Transcript DAC PowerPoint Template - richmedia

Advancing innovative development
and aid strategies in the Asia Pacific
Sydney, 16-18 June 2010
The Paris Declaration on Aid
Effectiveness – MDG8 in progress
Marjolaine Nicod
OECD-DAC
The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness
A key contribution to enhancing
global partnerships for development
(MDG-8):
– Why aid effectiveness matters
– What it is about
– Where we are
– What’s next
2
Why does aid effectiveness matter
3
Change ….? Why Change?
4
Too little from too many donors?
A world map of donor fragmentation
•
•
5
4000 aid relationships globally (of 46 donors in 151 countries)
50% of all relations represent only 5% of aid
Problematic aid management at country level
800
Vietnam (752)
750
700
650
600
Niger (569)
Indonesia (590)
550
Lao PDR (569)
500
Madagascar (509)
Number of donor missions: 14 420 missions in 55 countries in 2007
What is the aid effectiveness agenda?
7
The Aid Effectiveness Journey
Dili Declaration
on peacebuilding
and statebuilding
(2010)
Monterrey
Consensus
(2002)
8
Rome
Declaration on
Harmonisation
(2003)
Paris
Declaration on
Aid
Effectiveness
(2005)
Accra Agenda
for Action
(2008)
Bogota
Statement on
South South
Cooperation
(2010)
Korea HLF
(2011)
Where are we today?
9
Paris Declaration: 56 commitments
and 12 indicators (targets for 2010)
2005
10
2010 Targets
1
Operational Development
Strategies
2
Reliable Public Financial
Management Systems
3
Aid flows are recorded in
countries' budgets
42%
4
Technical assistance is
aligned & coordinated
48%
5a
Donors use country PFM
Systems
40%
45%
[80%]
5b
Donors use country
procurement systems
39%
43%
[80%]
6
Donors avoid parallel PIUs 1817
1832
7
Aid is more predictable
41%
8
Aid is untied
75%
9
Donors use coordinated
mechanisms for aid delivery
43%
10a
Donors coordinate their
missions
18%
21%
40%
10b
Donors coordinate their
country studies
42%
44%
66%
11
Sound frameworks to
monitor results
7%
12
Mechanisms for mutal
accountability
22%
17%
75%
22%
36%
50%
48%
85%
50%
611
1601
71%
46%
88%
47%
9%
26%
[100%]
66%
38%
100%
60%
What has changed?
• A widely accepted set of norms and
benchmarks
• Monitoring in place to hold donors and
developing countries accountable
• Country-led evidence-based dialogue
• Growing body of evidence
• Fragility and conflict at the forefront
• A more inclusive and fairer global
partnership for development
11
What’s next?
12
How to keep political momentum?
•
Demonstrate value for money and accountability - progress
against the Paris Declaration/AAA commitments and
changes at country level
•
Make aid make a difference - use evidence to identify which
principles matter most – and focus on these
•
Get ‘back to basics’ - aid effectiveness is about doing, not
talking
•
Step up the multi-stakeholder and inclusive dialogue CSOs, Parliaments, private sector, middle income countries
•
Decide on an aid effectiveness framework to 2015 - based
on evidence of what matters for development, and with a
monitoring process to hold partners to account
13
14