Transcript Slide 1

Measures (indicators)
related to security
in maritime sector
- DEDUCE project
Andrzej Cieślak, Juliusz Gajewski, Leonard Gajewski,
Łukasz Gajewski, Antoni Staśkiewicz, Kazimierz Szefler
Department of Operational Oceanography
Maritime Institute in Gdańsk
Presentation summary
• Deduce project objectives
• Sustainable Development Indicators of
Integrated Coastal Zone Management –
concept
• Examples of indicators – Pomorskie Region
• Connections to Baltic Master project
7/6/2015
Maritime Institute in Gdańsk, Department of Operational Oceanography
2
Deduce project objectives
• Development of Sustainable Development
Indicators of Integrated Coastal Zone
Management through Interreg IIIC network
• Preparation of methodology to
measure/monitor sustainable development
related to proper implementation of ICZM
• Actual tool to prepare basis for monitoring
of implementation of European Parliament
Recommendation on Implementation of
Integrated Coastal Zone Management
7/6/2015
Maritime Institute in Gdańsk, Department of Operational Ocenaography
3
Deduce project objective
• Having as background EP’s Recommendation Deduce is
about:
– Producing methodology for SD Indicators of ICZM
– Testing of methodology on real case of some regions around
Europe
– Development of guidelines for regions to report
– Development of common presentation
• Important thing is to use information already being
collected as much as it is possible
• Use of Eurostat, ICES, EEA, etc. – appreciated very much
• Advertisement of SDI of ICZM as tools for better planning
and intercomparison between regions
7/6/2015
Maritime Institute in Gdańsk, Department of Operational Ocenaography
4
Sustainable Development
Indicators of Integrated Coastal
Zone Management – concept
To control, as appropriate, further
development of the undeveloped
coast [EU ICZM Recommendation
(2002) Chapter 1 (a), (f) and (h)]
To protect, enhance and
celebrate natural and cultural
diversity [Chapter 1 (a) and (e)]
7/6/2015
1
Demand for property on the coast
2
Area of built-up land
3
Rate of development of previously
undeveloped land
4
Demand for road travel on the coast
5
Pressure for coastal and marine
recreation
6
Land take by intensive agriculture
7
Area of semi-natural habitat
8
Area of land and sea protected by
statutory designations
9
Effective management of designated
sites
10
Change to significant coastal and
marine habitats & species
11
Loss of cultural distinctiveness
Maritime Institute in Gdańsk, Department of Operational Ocenaography
5
Sustainable Development
Indicators of Integrated Coastal
Zone Management – concept
To promote and support a dynamic
and sustainable coastal economy
[Chapter 1 (d) and (g)]
To ensure that beaches are clean and
that coastal waters are unpolluted
[Chapter 1 (a), (g) and (h)]
7/6/2015
12
Patterns of sectoral employment
13
Volume of port traffic
14
Intensity of tourism
15
Sustainable tourism
16
Quality of bathing water
17
Amount of coastal, estuarine and
marine litter
18
Concentration of nutrients in coastal
waters
19
Amount of oil pollution
Maritime Institute in Gdańsk, Department of Operational Ocenaography
6
Sustainable Development
Indicators of Integrated Coastal
Zone Management – concept
To reduce social exclusion and
promote social cohesion in coastal
communities [Chapter 1 (e) and (g)]
To use natural resources wisely
[Chapter 1 (a)]
To recognise the threat to coastal
zones posed by climate change and to
ensure appropriate and ecologically
responsible coastal protection [Chapter
1 (b) and (c)]
7/6/2015
20
Degree of social exclusion
21
Relative household prosperity
22
Number of second homes
23
Fish stocks and fish landings
24
Water consumption
25
Sea level rise and extreme weather
conditions
26
Coastal erosion and accretion
27
Natural, human and economic assets at
risk
Maritime Institute in Gdańsk, Department of Operational Ocenaography
7
Indicator 1.1 – population structure
42
16°3 0'
38
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998 1999
Years
2000
2001
2002
18°0 0'
18°3 0'
Kro k ow a
C hoc z ew o
£eb a
54°40'
19°0 0'
Border of coastal adm inis trative units
Population density [residents per sq. k m]
0 - 25
25 - 50
50 - 100
100 - 250
250 - 500
500 - 1000
1000 - 2000
2000 - 3000
Puc k
Sm o ³dz ino
Ja s tarn ia
U stk a
H el
R eda
Kos a k ow o
W e jhe row o
Luz in o
R um ia
Lêb ork
Gdy n ia
S³u ps k
Sop ot
Kry ni c a M ors k a
Gda ñs k
Kar tu z y
Kêp ic e
¯u k ow o
Steg na
Sz tu tow o
Pru s zc z Gd añ s ki
N ow y D w ó r Gd añ sk i
By tó w
2003
N ow y S taw
Koœc ie rz y na
Tc z e w
Sk ar s ze w y
54°00'
54°00'
400
M alb ork
M ias tk o
Staro ga rd G dañ s k i
Pel plin
300
Sz tu m
D zie rz go ñ
Bru s y
C za rna W o da
53°40'
C ze rs k
200
Gni ew
Sk ór c z
Pra buty
Kw id zy n
C za rne
53°40'
Population density [number of residents per sq. km]
19°3 0'
W ³a dy s ³a wo w o
54°20'
36
17°3 0'
54°20'
%
40
17°0 0'
54°40'
Proportion (per
cent) of coastal
zone residents in
relation to the
total population
of the
Pomeranian
Voivodship in
1994 – 2003
C hoj nic e
C z³u c hó w
100
D ebr zn o
17°0 0'
17°3 0'
18°0 0'
18°3 0'
19°0 0'
19°3 0'
0
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Years
Population density (number of residents per sq. km)
in the coastal zone (red) and in the rest of the
Pomeranian Voivodship (blue) in 1994 – 2003
7/6/2015
Population density in rural communes and municipalities of
the Pomeranian Voivodship in 2003
Maritime Institute in Gdańsk, Department of Operational Ocenaography
8
Indicator 2.1 – built-up area
16°3 0'
Built-up areas in coastal and other regions of
Pomeranian Voivodship in 1990 and 2000
17° 0 0'
17° 3 0'
18° 0 0'
18°3 0'
19° 0 0'
54°40'
He l
Us tka
Built-up areas in
coastal regions
13627,92
Ja sta r n ia
S mo ³d zin o
54°40'
2000
P uc k
[% ]
0- 1
1 - 2 .5
2.5 - 5
5 - 15
15 - 2 0
20 - 3 0
30 - 4 0
40 - 5 0
50 - 6 0
W ³ad y s³a w o wo
K ro ko w a
Ch o cz ew o
1990
19° 3 0'
B or d e r o f c o a sta l a d m in i str ati ve u n its
K os a ko w o
17361,26
G d yn ia
23420,69
24931,02
Total built-up areas
37048,61
42292,28
G d a ñs k
K ryn i ca M o rs ka
S ztu to wo
S teg n a
54°00'
54°00'
Built-up areas in other
regions
Built-up areas in 1990 and 2000 in buffers 0-1 km
and 0-10 km from the coastline
Land area in
buffer
0-10 km from the
coastline
7/6/2015
28016,31 ha
Built-up area in 1990
3288,982 ha
Built-up area in 2000
3520,857 ha
Total area of the belt
226019,1 ha
Built-up area in 1990
14387,62 ha
Built-up area in 2000
18414,91 ha
53°40'
Total area of the belt
53°40'
Land area in
buffer
0-1 km from the
coastline
54°20'
54°20'
S op o t
17° 0 0'
17° 3 0'
18°0 0'
18°3 0'
19° 0 0'
19° 3 0'
Percent of built-up areas of Pomeranian Voivodship in 010 km buffer from the coastline in 2000
Maritime Institute in Gdańsk, Department of Operational Ocenaography
9
Indicator 5.1 – recreational pressure
Active berths in marinas (2005)
Trend on the number of "active" berths
1600
1400
Władysławowo
Puck
Jastarnia
Number of "active" berths
Łeba
1200
1000
Dry marinas
800
Marinas and Harbours
600
400
200
Hel
0
1995
Year
2005
Gdynia
Trend on the number of "active" berths per km of coastline
Górki Wschodnie
Gdańsk
Legend
4 - 10
11 - 25
26 - 50
51 - 150
151 - 300
Number of "active" berths /km of coastline
4.5
4
Krynica Morska
Kąty3.5
Rybackie
3
Dry marinas
2.5
Marinas and Harbour
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
10
5
5
0 Kilometers
1995
7/6/2015
Year
2005
Maritime Institute in Gdańsk, Department of Operational Ocenaography
10
Indicator 8.1 – protection of environment and
cultural heritage
Trend of the % of EU protected area in the coast,
as a proportion of the total protected area in the
coast
Area of land and sea protected by statutory designations
100
protected EU
percentage
80
protected
national/regional
60
40
20
Władysławowo
Łeba
0
1995
2005
year
Puck
Jastarnia
Żelistrzewo
Główczyce
Bolszewo
Gościcino Wejherowo Reda
Ustka
Bożepole Wielkie
Trend of the % protected area in the coastal zone
(sea, land and both), in the hinterland and in the
wider reference region
Hel
Rumia
Luzino
Lębork
100
Gdynia
90
Słupsk
Kobylnica
Łęgowo
Bytów
Nowy Dwór Gdański
Nowy Staw
Kościerzyna
Skarszewy
20
10
Pszczółki
Tczew
7/6/2015
30
5
0
10
5
0 Kilometers
Maritime Institute in Gdańsk, Department of Operational Ocenaography
REFERENCE
REGION
protected national/regional
40
HINTERLAND
Kępice
Kolbudy Straszyn
Pruszcz Gdański
50
TOTAL
COASTAL
Kiełpino
Somonino
coastal buffer
Stegna
60
COASTAL
LAND
Kartuzy
Żukowo
COASTAL
SEA
Legend
2005
70
percentage
Sierakowice
reference region
Sopot
Gdańsk
Dębnica Kaszubska
protected EU
1995
80
Chwaszczyno
11
Indicator 13.1 – passenger traffic –
international voyages
Table 1. Annual passenger traffic for main
and small seaports
100.00
0
0.00
274
8.59
Gdynia
395
12.39
Kołobrzeg
22
0.69
Nowe Warpno
198
6.21
Police
0
0.00
Stepnica
0
0.00
2217
69.54
Szczecin
32
1.00
Ustka
3
0.09
Władysławowo
0
0.00
Trzebież
44
1.38
Świnoujście
7/6/2015
17°3 0'
18°1 5'
19°0 0'
19°4 5'
W ³adys³awowo
#Y
Passenger traffic
in 2003
[thous. passengers]
Ustka
Dar³owo
#Y
Gdynia
#
Y
#
Y
#Y
Gdañsk
Ko³obrzeg
#Y
Œwinoujœcie
#Y
#Y
#Y
Nowe W arpno
##Y Stepnica
Y
#Y Police
#YSzczecin
15°1 5'
0 - 200
#
Y
200 - 500
Y
#
500 - 1000
#Y
1000 <
Elbl¹ g
Trzebie¿
14°3 0'
#Y
53°30'
Gdańsk
16°4 5'
54°00'
0.09
16°0 0'
54°30'
3
15°1 5'
55°00'
3188
14°3 0'
54°30'
Elbląg
2003
54°00'
Darłowo
2003
13°4 5'
55°00'
Total
Relative number
of passengers
[%]
53°30'
Year
Total number of
passengers
[thous. pass.]
16°0 0'
16°4 5'
17°3 0'
18°1 5'
19°0 0'
Total number of incoming and outgoing passengers in 2003
Maritime Institute in Gdańsk, Department of Operational Ocenaography
12
Indicator 13.2 – cargo traffic –
international cargo transport
Total cargo traffic through Polish ports (main and
small) between 1998 and 2003 (thous. tons)
2003
2003
51020
100.00
10
0.02
13°4 5'
14°3 0'
15°1 5'
16°0 0'
16°4 5'
17°3 0'
18°1 5'
19°0 0'
19°4 5'
55°00'
Percent of each
port
In total cargo
traffic [%]
55°00'
Years
Total cargo
traffic
[thous. tons]
W ³adys³awowo
Gdańsk
125
0.25
21323
41.79
9733
19.08
Kołobrzeg
151
0.30
0
0.00
Nowe Warpno
2314
4.54
17
0.03
Świnoujście
8997
17.63
Szczecin
8345
16.36
Ustka
1
0.00
Władysławowo
4
0.01
Trzebież
0
0.00
54°30'
#·
Gdynia
#·
#·
·#
Ko³obrzeg
#·
Œwinoujœcie
Gdañsk
Elbl¹ g
#·
#·
#·
Nowe W arpno
Trzebie¿
#· #·
#·
#·
Stepnica
Police
Szczecin
Stepnica
7/6/2015
14°3 0'
Total cargo
in 2003
[thous. tons]
#·
0 - 1000
#·
1000 - 5000
#·
5000 - 10000
·#
10000 - 25000
53°30'
Police
Dar³owo
54°00'
Gdynia
Ustka
54°30'
Elbląg
54°00'
Darłowo
#·
53°30'
Total
15°1 5'
16°0 0'
16°4 5'
17°3 0'
18°1 5'
19°0 0'
Total volume of cargo traffic through Polish seaports in 2003
Maritime Institute in Gdańsk, Department of Operational Ocenaography
13
Indicator 16.1 – bathing water quality
100%
2001
2002
2003
2004
17° 0 0'
17° 3 0'
18° 0 0'
90%
60%
Bathing waters worse than
mandatory standard
50%
40%
30%
20%
#
# #
Bathing waters worse than
mandatory standard
W i cko
#
54°20'
##
#
#
30%
20%
#
#
#
# #
#
###
#
B ytó w m .
54°00'
#
#
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
Insufficiently monitored
bathing waters
#
Bathing waters worse
than mandatory standard
Bathing waters fulfilling
mandatory standard
#
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
## Ch o jn i ce
Cza r n e m.
#
###
#
#
# #
### # #
#
S ka rs ze wy# m#
.
#
#Tcz ew
#
m.
#
#
S#tar o g a rd G d a ñ s ki m .
####
#
#
#
P el p li n
S ztu m #
m.
#
#
## #
# #
#
#
#
#
# # ##
##
##
#
#
Bathing waters fulfilling
guide standard
K ryn#i ca
#
# S#ztu#to wo
#
M o rs ka
S teg n a
#
Cze r sk m .
m.
#
#
#
#
##
#
Bor der of co as t al a dm in is t rat iv e u nit s
#
#
#
#
¯ u ko
#w o m.
m. #
B ru sy m .
#
#
#
#
##
##
##
#
G d a ñs k
#
# ####
### #
#
### # #
ci e rzyn
#K oœ#
# # a m.
## #
#### #
#
#
##
##
#
###
In s uff ic ien t ly m o nit o red b athin g w at er s
G d yn ia#
#
#
#
#
K ar tu zy
Bat h ing w a te rs w ors e th an m a nda t ory s ta nd ard
#
#
#
53°40'
40%
#
#
#
53°40'
50%
#
#
#
#
Bat h ing w a te rs fulf ill ing m a nd at ory s t and ar d
54°00'
60%
#
G ³ó w czyc e
Us tka
S ³u p sk#m.
90%
70%
##
###
Percentage of coastal bathing waters fulfilling the
standards of BWD in 2001 – 2004
80%
#
S mo ³d zin o
#
100%
#ro ko w a
K
Ch o cz ew o
19° 3 0'
54°20'
0%
#
#
#
#
####
#
# ###
# Ja sta r n#ia
#
P uc k #
#
#
#
#
##
#
#
P uc k #
He l
#
##
K os a ko w o#
#
##### ###
W ³ad y s³a w o wo##m
Lê b o r k m .
Bathing waters fulfilling
guide standard
10%
#
##
#
##
#
#
#
###
£e b a
19° 0 0'
Bat h ing w a te rs fulf ill ing g uid e s t and ard
54°40'
70%
Insufficiently monitored
bathing waters
54°40'
80%
18° 3 0'
#
#
#
##
10%
0%
17° 0 0'
Percentage of inland bathing waters fulfilling
the standards of BWD in 2001 – 2004
7/6/2015
17° 3 0'
18° 0 0'
18° 3 0'
19° 0 0'
19° 3 0'
Water quality in bathing waters of Pomeranian Voivodship
in the light of BWD in 2004
Maritime Institute in Gdańsk, Department of Operational Ocenaography
1414
Indicator 26.1 – coastal protection
Scheme of protective structures (2005)
Władysławowo
Łeba
Puck
Jastarnia
Żelistrzewo
Główczyce
Bolszewo
GościcinoWejherowo Reda
Ustka
Bożepole Wielkie
Hel
Rumia
Luzino
Lębork
Gdynia
Trend in the percentage of protected and defended coastline
Słupsk
Kobylnica
Chwaszczyno
18
Sopot
16
Gdańsk
Dębnica Kaszubska
Kartuzy
Kiełpino
Somonino
Kępice
12Stegna
Kolbudy
Straszyn
Pruszcz Gdański
Łęgowo
Legend
Bytów
10
other protective structures
harbours
8
Nowy Dwór Gdański
6
Pszczółki
protective structures
harbours
14
Żukowo
% of coastline
Sierakowice
5
4
Nowy Staw
Kościerzyna
2
Tczew
Skarszewy
10
0
1995
7/6/2015
5
0 Kilometers
year
2005
Maritime Institute in Gdańsk, Department of Operational Ocenaography
15
Connections to Baltic Master project
• Some of indicators directly related to
safety/security issues:
– Sea level rise and extreme weather conditions
– Coastal erosion and accretion
– Natural, human and economic assets at risk
– Amount of oil pollution
– Pressure for coastal and marine recreation
• All indicators are obvious for Sustainable
Spatial Planning in coastal/marine zone
7/6/2015
Maritime Institute in Gdańsk, Department of Operational Ocenaography
16