Hidden in Plain Sight: A Statewide AssessMent of Youth

Download Report

Transcript Hidden in Plain Sight: A Statewide AssessMent of Youth

Members-Only Youth Count!: Point-in-Time Homeless Count Webinar March 21, 2014

Welcome!

Paul Curtis

Executive Director California Coalition for Youth  There will be a question/answer session at the end of the presentation. Feel free to type your questions in the chat box during that time, and they will be answered in the order received.

Agenda:

Welcome & Introductions

Legislative & Policy Update – Kim Lewis

Hidden in Plain Sight: Improving Youth Inclusion in Point-in-Time Counts – Colette Auerswald

Questions & Discussion

Closing Remarks

 Next webinar date

Legislation We’re Watching:

High Priority Measure AB 1733

(Quirk-Silva)

AB 1806

(Bloom)

AB 2001

(Ammiano)

Subject Public Records Fee Waiver CCY Position

SUPPORT

Status

4/1/14 – Hearing in Asm. Health

Pupil Services: Homeless Children and Youth Homeless Youth Dependency Proceedings

SUPPORT STRONG SUPPORT 3/26/14 – Hearing in Asm. Education 3/13/14 – Referred to Asm. Human Services and Judiciary

Legislation We’re Watching:

High Priority Measure SB 970

(Yee)

SB 1296

(Leno)

TBD RESOLUTION Subject CCY Position Juveniles Solitary Confinement

SUPPORT

Status

4/8/14 – Hearing in Sen. Public Safety

Juvenile Truancy

SUPPORT

California Runaway & Homeless Youth Month

SPONSOR 4/8/14 – Hearing in Sen. Public Safety To be introduced in April

HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT:

IMPROVING YOUTH INCLUSION IN POINT-IN-TIME COUNTS CCY Webinar – March 21, 2014 Colette (Coco) Auerswald, MD, MS – UCB School of Public Health [email protected]

Collaboration between the California Homeless Youth Project and the UC, Berkeley School of Public Health

Hidden in Plain Sight Assessment

 Goals:     Describe current approaches to counting unaccompanied minors and TAY in the PIT count Describe best practices and innovations in California Describe barriers Recommendations  Methods:   Review of data from CoC reports in 2011 and 2013 Interviews with 31 CoCs and 5 consulting groups conducted in early 2013.

The Numbers: Unsheltered Minors and TAY, 2011 vs. 2013

YEAR

2011 2013

YEAR

2011 2013

No count

33 1

0

16 17

0

0 3

1-10

15 13

11-20 21-100 101-500 500+

3 5 3 2 5 4 1 1

1-20 21-100 101 500

0 7 2 16 6 11

501 1,000 1,001+

1 2 1 2

The Numbers: Unsheltered Minors and TAY, 2011 vs. 2013

YEAR

2011 2013

YEAR

2011 2013

No count

33 1

0

16 17

0

0 3

1-10

15 13

11-20 21-100 101-500 500+

3 5 3 2 5 4 1 1

1-20 21-100 101 500

0 7 2 16 6 11

501 1,000 1,001+

1 2 1 2

PIT Count Numbers: 2011 vs. 2013

45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0

2011 2013 Bay Area .

2011 2013 Central Coast .

2011 2013 Far North .

2011 2013 Inland Empire .

2011 2013 Sacramento .

2011 2013 San Diego .

2011 2013 San Joaquin .

2011 2013 Sierras .

2011 2013 South Coast

Homelessness Reports - http://www.hudhre.info/index.cfm?do=viewHomelessRpts

Youth Numbers: 2011 vs. 2013

6000 5000 1339 4000 302 298 3000 4418 2000 3681 3094 433 456 1000 0 1033

2011 2013 Bay Area

170 183 922

.

2011 2013 Central Coast .

26 201 177 387

2011 2013 Far North 2011 2013 .

Inland Empire .

21 0 29 117

2011 2013 Sacramento .

Homelessness Reports - http://www.hudhre.info/index.cfm?do=viewHomelessRpts 95 148 0 379

2011 2013 San Diego

332

.

5 462 0

2011 2013 San Joaquin .

3 0 8 23

2011 2013 Sierras .

2011 2013 South Coast

TAY Minors

Findings: Methods for youth inclusion Minimal changes Changes to planning processes Changes to count methods Youth specific counts

Findings: Methods for youth inclusion Minimal changes Include

unaccompanied minor and TAY categories

in PIT count.

Findings: Methods for youth inclusion Minimal changes Changes to planning processes

Include youth providers

in PIT count planning:

Findings: Methods for youth inclusion Minimal changes Changes to planning processes Collaborate with

McKinney-Vento

school liaisons:

Findings: Methods for youth inclusion Minimal changes Changes to planning processes

Include youth

in PIT count planning

Findings: Methods for youth inclusion Minimal changes Changes to planning processes Changes to count methods Include youth service

providers and youth

themselves as enumerators.

Incentivize

youth participants.

Findings: Methods for youth inclusion Minimal changes Changes to planning processes Changes to count methods Include

youth-inclusive or youth-specific, flexible enumeration

routes, times of day, or survey sites: “We targeted areas that youth knew specifically were more likely to find homeless youth.”

Findings: Methods for youth inclusion Minimal changes Changes to planning processes Changes to count methods Include

youth-related survey questions

in PIT count interviews

Findings: Methods for youth inclusion Minimal changes Changes to planning processes Changes to count methods Youth specific counts Implement many of the changes described, and Conduct a

dedicated, youth-specific count

Findings: Youth-Specific Barriers

 Hard to

identify

Sub-groups

of youth

Findings: CoC-related barriers

Limited integration

of youth service providers 

Geographical

factors 

Winter

weather conditions

Findings: Methodological Barriers

Wariness

of statistical methods  Concerns about ability to

compare results over time

Inexperience

with counting TAY

Findings: Structural Barriers

 Lack of

funding

 Limited

provider capacity

 Concerns regarding

reporting obligations

 Concerns regarding

implications of increasing numbers

Conflicting definitions

of homelessness

Recommendations: Policy

Clarification

of the goals and outcomes of the PIT count on a federal and local level.

Assurance

that increases in PIT count numbers related to efforts to conduct more youth inclusive counts will be praised, not penalized.

Recognition

that standardized PIT count methods may lead to systematic undercounting.

Recommendations: Policy

Expansion

of the PIT count definition of youth homelessness.

Coordination

of definitions and data systems for the homeless across federal level programs.

Funding

PIT count efforts overall and youth specific efforts in particular.

Next Steps: Technical Assistance and Structural Change

Technical Assistance Project: Three phases  Phase 1:  Technical Assistance for all CoCs.

 Phase 2:  One-on-one technical assistance for two CoCs.

 Phase 3:  Structural interventions informed by study findings.

Convenings: Spring 2014

   

8 day-long regional convenings

CoC’s, partnering youth agency(ies), and school liaisons.

Travel costs reimbursed. Stipends as needed to support attendance.

Convenings: Spring 2014

    

Logistics and Materials

enumeration.

for training, promotion, and  Moving one step along the continuum

Engaging youth Engaging local partners

  

RHY

providers and other youth providers.

McKinney-Vento

liaisons.

Other youth serving agencies Leveraging resources

Support for enumeration using

multiple definitions of youth homelessness

Seed Grants

 Seed grants for youth-specific counting initiatives  Examples of potential initiatives:  Youth advisory boards  Stipends for youth enumerators  Reimbursing youth for participating in youth surveys  Advertising counts to youth  Hosting events to draw youth to be counted  Sharing information back with the community  Other practices as determined by communities

Standardized survey

 For CoC’s conducting a survey, development of an instrument that will be:  Brief  Inclusive of HUD and McKinney-Vento definitions  Compatible with HMIS  Standardized across CoC’s (for data aggregation)

One-on-One Technical Assistance

 Provision of intensive technical assistance to two mid to-low-resource communities for the 2015 PIT count.

 Goals:  To serve one rural and one mixed site.

 Support local capacity for improving count practices.

 Share ongoing work with larger community.

Structural Change

 Working federally to:  Clarify HUD policies about the count  Broaden the data that can be reported to federal partners  Working with legislators to:  Prioritize youth counts  Increase awareness of the scope of the problem  Working with local CoCs and advocates to:  Employ numbers for advocacy and funding

We need you!!

Youth cannot be counted without the

collaboration of those who work with them!

Shahera Hyatt, MSW California Homeless Youth Project Coco Auerswald, MD, MS UCB School of Public Health Laura Petry, MSW ’14 UCB School of Social Welfare Jess Lin, MPH UCB School of Public Health

Thank you!

 To access the full report, visit http://cahomelessyouth.library.ca.gov/publications.

html  Coco Auerswald, MD, MS: [email protected]

 Shahera Hyatt, MSW: [email protected]

 Jess Lin, MPH: [email protected]

 Laura Petry: [email protected]

1.

2.

3.

4.

Stay up to date on latest developments at the

Capitol regarding youth policy issues (including exclusive access to these webinars!

Get a BIG discount on your Taking Action Conference

registration rate and network with other like-minded individuals and organizations.

Request specialized data from the California Youth Crisis Line

to support your fund development and/or advocacy efforts.

Being a member instantly raises your "awesomeness factor" tenfold!

Thanks for joining!

   Save the date – next members-only webinar scheduled for mid to late April. (Members Only) Feel free to email Paul Curtis at call. [email protected]

with any questions we didn’t address during today’s If you have any ideas for webinar topic(s) you would like covered in the next webinar, please let us know!