Transcript Acquisition at the Air Armament Center

Acquisition at the Air Armament Center
War Winning Capabilities…
On Time, On Cost
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public
release; distribution is unlimited.
Judy A. Stokley
Deputy PEO And Executive Director
Air Armament Center
1
Eglin AFB FL
Acquisition at the Air Armament Center
Pulling It All Together… Government & Industry
19 Feb, 28 Feb
Government Days
18 Mar
Industry Day
19 Mar
One-on-Ones with Companies
Upon Request
2
Purposes
• Provide information on what we are doing at the Air
Armament Center to improve our program results
• Foster alignment of expectations between our
Government teams and our Industry counterparts
• Get creative juices flowing on “both sides of the table”
to develop better ways to establish and execute our
programs
• Integrate and rationalize improvement efforts
On-Time, On Cost… CRADLE-TO-GRAVE!
For Our Warfighters
3
Overview
•
•
•
•
Organization
Execution
Our Journey to Excellence
Zero Based Documentation
4
Air Armament Center
Program Executive Officer for Weapons and
Commander
Deputy PEO
and Executive Director
Maj Gen Eidsaune
Vice Commander
Deputy For Support
Ms Stokley
308th ARSW
Dr Simpson
46th Test Wing
Col Plumb
Brig Gen Wilson
96th Air Base Wing
Col Pohland
IG (Inspector Gen)
Col Denison
XR (Capabilities Integ)
Dr Corley
XP (Planning)
Mr Arnold
CS (Chief of Staff)
Col Buell
EN (Engineering & AE)
Mr Israel
SE (Safety)
Mr Phillips
PK (Contracting)
Ms Jay
JA (Judge Advocate)
Col Caggiano
FM (Financial)
Col Shaw
DP (Manpower)
Ms McGehee
5
308th Armament Systems Wing
Col Michelle Miller Peck
Vice Director
850-883-0687 (DSN 875)
Christopher L. Clay
Technical Director
850-883-3083 (DSN 875)
Col John R. Griggs
Commander
308th ARSG
850-883-5340 (DSN 875)
Dr. L. Bruce Simpson, SES
Director
850-883-0673 (DSN 875)
Gary A. Williams
Chief of Contracting
850-883-0688 (DSN 875)
Col Scott Rumph
Terrence May
Commander
Director
328th ARSG
408th ARSG
850-883-0343 (DSN 875) 850-883-3801 (DSN 875)
John S. Batog
Vice Director Navy
850-882-8623 (DSN 872)
Della R. McPhail
Chief Financial Officer
850-883-0304 (DSN 875)
Lynda Rutledge
Director
708th ARSG
850-882-3525 x3311
(DSN 872)
Col Cyril Socha
Commander
728th ARSG
850-883-1088 (DSN 875)
Margaret R. Villagran
Chief of Logistics
850-883-0674 (DSN 875)
Brian Rutledge
Director
808th ARSG
850-883-3531 (DSN 875)
Col Richard D. Justice
Commander
918th ARSG
850-882-7321 x2253
6
DSN (872)
308th Armament Systems Wing
308th ARSW
Dr. Bruce Simpson, CL
Technical Director:Mr. Clay
Chief Of Contracting: Mr. Williams
Chief Financial Officer: Ms. McPhail
Chief Of Logistics: Ms. Villagran
Mr. Batog, DV (Navy)
Col Miller Peck, DV
308th ARSG
Long Range Systems
328th ARSG
Air Dominance
408th ARSG
Armament Support
708th ARSG
Direct Attack
728th ARSG
Test and Training
808th ARSG
Advanced Programs
New/JSuW
JDAM
918th ARSG
Miniature Munitions
SDB Test Flight
AMRAAM
FMS
JASSM Impact
JPF
SDB
P5
HTS
DSU-33
AMRAAM
SDB Impact
SFW Impacts
WCMD
AFSAT
IM BLU-122
AIM-9X
C&IT and
Infrastructure
ARTS
MTRS
CRIIS
MALD
Weaponeering
UMT
7
Capabilities Integration Directorate
AAC/XR
Director
Dr. John Corley
Business Operations
Ms. DeAnna Morales
Deputy Director
Lt Col Will Evans
Tech Director
Mr. Gene Estep
Acquisition Intel (A2)
Mr. Paul Schroeder
Cross
Enterprise
Mr. James Schoeneman
Capability Development (A5)
Mr. Roger Barrett
Directed
Energy
Mr. Steve Whitten
Hard & Deeply
Buried Targets
(HDBT)
Ms. Marya Bard
Advanced
Concepts
Mr. Ron Johnson
8
Budget
Portfolio Funding = $5,851M
FMS is for All Active Cases
RDT&E is for FY07 & FY08
Procurement is for FY06, FY07, & FY08
Sustainment is for FY08
FMS
$2,709M
RDT&E
$621M
Procurement
$2493M
Sustainment
$28M
9
Overview
•
•
•
•
Organization
Execution
Our Journey to Excellence
Zero Based Documentation
10
AAC Portfolio Performance
CY 2007 Overall Program Health
100%
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
12
12
12
Oct
Nov
Dec
90%
80%
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
5
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
10
20%
10%
0%
Jan
Months
Red Programs
Yellow Programs
Green Programs
FY 08: Add 6 Projects
11
Overall Portfolio Health
Program
Jan 07
MAR
Jan 08
MAR
Jan 08
PoPS
Program
Jan 07
MAR
Jan 08
MAR
Jan 08
PoPS
AFSAT
81
MALD
64
AMRAAM
80
MDS HTS
90
ARTS*
69
P5CTS
JASSM
76
QF4
92
JASSM ER
72
SDB I
95
JDAM
97
SDB II
84
JPF
85.5
SFW*
81
JTE
71
WCMD*
84
87.5
*Program Transition Planned
12
Focus and Transition
Weapons Technology
2010 Program Objective Memorandum (POM) Initiatives
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Damaged
Containers &
Remaining
Viable Agent
Hard Target Void Sensing Fuze
Eglin Steel Producibility Enhancement
Active Denial System
Counter Electronics HPM
Airborne Tactical Laser Weapon
Mk-82 Reactive Liner
Chemical Biological Agent Defeat
Reliable Replacement Warhead-2
Neutralized
Vented
Agent
13
Just Some of Our Successes
• Delivered 181,611 Joint Direct Attack Munitions – Zero late
• Delivered 11 Quick Reaction Variants of JDAMs/Aircraft
Integrations to War – record timelines, Zero late
• Delivered 5,855 Joint Programmable Fuzes over last 12 months
– 3,269 combat drops--6X more than previous 12 months
• Delivered 22,634 DSU-33 height of burst sensors over last 12
months
– 1,362 combat drops--50%+ increase over previous 12 months
• Maintained 887 hours MTBF on AMRAAMs (Req’t is 450 hours)
– Over 1,500,000 total AMRAAM flight hours flown
• SDB logged 40,000 captive carry hrs & 49 combat drops in FY07
• Matured FLM technology & transitioned from lab to field in less
than 19 months--delivered to warfighter 2 months early!
~107 Promotions, ~124 Awards for Acquisition Workforce
14
Overview
•
•
•
•
Organization
Execution
Our Journey to Excellence
Zero Based Documentation
15
Our Journey to Excellence
LtGen Hoffman,
On restoring credibility in Air Force acquisition:
… I mentioned the widespread view that our weapon systems cost too
much and take longer than predicted. We need to ensure "false
optimism" does not cloud our judgment. I am a natural optimist, but
we need to be firmly grounded in reality as we assess program risk.
Wanting something badly does not make it happen. This is
especially important as we start a program….do we have a solid
lock on the requirements, have we included all the elements of the
program, do we have our best estimate of cost and schedule? Once
we define the start of the program, we will be forever measured
by that definition so take the time to do it right.
We are on a quest to launch more realistic programs and bolster
existing programs.
16
Our Environment
Congress
Warfighters
S&T
Major Commands
Combatant Commanders
Joint Staff
Laboratories
Defense Threat
Reduction Agency (DTRA)
Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency (DARPA)
Program
Acquisition
Team
Financial Management
Oversight
Program Executive Offices
Materiel Commanders
Service Acquisition Executives
Office of
Secretary of Defense (OSD)
Industry
Planning, Programming and
Budgeting System (PPBE)
Service Staffs
OSD
Congress
Primes & Suppliers
17
What are the Expectations?
• Safe, effective, reliable, affordable products on time and
within budget
• Ownership of product health without legal wrangling
• Realistic marketing and budget entries
• Technical competencies to leverage leading edge
technologies
• Agility to surge or decrease production and respond to
changing rule-sets
18
Integrating & Rationalizing Improvement Efforts
Sub-Functional Pillars
Systems Engineering
Risk Assessment & Management
Cost Estimating
Programming
Reliability
Financial Execution
Technology & Integration Readiness
Earned Value Management System
Manufacturing Readiness
Award & Incentive Fees
Logistics Health Assessment
Contract Performance Asst Reports
Integrate and Rationalize for Workable Program Constructs
19
Overarching Topics
• Reliability
• Joint Capabilities Integration &
Development System (JCIDS)
–Training / Certification Program
• Networked Weapons
• Open Architectures
• M-Code – Next GPS Challenges
20
Red Flags for Weapons Programs*
1) Relying on COTS/NDI to meet Robust Military Requirements
– Systems Engineering – staffing and tasks
2) Going into SDD without RR or “SDD-readiness” phase
3) Lack of early wind tunnel and instrumented captive carry
4) Program Plans, Budget, IBR missing key elements
– Explicit requirements/verification of captive carry and in-flight
reliabilities and service life
– Transition to Production
– Reliability Growth program
– Safety-of-flight analyses at design reviews
5) Contractors decline to make an offer
6) Back-loaded development budget
*From Study of Troubled Weapon Programs 1997-2007
21
High-Confidence Programs
Key Characteristics*
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Good “Should-Cost” Estimate
Budget/Cost Estimate alignment
Approved time-phased CDD requirements
Program office resourcing
Requirements stability
Budget stability mechanism
Incremental program plan
Short-duration capability release/production schedules
SDD phase no greater than 6 years
Tech maturity assessment thresholds met
Integrated sustainment and depot strategy
Realistic test planning, Approved IOT&E plan
Life-cycle acquisition strategy – time certain success incentive
Executing according to “plan”
Probability of Program Success (PoPS) measures
* As Defined by Develop & Sustain Weapon Systems (D&SWS)
design teams
22
It’s the Engineering!
Engineering -- design, verification, manufacturing,
and quality, throughout voluminous supplier base
-- determines fate of programs
23
Team Dynamics
How do we
use the
Information
?
Warfighters
Program Execution Team
Capability Needs
What’s In, What’s Out
Budget Choices
How Much Risk?
I CAN
DO IT!
DO YOU
HEAR
ME?
NATURAL AMERICAN OPTIMISM
COMPETITION FOR BUDGET
FRAGMENTED AUTHORITIES
(REQUIREMENTS, PROGRAMMING, ACQUISITION)
START AGGRESSIVE SDD ASAP
24
25
Proven Acquisition Approach
SDD is where we spend most of the development dollars, and
determine most of the production and sustainment costs for Weapons.
• Structure ROBUST SDD-Readiness Phase to size a realistic SDD
phase
–
–
–
–
–
Block requirements into increments - deliver in 3-6 year SDD phases
Execute SDD-Readiness contract(s) for each increment
Demonstrate technologies in robust environment
Mature design to PDR or later
Build SDD plan including Integrated Baseline Review (Design, V&V, OT,
Transition to production and support) during readiness phase
– Program funds to realistic cost estimate based on detailed SDD Plan and
rigorous benchmarking
• Conduct Rigorous Milestone A & B Reviews whether required or not
Launch incremental and realistic SDD phases that
position programs for long term success
26
Win-Win Business Arrangement
Congress
OSD
Service(s)
Affordable, Combat
Ready Products to
Warfighters
Stockholders,
Corporate Construct,
Profits, Marketing,
Suppliers
ACCOUNTABLE
Accountable
Accountable
Requirements
Resources
Reports
Government and
Industry Team
Profits
New Business
Reputation
Develop and Execute Win-Win Strategies In An Atmosphere of
Teamwork and Trust
27
Overview
•
•
•
•
Organization
Execution
Our Journey to Excellence
Zero Based Documentation
28
A Golden Opportunity
AAC Zero Based Documentation Pilot Program
29
Zero – Based Documentation Pilots at AAC
• Pilot Programs Approved by Senior Acquisition Executive
Memo 6 Nov 2007
• Retain the documents that the Program Manager needs
• Consolidate other documents into Life Cycle Management
Plan (LCMP)
• Develop one each Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) and Risk
Management Plan (RMP) for AAC
– Declare compliance, variances and program specifics in LCMP
– For the Pilot Programs, use QF-4 for QF-16 and Miniature Air
Launched Decoy (MALD) for MALD-J
• Allow Program Manager discretion on format, including the
use of briefing charts
30
What a Program Manager Needs to
Run Programs
• Requirements
– Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)
– Capability Development Document (CDD)
– Capability Production Document (CPD)
• Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)
• Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)
• Program Status
– Earned Value Management System (EVMS)
– Integrated Master Plan (IMP)
– Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)
– Technical Performance Measures
31
What AFPEO for Weapons
Uses to Drive Portfolio Performance
• Personal Interfaces
• Acquisition Strategies &
Baselines
Systems
Engineering
Assessment
• Integrated Assessment Tools
• Status Reporting
– Activity Reports
– Monthly Acquisition Reviews
– PEO Chats
Probability
of Program
Success
(PoPS)
Cost
Sufficiency
Review
Sufficiency
Review
• Customer Relationships
– Expectation Management
Agreements
Manufacturing
Readiness
Assessment
Technology
Readiness
Assessment
32
Approach to Coordination for
Pilot Programs
• Approvals delegated as low as allowable
• When required, approval chain is Group to PEO to SAE
• AAC/ACE will codify distribution list that includes all current
coordination/approval offices
– Copies will be provided electronically FYI only
– Offices will be given 2 working days to respond with CAT I and
CAT II Deficiencies* if they choose to respond
– AAC/ACE will maintain log through this process for learning
* CAT I changes program content; CAT II needed for record or compliance with
law/reg; CAT III comments and suggestions
GOAL: Final approval of meaningful, quality documents within 2
weeks of PM release
33
Expected Benefits
• Put focus on Integrated Life Cycle Management
• Allow workforce to focus on establishing and
executing successful programs
• Garner enthusiasm and pave way for standard work
• Elevate our workforce from drudgery to innovation
• Promote critical thinking and collaboration
34
It’s a Journey
Move our culture to one that
warfighters and stakeholders
can depend on for realistic
expectations and high quality,
high performing, affordable
products.
Vision: War Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost!
35
It’s a Journey
• Wouldn’t it be wonderful if the DoD had to
develop a process to allocate the margin we did
not spend each year instead of determining
which programs to terminate or stretch out due
to overruns?
• Wouldn't it be wonderful if Combatant
Commanders spoke of us, Industry and
Government, as “those Acquisition people – the
ones we can always count on…”
War Winning Capabilities … On Time, On Cost …
Cradle-to-Grave
36
Thank You for All You Do for our Country
37
Agenda
Welcome/Announcements/Opening Remarks
Mr Israel
Overview of Acquisition at the AAC
Ms Stokley
Update on Integrated Tools/Assessments
Mr Israel
Logistics Health Assessment (LHA)
Ms Brinston
System Engineering Update
Mr Mistretta
Announcement on Symposium’s SE Panel
Mr Mistretta
Acquisition Cost Estimating Update
Ms Golden, Mr Kennedy
Nunn McCurdy Legislation and Impacts
Ms McPhail
Morning Recap & Answers to Questions
Ms Stokley
Independent Review Team (IRT) Results
Mr Clay
AAC response to IRT Results
Mr Clay
Acquisition Contracting Update
Ms Jay
Future Concepts & Capabilities
LtCol Evans, Mr Furlong
Portfolio Results
Col Miller Peck
Question/Answer Session
All
38