Impact Evaluation of Rwanda Health Results

Download Report

Transcript Impact Evaluation of Rwanda Health Results

FBP communautaire au
Rwanda
James Humuza, MD, MSc
February 2nd -6th 2010
Bujumbura, Burundi
Généralités

•
En 2005, Minisanté a renforcé 3 stratégies
majeures pour améliorer la qualité des services de
santé:
 Mutuelles de santé a base communautaire
 Financement basé sur la performance
 Assurance qualité
Le FBP communautaire a débuté en Janvier 2006,
dans tous les districts du Rwanda, avec financement
a travers l’administration locale.
Indicateurs sélectionnés 2006-2008






Nombre d’adhérents aux mutuelles de santé dans
la zone de rayonnement,
Sensibilisation à l’Accouchement assisté,
Sensibilisation à l’ utilisation des moustiquaires
imprégnés d’insecticides (LLIN),
Traitement de la déshydratation chez les < 5 ans,
Hygiène
Rapportage des activités communautaires.
Défis de l’ancien modèle FBP
communautaire 2006-2008
Nouveau modèle FBP
communautaire: 2009-2012

Conçu en 2007 pour adresser les défis de l’ancien
modèle:
 A travers un groupe technique de travail (Minisante
et partenaires WB, USAID/MSH, BTC etc…)
 Mi-décembre 2007: premier draft du modèle FBP
communautaire.
 Nouveau modèle proposé dans différents fora pour
amendement (Direction des Politiques au Ministère;
Senior Management; Cellule d’Appui a l’Approche
Contractuelle ; Groupe de travail technique FBP
etc)
Prise de decision basee sur faits

Les resultats issus des CS ayant fait objet de l’evaluation de
l’impact du PBF ont montre que le MINISANTE a atteint:



Augmentation de l’utilisation – Accouchements, Soins preventifs des
enfants
Augmentation de la qualite – Soins Postnataux et VAT
Les results montrent egalement que l’expension de PBF au
niveau de la communaute peut reduire les difficultes pour
realiser les indicateurs MCH:





Nutritional status
Timely prenatal care utilization
Institutional delivery
Timely postnatal care utilization
Modern contraceptive use
Nouveau modèle FBP comm: 20092012




Inspiré des modèles
FBP cliniques (CS et
Hop)
L’acheteur est le
comité de pilotage
niveau secteur
Contrôleur: est le
centre de santé
Prestataire:
Coopératives des ASC
Separation des fonctions


Mécanisme contractuel
entre acteurs
Financement
forfaitaire d’un seul
résultat trimestriel:
Rapport des ASC avec
suivi spécifique de 5
indicateurs (Modèle
national)
Modèle administratif du PBF
communautaire
Program Description

CHW cooperatives receive incentives payment for:



Timely submission of quality data reports on 29 maternal
and child health indicators
Targeted improvements in 5 indicators (Nutrition
monitoring, early antenatal care, institutional delivery, family
planning: short and long terms). Paid per % increase in
indicator
Demand-side Incentives model

Introduce conditional in-kind incentive payment to women
on 4 indicators

Early antenatal care, institutional delivery, timely postnatal care,
and initiation of long-term modern contraceptive use
Program Challenges






Training: CHWs need training in essential service delivery, data
reporting, use of mobile technology, and income generation;
Robust verification mechanisms to ensure that minimum
package of community health services has been delivered;
The logistics to deliver the minimum package of community
health services;
Data verification mechanisms on reported indicators;
Communication issues: cell phones for reporting and sharing
information regarding the community-based activities;
Issues related to the design and management of community
health workers’ income generating activities (cooperatives)
Program Impact Evaluation: Aims and
Objectives
Do PBF incentives to CHW cooperatives and women for
maternal and child health indicators:





Increase the quantity of health services for women referred
to a health center.
Improve the health status of the population.
Improve the quality of the services provided. (CHW incentive
only)
Improve the motivation and behaviors of the CHWs.
(CHW incentive only)
Have no impact on the non-PBF services delivered
Impact Evaluation Methodology



4 study arms = 200 sectors, 2400 households
150 Treatment sectors begins April 2010
50 Control sectors incorporated January 2012
Demand-side
incentives only
50 sectors
600 households
CHW coop
incentives only
50 sectors
600 households
Demand+CHW
incentives
50 sectors
600 households
Control only
50 sectors
600 households
Program Status and Next Steps








Implementation manual and roll-out plan agreed and endorsed by Minister
of Health January 2010
Demand-side intervention implemented in 30 VUP sectors (excluded from
impact evaluation) January – March 2010
Impact Evaluation baseline data collection January – March 2010
Identify technical support for establishment and management of
cooperatives
CHW cooperatives start submitting data reports to the Community PBF
Steering Committees in first quarter of 2010
Focus groups in 30 VUP sectors to inform scale-up of program
CHW cooperatives start receiving incentives payments for indicators by
April 2010
Health centers in 100 sectors scale-up demand-side incentives by April 2010
Time-line for fiscal year July 2009-June 2010
Key Community PBF Activities to be
implemented
July-Dec 2009
7
Formation of PBF sector steering committee
Formation of CHW cooperatives
First Payment for National CPBF-Reporting
First Payment for National CPBF-Incentives
Implementing demand-side incentives in 30 VUP sectors
Implementing demand-side incentives in 150 sectors
Promotion of demand-side benefits
First payment of demand-side incentives
Treatment Window
Impact Evaluation
Presentation to Ethics Committee
Baseline-Survey (CHW cooperatives and Households)
Data entry and data cleaning
Baseline Report
January-June
2010
8
9
10
11
12
1
2 3 4 5 6
Merci