Sample Datasets that will be available

University of Michigan


University of Washington


Wisconsin Advanced Internet Lab – Netflow, iSink logs, IDS logs
XO Communications


Performance data, NetFlow data, and routing protocol data from the
Abilene network
University of Wisconsin


Host-based forensic data and honeypot data
Internet 2


Dark address space monitoring, honeypot monitoring, BGP Beacon
routing data, and routing protocol sensors, MichNet routing protocol
data and Netflow data
Netflow and routing protocol logs
Packet Clearing House

BGP routing dataset and VoIP measurement data
23 September 2004
31
Sample Datasets (continued)

CAIDA


Internet Software Consortium (ISC)


Packet traces from Internet Business Exchange (IBX) point
Los Nettos - LA regional network provider




Packet traces from OC48 operational network
Equinix


DNS packet traces from F-root
Verio


Topology measurement data, Network Telescope data
Full packet headers, NetFlow data, SNMP data, and standard logs
DNS root server data. Los Nettos hosts both the B and L root servers
Internet topology data based on the SCAN topology-mapping project
LBNL

Anonymized enterprise traffic from internal LBNL networks
23 September 2004
32
PREDICT – Proposed Timeline
 Sep
1- Oct 30: Working groups complete actions identified at
last PI meeting
 Data
Schema WG
 Application Process WG

All MOU/MOAs in develoment
 Public
Relations WG
 Oct
1-Nov 15: Conduct internal PREDICT Process Pilot
 Nov 15- Dec 15: Conduct external PREDICT Process Pilot
 Dec
15-Jan 15: Modify PREDICT processes based on
feedback from PREDICT pilot
 ~Jan 15: PREDICT goes live
 Working
through announcement process
23 September 2004
33
Cyber Economic Assessment Studies


Examination of current “cyber event” cost evaluation
methods
Business Case Development
 Understanding
of costs and losses
 Strategies for encouraging cyber security investment

Cyber Risk Prioritization
23 September 2004
34
Presentation Agenda



DHS Overview
Cyber Security R&D Overview
Cyber Security R&D Activities
 National


Strategy to Secure Cyberspace
Secure Domain Name System (DNSSEC)
Secure Protocols for the Routing Infrastructure
 DHS
/ NSF Cyber Security Testbed
 Large-scale Network Security Datasets
 Cyber Economic Assessment studies

“New” Activities
23 September 2004
35
Recent SBIRs
 SBIR
= Small Business Innovative Research
 CROSS-DOMAIN ATTACK
CORRELATION
TECHNOLOGIES
 Objective:
Develop a system to efficiently correlate information from
multiple intrusion detection systems (IDSes) about “stealthy” sources and
targets of attacks in a distributed fashion across multiple environments.
 REAL-TIME
MALICIOUS CODE IDENTIFICATION
 Objective:
Develop technologies to detect anomalous network payloads
destined for any service or port in a target machine in order to prevent the
spread of destructive code through networks and applications. These
technologies should focus on detecting “zero day attacks”, the first
appearance of malicious code for which no known defense has been
constructed.
23 September 2004
36
HSARPA Cyber Security
Broad Area Announcement (BAA 04-17)

A critical area of focus for DHS is the development and
deployment of technologies to protect the nation’s cyber
infrastructure including the Internet and other critical
infrastructures that depend on computer systems for their
mission. The goals of the Cyber Security Research and
Development (CSRD) program are:




To perform research and development (R&D) aimed at improving the
security of existing deployed technologies and to ensure the security
of new emerging systems;
To develop new and enhanced technologies for the detection of,
prevention of, and response to cyber attacks on the nation’s critical
information infrastructure.
To facilitate the transfer of these technologies into the national
infrastructure as a matter of urgency.
http://www.hsarpabaa.com
23 September 2004
37
BAA Technical Topic Areas (TTAs)

System Security Engineering

Vulnerability Prevention


Vulnerability Discovery and Remediation


Tools and techniques for analyzing software to detect security
vulnerabilities
Cyber Security Assessment


Tools and techniques for better software development
Develop methods and tools for assessing the cyber security of information
systems
Security of Operational Systems

Security and Trustworthiness for Critical Infrastructure Protection




1) Automated security vulnerability assessments for critical infrastructure
systems
2) Improvements in system robustness of critical infrastructure systems
3) Configuration and security policy management tools
4) Cross-platform and/or cross network attack correlation and aggregation
23 September 2004
38
BAA TTAs (continued)

Security of Operational Systems
 Wireless



Security
Security tools/products for today’s networks
Solutions and standards for next generation networks
Investigative and Prevention Technologies
 Network Attack

Tools and techniques for attack traceback
 Technologies

Forensics
to Defend against Identity Theft
R&D of tools and techniques for defending against identity theft
and other financial systems attacks, e.g., phishing
23 September 2004
39
BAA Program / Proposal Structure


NOTE: Deployment Phase = Test, Evaluation, and Pilot
deployment in DHS “customer” environments
Type I (New Technologies)

New technologies with an applied research phase, a development
phase, and a deployment phase (optional)


Type II (Prototype Technologies)

More mature prototype technologies with a development phase and a
deployment phase (optional)


Funding not to exceed 36 months (including deployment phase)
Funding not to exceed 24 months (including deployment phase)
Type III (Mature Technologies)

Mature technology with a deployment phase only.

Funding not to exceed 12 months
23 September 2004
40
Tackling Cyber Security Challenges:
Business Not as Usual



Strong mission focus (avoid mission creep)
Close coordination with other Federal agencies
Outreach to communities outside of the Federal
government
 Building
public-private partnerships (the industrygovernment *dance* is a new tango)



Strong emphasis on technology diffusion and
technology transfer
Migration paths to a more secure infrastructure
Awareness of economic realities
23 September 2004
41
Summary


DHS S&T is moving forward with an aggressive
cyber security research agenda
Working with industry to solve the cyber security
problems of our current infrastructure
 DNSSEC,

Working with academe and industry to improve
research tools and datasets
 DHS/NSF

Secure Routing
Cyber Security Testbed, PREDICT
Looking at future RDT&E agendas with the most
impact for the nation
 SBIRs,
BAA 04-17
23 September 2004
42
Douglas Maughan, Ph.D.
Program Manager, HSARPA
[email protected]
202-254-6145 / 202-360-3170
23 September 2004
43