Safety, Budapest Airport

Download Report

Transcript Safety, Budapest Airport

Click to edit Master title style
Attention! FOD...
BUDAPEST
Airport
www.bud.hu
www.bud.hu
Transportation Safety Bureau Meeting
Siófok, October 7, 2008
Introduction
• Foreign Object Debris/Damage (further referred as FOD)
at the airport can cause damage that costs airlines,
airports, and airport tenants millions of HUF (or
equivalent currency) every year.
• FOD is any object that does not belong to, or near
the airplanes and, as a result, can injure airport or
airline personnel and/or damage aircraft.
www.bud.hu
Introduction
FOD at airports:
• includes any object found on an inappropriate location that -as a result of being there -- can damage equipment or injure
airplane and/or airport personnel.
• Worldwide, the estimated cost of FODs for the aviation
industry is in order of 4 billion USD a year. Airports, airlines,
and airport tenants can reduce this cost by taking steps to
prevent airport FOD.
• FOD is all around terminal gates, cargo aprons, taxiways,
runways, and run-up pads. It causes damage through direct
contact with airplanes, such as by cutting airplane tires or
being ingested into engines, or as a result of being thrown by
jet blast and damaging airplanes or injuring people.
www.bud.hu
What is FOD?
•Foreign Object Debris
•Foreign Object Damage
www.bud.hu
Foreign Object Debris
Foreign
Object
Debris
A substance, debris or article alien to a
vehicle or system which would potentially
cause damage.
www.bud.hu
Foreign Object Damage
Foreign
Object
Damage
Any damage attributed to a foreign object that
can be expressed in physical or economic
terms which may or may not downgrade the
product’s safety or performance
characteristics.
www.bud.hu
ICAO requirement
• The ICAO Annex 14 (Chapter 10, paragraph
10.2.1) prescribes that
"The surface of pavements (runways, taxiways,
aprons and adjacent areas) shall be kept clear
of any loose stones or other objects that might
cause damage to aircraft structures or engines,
or impair the operation of aircraft systems."
(RMK: it became standard in November 24th, 2005 Fourth
Edition, Amendment 7) and additional information can be found
in the ICAO Doc 9157 Aerodrome Design Manual, Part 2.)
www.bud.hu
FOD occurrence
FOD occurrence:
• Airport infrastructure
The deterioration, maintenance, and construction of the airport
infrastructure can contribute to FOD. For example, pieces of concrete
can break loose from holes in pavement or from fatigue corner cracks,
and building materials can fall from construction vehicles or be blown
from gate areas onto aircraft maneuvering area.
• Normal airplane operations
Refueling, catering, cabin cleaning, and baggage and cargo handling
can produce broken materials. Baggage pieces, including bag tags and
wheels, can break off luggage and either fall onto the apron or collect in
the door sill. Items collected in the door sill can damage the door or
prevent it from fully sealing.
• Personal belongings
Pens, coins, identification badges, hats, soda cans, paperwork, and any
other object that airport or airline personnel carry can become FOD if
inadvertently left in an inappropriate location.
www.bud.hu
FOD-prevention program
• A FOD-prevention program can minimize FOD and its
effects. According to experience, a program to control
airport FOD is most effective when it addresses four main
areas:
• Training,
• Inspection by airline, airport, and airplane handling agency
personnel.
• Maintenance
• Co-operation and co-ordination.
www.bud.hu
FOD prevention
FOD prevention:
• FOD bins
• Cleaning, sweeping
• FOD campaign for prevention
www.bud.hu
FOD inspection and collection campaign
• Late February the Budapest Airport decided to carry out an
immediate FOD inspection and collection campaign on part
of the maneuvering area. The result is “impressing”: 314
sacks of FOD (including garbage) were collected which is
around 60 m3 of waste.
www.bud.hu
FOD
www.bud.hu
Statistics for 2005-2006-2007
0
www.bud.hu
1
4
Statistic for 2008
1
www.bud.hu
FOD incident at LHBP (1)
Incident at LHBP in relation to FOD
• October 8, 2004
Tyre damage of a Malév CRJ-200 due to broken piece of
concrete.
www.bud.hu
FOD incident at LHBP (2)
Incident at LHBP in relation to FOD
• March 4, 2005
The Malev Maintenance Duty noticed tyre damage on two
Malev aircraft (HA-LON, HA-LOB).
Involvement in occurence or location of BA is not provable.
www.bud.hu
FOD incident at LHBP (3)
Incident at LHBP in relation to FOD
• November 5, 2006
A plastic foil was sucked into engine N°1 of a Malev
Boeing 737-700. The foil was carried by the baggage dolly.
The picture is for illustration
purposes only.
www.bud.hu
FOD incident at LHBP (4)
Incident at LHBP in relation to FOD
• September 11, 2007
The active runway had to be closed due to an oil can left
on the RWY.
www.bud.hu
BA SMS Manual, Section S10 FOD
www.bud.hu
FOD campaign at
Budapest Airport
www.bud.hu
Final conclusion
• We should be well aware that this FOD concern will
never be solved.
but…….:
• We will only be able to reduce risk of appearance of FOD
based on very conscious education of people and very
consequent supervision/monitoring of our area of
responsibility on the Airside.
• Common efforts are required from each parties of
aviation to deal with the issue properly!
(RMK: and in addition to that, we always will have vis maior
situations /like extra strong winds/ which will always make
our life more complicated than we wanted to.)
www.bud.hu
REMEMBER!!!
July 25, 2000, Paris, CDG
100+9+4 lives
The ‘accident’
The ‘corpus delicti’
www.bud.hu
The ‘remains’
Question?
Thank you…
Any Question?
www.bud.hu