Transcript Presentation held at the supplier information meeting 22

Welcome to the Electrification Programme
Suppliers Briefing – Copenhagen
22 Aug.2013
Introduction and Programme
10.30 – 11.00 Registration
11:00 - 11.30 Presentation of the programme and the vision behind the programme
(Søren Thorpstrup Larsen & Susan Bille Andersen)
11: 30 - 12:00 Technical perspective of the programme
(Poul Neumann & Peter Dearman)
12.00 - 12:45 Refreshments
12:45 - 13:15 Tender process and commercial implications
(David Humberstone, Susan Bille Andersen and Jimmie Bøllingtoft )
13.15 – 14.00 Questions.
Presentation of the Programme and the vision behind the Programme
Søren Thorpstrup Laursen -
Programme Manager
&
Susan Bille Andersen, Head of Programme Management Office
Why is Denmark Electrifying again ??
•Electric rolling stock for speeds over 160 km/t are 15% cheaper to acquire
than similar diesel rolling stock.
• OPEX for electric rolling stock are 2/3 of the cost for equivalent diesel rolling
stock.
• The main operator DSB has a great
shortage of rolling stock.
• Considerable environmental benefits
with electric traction. Both in regard to
CO2 emissions and the local
environment.
Why put all the electrification projects into one
Programme??
Banedanmark's Vision is to:
1) Roll out all the “Authorised” electrification projects in a joint programme,
2) Include the lines that are not yet authorised as options in the tender
3) Introduce a new electrification system based on a functional requirements tender,
Benefits by functional tenders:
1. Draw benefits from the extensive rollout of electrification in Europe
2. Find a supplier that has an already TSI approved system
Benefits by a joint programme:
1. Ensure we get one system, a common system architecture with a single set of components
2. Ensure the knowledge stays on the programme – from line to line
3. Continuous work with industrialising the roll out
4. Use the relative large line volume, to get better prices in the tender
Electrification in Denmark
Authorised (Decided) lines
Esbjerg – Lunderskov 114 km
Cph – Ringsted
120 km
Køge N – Næstved
45 km
Ringsted – Holeby
258 km
Total:
2015
2017
2018
2019/20
537 km
Options (Togfonden.dk Funding)
Roskilde – Kalundborg
112 km
Fredericia – Aarhus
218 km
Aarhus – Aalborg
280 km
Vejle – Struer
130 km
Aalborg - Frederikshavn
85 km
Total (options):
825 km
Overall total 1362 track kilometres
Early depoyment: Esbjerg - Lunderskov
Esbjerg – Lunderskov is almost through the environmental impact
assessment and the programme phase reports are finished.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Programme phase report
Bridgeworks
LER works (The Danish Register of Underground Cable Owners)
Dialogue with the Transmission System Operator (TSO)
Earthing and bonding
Immunization
Land acquisition
Track possession
Geotechnical works
3D scan
DONE
Started
Started
Started
Tender
Started
Started
Started
•
Work has commenced to collect the above data on the other three
authorised lines
In development
In development
Organisational structure in EP
Sponsoring Group/ Programme
Board
Programme Management
Group
Programme Manager
Søren T. Laursen
Lead Consultant
(COWI Systra)
PMO
Programme support
• Anette Malling Beck
• John Bjerregaard Villadsen
Procurement & contracts
• Nigel Morgan
• Søren Fosberg
• Louise K. Boserup
• Xavier Durand
Stakeholders
• Preben J. Mikkelsen
Communication and teambuilding
• Elizabeth Pratt
Safety management
• Niels Baden
Risk Management
• Leif Brandt
Environmental mgmt
• Jens B. Larsen
Configuration, asset and
documentation management
• Niels D. Overgaard
Land acquisition
• Michael H. Persson
• Morten Krebs
Quality management
• Marianne Kronborg
Occupational health and safety
management
• Kristine B. Klint
Planning management
• Michael A.S. Christensen
Authority coordinator (others)
• Rasmus Kolding
Conceptual
Design
Catenary/ Power
Supply
Programme Finance
and IT
Christian Fürstnow
Turan Erdogan
Head of PMO
Head of Project
Management
Susan B. Andersen
Poul Neumann
CopenhagenRingsted
Esbjerg–
Lunderskov
Køge NordNæstved
Ringsted–Holeby
Project Board:
• …
PM BDK:
• Henrik Vikelgaard
DM CS:
• Ludwig Cueff
Project Board:
• …
PM BDK:
• Henry Martensen
PM CS:
• Peter Søgaard Christensen
DM CS:
• Ludwig Cueff
Project Board:
• …
PM BDK:
• …
PM CS:
• Peter Søgaard Christensen
DM CS:
• Ludwig Cueff
Project Board:
• …
PM BDK:
• Henry Martensen
PM CS:
• Peter Søgaard Christensen
DM CS:
• Ludwig Cueff
Project Board:
• …
PM BDK:
• …
PM CS:
• Peter Søgaard Christensen
DM CS:
• Ludwig Cueff
Project team:
• Haidar Al-Ali
• Antoine Chatelain
• Djamel Sellam
• P. Regazzoni
• A. Monnier
• Niels Kjær
• Kamil Stolarek
• Jimi Okstoft
Project team:
• Henry Martensen
• Bjørn Lykke Jensen
• Sami Kilic
Project team:
• …
• …
• …
• …
Project team:
• …
• …
• …
• …
Project team:
• …
• …
• …
• …
20130702Orgdiagramme_02
Technical Support
Project system coordination
• Jean-Marc Bedmar
System integration
• Jean-Marc Bedmar
• Phillippe Regazzoni
Catenary system
• Antione Chatelain
• Niels H. K. Jensen
• Thomas Urbanos
• Alain Monnier
• Frédéric Boisson
• Fabien Le Porquir
• Sébastien Epaillard
Power supply system
• Kamil Stolarek
• Oddur Ingvarsson
• Etienne Cazaudebat
• Peter V. Nielsen
• Cyril Mordret
• Didier Lafouasse
Earthing and bonding & EMC
• Frans Schorens
Remote control, communications &
signalling systems
• Djamel Sellam
• Erik Amtoft
• Boris Miric
• Christophe Carvalho
• Michel Di Lena
RAM
• Jean Marie Cloarec
LCC optimisation
• Emmanuel Michel
Track Engineering, utilities, drainage
• Safia Ullah
• Jimi Okstoft
Traffic, possession
• Mette Thun Klausen
Structures
• Jakob Laigaard Jensen
Geotechnics
• Ole Frits Nielsen
Authority coordinator (Rail)
• Christoffer Kronqvist
• Kirsten M. Hansen
How does the Electrification programme work
1. Informal and dynamic work environment
2. If you take responsibility, responsibility is given to you
3. Joint team: COWI+Systra+Bdk=EP
4. Pitching in is encouraged. We like new ideas. We like well
founded ideas, in contrast to “we usually do”
Technical Requirements
Poul Neumann, Head of Project Management
&
Peter Dearman, Engineering Director , Systra UK
Scope of the activities included in the task
Authorised ( Decided ) lines
Copenhagen - Ringsted:
Ringsted - Holeby:
Esbjerg-Lunderskov:
Køge N-Næstved:
Electrification
Electrification
Electrification / Bridges/ Immunization
Electrification / Bridges
Optionial (Togfonden.dk – Special Government Funding )
Roskilde – Kalundborg
Fredericia – Aarhus
Aarhus – Aalborg
Vejle – Struer
Aalborg - Frederikshavn
Electrification
Electrification
Electrification
Electrification
Electrification
/
/
/
/
/
Bridges
Bridges
Bridges
Bridges
Bridges
Activities marked with GREEN will not be part of the functional tender
Inside and outside the delivery from the supplier(s)
Inside the delivery
The cornerstones of the delivery are for all lines to be electrified:
1. Catenary system 25 kV 50 hz
2. Power Supply stations 25 kV 50 hz
3. Remote control system
4. 200kph system on Cph-Rig enabled for upgrade to 250Kph
Details for each:
1.
Catenary - We have no specific BDK preferences except for the requirements
on Life Cycle Costs and aesthetics.
2. Traction Power Supply - The system has to fulfil the requirements in a master
plan for Traction Power Supply that has not yet been completed.
3. Remote Control – SCADA, the system will be an add-on to the existing system.
The substations have to comply with the specifications of the existing system
based on standard communication protocols.
Inside and outside the delivery from the supplier(s)
Outside the delivery
The following will be handled outside the delivery:
•
Bridgeworks
•
Earthing and bonding ( not decided in details )
•
Geological surveys
•
Surveys for existing cables (registrations in LER - Buried Services )
•
Immunization ( is secured by the Signalling Programme )
This is our plan at the moment !!!
The road map for the Electrification
Suppliers Deliverables
1. Conceptual design for each construction element
2. Approval for compliance with TSI and specifications
3. Detailed design for Esbjerg – Lunderskov ( Early deployment )
4. Construction on Esbjerg - Lunderskov
5. Approval for compliance with TSI and specifications as build
6. Detailed design for other lines
7. Construction on other lines
8. Approval for compliance with TSI and specification as build for each
line
9. Maintenance (to be decided )
A new system plan
•
The electrification programme team are working on a joint system plan.
•
We want the full picture of the correlation between the future conceptual
timetables and the corresponding need for power.
•
That enables us to make every new power substation suited for the job at
hand, and have the necessary upgradability for the job in the near future
On top of the electrification, we need more
power to the existing system !!
The existing system was not built to handle
the increased amount of electrified traffic
running through the existing lines.
Some form of upgrade is necessary in order
to handle this traffic.
The system around Copenhagen receives the
most strain of all. Trains for all the new
electrified lines originate from Copenhagen
The necessary upgrades from line to line are
identified as best as possible in the budget
estimate for each optional line.
The main operators wish for operation with
coupled train sets
The main line between Copenhagen and Fredericia is
by far the most congested line in Denmark. Therefore
the main operator DSB has developed a convoy type
traffic operation between Copenhagen and Frederica.
Today, DSB is running up to 5 trains for different
destinations in Jutland connected in convoy to
Fredericia, and then splits the train in a few
minutes in Fredericia.
To do this fast coupling and decoupling with 5 separate
trains. DSB are currently using up to 5 pantographs!!
The new system will need to run up to 200 kph
DSB will acquire new rolling stock to operate on
the electrified lines and works together with
Banedanmark on finding a solution with regards
to equipment that can handle the need for
coupling/decoupling trains
Tender & Commercial Process
Susan Bille Andersen, Head of Programme Management Office
&
David Humberstone, Systra UK
&
Jimmie Bøllingtoft, Kammeradvokaten
(Legal Advisors to the Danish Government)
Tender Objectives & Timeline
–
Undertake a ”functional tender” for electrification of the 4 x authorised lines plus
options for a number of additional lines which are pending a political decision
–
The first line from Lunderskov to Esbjerg to be fully operational by the end of
2015. The following 3 x authorised lines to be completed in 2017-2020
–
The tender will be for ”Design and Build”, and most likely include a possibility
regarding ”Maintenance”
–
The working hypothesis as of now, is to do one ”all inclusive” tender
–
We would welcome the market to offer alternatives i.e. split into sub-packages for
example
o
a) Contact catenary system,
o
b) Traction Power Supply including protection control,
o
c) Contract & Catenary Wire Supply, etc
DRAFT Timeline To Award – Q3 2013 to Q4 2014 (1 of 2)
JUN
Project Mobilisation
OJEC PIN Notice release
Suppliers register interest by 15 Aug.
Develop early tender strategy
Dialogue themes released (Mid Aug)
Market Briefing (22 Aug)
Dialogue meetings (9 -27 Sep)
Visit selected ”Best Practise”
Builders
Final Procurement Strategy, Peer
Review and Board approval
Release contract notice ( PQQ )
Target Date Dec 10
Drafting of tender package
Receipt of PQQ submissions
deadline 10 Feb
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
DRAFT timeline to Award Q3 2013 to Q4 2014 (2 of 2)
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
PQ application deadline (appr 10 Feb)
PQ review (finalise 28 Feb)
Finalise tender package incl. peer
review, board approval etc
PQ and release tender package
Tenderers prepare submission 1
Review of submission 1
Negotiation meetings
Prepare and release ”version 2” of
tender package
Tenderers prepare submission 2
Review of submission 2
Award
Standstill & final contract
adjustments
Signing
Possibly, the process will include a
downselection in connection with
submission 1. Further, an option to
select a preferred bidder already in
connection with submission 1 might
also be included
Dialogue meetings – practical matters
The purpose of the “Technical Dialogue” meetings to be conducted by
the Electrification Programme of Banedanmark in September 2013 (9th 27th) is to gather general market information to be used for the
preparation of tender documents that are suitable for all involved
parties.
Next step in the process: We will go through the applications and decide
if we can accommodate all that expressed interest herein. If anyone is
considering to participate in a JV/consortium-constellation kindly let us
know
Notifications regarding meeting dates, location and timing to be released
by the end of August
Dialogue themes – a bit of background for each
of the questions
1) Banedanmark would like to discuss the market's capacity to take on the
programme with a special interest in the design and early deployment phase.
2) If the potential contractors envisage capacity issues, Banedanmark would like to
discuss whether or not Banedanmark can take actions to alleviate the problem of
lacking capacity now. ( High output and conventional plant )
3) What is the market's view on the proposed timetable set out by the Ministry to
electrify the Esbjerg-Lunderskov Line by 2015 and the time gap to the 3 other lines
in the first phase of the programme?
4) What would the market consider a realistic timeline for developing a conceptual
design and following this a specific design for the early deployment line?
5) What are the potential choices available to Banedanmark to achieve the
programme timeline and what do they mean in respect of acquiring track
possessions?
Dialogue themes – a bit of background for each
of the questions
6) What design and construction challenges does the market perceive to deliver
this programme and how would Banedanmark mitigate those challenges?
7) Which social clauses (i.e. clauses in the contract that requires the contractor to
take certain actions with a positive social impact while performing the contract e.g. hiring of unemployed persons, job training, etc.) does the market perceive to
be most suited for inclusion in the programme?
8) What does the market perceive the primary cost drivers to be and why?
9) What is the market’s view on proceeding with one “all inclusive tender” as
opposed to breaking the project into defined smaller tenders covering e.g. Contact
Catenary System, Traction Power System, etc. and which in the market's opinion
would be a better proposal and why? Time ?
10) What would be the preferred payment structure if any (e.g. monthly in
arrears)?
Dialogue themes – a bit of background for each
of the questions
11) Is there an international standard contract preferred by the market for railway
electrification projects and what would the view be on applying the existing Danish
standard contracts such as “ABT93 Turnkey” or “AB92 Works & Supplies”
12) What is the market’s view if Banedanmark is to take ownership of the
Intellectual Property Rights of the final design once the changes to meet Danish
Regulations & Standards have been incorporated?
13) What is the market’s preliminary assessment of the Electrification Programme
regarding perceived risks and mitigation of these risks?
14) What is the market’s opinion of incorporating a maintenance program inclusive
of training Banedanmark’s personnel once construction is complete for each line?
15) What is the market's opinion on tendering the electrification programme on the
basis of functional requirements?
Questions & Answers
Finish.
Our sincere thanks to everyone for attending the Briefing Session
today and we wish all of you, a safe journey home.
Thank you.