Transcript Joint ventures, collaboration and mergers
Funding Fair 2013
Joint Ventures, Collaborations and Mergers
Andrew Studd
Charity and Social Business Team Russell-Cooke LLP 12 July 2013
Context
Current environment Trustee duties and setting the strategy to achieve the objectives Spectrum of collaborative working arrangements
Drivers
Wider geographic spread / scale / reach Better / more efficient service delivery Reduce overheads / loss of income / cost savings Future funding uncertainty Brand and cost of fundraising Louder “voice” in campaigning Move from grants to contracts Funders requiring partnership working Governance Staff retention / skills Crisis?
Business Themes
Who is your partner?
Common objectives / goals What do they want from you? Trust, culture and personalities Reputation Funding Communications and planning Contracts
Authority
Memorandum and articles/trust deed/rules* Objects Powers Trading or fundraising? Primary purpose Appropriate use of resources Private benefit Trustees Commercial partnerships policy Reputation management Charity Commission guidance *note own structure and impact on liability
Degree of integration Sharing/apportioning of risk MOU? Legally binding or not?
Accountable Body and Sub Contractor Primary responsibility remains Apportion service responsibility Risk of default by subcontractor?
Collaboration: Joint Venture SPV Charity A
Member or Shareholder with right to appoint to board
Charity B
Member or Shareholder with right to appoint to board
JV Entity
Charity C
Member or Shareholder with right to appoint to board
New Entity
“Corporate” joint venture or “SPV” Limited liability for members or shareholders Governance issues Business rates Costs sharing, VAT and grouping – cost sharing exemption Capital provision Board appointment and other controls
Key Legal Issues
Assumption and management of risk – structures and contracts Identifiable benefits, outputs or cost reduction Management and decision making - process Communication Due diligence Viability of partner Employees and TUPE VAT/Tax/Accounting Legal and Financial Culture?
Control Exit
Merger – Structures
Overlapping board membership strategic partnership but potential conflicts of interest Group structure Parent /subsidiary Full merger One into another New organisation Other options – function swap
Parent Charity Trading Subsidiary Subsidiary Charity
Structures - Group
Key Benefits Isolation of risk Benefit of simplicity Governance Issues Benefits of integration Confused reporting lines “independent” trustee board Unincorporated charities
Merge into new charity
Charity A Charity B
New Charity
One merges into another
Charity A Charity A (+ B) Charity B
Structures – Full Merger
Benefits Full integration?
Branding Competitive environment Issues More extensive due diligence Cost Legal issues Pensions TUPE Leases
Combination
Group structure followed by full merger or “hive up” Control Timing Flexibility “Independent” trustee board and managing conflicts of interest
Due Diligence
Asset risks Consents? Landlords and other third parties Income risks Contracts Consent of funders New funders Old funders – clawback Past risks Reputational risks Data protection Regulatory risks
Due Diligence – Staff Issues
TUPE Varying the employment contract Compromise agreements Pensions Union recognition and national terms Self-employed, casuals and volunteers
Transfer Agreement
Transfer of Assets Warranties Indemnities Intellectual property Land Assignment/Novation of contracts
Risk Management
Deal breakers Due diligence is key Confidentiality agreement Heads of terms/MOU Role of structure Acts as a firewall Role of the transfer agreement Transfer of assets Warranties Indemnities
Post Merger
Just the beginning….
Integration and implementation Mission protection Retention, wind-up or strike off Register of mergers Insurance and claims Ring fencing and restricted funds
Checklist
The starting point: inspiration, not desperation! Be clear about the risks, and benefits you are seeking Working in the spirit of partnership is key Effective leadership is essential People are the most important consideration Process management is complex and time consuming Independent facilitation can be highly cost effective
Contact Details Andrew Studd
Partner – Charity and Social Business Team 020 8394 6414 [email protected]