COEXISTENCE IN NORTH DAKOTA
Download
Report
Transcript COEXISTENCE IN NORTH DAKOTA
COEXISTENCE IN
NORTH DAKOTA
Brad Brummond
September 2005
SITUATION
North Dakota is a national leader in
Certified organic production
Oil seeds (flax and sunflower)
Cereal grains
North Dakota is increasing it’s acres of
transgenic crops
Soybeans
Corn
SITUATION
Organic and IP markets have low to no
tolerance for transgenic crops.
Biotech markets need pure seed for traits to
work.
World market is increasingly demanding
specialized and branded products.
HOW TO PROTECT MARKETS
Products need to be segregated and genetic
drift contained.
Agriculture needs to work together to
guarantee markets.
If markets can not be met we lose markets
and income for North Dakota.
ISSUES (AS IDENTIFIED CWG)
Liability
Segregation
Tolerances
Seed Certification Standards
Germ Plasm Purity
Opportunity and Consequences
Neighbor Relations and Communication
Education of Consumers
COEXISTENCE WORKING GROUP
July 02-05
Made up of stakeholders
Developed Best Management Practices
Organic growers and one conventional grower
withdrew in protest over BMPs.
See handout of BMPs
HOW DO WE COEXIST
Communication
Industry
University
Regulatory
Producers
Seedstocks
If we do not communicate and help each
other we all lose.
HOW DO WE COEXIST
Strict segregation practices must be followed.
Equipment cleanout
Facilities clean
Tarp trucks
Dedicated resources
HOW DO WE COEXIST
We must maintain genetic purity.
If we do not have pure lots how can we serve
our markets?
Buffer strips
Distance
Pretest seed
Planting dates
OTHER WAYS
Understand contracts and risk
Be a good neighbor
Insurance??
ISSUES YET TO BE RESOLVED
How far is far enough?
Liability?
Tolerances?
What to do with unintended presence in
seedlots?
WHERE ARE WE NOW?
BMPs developed
Communication started
Other states and nations continuing efforts.
North Dakota was one of the first efforts in
coexistence.
CONCLUSION
We must remember that coexistence is a
journey, not a destination.
Brad Brummond
North Dakota Coexistence Coordinator
Any opinions, findings, conclusions or
recommendations expressed in this
publication are those of the authors and do
not necessarily reflect the view of USDA
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This material is based upon work supported
by the Cooperative State, Research,
Education and Extension Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, and Nebraska
Experiments, University of Nebraska, under
cooperative agreement number 2000-3864011923
Additional funding was provided by Monsanto
Questions? Comments?