Analysis of Student Work Coordinator and Think Tank Update

Broadcast: Wednesday, July 16 1:00 – 3:00 p.m.

ASW Reality vs. Rumor Activity

NC Professional Teaching Standards

Standard I: Teachers demonstrate leadership.

Standard II: Teachers establish a respectful environment for a diverse population of students.

Standard III: Teachers know the content they teach.

Standard IV: Teachers facilitate learning for their students.

Standard V: Teachers reflect on their practice.

Standard VI: Teachers contribute to the academic success of students.

NC Educator Evaluation System

Overview of Standard 6 Demonstrate 1 Establish 2 5 Rating Categories

Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished

Facilitate 4 Reflect on 5 6 Success 3 Rating Categories

Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth

Overview of Standard 6

Contribute to Academic Success 6

End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) tests

6

Career Technical Education Assessment

6

NC Final Exams

6

K-3 Checkpoints

6 Analysis of Student Work

Analysis of Student Work

Contribute to Academic Success

In 2014-2015, ASW is the Standard 6 measure for teachers in Advanced Placement, Arts Education, Healthful Living, International Baccalaureate, and World Languages.

Growth is based on student work submitted by teachers and rated by content experts in a “blind review” process.

6 Analysis of Student Work

Analysis of Student Work Process

• Fall 2011 Design Groups • Spring 2013 ASW Pilot • 2013 – 2014 ASW Pilot

ASW 2014 Pilot Participants Over 1100 NC Educators Representing Regions 8 Content Areas

Advanced Placement Arts Education Healthful Living International Baccalaureate Occupational Preparation 7 th Grade Social Studies World History World Languages

Questions about the previous section? Type them in the question box now.

Overview of ASW Process

Overview of the ASW Process Teacher verifies schedule and chooses objectives for each course Teacher collects TAs of student work Teacher Uploads Evidence Collection to Online Platform Reviewers rate Evidence Collections Teacher receives category rating for Standard 6

Overview of the ASW Process

Overview of the ASW Process

ASW Process: A Quick Guide

Overview of the ASW Process

• • • • • Items needed to compile a Timelapse Artifact (TA): A specific objective measured over 2 distinct points in time Work Sample Options: Student or Whole Class Method(s) or tool(s) for collecting 2 work samples Context

Overview of the ASW Process

Objectives: Using the Strands and Standards guidance charts, 5 objectives will be chosen.

Questions about the previous section? Type them in the question box now.

Overview of the ASW Process

Work Samples: Option 1 – Student Work Samples Collect and keep 2 work • • • samples: for each class member for the objective at 2 separate points in time

Overview of the ASW Process

Work Samples: Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples 2 work samples that • • represent the entire class for the objective at 2 separate points in time

Overview of the ASW Process

Method(s) or tool(s) for collecting:

Overview of the ASW Process

Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples Online platform will select 3 students The TA will be compiled using the Student Work Samples from these selected students.

TA 1

Overview of the ASW Process

Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples If a student work sample is unavailable, that student will be reshuffled to create another sampling.

TA 1

Overview of the ASW Process

Timelapse Artifact Option 1 –

Student Work Samples

Context for 1 st work sample

How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective?

1 1 1

Overview of the ASW Process

Timelapse Artifact Option 1 –

Student Work Samples

Context for 2 nd work sample

How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective?

2 2 2

Overview of the ASW Process

Timelapse Artifact Option 1 –

Student Work Samples

Context for Growth

Describe the growth that occurred between points one and two.

2 1 2 1 2 1

Overview of the ASW Process

Timelapse Artifact Option 1 –

Student Work Samples

1 Timelapse Artifact 2 1 2 1 2 1

Overview of the ASW Process

Timelapse Artifact Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples Be sure to keep the Whole Class Work Samples If the composition of your class changes, do not worry, submit your two work samples.

1 #2 Timelapse Artifact Work Sample 1 Work Sample 2

Overview of the ASW Process

Timelapse Artifact Option 2 –

Whole Class Work Samples

Whole Class Work Sample 1 1 Timelapse Artifact Whole Class Work Sample 2

Overview of the ASW Process

Timelapse Artifacts will be uploaded to the online platform.

TA 3 Student TA 1 Student TA 4 Student TA 2 Whole Class TA 5 Whole Class

Questions about the previous section? Type them in the question box now.

Principal’s Input

Ensure Teacher Participation

Principal’s Input

Principal meets with the teacher to ensure that the 5 objectives chosen use the parameters in the Strands & Standards Guidance Chart • • Some examples of meetings: PDPs teacher meetings

Principal’s Input

The Principal is notified when a reshuffle is used by a teacher.

TA 1

Overview of the ASW Process

Blind Review: The Evidence Collection will be reviewed by 2 content area specialists.

Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

Overview of the ASW Process

Blind Review: The platform sends the evidence collection to two reviewers who have been matched to the teacher because of their similar content area expertise. Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

Overview of the ASW Process

Blind Review: If the category ratings from each reviewer are the same, then the review process is complete and the Standard 6 rating will be posted for that year. Meets Expected Growth Category Rating: Meets Expected Growth Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

Overview of the ASW Process

Blind Review: If the category ratings from the two reviewers are not the same, the Evidence Collection is automatically sent to a 3 rd reviewer for an additional review to get a rating for that year. Reviewer #3 Exceeds Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Reviewer #2 Reviewer #1

Overview of the ASW Process

2-Step ASW Process Review :

Evidence Collection Checklist ASW Quality Rubric

Overview of the ASW Process

Evidence Collection Rating Form: • • •

D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth M = Meets Expected Growth E = Exceeds Expected Growth Transfer your rating for each TA from the quality rubric to the table below: TA 1 TA 2 TA 3 TA 4 TA 5 Use this table to determine the overall rating for the evidence collection Does Not Meet

D D D D D D D D D E D D D D M D D D E E D D D M E D D D M M

Meets

M M M M M M M M M E D M M M M M M M E E D D M M M D M M M E D D M M E D D M E E D M M E E

Exceeds

E E E E E M E E E E M M E E E D E E E E D M E E E D D E E E

Overall Rating for the entire Evidence Collection Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth

NC Educator Evaluation System

Overview of Standard 6 Demonstrate 1 Establish 2 5 Rating Categories

Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished

Facilitate 4 Reflect on 5 Contribute 6 to Success 3 Rating Categories

3-Year Rolling Average

Standard 6 Standard 6 Standard 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

An educator receives an effectiveness status only after he or she has 3 years of data on Standard 6 A 3-year rolling average of growth data from Standard 6 is used as part of determining overall status

Demonstration of

3-Year Rolling Average for 2014-2017

Mr. NC’s 3-year rolling average of growth data: Standard 6 Standard 6 Year 1 2014-2015

Does Not Meet Expected Growth

Year 2 2015-2016

Meets Expected Growth

Standard 6 Year 3 2016-2017

Meets Expected Growth

2014-15 Does Not Meet (Year 1) 2015-16 Meets (Year 2) + 2016-17 Meets (Year 3) Mr. NC’s 3-year rolling average for 2014-2017

Meets Expected Growth

to Academic Success

Effectiveness Status for 2016 - 2017

Effectiv

2016 - 2017 Developing Proficient

e

Accomplished Distinguished Standard 1 Demonstrate leadership

X

Standard 2 Establish Environment

X

Standard 3 Know Content Standard 4 Facilitate Learning Standard 5 Reflect on Practice Standard 6 Three year rolling average

X X X

3 year rolling average for 2014 – 2017 Meets Expected Growth

ASW Wikispace

• • •

Online Training Modules Important Forms Frequently Asked Questions

Visit the Wiki here: http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/

Regional Training Schedule – August, 2014

(Known locations available on the ASW Wikispace) Regions 1 & 2 Region 3 Region 4 Region 5 Region 6 Region 7 Region 8 Combined 7 &8 August 12 August 19 August 6 August 14 August 15 August 21 August 22 August 8

Questions about ASW Process Jennifer DeNeal

Race to the Top Project Coordinator for Educator Effectiveness

North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

Have a question about educator effectiveness?

Send an email to: [email protected]

Questions about Educator Effectiveness North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

Have a question about Educator Effectiveness?

visit

www.ncpublicschools.org/ effectiveness-model

or

http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/NC EES+Wiki