Transcript Document
PROJECT UPDATE
PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3
OCTOBER 17
4:30 PM – 6:30 PM
Dakota County Northern Service Center
AA PROCESS
1
Project Scoping
2
3
We are here
4
2
1. PROJECT SCOPING: PURPOSE AND NEED
PROJECT PURPOSE
The purpose of the Robert Street Transitway is to provide the necessary
transit infrastructure and service to meet the long-term regional mobility
and local accessibility needs between downtown St. Paul and areas within
Dakota County.
PROJECT NEED
Forecasted growth in travel demand
Limited transit service and time-efficient transit options
Needs of people who depend on transit
Roadway congestion and shift toward multimodal investments
Regional objectives for growth
3
1. PROJECT SCOPING: GOALS AND
OBJECTIVES
GOALS
Improve mobility and accessibility
Enhance the effectiveness of transit service within the corridor
Provide cost-effective and financially feasible transit solutions
Support and enhance existing communities and planned development
Support healthy communities and sound environmental practices
4
2. PRELIMINARY SCREENING
WHAT WAS INCLUDED
IN PRELIMINARY
SCREENING?
Does the alignment meet the
project purpose?
Does the alignment show
ridership potential?
Does the alignment match a
transitway mode’s
recommended facility type,
system length, and physical
needs?
5
2. PRELIMINARY
SCREENING:
ALTERNATIVES
Preliminary screening
considered alignment
and mode alternatives
generated by fall 2012
open houses, the Robert
Street Steering
Committee, and the 2008
feasibility study.
Alternatives included:
33 unique alignment
segments
7 mode alternatives
2. PRELIMINARY
SCREENING:
RESULTS
Alternatives advanced through
preliminary screening:
Robert Street Arterial BRT
Robert Street Streetcar
TH 52 LRT/Dedicated Busway
TH 52 Highway BRT
Concord Arterial BRT
Concord Streetcar
These alternatives:
Met the project purpose
Showed ridership potential
Fit a transitway mode
A possible service extension to
Rosemount was advanced for
sensitivity analysis.
3. CONCEPTUAL DEFINITION AND
PRELIMINARY EVALUATION
WHAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE CONCEPTUAL
DEFINITION OF ALTERNATIVES?
Alignments
Service plans
Cross sections
Facilities
Conceptual station design
8
3. PRELIMINARY EVALUATION
WHAT WAS INCLUDED IN PRELIMINARY EVALUATION?
1. Engineering Constraints
Project Goal
Assess alternative’s
ability to:
■
■
Improve mobility and
accessibility
Support healthy
communities and
sound environmental
practices
2. Ridership Potential
Assess alternative’s
ability to:
3. Capital Improvement Needs
Assess alternative’s
Enhance effectiveness ability to:
of transit service
■ Provide cost-effective
within the corridor
and financially feasible
Improve mobility and
transit solutions
accessibility
9
3. PRELIMINARY
EVALUATION:
RESULTS
Alternatives advanced through
preliminary evaluation:
• Robert Street Streetcar
• Robert Street Arterial BRT
• TH 52 Highway BRT
These alternatives showed the
best ability to satisfy project
goals based on one or more
factors including:
Physical impacts
Projected ridership
Cost-effectiveness
A service extension to
Rosemount was evaluated
separately from preliminary
evaluation. Further study of a
traditional express bus service
along TH 52 is recommended for
analysis outside of this study.
4. ADVANCED DEFINITION AND FINAL
EVALUATION
ADVANCED DEFINITION WILL INCLUDE:
We are here
Runningway alignment
Stations
Service plans
Traffic controls
Operating facilities design
11
4. ADVANCED DEFINITION AND FINAL
EVALUATION
ADVANCED DEFINITION WILL PROVIDE
INFORMATION TO EVALUATE:
• Cost estimates
• Economic development and land use
• Environmental and natural resources
• Environmental justice
• Mobility
• Traffic operations
• Travel demand
We are here
12
4. ADVANCED DEFINITION AND FINAL
EVALUATION
INFORMED BY:
•
•
•
We are here
Purpose and Need local
•
Adopted goals, objectives, and evaluation measures
Metropolitan Council Regional Transitway Guidelines regional
•
Capital Investment Criteria – Section 10.8
FTA New Starts national
•
Project Justification Criteria
13
NEXT STEPS TODAY
WHAT’S NEXT TODAY?
We invite you to:
Review materials
Ask questions
Sign-up for email list
Fill out comment cards
Provide feedback on preliminary alternatives
14
THANK YOU!
WWW.ROBERTSTREETTRANSIT.COM