Transcript Document
Assesment of utilized technologies and comparasion with Best Available Techniques Authors: Željko Kamberović, Ph.D. metallurgy Marija Korać, M.Sc. metallurgy Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 Mapped locations in Serbia The Šabac Plant Zajača, Loznica US Steel Serbia Thermal Power Plant Kostolac Thermal Power Plant Kolubara RTB Bor, Bor Rudnik, Rudnik Trepča Complex Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 OBJECTIVES 1. Comparison of the technologies currently used by the mining and metallurgical industries with BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES in the relevant fields 2. Evaluation of potential technological improvements in the same fields, focusing at the prevention of the regional water resources contamination and remediation of the polluted surface-, ground- water. Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 BATs for the metallurgical industries SERBIA METALLURGICAL INDUSTRIES US steel: Iron and steel production Sabac Plant: primary Zn production Zajaca AD: secondary Pb production RTB BOR : primary copper production SERBIA ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS Kostolac : electric power plant Kolubara : electric power plant Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 Mining activities • RTB Bor, TREPCA • Rudnik, Rudnik • Rudnik flotation tailings are tailings of canyon type. Dam of the tailing is on 495m and it is made from hydrocyclone sand, and slurry fraction is transported to settling lake, distant from the top of the dam 200-300m. Pulp pipe line is 2km long, diamenter 150cm. Tailings is designed and build providing work of Rudnik in the next 40 years. Retention time of slurry fraction is long, 1-2 years, allowing enough time for settling of mineralar particles, dissolution and bonding of flotation agents. Annual quantity of tailings is 200 000t. In wastewaters no toxic materies in amounts over discharge limits are detected. Nearest settlement is town Rudnik on 5-6km from tailings. Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 • Trepca complex • Passive tailings are: • Marevački Stream – Novo Brdo, Gračanica, Gornje Polje – Zvečan, Žitkovac, • Gornji Krnjin – Leposavić and Veliko i Malo Polje – Rudnica with total area of 147ha. • Active flotation tailings are, although they are not in function for pas five years, • Dečkin Stream – flotation Badovac Žarkov Stream – flotation First Tunel, Bostanište – flotation Kopaonik – Leposavić, Kukanjica Stream – flotation Suva Ruda – Rudnica with total area of 90ha. Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 • • • • • • • • • • Flotation tailings Marevci is from processing of lead-zinc ores and is located beside Marevacka river. On this flotation tailing is astimately disposed 651.000 t ( 345.000 m3) of tailings on area of 6ha. Flotation tailings Gracanica is located beside river Gracanka approximately 3km from monastery Gracanica. Near the tailings is road Pristina-Gnjilane-Vranje. Here is deisposed tailings from leadzinc processing. Total area of tailings is 40ha with average height of 20m where 11. 235.000 t (5,9 miliona m3) tailings is disposed. Flotation tailings Gornje polje is located on right bank of river Ibar,3 km north from Kosovska Mitrovica. Near the tailings are road and rail.Tailings is devided in two parts by Kutlovacki stream. Total area of tailings is 50ha with average height of 10-12m where 15.000.000 t (8.150.000 m3) tailings is disposed. Flotation tailings Zitkovac is located 1.4 km north from Zvecan on theritory of Zitkovac village at the left bank of river Ibar near the road and rail. Total area of tailings is 26ha with average height of 19-22m where 7.050.000 t tailings is disposed. Flotation tailings Gornji Krnjin (Upper Krnjin) is located 900m north from flotation plant on the right bank of river Ibar. Total area of tailings is 7ha with average height of 12-14m where 2.600.000 t tailings is disposed. Flotation tailings Velilko and Malo Polje (Big and Small Field) are on the right bank of river Ibar closeby rail and road. Total area of tailings is 18ha where 2.750.000 t of tailings from magnetite and copper concentrate production and 850.000t of tailings from lead and zinc concentrate production are disposed. Flotation tailings Deckin Stream is built up above village Badovac in basin Deckin stream, nearby is road Priština – Gnjilanje – Vranje. Tailings is in operation since 1988 and for the time of exploitation disposed was 1.970.000t of tailings on area of 18ha. Flotation tailings Zarkov Stream is basin Zarkov Stream near the road Kraljevo-Skoplje. Exploitation of this tailings started in 1974 and up to now is disposed 11.970.000 t of tailings on 22ha. Flotation tailings Bostaniste, Leposavic is near right bank of river Ibar on 1.2 km from flotation Kopaonik. Dam of flotation tailings is built by hydraulic methiod from hydrocyclone sand. Small fractions are depositet in tailings lake, and clarified waters are trough collector are drained out of tailings. Up to now on area of 30ha 3.340.000 t of tailings is disposed. Flotation tailings Kukanjica, Rudnica is located within village of Rudnica and occupies area of 19ha and up to now disposed is 1.080.000t of tailings. Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 General principles of BATs BATs involve Raw materials handling Process control Gas collection and abatement Prevention and destruction of dioxins Metallurgical process Emissions to air/ to water Process residues Toxic compounds Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 Iron and steel production Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 Emission to water • The water management in an integrated steelworks primarily depends on the local conditions, • fresh water and on legal requirements. • Figure 1 gives an example of water management with an indication of the water treatment of an integrated steelworks with surplus of intake water availability, thus explaining the presence of many once-through cooling systems, resulting in a specific water consumption of more than 100 m3/t steel. At sites with very low fresh water availability there is a need to save water as much as possible. In such cases the specific water consumption can be less than 5-10 m3/t steel Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 US Steel Serbia • Direct recipient of ww is Ralja river – 2 collectors, no ww flow measurement – 12 samples × 4 sampling points per year • Increased ammonia (CII), phosphate, suspended materials, BOD5 & COD (Ralja upstream CI&II) • 2 industrial water recirculation systems A&B – 90% of water in recirculation system (according to design) – No significant release of recirculation water to surface water • Underground water – Some points increased content of Al, Ba, B, Co, Cu, Mg, Mn, Ni, Zn Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 USSS use in total 245m3 ind water/t of product Flow sheet of using and treatment of cooling and technical water in blast furnace complex Source: Study of environmental impact of Blast furnace 1 in US Steel Serbia Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 Gases • For sinter plants the following techniques or combination of techniques are considered as BAT: • Waste gas de-dusting by application of: • Advanced electrostatic precipitation (ESP) (moving electrode ESP, ESP pulse system, high voltage operation of ESP), or • Electrostatic precipitation plus fabric filter, or • Pre-dedusting (e.g. ESP or cyclones) plus high pressure wet scrubbing system. • Using these techniques dust emission concentrations <50 mg/Nm3 are achieved in normal operation. In case of application of a fabric filter, emissions of 10-20 mg/Nm3 are achieved. Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 • • • • • • Waste gas recirculation, Minimisation of PCDD/F emissions Minimisation of heavy metal emissions Lowering the hydrocarbon content of the sinter feed and avoidance of anthracite as fuel. Recovery of residue heat. Minimisation of SO2 emissions, by for example: – – • • • Lowering the sulphur input With wet waste gas desulphurisation, Minimisation of NOx emissions by, for example: Waste gas recirculation Waste gas denitrification, applying – – Regenerative activated carbon process Selective catalytic reduction. Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 BAT-Integrated steelworks Typical example for the management of residues and by-products in an integrated steelworks fine scale small sections casting scale filter dust filter dust coke plant H2 SO4 waste oil oil and water sinter plant breeze blast furnace Basic oxygen steelmaking coke abrasions tar1 BF coarse dust Fe-cont. material slags mill scale scale cold rolling hot rolling mill mill slag treatment/ recycling rubble iron sulphate BF slag granulate benzene foamed slag LD slag sale converter lime BF fine dust rubble landfill filling material Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 US Steel Serbia • Per t of steel 600 kg of by-products and secondary meterials – BF slag 250-500 kg/t Fe, CR slag 130-150 kg/t steel • More than several projects on recycling of these products in past 10 years! CONCLUSION →air pollution →degradation of environment →risky work conditions Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 5 mil. tons cat. Cu RTB Bor • WW treatment plant – Lime milk neutralization trough two tanks – Out off work • See: http://www.labmet.ntua.gr/intreat/ • Treatment of part of mining and metallurgical blue waters is performed in existing cementation plant • Government conditioned new owner to change smelting technology Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 Copper Reverberatory Furnace 1879 Butte, Montana Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 BAT-Primary Cu production Primary copper production route Concentrates air emissions-SO2 to acid plant Roasting Smelting Fluxes Dust, metal oxide fume Oxygen Land emissions Matte air emissions Slag treatment land emissions furnace lining, dust (depending on process) Furnace linings slag concentrate or matte Converter Flux, scrap, air emissions- SO2 to acid plant air, oxygen land emissions blister copper final slag slag filter dust furnace linings wastewater Reductant, scrap, air Anode furnace air emissions- SO2 to acid plant water vapour anodes anode scrap Electrolytic refining electrolyte bleed wastewater Slime PM Cathodes Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 Copper converting Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 Flash Smelting 1950s Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 Outokumpu Flash Smelting Process, 'Metallurgical innovation of the 20th century' ASM Historical Landmark status Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 SO2 versus So Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 SO2 versus So Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 HYDROMETALLURGY H2SO4, H2SO4 + Fe2(SO4)3, chloride solutions e.g. FeCl2, amonnia chloride hydroxyphenyl oximes C6H3 (R)(OH) CNOHR* R= C9H19 or C12H25 R*= H, CH3 ili C6H5 Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 RTB Zajaca & MONBAT PLC, Indjija • Currently in construction • Water treatment seems to be according to BAT Battery process-short rotary Physical treatment of batteries Na2SO4 (CX) 140 sale Battery paste (MA) 500 to primary smelter Polypropylene Residual plastics Smelting kg/t Pb Slag 70-80 100-130 150-200 sale disposal or incineration Disposal PROBLEM! Flue dust 25-60 after treatment back to Pb-smelter PRETREATMENT! Refining Dross 60-90 to primary smelter Waste water Precipitated sludge return to smelter PRETREATMENT! Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 scrap batteries BATSecondary Pb gases wastewater Drainage Crusher battery acid gases wastewater Screening Crusher Electrode Hydraulic Hydraulic poly- paste separator separator propylene Metallics Ebonite fines (lead grid) Smelting gases slag lead bullion lead dross (for recycling) 1st and 2nd dross Reverberatory furnace (by - kettle product treatment) sulphur Baghouse copper rich matte and copper dross speiss (to copper fumes to baghouse smelter) air NaOH Softening Hard lead furnace Antimonial Refining kettle (hard) lead arsenical/antimonial skims dross slag (return to charge preparation) lead air Desilvering Howard 1 press zinc/silver crust Liquation Retort Cupel Doré silver zinc (to de-silvering) lead oxide skims Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 Other locations • The Sabac zinc plant – – – – currently out of work in process of ownership transformation contact with new owner total water treatment reconstruction! • The Trepca Complex – currently hope for renewing of metallurgical activities – in future new smelter could be built Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 dling/ BAT-Zn hydrometallurgy Diagram of the zinc hydrometallurgical process dust ment dues removal of other dust, Hg and Se D Zn concentrates E Zn wastes U Scrubbing system Wet electrostatic S precipitator D wastewater T gas I Fluidised Bed N Roaster er G Hot electrostatic Sulphuric acid plant precipitator wastewater dust from roaster gases s Goethite wastewaters Leaching Further treatment Jarosite (precipitation) Hematite gas Zinc solution purification NL-Residue to ISF or Cadmium wastewaters refinery gas Waelz Kiln wastewater ISF off gas Waelz Kiln off-gas ISF wastewater Electrolysis Stage wastewaters off-gas Melting Alloying & Casting Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 Techniques that can be used to reach the SO2 levels, BAT Pollutant Low SO2 off-gas Range associated with Techniques that can be the use of BAT used to reach this level >99,1% conversion factor single contact sulphuric acid streams (~ 1-4%) Comments For low-grade SO2 gases. Combined with plant or WSA (Wet gas Sulphuric dry or semi-dry scrubber to reduce SO2 Acid/BREF_p.388), (tail gas SO2 emissions and produce gypsum if a market is content depends on feed gas available strength) SO2 rich off-gas >99,7% conversion factor Double contact sulphuric acid Very low levels of other air-borne streams plant (tail gas SO2 content pollutants will be reached due to intensive depends on feed gas strength). A gas treatment prior to the contact plant de-mister may be appropriate for (wet scrubbing, wet EP and , if necessary, the final removal of SO3 mercury removal to ensure H2SO4 product quality Note: Collected emissions only. Acossiated emissions are given as daily averages based on continuous monitoring during the operating period. In cases where continuous monitoring is not practicable the value will be the average over the sampling period. For the abatement system used, the characteristics of the gas and dust will be taken into account in the design of the system and the correct operating temperature used Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 Jarosite and Pb-Ag slimes from leaching • • • • • • • • Jarosite According to the “European Waste catalogue of Hazardous Waste List” jarosite is characterized as ”hazardous waste”. Re-design of the leaching process Restricting the process to neutral leaching only is one alternative method that can be used to avoid the production of intractable wastes (jarosite). In this case iron remains in the leach residue along with a significant portion of the zinc. This residue is used as the feed for a pyrometallurgical process to recover the zinc, lead, silver, sulphur and to bring the iron into a slag. Controlled Disposal If the modification of the leaching process is not feasible, then techniques to render the jarosite residue inert should be used if possible. The effective washing and precipitation of the leachable metals as sulphides before disposal should be considered. Moreover, the solubility of the residue should be monitored using a standard leachate test. (Council Directive 1999-3 on the landfill of waste). Pb-Ag slime BAT for the treatment of this kind of slime is the recovery of Ag. However there are no BATs available for the recovery of Ag so this is an open area for research. The Pb-Ag slime could be processed further in a lead smelter (during lead smelting and refining the precious metals are concentrated in a Pb-Zn-Ag alloy) or leached with MgCl2 or CaCl2. Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 ENERGY PRODUCTION • Wastes arising from the lignite combustion plants are of three types: liquids (mainly oil contaminated waste waters), solids (fly ash) and gases (SO2 , CO2 , NOx emissions, dusts). Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 Fly ash Bottom ash Sorption process Gypsum products Construction industry Concrete additive (disregarding "Flual") Lightweight aggregates for concrete Foam mortar, porous concrete High performanve concrete "Flual" production Blend additive in the cement industry Raw meal consituent in the cement industry Cement additive to delay setting Isolation walls Construction gypsum Ceramic industry Road building and landscaping Dam construction with the RCC (Roller Compacted Concrete) technique Filler for bituminous surfacing, bonding layers and sub-base binders Ground stabilisation, loose building materials for earth work and road construction Sound proofing Landfill technology, waste treatment Landfill Hazardous substance immobilisation Lining material for landfill bottom lining Surface filter for landfill sealing Sewage sludge conditioning Base material for biological waste water cleaning Utilization possibilities of combustion residues and by-production Filler for pipeline ditches Stabilised ash cement mixture Ditch filling Other methods of utilisation Reclamation material in mining Zeolite production Alpha- and beta- half hydrate production Filling material in the paper industry Production of anhydrite "Muller-Kuhne-process" Thermal recovery Flue-gas desulphurisation Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 BATs for de-dusting off-gases from lignite-fired combustion plants Dust emission level (mg/Nm3) Capacity (MWth) Capacity (MWth) 50-100 50-100 3 5-20 100-300 5-20 Dust emission level (mg/Nm ) new plants 5-20 (1) existing plants 5-30 new plants (1) 5-30 (2) BAT to reach these levels (2) (3) ESP or FF ESP or FF 5-25 (4) continuous FF for CFBC 5-20 5-10 (5) 5-20 (6) (5) ESP Notes: ESP FF FF the redu fabric fi FGD for PC new and(wet) existing plants of an ES the reduction rate associated with the use of a the redu new and existing fabric filter is considered to be 99,95% or continuous fabric fi plants reduces of an ESP is considered to be 99,5% or higher new and existing continuous Electrostatic precipitator plants the reduction rate associated with the use of a fabric filter is considered be 99,95% orin the ra For very high dust to concentrations Fabric filter higher calorific lignite is used as a fuel, thereduc a FGD Flue gas desulphurisation by using a spray dryer ESP or (sds) FF for CFBC 99,9% for fabric filters is considered to b wet scrubber used for desulphurisation also Electrostatic precipitator2 FGD (wet) Wet flue-gas desulphurisation FGD (dsi) Flue-gas desulphurisation by dry sorbent the dust concentration levels mentioned in reduces dust The rationale given by Indust 3 For very high dust concentrations Industry and one MS proposed 20-100mg/Nm that be issues fuel ch in the raw gas, which is might the such case as when low gas inlet SO concentration w 2 calorific lignite is used as a fuel, the reduction rate of 99,95% for the ESP or 3 Industry and one MS proposed 10-30mg/Nm3 FGD, economics, as well as hi Flue gas desulphurisation by using a spray dryer FGD (wet) the dust concentration levels mentioned in this table. Wet flue-gas desulphurisation in the case of combination with wet FGD 99,9% for fabric filters is considered to be the BAT associated level,taken rather than not been fully into acco 4 Industry and one MS proposed 10-100mg/Nm3 for Esp or FF, and 10-50mg/Nm3 Flue-gas desulphurisation5byIndustry dry sorbent and one MS proposed 10-30mg/Nm3 1 Industry and one MS proposed new and existing plants the reduction rate associated with thehigher use FGD (sds) FGD (dsi) of an ES Comments 1 Industry and one MS proposed 10-50mg/Nm3 Fabric filter the r plants the r of an ESP is considered to be 99,5% or higher FGD (wet) for PC Notes: 5-20 (6) plants new and existing higher higher ESP or FF for CFBC the reduction rate associated with thewet usescru (6) ESP or FF in combination with >300 5-20 (5) 5-20 new FF andfor existing CFBC Applicability ESP or FF in combination with (6) (wet, sd or dsi) for PC /ESP or continuous >300 continuous (wet, sd or dsi) for PC /ESP or continuous 5-20 ESP or 5-10 FF in combination /FGD 5-20 (3) Monitoring Monitoring ESP or Applicability FF in combination /FGD 5-25 (4) (5) 100-300 BAT to reach these levels existing plants view and maintained that eve emissions levels achieved, wh resistivity and high ash conte 6 Industry and one MS proposed 10-100mg/Nm3 for Esp or FF, and 10-50mg/Nm3 the proposed levels for exist in 3the case of combination with wet FGD The rationale given by Industry proposing to fornatural the values given beside, desulphurisation 10-50mg/Nm is that issues such as fuel characteristics, ash resistivity, the flue1,2 One3 Industry representative mentioned that for coal fired plants between 50 2 Industry and one MS proposed 20-100mg/Nm gas inlet SO concentration which determined the necessity for an and 100MW, dust emissions of less than 30mg/Nm32 are too optimistic and gives 3 Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 BAT for nitrogen oxide prevention and control in lignite-fired combustion plants Capacity Combustion (MWth) technique NOx emission level associate with BAT (mg/Nm3) new plants Grate-firing 200-300 50-100 CFBC, BFBC and PFBC PC PC 200-300 200-450 100-200 BAT options to reach Applicability Monitoring Pm and/or SNCR New and existing Continuous 200-300 Combination of Pm (such as plants New and existing Continuous 200-450 (2) air and fuel-staging) Combination of Pm (such as plants New and existing Continuous 100-200 (3) air and fuel-staging) Combination of Pm (such as plants existing plants 200-300 (1) these levels air and fuel-staging, low 100-300 CFBC, BFBC 100-200 100-200 4) and PFBC New and existing NOx burner, reburning, plants etc) Combination of Pm (such as New and existing air and fuel-staging) if plants Continuous Continuous necessary tohethre with PC 50-200 (5) 50-200 (6) SNRC Combination of Pm (such as air and fuel-staging, low >300 CFBC, BFBC 50-150 50-200 (7) and PFBC New and existing NOx burner, reburning, plants etc) Combination of Pm (such as New and existing air and fuel-staging) plants Continuous Continuous Notes: PC CFBC Pulverised combustion circulating fluidised bed BFBC bubbling fluidised bed PFBC pressurised fluidised bed Pm Primary measures to reduce NOx SCR Selective catalytic reduction of NOx SNCR Selective non catalytic reduction of NOx Industry and one MS proposed that the levels should be as follows Industry claimed that their proposed figures better consider the issue that the 1 400mg/Nm3 2 upper level 500mg/Nm3 3 upper level 450mg/Nm3 4 range to be 100-300mg/Nm3 5 range to be 100-200mg/Nm3 6 range to be 100-450mg/Nm3 7 lower end of the range to be 100mg/Nm3 application of primary measures are restricted by boiler geometry and configuartion (height restrictions may not allow retrofitting of air and fuel staging). One MS added that for existing plants burning low quality lignite, the produced NOx emision levels are quite low, due to the combustion technique inherent primary measures for NOx reductions (flue gas recirculation, fuel and air staging etc). Further modifications for improvement of already installed primary measures are rstricted by boiler geometry and configuration and are not cost effective Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 SO2 emission level associate with Capacity (MWth) Grate-firing PC 50-100 BAT (mg/Nm3) Combustion technique CFBC and BFBC BFBC PC new plants existing plants 200-400 200-400 200-400 (1) 150-400 (3) 150-400 (5) 100-200 200-400 (2) 150-400 150-400 (4) (6) 100-250 (7) BAT options to reach Applicability Monitoring Low sulphur fuel or New and Continuous FGD (sds) existing plants these levels Low sulphur fuel or New and Continuous FGD (sds, dsi) Low sulphur fuel existing plants New and Continuous Limestone injection existing plants Low sulphur fuel FGD New and Continuous BATs for prevention and control of SO2 from lignite power production plants (sds, dsi) existing plants Low sulphur fuel FGD (wet, sds) FGD (dsi, up to about 200MWth) Seawater scrubbing Combined techniques 100-300 New and existing plants Continuous for the reduction of NOx and SO2 CFBC and BFBC BFBC PC 100-200 100-200 20-150 (10) 100-250 (8) 100-250 (9) 20-200 (11) Low sulphur fuel New and Limestone injection existing plants Low sulphur fuel FGD New and Continuous Continuous (sds,wet) existing plants Low sulphur fuel FGD (wet, sds) FGD (dsi, up to about 200MWth) Seawater scrubbing Combined techniques >300 New and existing plants Continuous for the reduction of NOx and SO2 CFBC and BFBC BFBC 100-200 20-150 100-200 20-200 (12) (13) Low sulphur fuel New and Limestone injection existing plants Low sulphur fuel FGD New and (wet) Continuous Continuous existing plants Notes: PC Pulverised combustion CFBC circulating fluidised bed combustion BFBC bubbling fluidised bed combustion PFBC pressurised fluidised bed combustion FGD (wet) wet flue-gas desulphurisation FGD (dsi) FGD (sds) flue-gas desulphurisation by dry sorbent injection flue-gas desulphurisation by using a spray dryer These levels where proposed by the industry because they claim that better takes into account the fuel 1-6, 8, 9, upper level 300mg/ Nm3 12, 13 characteristics, the inlet flue-gas SO2 concentration affects the BAT achievable levels considering the Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007 agreed wet scrubber SO removal efficiencies of 85-98%, the high energy consumption of such a wet Conclusion • Comparison of BAT’s and currently used technologies in mining and metalurgical industry of Serbia showed that only one plant could be considered as BAT (Monbat, Indjija) • Significant effort for technological improvement is visible in companies with constant production level and appropriate profit (US Steel Serbia, Smederevo) Workshop, Belgrade, dec. 10th 2007