Transcript Document

FEMA Update
Updates on various FEMA Preparedness and other Agency
programs and initiatives
Partners in Emergency Preparedness Conference
April 14, 2009
Patrick Massey
Federal Preparedness Coordinator
Director, National Preparedness Division
FEMA Region 10
Presentation Topics
I.
Overview of FEMA Nationally
IV.
Hazard Mitigation
II.
Overview of FEMA Region 10
V.
Grants Programs
III.
Preparedness
VI.
Disaster Operations
VII.
Disaster Assistance
• Assessments
• Planning
• NIMS
• Training
• Exercises
• Continuity Programs
• Community Preparedness
I. Overview of FEMA
Prepared. Responsive. Committed.
FEMA Mission
Lead Nation’s Efforts to:
–Prepare for,
–Protect against,
–Rapidly respond to, and
–Recover from disaster.
–Mitigate risk.
All Hazards:
–Natural disasters
–Terrorism
–Other man-made disasters
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Office of the Administrator
Acting Administrator– Nancy Ward
Acting Deputy Administrator – David Garratt
Gulf Coast Recovery
Assistant Administrator
James Stark
Law Enforcement
Advisor to the
Administrator
Rick Dinse
Center for FaithBased and
Community
Initiatives
Director
Carole Cameron
Acting
Office of Policy and
Prog. Analysis
Director
Pat Stahlschmidt
Acting
Executive Secretariat
Exec. Secretary
Elizabeth Edge
Office of External
Affairs
Director
Robert Jensen
Acting
Associate Deputy
Administrator
Bob Shea
Regional Administrators
Disability Coordinator
Office of Equal Rights
Director
Pauline Campbell
Cindy Daniel
Logistics
Management
Disaster
Assistance
Disaster
Operations
Assistant
Administrator
William “Eric”
Smith
Assistant
Administrator
James Walke
Acting
Assistant
Administrator
Bob Powers
Acting
Dotted Lines are Coordination Solid Lines Are Command and Control
Names in Italics are in Acting positions
As of 1/21/09
Office of Chief
Counsel
David Trissell
Grant Programs
Assistant
Administrator
Ross Ashley
Office of Chief
Financial Officer
Norman Dong
Management
Assistant
Administrator
Albert Sligh
National
Preparedness
United States
Fire Admin
Deputy
Administrator
Corey Gruber
Acting
Assistant
Administrator
Denis Onieal
Acting
National Capital
Region Coordination
Director
Ken Wall
Acting
Region I - Paul Ford, Acting
Region II - Mike Moriarty, Acting
Region III – Jon Sarubbi
Region IV - Major P. May
Region V - Janet Odeshoo, Acting
Region VI – Gary Jones, Acting
Region VII – Art Freeman, Acting
Region VIII –Doug Gore, Acting
Region IX – Karen Armes, Acting
Region X – Denis Hunsinger, Acting
National
Continuity
Programs
Assistant
Administrator
Ann Buckingham
Acting
Mitigation
Assistant
Administrator
Mike Buckley
Acting
Who is FEMA?
3,000 authorized
full-time
permanent
employees
8,000 on-call
disaster
assistance
employees
New FEMA Vision
TRANSFORM FEMA INTO THE NATION’S
PREEMINENT EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AND
PREPAREDNEDSS AGENCY
▪ Marshall an effective national response
▪ Improve delivery of service to victims
▪ Reduce vulnerability to life and property
▪ Strengthen our partnerships with states
▪ Earn public confidence
Operational Core Competencies
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Service to Disaster Victims
Operational Planning and Preparedness
Incident Management
Disaster Logistics
Hazard Mitigation
Emergency Communications
Public Disaster Communications
Integrated Preparedness
Continuity Programs
II. FEMA Region 10
Office located in Bothell, WA “The Bunker”
• 90 Full-time staff
• 400+ Disaster Reservists
• MERS detachment co-located
Satellite offices:
Hermiston, OR
Anchorage, AK
Dennis Hunsinger, Acting Regional Administrator
FEMA Region 10 FY09 Goals
1. Disaster Readiness
2. Program Delivery
3. Stakeholder Outreach
4. Professional Development
III. Preparedness
• Assessments
• Planning
• NIMS
• Training
• Exercises
• Community Preparedness
• Continuity Programs
Goal: Implement the Preparedness Cycle
CONPLAN, OPLANS
Plan
RAMP,
CAP
Evaluate &
Improve
NIMS / NRF
Organize,
Train &
Equip
Exercise
HSEEP, NEP, NIECG
Internal,
External,
T&E
Integration
Doctrine development:
• Preparedness – National Preparedness Goal
(NPG) and Target Capabilities (TCL)
• Exercises – National Exercise Program (NEP)
• Incident Management – National Incident
Management System (NIMS)
• Planning – Integrated Planning System (IPS) and
Comprehensive Preparedness Guides (CPG)
Assessments
• Target Capabilities List (TCL) Update Project
• Gap Analysis Program (GAP)
• Comprehensive Assessment System (CAS)
The Target Capabilities List (TCLs)
Common Mission Area
Communications
Community
Preparedness and Participation
Intelligence/Information Sharing and
Dissemination
Planning
Risk Management
Prevent Mission Area
CBRNE
Detection
Counter-Terror Investigations and Law
Enforcement
Information Gathering and Recognition
Intelligence Analysis and Production
Protect Mission Area
Critical
Infrastructure Protection
Epidemiological Surveillance and
Investigation
Food and Agriculture Safety and Defense
Laboratory Testing
Recovery Mission Area
Economic
and Community Recovery
Restoration of Lifelines
Structural Damage Assessment
Respond Mission Area
Animal
Health Emergency Support
Citizen Evacuation and Shelter-in-Place
Critical Resource Logistics and Distribution
Emergency Operations Center
Management
Emergency Public Information and Warning
Emergency Public Safety and Security
Response
Emergency Triage and Pre-Hospital Treatment
Environmental Health
Explosive Device Response Operations
Fatality Management
Fire Incident Response Support
Isolation and Quarantine
Mass Care (Sheltering, Feeding, and Related
Services)
Mass Prophylaxis
Medical Supplies Management and Distribution
Medical Surge
Onsite Incident Management
Responder Safety and Health
Search and Rescue (Land-Based)
Volunteer Management and Donations
WMD/Hazardous Materials Response and
Decontamination
TCL Update Project
• Update content to reflect current policies, guidance, capabilities
• Establish ‘frameworks’ that are more user-friendly, especially for TCL
application to preparedness decision making
• Strengthen the role of a jurisdiction’s unique risks and circumstances
• Establish measurable targets for planning and assessment purposes
• Provide an objective means to justify investments and priorities
• Provide strong links among applicable standards, Federal policies and
guidance, and terminologies
• Help synchronize administrative and programmatic reporting
• Promote mutual aid and resource sharing
• Promote integration across programs along the preparedness lifecycle
Impacts from the TCL Update
• Individual capabilities will be implemented on a rolling basis as they
are developed until the entire TCL is updated
• TCL updates will be reflected or referenced within federal
preparedness programs (e.g., grant investment justifications,
planning guidance, exercise evaluation guides, assessments)
• The TCL provides guidance for building and measuring capabilities,
it is not meant to prescribe how to perform operations or to be
viewed as a standard
• Entities are not expected to deliver a capability by itself – rather it is
anticipated for capabilities to be met through mutual aid and regional
collaboration.
Updated Frameworks Under Development
From the original 37 capabilities, the following six (6) are under development to
test the means for updating the TCL:
•
Animal Disease Emergencies
•
Multi-Agency Coordination/Emergency Operations Center Management
•
Intelligence
•
Mass Transit Protection
•
Incident Command
•
Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)/Hazardous Materials (HazMat)
Rescue
FEMA convened Technical Working Groups comprised of local officials
from all Regions of the country to develop the first set of draft
Frameworks being circulated for a wider national review
Target Capability Frameworks
A Target Capability Framework comprises three charts: Performance
Classes, Performance Objectives, and Resource Elements
Performance Classes: Examples
WMD/HazMat Rescue
Risk Factors
Class I
Class IV
Population
Cities and Counties with population
greater than 3 million
Cities / Counties with population
between 100,000 and 500,000
Population Density
Cities / Counties with population less
than 100,000 and density greater than
2,500 people per square mile
Critical Infrastructure
Chemical
Animal Disease Emergencies
Risk Factors
Class I
Class IV
Yearly Sales Value of
Livestock, Poultry,
and their Products
States with yearly sales of
livestock, poultry, and their
products of greater than $5 billion.
Counties and tribes with yearly
sales of livestock, poultry, and
their products of greater than $50
million.
Animal Population
Density
States with greater than X
concentrated feeding operations
Counties and tribes with greater
than X concentrated feeding
operations
Gap Analysis Program (GAP)
GAP Critical Areas:
1.
Transportation and
Evacuation
2.
Communications
3.
Temporary Emergency
Power
4.
Mass-Care and Emergency
Assistance
5.
Logistics Management and
Resource Support
6.
Public Health
7.
Search and Rescue
The purpose of the FEMA Gap Analysis Program is to engage State, Federal,
and other partners in a process that identifies and addresses shortfalls in
meeting disaster resource and planning requirements. Gaps are identified by
comparing current capabilities to disaster response requirements.
Comprehensive Assessment System (CAS)
“A Comprehensive Assessment System (CAS) that assesses, on an ongoing basis,
the Nation’s overall preparedness, including operational readiness.”
– PKEMRA 649(a)
REQUIREMENTS
OUTCOMES
 Assess compliance with the national
preparedness system, National Incident
Management System, National
Response Plan, and other related plans
and strategies (PKEMRA 649 (c)(1))
Analysis and information that:
 Assess capability levels at the time of
assessment against target capability
levels (PKEMRA 649 (c)(2))
 Helps set policy requirements and
allocate finite resources
 Assess resource needs to meet
desired target capability levels
(PKEMRA 649 (c)(3))
 Assess performance of training,
exercise, and operations (PKEMRA 649
(c)(4))
 Informs the Federal Preparedness
Report (FPR), State Preparedness
Reports (SPR), and, ultimately, National
Preparedness Report (NPR)
 Supports the Grant Programs
Directorate (GPD) Cost-to-Capability
(C2C) Initiative
 Guides improvements in training,
exercises and operations
EMAC
Grant
Reporting
Data
IJs
Aid
Agreements
Data
LLIS
After Action and
Corrective
Action Data
FEMA
RAMP
BISRs
CAP
C2C
FPR
FYHSP
Exercise
Data
CAS
CRR
NEXS
Training
Data
PKEMRA
Reporting
Requirements
GAP
DPETAP
TIC
P
CSID
CTGP
TEI
EMI
TAI
S
SPR
NIMS
DATA
PCA
EMAP
Preparedness
Standards Data
NPS
Existing and
Legacy
Assessment
Data
National Response Framework (NRF)
www.fema.gov/nrf
Core
Document
Doctrine, organization, roles and
responsibilities, response actions
and planning requirements that
guide national response
Emergency Support
Function Annexes
Mechanisms to group and provide Federal
resources and capabilities to support State
and local responders
Support
Annexes
Essential supporting aspects of the Federal
response common to all incidents
Incident
Annexes
Incident-specific applications of the
Framework
Partner
Guides
Next level of detail in response actions
tailored to the actionable entity
24
National Incident Management System
2008
1st edition NIMS Guidance Document issued in 2004
2nd edition NIMS Guidance Document issued in 2008
2008 NIMS Document:
• Preparedness
• Communications and Information Management
• Resource Management
• Command and Management
• Ongoing Management and Maintence
National Incident Management System
2008 Changes
Preparedness:
 Additional roles of elected and appointed officials to define their
responsibilities prior to and during an incident
 Added key roles of NGOs and private sector, detailing how they should
be integrated into preparedness efforts
Communications & Information Management
 This component was heavily revised to better articulate the importance
of communications and information management and is now comprised
of three main sections.
Resource Management
 The majority of the concept and principles within this component
remained unchanged; however, clarifying language was added
wherever possible to ensure readability.
National Incident Management System
2008 Changes
Command and Management
 Clarified the purpose of Area Command and how it fits into ICS
 Expanded the Multiagency Coordination System (MACS) section to
better define the process of Multiagency Coordination and the elements
that make up the System
 Replaced the term MAC Entities with MAC Groups
 Major system elements within MACS now include Emergency
Operation Centers (EOCs) and communications/dispatch centers.
Ongoing Management and Maintenance
 As part of the restructuring of the component, the Supporting
Technologies chapter of the 2004 NIMS was moved into the Ongoing
Management and Maintenance Component in the 2008 version.
NIMS – the path forward
• NIMS Compliance Metrics (FY09 and FY10)
• NIMS Strategy Document
• NIMS 5-year Training Plan
• ICS Position-specific Training
• ICS Emergency Responder Field Guide
• NIMS Intelligence/Investigative Function Guide
• NIMS Credentialing Guide
Planning
Integrated Planning
System (IPS)
Comprehensive
Preparedness
Guides (CPGs)
National Planning Scenarios
Source: National Response Framework (NRF) p.75
Scenario Set
National Planning Scenarios
Explosives Attack – Terrorist
Use of Explosives (TUE)
Scenario 12: Explosives Attack – Bombing Using Improvised Explosive Device
(IED)
Nuclear Attack (IND)
Scenario 01: Nuclear Detonation – Improvised Nuclear Device (IND)
Radiological Attack (RDD)
Scenario 11: Radiological Attack – Radiological Dispersal Devices (RDD)
Scenario 02: Biological Attack – Aerosol Anthrax
Biological Attack – with
annexes for different pathogens Scenario 04: Biological Attack – Pneumonic Plague
(BW)
Scenario 13: Biological Attack – Food Contamination
Scenario 14: Biological Attack – Foreign Animal Disease (FAD)
Chemical Attack - with
annexes for different agents
(CW)
Scenario 05: Chemical Attack – Blister Agent
Scenario 06: Chemical Attack – Toxic Industrial Chemicals (TIC)
Scenario 07: Chemical Attack – Nerve Agent
Scenario 08: Chemical Attack – Chlorine Tank Explosion
Natural Disasters – with
different annexes for different
disasters
Scenario 09: Natural Disaster – Major Earthquake
Scenario 10: Natural Disaster – Major Hurricane
Cyber Attack
Scenario 15: Cyber Attack
Pandemic Influenza
Scenario 03: Biological Disease Outbreak – Pandemic Influenza
Implementing IPS
National Planning
Scenarios
Strategic Guidance
Statements
Strategic Plans
• DHS develops, updates, or amends the Scenarios.
• Coordinates with other Federal Departments and agencies.
• Focused on risked-based planning.
• Updated at least biennially.
• Developed by DHS; grouped into eight categories.
• Outlines strategic priorities, broad national objectives.
• Describes the envisioned “end-state.”
• Developed by DHS; one for each SGS.
• Defines mission, roles, authorities, and responsibilities.
• Establishes mission-essential tasks.
Federal HQ CONPLANS
Regional CONPLANS
• Developed by FEMA – ESF inputs.
• Describes the process for integrating and synchronizing
existing Federal capabilities at the Regional level to
accomplish NRF tasks.
• Describes how Federal capabilities will be integrated into
State plans.
Exercise
Design, Development, and Coordination
National Exercise Program (NEP)
• Homeland Security Exercise and
Evaluation Program (HSEEP)
Region 10 Exercise Program
• Regional Exercise Support
Program (RESP)
• National Exercise Schedule
(NEXS)
• Northwest Interagency
Exercise Coordination Group
(NIECG)
• Corrective Action Program
(CAP)
• Training and Exercise
Planning Workshop (T&EPW)
• Lessons Learned Information
Sharing (LLIS) System
• Coordinate Federal exercise
design and development
National Exercise and Simulation Center (NESC)
To establish a state-of-the art National Exercise & Simulation Center (NESC)
at FEMA Headquarters to serve the Department’s all-hazards preparedness
and response program through the use of a central facility that pools
resources, maximizes efficiency, and provides sustained exercise and training
support to all stakeholders.
NESC Core
Computer
Modeling &
Simulation
TEEX
SANDIA
DoD
JHU APL
DHS S&T
EPA
Private
Others
Human/SME
Modeling &
Simulation
FBI
VNN
CIA
EPA
HHS/CDC
DHS
U.A.
Others
Improvement Exercise Design
& Delivery
Management &
Exercise Eval
Plans
Ops
LLIs
AARs
CAP
RAMP
Log
NxMSEL
LLIS
Training
FEMA Disaster
Workforce Task Books
and credentialing
Newly released Independent Study
Courses:
IS-100a: Introduction to ICS (updated)
IEMC 2008
IS-200a: Single Resources and Initial
Action Incidents (updated)
City of Spokane 11/08
IS-700a: Intro to NIMS
Washington state 10/08
IS-800b: Intro to NRF
City of Bellingham 8/08
IS-801-814: ESF Training (except ESF-6)
Pierce County 5/08
IS-775: EOC Management and
Operations
Federal Way 9/09
IS-102: Deployment Basics for FEMA
Response Partners
IS-821: Critical Infrastructure and Key
Resources Support Annex
Continuity Programs
 Approved by the FEMA Administrator on
January 21, 2009
 CGC 1 provides Continuity guidance on:
 Continuity Program Management
information for the States, territories,
tribal, and local government jurisdictions,
and private sector organizations
 Elements and components of a viable
continuity capability
 Coordination of interdependencies
 Continuity plan operational phases and
implementation
Continuity “Excellence Series”
“Professional Continuity Practitioner”
Continuity Excellence Series – Level I










COOP Awareness Course
Introduction to COOP
Effective Communication
COOP Manager’s T-t-T Course
COOP Planner’s T-t-T Workshop
Intro to Incident Command System (ICS)
Principles of Emergency Management
Intro to National Incident Management System (NIMS)
A National Response Framework (NRF), An Introduction
Exercise Development Course/Exercise Design Course/or COOP Exercise
Design/Development T-t-T Course
 Complete attendance in continuity exercise Determined Accord, and
 NARA/CoSA Vital Records Training (optional, recommended)
Continuity “Excellence Series”
“Master Continuity Practitioner”
Continuity Excellence Series – Level II
 Applicants must attain Continuity Excellence Series – Level I, Professional
Continuity Practitioner
 Exercise Evaluation and Improvement Planning
 Leadership and Influence
 Devolution Training
 Building Design for Homeland Security T-t-T Course for Continuity of Operations
 Instructional Delivery for Subject Matter Experts
 Instruct COOP Manager’s T-t-T Course
 Facilitate COOP Planner’s T-t-T Workshop, and
 Written Comprehensive Exam
Integrated Public Alert and Warning Systems (IPAWS)
Receive alert and warning information through as many means as possible
Community Preparedness
2 primary components
Volunteer programs
Citizen Preparedness
(i.e., Citizen Corps)
(i.e., Individual and Family
preparedness)
Why is it critical to involve the Community?
• Less than 1% of the
U.S. population is an
emergency responder
• In 95% of situations,
victim/ bystander first
to respond
Journal of Emergency Medical Services (2004); National Fire Protection
Association (2003); National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund (2003)
Citizen Corps Partners
The Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) program
educates and trains citizens in basic disaster response skills
Fire Corps promotes the use of citizen advocates to provide support to
fire and rescue departments
The Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) Program helps medical, public
health, and other volunteers offer their expertise
Neighborhood Watch/USAonWatch incorporates terrorism
awareness education into its existing crime prevention mission
Volunteers in Police Service (VIPS) works to enhance the capacity of
state and local law enforcement to utilize volunteers
Harris County
Citizen Corps Council
Over 60,000 volunteers helped
process 60,000 evacuees and
shelter 30,000 at Reliant Center
Katrina: Astrodome
FEMA Region 10: Citizen Corps
Councils
CERT
Neighborhoods Watch
Volunteers in Police Service
Medical Reserve Corps
Fire Corps
AK ID OR WA
11
11
39
62
3
27
49
62
88 118 170 241
12
22
43
78
2
6
11
21
3
6
12
29
As of April 8, 2009
www.citizencorps.gov
Citizen Corps Council Growth - nationally
2500
1830
2000
2103
2301
1435
1500
887
1000
500
0
203
0
Dec
31
2001
Dec
31
2002
Dec
31
2003
Dec
31
2004
Dec
31
2005
Dec
31
2006
Dec
31
2007
IV. Hazard Mitigation Division
Risk Analysis
R10 Map Mod (04-08)
$30 million
Risk Reduction
• Flood Map Modernization
• Hazard Mitigation Plans
• Risk Assessment (HAZUS)
• Earthquake program
• Hazard Mitigation Plans
• Hazard Mitigation grants
• Floodplain Management compliance
R10 HMGP - $160 million
• Flood Insurance
R10 PDM - $23 million
R10 FMA - $7 million
Mark Carey, Director
V. Grants Programs Division
Homeland Security Grant Program
State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSP)
Infrastructure Security grants
Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI)
Transit Security Grant Program
(TSGP)
Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS)
Port Security Grant Program (PSGP)
Citizen Corps Program (CCP)
Buffer Zone Protection Program
(BZPP)
SHSP Tribal
UASI Non-profit Security Grant Program (NSGP)
Freight rail / Intercity Bus / Intercity
rail / Trucking security
Operation Stonegarden (OPSG)
Assistance to Firefighters Grants (AFG)
Emergency Management Performance Grant
(EMPG)
Interoperable Emergency Communications Grant
Program (IECGP)
Richard Donovan, Director
VI. Disaster Operations Division
Response Operations
Regional Response
Coordination Center
Operational Planning
Disaster Logistics
Emergency
Communications
Lon Biasco, Director
VII. Disaster Assistance Division
Individual Assistance
• Mass Care
• Emergency Assistance
• Housing
• Human Services
Public Assistance
• Debris removal
• Emergency Protective Measures
Planning and Prep
• Conduct rapid Preliminary
Damage Assessments (PDAs)
• Rapid Establishment of Disaster
Recovery Centers (DRCs) –
fixed or mobile
• Planning – evac, sheltering,
feeding, voluntary org
coordination, housing and human
services, debris removal,
generator requirements
• Restoration of damaged facilities
Washington Storms – December 2007: 10,750 IA Registrations; $20 M in IA, $31 M
SBA, $83 M in PA for 176 apps
Washington Storms – December 2008: 10,727 IA Registrations; $20 M in IA, $32 M
SBA, $78 M in PA for 376 apps
Charles Axton, Director
Questions?