Transcript www.dtps.gov.za

Agenda Item: 1.3
Title:
“to review and revise Resolution 646
(Rev.WRC-12) for broadband public
protection and disaster relief (PPDR), in
accordance with Resolution 648
(WRC-12)”
ITU-R Responsible Group: WP 5A
WRC 2003 adopted
Res. 646
Resolution 646 WRC-03 public
protection and disaster relief (PPDR)
RESOLUTION 648 (WRC-12) Studies to
support broadband public protection and
disaster relief ( B-PPDR)
What is PPDR?
PUBLIC SAFETY BROADBAND
SPECTRUM STUDIES
LSE- Socioeconomic Value of Mission
Critical Mobile Applications for Public
Safety in the EU: 2x10MHz in 700MHz in
10 European Countries
December 2013
Dr Alexander Grous
Centre for Economic Performance
London School of Economics and
Political Science
ALLOCATING
SPECTRUM TO
PUBLIC SAFETY
HAS GREAT
BENEFITS
DEDICATED
BB PPDR
ALLOCATION
AUCTIONED
TO
COMMERCIAL
LTE SERVICE
4
WRC-2012 approved a
new agenda for PPDR
 Recognized that the focus in 2003 was to identify
spectrum bands for mission critical voice and
relatively low-speed data for PPDR agencies – not
broadband.
 Since then, there has been a significant growth in
smart phone use and broadband applications,
including real-time, high quality, video and other
applications.
 LTE technology had already been adopted by the U.S.
and broadband spectrum allocated for public safety.
Need for real-time
multimedia
Need for Situational
Awareness
Misuse of Social
Networks
 It had been more than eight years since WRC adopted
Resolution 646. The WRC concluded that the time
was right for review of this resolution
 Affords the opportunity to identify and analyze PPDR
broadband requirements and identify potential
spectrum bands for PPDR broadband for WRC – 2015.
Increased severity of
Incidents and
disasters
5
Need for Review of
Resolution 646
 The focus in 2003 when ITU adopted Resolution 646 was
to identify bands for mission critical voice and data for
PPDR agencies. The broadband applications particularly
video were thought to be relevant only for hot spot
coverage
 Over last few years, many broadband technologies,
particularly IMT based technologies such as LTE are being
customized to meet the needs of Public safety agencies
 Video surveillance and usage by the PPDR agencies has
become crucial to saving lives.
 It has been eight years since WRC adopted the last PPDR
Resolution – Resolution 646. The time is right for review
of this resolution
6
ITU ACTIVITIES ON
PPDR
Identification of
spectrum bands
Res. 647 (WRC2007)
Agenda Item 1.3
Regional
Harmonization
Rec. M.1826
Revise M.2033
Rec. M.2015
IDENTIFY
BANDS
CPM Text
Further Studies
by ITU-R
WRC 2003 Res. 646
vs. Res. 646 WRC-15!
Resolution Identified
Regionally harmonized
frequency bands
ITU Region 1 (EMEA)
380-470 MHz as the
frequency range with
380-385/ 390-395 MHz
as core PPDR Band
Further Studies
by ITU-R
Cross Border
movement
ITU Region 2
(Americas)
Region 3 (Asia /Australia)
746-806 MHz,
806-869 MHz,
4940-4 990
MHz
406.1-430 MHz, 440-470 MHz,
806-824/851-869 MHz,
4 940-4 990, 5 850-5 925 MHz
Footnote for some countries
380-400 MHz
746-806 MHz
New Harmonized bands for Broadband PPDR for WRC15?
Add B-PPDR:
700MHz / 800MHz?
+B-PPDR in 700MHz
BC 14 or BC 28 !
Add B-PPDR in 800/700
BC 26/27 or BC28!
Organization of the
work in WP 5A
Spectrum
Technical &
Needed for
Operational
Broadband
Requirements
PPDR
Studies
Needed
under
Agenda 1.3
Conference
Frequency
Preparatory
Bands
Meeting(CPM)
Identification
Text
9
Summary of Relevant ITU
SG/WP Progress
As of May 2014
SWG AI1.3 CPM Text
– Draft CPM Text completed in May 2014. [232] Annex 6 to Working Party
5A Chairman's Report - Draft CPM text for WRC-15 agenda item 1.3
(http://www.itu.int/md/R12-WP5A-C-0543/en Annex 06)
SWG PPDR Report
• Working document toward a preliminary draft new Report ITU-R M.[PPDR]
"Public protection and disaster relief communications“
http://www.itu.int/md/R12-WP5A-C-0543/en Annex 15”
Revision of Recommendations M.2009 and M.2015
• Working document toward a preliminary draft revision of Recommendation
ITU-R M.2015 - Frequency arrangements for public protection and disaster
relief Radiocommunication systems in UHF bands in accordance with
Resolution 646 (Rev.WRC-12)
• Preliminary draft revision of Recommendation ITU-R M.2009 “Radio interface
standards for use by public protection and disaster relief operations in some
parts of the UHF band in accordance with Resolution 646 (Rev.WRC-12)”
http://www.itu.int/md/R12-WP5A-C-0543/en (Annex 14 & Annex 13)
10
Development of a draft
Report on NB/WB & BB
PPDR
• The main activity is the development of a draft Report on
narrowband/wideband/broadband (NB/WB/BB) PPDR
with the view to suppress Report ITU-R M.2033
– This draft Report includes sections on the technical
and operational issues relating to broadband PPDR,
which ITU-R was invited to study under Res. 648
(WRC-12).
Working document http://www.itu.int/md/R12WP5A-C-0543/en Annex 15
– Creation of Correspondence Group to work on section
for narrowband and wideband land mobile system
(https://extranet.itu.int/rsg-meetings/sg5/wp5a/cgppdr-report-n-w/ )
11
Working party 5D
Activities on B-PPDR
WP5D /SWG on BB PPDR completed work in Nov 2012 and
SG5 Approved in Dec 2012
COMPLETED ITU R Report M. 2291 addressing LTE/IMT
suitability for Broadband PPDR requirements
Main
Number
Title
Status
M.2291-0
(12/2013)
The use of International Mobile
Telecommunications for broadband
public protection and disaster relief
applications
In force (Main)
12
CPM: Methods to satisfy
the agenda item
• For WRC-15 agenda on PPDR, the proposal to be considered are
being documented in a report called the CPM Report
• The CPM report will be considered in the CPM meeting in early
2015 and will become the official brief for the WRC.
• The current draft approved at the meeting last month includes:
– Method A: Only editorial updating to Resolution 646
(Rev.WRC-12)
– Method B: Modify Resolution 646 (Rev.WRC-12) to include all
the necessary bands for broadband PPDR
– Method C: Modify Resolution 646 but remove any reference to
frequencies in resolves or recognizing and place them in new
recommendation by non binding reference ITU R M report
2015
13
Disadvantages of
Method A
 This method will not fulfill the objective of Resolution 648 (WRC-12), which
recognized that it is timely “to consider the future direction of spectrum
needs of public safety and disaster management agencies” and called on
WRC-15 to “take appropriate action with regard to revision of Resolution 646
(Rev.WRC-12)”
 There will be no guidance to administrations and manufacturers to
encourage regional/ international harmonization of frequency ranges for
wide area mobile broadband PPDR.
 Additional regionally harmonized frequency ranges/bands for broadband
PPDR will not be included for Region 1 and Region 3 in resolves 2 of
Resolution 646 (Rev.WRC-12). In addition, invites ITU-R 2 of Resolution 646
(Rev.WRC-12) specifically calls on ITU-R “to conduct further appropriate
technical studies in support of possible additional identification of other
frequency ranges to meet the particular needs of certain countries in Region
1”. Such identification will not be done unless Resolution 646 (Rev.WRC-12)
is suitably modified as called for in Resolution 648 (WRC-12). In particular
in Region 3, the band 746-806 MHz is included for some countries but this
part of the APT 700 MHz band (698-806) is not part of the harmonized
frequency range.
[ http://www.itu.int/md/R12-WP5A-C-0543/en] Annex 06
Disadvantages of
Method C
 Resolution 648 (WRC-12) only calls for revision of Resolution 646
(Rev.WRC-12)to meet the needs of broadband PPDR. There is no
provision in this agenda item for changing the bands/ranges for narrow
band/wideband already identified in Resolution 646 (Rev.WRC-12). Any
change to the bands/ranges contained in resolves 2 of Resolution 646
(Rev.WRC-12) for PPDR applications other than broadband is outside
the scope of agenda item 1.3 (WRC-15).
 This method removes the guidance to ITU-R working parties as to which
frequency bands/ranges should be used to develop frequency
arrangements for PPDR. It will result in the introduction of nonharmonized bands/ranges for PPDR and defeat the purpose of
Resolution 646 (Rev.WRC-12). It isolates into a single study group
important decisions on spectrum usage that would affect spectrum
bands and users across multiple radiocommunication services. It could
lead to identification of additional preferred frequency ranges without
appropriate technical studies, creating the potential for harmful
interference situations to and from PPDR operations worldwide through
global circulation of equipment.
[ http://www.itu.int/md/R12-WP5A-C-0543/en] Annex 06
Disadvantages of
Method C
 Removal of the listed spectrum ranges from resolves 2 of Resolution
646 (Rev.WRC 12) would raise the potential for more frequent
changes in identified spectrum ranges, leading to uncertainty for
PPDR equipment manufacturers, PPDR system operators and
incumbent spectrum users across multiple spectrum bands.
 This method will remove the stability of the bands/ranges identified
for PPDR as revisions to ITU-R Recommendations can be made
anytime. This will discourage investment in the development of PPDR
equipment for meeting the needs of PPDR agencies. This method is
un-implementable as ITU-R working parties, on their own and
without guidance from the Radio Regulations, cannot decide which
band to develop frequency arrangements for broadband PPDR. This
will therefore defeat the whole purpose of Resolution 646 (Rev.WRC12).
[ http://www.itu.int/md/R12-WP5A-C-0543/en] Annex 06
Advantages of
Method B
 This method satisfies agenda item 1.3 and the resolves part of Resolution 648(WRC12) to review and revise Resolution 646 (Rev.WRC-12) for broadband public protection
and disaster relief (PPDR). The method can also fulfill invites ITU-R 2 of Resolution
646 (Rev.WRC-12) that specifically calls on ITU-R “to conduct further appropriate
technical studies in support of possible additional identification of other frequency
ranges to meet the particular needs of certain countries in Region 1”. Such
identification can be done under this method by suitable modification of Resolution
646 (Rev.WRC-12) as called for in Resolution 648 (WRC-12).
 This method can facilitate regional harmonization of frequency bands/ranges for
broadband PPDR by identifying frequency bands/ranges that are suitable for the
deployment of mobile broadband PPDR systems. As indicated in section 1/1.3/4,
various studies in section 1/1.3/3, in particular ECC Report 199, APT/AWG/Report
38 and Report ITU-R M.[PPDR] indicate a strong need for harmonized spectrum to
meet the needs of PPDR agencies.
 This method facilitates, through harmonized frequency bands/ ranges, the
development of economies of scale for broadband PPDR equipment; and this will
address the needs of developing countries for cost-effective PPDR equipment. Studies
indicate that adoption of common technology, technical features and functional
capabilities, as well as harmonized spectrum arrangements, can maximize the
potential for regional cooperation and cross-border inter-working and lead to greater
market scale to the benefit of PPDR agencies and increase the safety and security of
the public.
[ http://www.itu.int/md/R12-WP5A-C-0543/en] Annex 06
CPM Method B
for Region I
 Method B: Modify Resolution 646 (Rev.WRC12) to include all the necessary bands for
broadband PPDR for Region I
 Option 1 to add under resolves 2
 “The frequency range 694-790 MHz is a preferred
harmonized range for broadband public protection and
disaster relief solutions in some countries in Region 1”
 Option 2
 the band 698-713 MHz/753-768 MHz within the
frequency range 694-790 MHz and the band 791-801 /
832-842 MHz within the frequency range 790-862 MHz
are the preferred bands for broadband PPDR within
certain countries of Region 1 which have given their
agreement;
[ http://www.itu.int/md/R12-WP5A-C-0543/en] Annex 06
Preliminary SA
Position
 Support Method B and encourage identification of
Spectrum for B-PPDR
 Seek harmonized band or range for PPDR
implementation for Africa & Region I
 Balance between commercial and dedicated PPDR
spectrum requests at national level
 To allow flexibility by selecting as Africa states have
different arrangements than CEPT for both 800/850
MHz
 Propose common position for Africa based on
identification of a frequency range under Method B
Proposal 1 new Option 3 to include range either
700(694-790MHz) or 800/850MHz i.e. Add the
Range 694-889MHz from within which B-PPDR is
allocated
Scenarios for
Arrangements in 700MHz
for both Commercial and
B-PPDR
IMT
20MHz
791
788
763
753
736
733
708
703
698
IMT
25MHz
788
768
758
753
733
703
698
3MH
z
PPDR IMT
10MHz
791
IMT
20MHz
PPDR
Expansi
PPDR IMT
on
10MHz
eg.
5MHz
PPDR
Expa
nsion
788
PPDR IMT
10MHz
PPDR
Expansi PPDR IMT Main IMT
on
"A5"
"A5" UL
eg.
10MHz
20MHz
5MHz
IMT
PPDR IMT Main
"A5"
10MHz
25MHz
768
758
733
713
703
PPDR IMT Main IMT
"A5"
"A5" UL
10MHz
20MHz
PPDR
Expa
nsion
3MH
z
Scenarios for Frequency
Arrangements for IMT
Commercial and B-PPDR
703MHz
733MHz
758MHz
832MHz
788MHz
791MHz
694
PPDR
PPDR
703MHz
OR
694
PPDR
915MHz
PPDR
803MHz
803
748MHz
880MHz
821MHz
PPDR
758MHz
862MHz
844MHz 862MHz 880MHz
821MHz
915MHz
925MHz
960
915MHz 935MHz
960
PPDR
703MHz
788MHz
758MHz
694
788MHz
BC 28
BC 28
824
806MHz
748MHz
B27
803MHz
BC26/5
BC 8
PPDR
834MHz
869MHz 879MHz
851MHz
PPDR
880MHz
Conclusion
SUPPLIMANTARY
SLIDES
BACKGROUND SLIDES ON
PPDR
SUPPLIMANTARY
SLIDES
List of bands considered in
different regions
Studies on Spectrum
requirements
Socio Economic value of
allocating Spectrum to BPPDR
LIKELY PPDR BROADBAND
ALLOCATIONS
BANDS
LIKELY TO CONSIDER FOR PPDR BB
• 700 MHz US (BC 14)
• USA/CANADA/CARIBBEANs ISLANDS
• 700 MHz APT (BC 28)
• CENTRAL/LATIN AMERICA
• PARTS OF ASIA
• 700 MHz DD2
(within 694-791 MHz)
• EUROPE/MIDDLE EAST
• 800 MHz
(BC 26 or BC 27)
• ASIA, LATIN AMERICA
• 800 MHz (BC 20)
• MIDDLE EAST
• 1.4 GHz (TDD)
• CHINA
• 2.3 GHz (TDD, BC40)
• MIDDLE EAST, INDIA
REGION III – Preferred
Frequency band for B-PPDR
APT Preliminary Views:
APT Members support revision of Resolution 646 (Rev.WRC-12) for regional harmonisation of frequency bands/ranges
for future deployment of broadband PPDR.
Different amounts of available spectrum may be used within bands included in revised Resolution 646 by APT
Members depending on their national circumstances. This will provide flexibility to decide the amount of spectrum and
the frequency arrangement that best meets their overall national broadband PPDR requirements.
5.
Other Views
Some APT Members are of the view that the band 806-824/851-869 MHz (or parts thereof), which is included in
Resolution 646 (WRC-12), should be the regionally harmonised band for broadband PPDR use in Region 3.
Some APT Members also support other frequency bands than 806-824/851-869 MHz in the revision of the Resolution
646 in the draft CPM text.
PUBLIC SAFETY BROADBAND
SPECTRUM STUDIES
Phoenix Center Policy Bulletin No. 26 D Block
“…10 MHz D Block plausibly provides at least $3.4
billion more in social benefits if assigned to public
safety rather than to commercial use”
www.phoenix-center.org
Main points
a non-profit 501 (c)(3) organization
• $3.4B more in social benefits if additional 5+5 MHz is assigned to public safety
• Auctioning the D Block adds, rather than relieves, stress to the public budget
• Benefits mainly attributable to opportunity to create a contiguous 20 MHz block of spectrum, and this opportunity
•
•
•
only exists for public safety
Loss in auction revenues today more than offset by $2B-$6B gain in auction revenues in the future and $4B in
lower public safety network deployment costs
Applying public safety obligations on commercial spectrum more costly than the assignment of spectrum to
public safety
D Block auction revenue unlikely to exceed $2B
About the authors
• Lawrence J. Spiwak, J.D., President, Phoenix Center For Advanced
•
Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies
Previously, Mr. Spiwak was a Senior Attorney with the Competition
Division in the FCC’s Office of General Counsel from 1994-1998
George S. Ford, PhD, Chief Economist, Phoenix Center For
Advanced Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies
Previously, Mr. Ford was a Economist with the Competitive Division27
in
the FCC’s Office of General Counsel & Cable Bureau from 1994-1996
Wik CONSULT
Taken From:
PAGE 28
PUBLIC SAFETY BROADBAND
SPECTRUM STUDIES
Defense Research & Development
Canada – Feb. 2011Report
“The results show that the amount of bandwidth required to satisfy the
needs of public safety is greater than 20 megahertz in the near- to midterm, and likely to also exceed 20 megahertz in the long term, despite
advances in technology. ”
www.drdc-rddc.gc.ca
www.publicsafety.gc.ca
Main points
•
•
•
•
•
•
Channelization of the Canadian 700MHz band is under study by Industry Canada; the impetus for this assessment was
Industry Canada’s call for consultation, SMSE-018-10
Global demand for mobile broadband data is experiencing exponential growth in the commercial space fueled primarily by the
continued deployment of laptop and netbook computers, and smartphones
It is expected that tactical video will play an increasingly important role to enhance situational awareness
Limiting public safety to 10 MHz (5+5 MHz) will require significant reduction in public safety broadband requirements, including
a 50% reduction in video data rate and quality, and limiting simultaneous data users to 1 in 20 instead of 1 in 4
Even 20 MHz (10+10 MHz) is insufficient bandwidth to support the needs of public safety in the 10-15 year horizon
LMR will remain the key voice communications tool for the foreseeable future
About the study
•
•
•
•
Report title, “700MHz Spectrum Requirements for Canadian Public Safety Interoperable Mobile Broadband Data
Communications”. Report attached to Public Safety Canada’s filing to Industry Canada’s consultation, SMSE-018-10
Capacity model developed using Long Term Evolution (LTE) and public safety data demands for recurring emergency
situations modeled with active participation from Canadian public safety stakeholders
Three incident scenarios selected as case studies for public safety stakeholders to develop incident-response profiles
establishing how many resources and assets are assigned to each incident, and what applications are used during each
incident. Incidents chosen as case studies represent major but commonly re-occurring events
The data throughput for each application was derived from empirical studies conducted by public safety agencies, support29
organizations, and research labs
Opportunity Cost of per capita
20 MHz Spectrum in 700/800
MHz Vs per capita PPDR Costs
in 8 Asian countries
Country
Opportunity
cost
(20 MHz)
$33
Annual
losses per
capita
$299
China
$9
$54
Indonesia
$2
$505
Malaysia
$6
$269
New
Zealand
Singapore
$20
$280
$19
$36
South
Korea
Thailand
$13
$182
$7
$345
Australia
30
ITU RELATED STUDIES TO
PPDR ( 1 of 2)
Recommendations and Reports for which consequential changes may be
required based on results of technical studies
• Recommendation ITU-R M.1637: “Global cross-border circulation of
Radiocommunication equipment in emergency and disaster relief situations”
(2006)
The document is designed “to facilitate the global circulation of Radiocommunication equipment to be used in emergency and disaster
relief situations”.
1) References Resolution 646 (Rev.WRC-12); therefore relevant to WRC-15 Agenda item 1.3.
•
Recommendation ITU-R M.1826: “Harmonized frequency channel plan for
broadband public protection and disaster relief operations at 4 940-4 990 MHz
in Regions 2 and 3” (2007)
The document “addresses harmonized frequency channel plans in the band 4 940-4 990 MHz for broadband public protection and
disaster relief Radiocommunication in Regions 2 and 3”
1) Relevant to WRC-15 Agenda item 1.3, appears to address broadband already.
2) Suggest no further revision needed under WRC-15 Agenda item 1.3; possible further review based on technical studies developed
to support CPM text.
•
Recommendation ITU-R F.1105: “Fixed wireless systems for disaster
mitigation and relief operations” (2006)
This document “provides characteristics of fixed wireless systems used for disaster mitigation and relief operations”
1) Not relevant to WRC-15 Agenda item 1.3.
2) Possible revision to address broadband characteristics based on technical studies developed to support CPM text.
3) Revision complete and submitted to SG 5 for consideration.
ITU RELATED STUDIES TO
PPDR ( 2 of 2)
Recommendations and Reports relevant to WRC-15 Agenda item 1.3
•
Report ITU-R M.2033: “Radiocommunication objectives and requirements for public
protection and disaster relief” (2003)
This document “identifies objectives, applications, requirements, a methodology for spectrum calculations, spectrum requirements and
solutions for interoperability”
1) Relevant to WRC-15 Agenda item 1.3.
2) Propose review and revision to further address broadband requirements.
3) Decision taken to develop a new Report on narrowband, wideband, and broadband PPDR with a view to suppress Report ITU-R
M.2033 upon completion of the new Report.
•
Recommendation ITU-R M.2009: “Radio interface standards for use by public
protection and disaster relief operations in some parts of the UHF band in accordance
with Resolution 646 (WRC-03)” (2012)
1)
2)
•
Recommendation ITU-R M.2015: “Frequency arrangements for public protection and
disaster relief Radiocommunication systems in UHF bands in accordance with
Resolution 646 (Rev.WRC-12)” (2012)
1)
2)
•
Relevant to WRC-15 Agenda item 1.3.
Already under revision.
Relevant to WRC-15 Agenda item 1.3.
Already under revision.
Report ITU-R M.2014: “Digital land mobile systems for dispatch traffic” (2012)
1)
2)
3)
Not relevant to WRC-15 Agenda item 1.3.
Revision complete and submitted to SG 5 for consideration.
Completed.