How specific should we be?
Download
Report
Transcript How specific should we be?
Louis Rogers
www.macmillanskillful.com/
Current practice
General academic vocabulary
Beyond individual words
Practicalities
The broader picture
Current practices
How similar are different genres and
disciplines?
Academic writing - 15,559 Results
How do these style guides present academic
writing?
Bennett’s survey
Barrass, R. Scientists must write: A guide to
better writing for scientists, engineers and
students.
Brown, R, B. Doing your dissertation in business
and management: The reality of researching and
writing.
Fabb, N and Durant, A. How to write essays and
dissertations: A guide for English literature
students.
Kneale, P. Study skills for geography students: A
practical guide.
Northedge et al. The sciences good study guide.
Strong, S.I How to write law essays and exams.
General principles
Text structure
Grammatical issues
Lexical features
Other features
Large degree of consistency
Evidence, caution and restraint, incorporation
of sources
Formal, technical, objective
Structure – IMRD / IDC
Impersonal
General Academic
Vocabulary
The Academic Word List (Coxhead)
4 discipline areas
3.5 million word corpus
570 word families
West’s 1953 General Service List
75% = 2000 most frequent words
10-15% = academic vocabulary
10-15% = specialist vocabulary
Job
Examine
Quantitative
Qualitative
Omission
Persuasion
Classification
Determine
Multi-meaning words
Volume
Is one core list possible?
Moving beyond individual words
General Service List + AWL
Attribute
◦ Address, control, means
◦ Address-issue, control-group, by-means
Beyond individual words
Hyland 2008
◦
◦
◦
◦
Electronic Engineering
Biology
Business Studies
Applied linguistics
4 word bundles
50 most frequent
◦ On the other hand, as well as the, in the case of, at
the same time, the results of the
Half on one list only
Function of collocations
◦ Research-orientated = location, procedure,
quantification, description, topic
At the same time, the purpose of, a wide range of,
the size of the, the currency board system
◦ Text-orientated = transition, results, structure,
framing
In addition to the, it was found that, in the next
section, with the exception of
Participant-orientated = stance, engagement
It is possible that, as can be seen
Discipline
Researchorientated
Textorientated
Participantorientated
Biology
48.1%
43.5%
8.4%
Electrical
engineering
49.4%
40.4%
9.2%
Applied
linguistics
31.2%
49.5%
18.6%
Business
studies
36%
48.4%
16.6%
Sciences = research-orientated
Social sciences = text-orientated
90% Vs. 80%
and 9% Vs. 17%
Chunks not transferable
Functions are transferable
Relative weight of assessment type
Hyland and Tse (2007)
◦ marketing strategy
◦ learning strategy
◦ coping strategy
Durrant (2009)
◦ Life Sciences, Science and Engineering, SocialPsychological, Social-administrative, Arts and
Humanities
◦ 1000 two-word collocations across all 5 areas
Three quarters grammatical
Reporting pattern ‘verb + that’
◦ Argue, assumer, conclude, confirm, demonstrate,
emphasize, hypothesize, imply, indicate, note,
predict, reveal, show, speculate, suggest, suppose
Frequency and pattern combined
Transferability of use not investigated
◦ Based on, associate with, note that, defined as,
relationship between, effects on, indicate that
Strong evidence for disciplinary differences
Broad or subtle?
◦ Nation - theory is theory no matter what the
discipline
Are grammatical collocations and functions
more transferable?
Implications for institutions and teachers
Time for research
Contact with academics
Time for materials development
Financial constraints
Broad ESAP
Combined degrees
◦ Accountancy with; Management, Divinity, Law, IT,
Economics, Spanish, Biology, Broadcast media,
Geology, Psychology, HR, Finance, Leadership
Mandarin, Logistics, and Maths
EAP teacher knowledge
Variability of specialist areas
◦ Management and Business
Consistent areas - Finance, Accounting, Statistics and
Organisational Behaviour
Differences – Economics, Marketing, Computing,
Enterprise, Law, Foreign Languages
Challenge in defining genres
‘An expert is one who knows more and more
about less and less.’ Nicholas Murray Butler
Bachelors, Masters, PhD
The interdisciplinary nature of the Colleges as
a major stimulus to teaching and learning
Highly flexible programme
Extensive choice of subjects
Acquire transferable skills
Highly flexible undergraduate learning
environment
Cater for a variety of different student
interests and career aspirations
Develops analytical, quantitative, computing,
presentation and other transferable skills
Progression through years
Sandwich degrees
Placements
Knowledge economy
Skills to deal with a wide range of texts
◦ Purpose, audience, aims
Ability to identify patterns
Critically analyse these features
Mixed backgrounds, experiences, disciplines
allows for better analysis
Is there a core academic vocabulary?
Are the differences significant enough?
How specific can we be?
How specific should we be?
www.macmillanskillful.com/
Anthony, L. (2011). Products, processes and
practitioners: A critical look at the importance of
specificity in ESP. Taiwan International ESP Journal.
Vol 3:2 1-8
Bennett, K. (2009). English academic style manuals: A
survey. English for specific purposes. 8 p43-54.
Biber, D, Conrad, S and Leech, G. (2002). Student
Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman:
Harlow.
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL
Quarterly, 34: 213-238.
Coxhead, A. (2011). The Academic Word List 10 Years
On: Research and Teaching Implications. TESOL
Quarterly, 45: 355-361
Dovey, T. (2006). What purposes specifically? Rethinking purposes and specificity in the context
of the ‘new vocationalism’, English for Specific
Purposes, 25(4), 387-402.
Durrant, P. (2009). Investigating the viability of a
collocation list for students of English for
academic purposes. English for specific
purposes. 28 p157-169.
Eldridge, J. (2008). “No, There Isn’t an ‘Academic
Vocabulary’ but…” TESOL Quarterly, 42: 109 –
113
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2007). Is there an
“Academic Vocabulary”?. TESOL Quarterly, 41:
235 – 253.
Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles
and disciplinary variation. English for specific
purposes. 27 p4-21.
James, M.A. (2009). “Far” transfer of learning
outcomes from an ESL writing course: Can the gap be
bridged? English for Specific Purposes. 18 69-84
Jordan, R, R. (1998). English for Academic Purposes:
A guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Ramoroka, B, T. (2012). Teaching Academic Writing
for the Disciplines: How far can we be specific in an
EAP writing course? English Linguistics Research. 1:2
available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/elr.vln2p33