Transcript Document

The Fiber Tracker Option for MICE Spectrometers

The D0 Central Fiber Tracker – Experience and Implications for MICE A. Bross Fermilab

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

Fiber Tracker Option for MICE

    

In its simplest implementation, a FT for MICE could consist of two upstream and two downstream x-y tracking planes (assumes no or low background!) u-v-t option gives more redundancy With 500 micron round fiber and a fiber doublet structure (detail later) – 30 cm active width

 

600 fibers/layer X 2 layers/doublet X 2/3 measurements (x&y or u-v-t) X 2 (stations) X 2 (up/downstream) yields

 

9600 channels (x-y) 14,400 channels (u-v-t) Expect



m point-set resolution extrapolated from D0 results ( 90 mm ) with 835

m fiber This would require 10-14 D0-type VLPC cassettes

Basically all D0 spares However, IF BACKGROUNDS ARE LOW – 4:1 multiplexing possible with 1 mm D0 pixel Tremendous Premium in lowering backgrounds

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

D0 Central Fiber Tracker

    

8 layers

Outer 6

 

2.52 m Inner 2

1.66 m r - .2 to .51 m Axial readout to south VLPC Readout

77,000 channels Waveguide system

 

8-11.5 m “Pipes” light from detector to VLPCs

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

Central Fiber Tracker Channel Mirror Scintillating Fiber Optical connector Waveguide VLPC cassette Electronics Cryostat

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

Scintillating Fiber Ribbons

     

Interlocking doublet 835

m 3HF scintillating fiber

Fluorescence 525 nm (peak) to 610 nm Grooved substrate - machined Delrin

Pitch between 915 and 990

m Substrate put into curved backbone

Fibers glued together with polyurethane adhesive Ribbons is then QC’ed using scanning X-ray source Technique is very fast

All MICE planes require



4 MM effort + Tooling

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

CFT Tracker Mechanical

3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 All axial layers,  r  and  r (incl. correct.) Mean RMS Constant Mean Sigma 0.3375E-05 0.1455E-02 2284.

0.2749E-04 0.1323E-02 1000 500 0 -0.01 -0.008 -0.006 -0.004 -0.002

( r  ) measured 0 - ( r 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01

) predicted  inch  4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 -0.02

-0.015

-0.01

-0.005

0 Mean RMS Constant Mean Sigma 0.005

( r ) measured - ( r ) 0.01

-0.6468E-03 0.2633E-02 2903.

-0.6892E-03 0.2527E-02 0.015

0.02

 inch 

Global precision » 33

m (Measured vs Desired)

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

Fiber Tracker Status

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

Waveguide Bundle Fabrication and Routing 2-FRONT FORWARD DETECTORS FORWARD PRE-SHOWER ICD LEVEL ZERO CFE CENTER BEAM WAVE GUIDE PATCH PANEL ECS TRACKER CABLING SLOT CFW VLPC CRYOSTAT INSTALLATION SEPT 98 WAVE GUIDE FIBER BUNDLE INSTALLATION

Waveguide bundles consist of 256 fibers in light-tight nylon sheath

 

Curved connector (256 ch.) at detector 2 128 ch. Connector at cassette end VLPC CASSETTE VLPC CASSETTE VLPC CRYOSTAT VLPC CRYOSTAT SILICON TRACKER POWER SUPPLIES

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

Routing, strain relief, etc for CFT (+CPS) CFT Waveguide Routing

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

Fiber Tracker Status

South (Axial) side complete

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

 

VLPC (Visible Light Photon Counter)

Cryogenic APD operating @ 9K Characterization/test/s ort Cassette Assignment

As shown CFT - Readout System

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

VLPCs

VLPC



HISTE VI

High QE



80%

  

Low noise <5X10 4 Hz High Rate capability

>40 MHz (@ High production yield

 

70% (vs. 27% projected)

1.0 pe)

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

1024 Channel VLPC Cassettes

Engineering Design

 

8 – 128 channel modules Cassette carries two 512 ch readout boards

 

Front-end amp/discriminator Analog – SVX IIe 3 ’

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

Cassette Performance

Noise low

Good uniformity CFT - Readout III

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

The VLPC Cryostats

 

The VLPC cryostats at DØ accommodate up to 102 cassettes. The full complement of 99 cassettes necessary to instrument D0 are installed on the platform.

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

CFT: System Performance ~14.5 pe

Pulse Height Abid Patwa Como-Italy 2001

Read-out Platform: Waveguides and VLPCs

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

Lab 3 CRT (Singlet) Light Yield Lab 3 CRT Light Yield Summary Covers Waveguide lengths 7.7-11.4m

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

First Events of Run II

Tracking in the CFT is working although we still have a long way to go to fully optimize

   

Alignment VLPC operating point optimization Threshold setting Etc….

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

MICE Fiber Tracker VLPC Cryostat

  

Could envision a single VLPC cryostat reading out both up and downstream spectrometers

If multiplexing was an option

D0 test cryostat can hold required number of channels Waveguide length about 5 m

 

Yield with VLPCs

 [exp(-5/8)]/[exp(-11.4/8)]X7 

pe However

This assumes multiplexing

0.5 mm scintillating fiber coupled to 0.835 mm waveguide fiber

Could use 1 mm fiber also and

get small improvement

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

MICE Fiber Tracker Attenuation vs. wavelength of Kuraray clear fiber

Conventional Blue 3 HF   

Conventional FT using MAPMT With same length of readout fiber

If waveguides are used

    L

430 nm = 1300 dB/km (1/e = 3.4m)

L

525 nm = 450 dB/km (1/e = 9.6m)

D0 measured 8.1m @ l

f p = 525 nm QE = 20% Yield =

16 X 20/80 X exp(-5/3.4)/exp(-5/8)

 

2 pe Effective tracking can likely be done @ 2 pe, but would be more difficult

 

Depends on backgrounds Minimum acceptable waveguide length

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002

Conclusions

  

A Fiber tracker is an attractive option for MICE

  

Material presented to beam acceptable

As small as 0.15% RL per doublet (smaller if can multiplex – channel count) Excellent resolution (<50

m) High light yield

efficient tracking possible VLPC (or other SS photodetector) has major advantage vz a vz light yield, but MAPMT can likely be made to work If backgrounds can be kept low, multiplexing can reduce channel count

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002