Transcript Isolated word recognition with the Liquid State Machine: a case study

Isolated word recognition
with the Liquid State
Machine:
a case study
D. Verstraeten ∗, B. Schrauwen, D. Stroobandt, J. Van Campenhout
Written By:
Gassan Tabajah
Ron Adar
Gil Rapaport
Abstract

The Liquid State Machine (LSM) is a recently
developed computational model with interesting
properties.


It can be used for pattern classification, function
approximation and other complex tasks.
Contrary to most common computational models, the
LSM does not require information to be stored in
some stable state of the system:

The inherent dynamics of the system are used by a
memoryless readout function to compute the output.
Abstract

In this paper we present a case study of the performance of the
Liquid State Machine based on a recurrent spiking neural
network by applying it to a well known and well studied
problem:




Speech recognition of isolated digits.
We evaluate different ways of coding the speech into spike
trains.
In its optimal configuration, the performance of the LSM
approximates that of a state-of-the-art recognition system.
Another interesting conclusion is the fact that the biologically
most realistic encoding performs far better than more
conventional methods.
1. Introduction

Many complex computational problems have
a strong temporal aspect:


Not only the value of the inputs is important, but
also their specific sequence and precise
occurrence in time.
Tasks such as speech recognition, object
tracking, robot control or biometrics are
inherently temporal, as are many of the tasks
that are usually viewed as ‘requiring
intelligence’.
1. Introduction

However, most computational models do not explicitly
take the temporal aspect of the input into account or
transform the time-dependent inputs to static input
using.


e.g., a tapped delay line.
These methods disregard the temporal information
contained in the inputs in two ways:


The time-dependence of the inputs within a certain time
window is compressed into a static snapshot and is therefore
partially lost.
The temporal correlation between different windows is not
preserved.
Liquid State Machine (LSM)


The Liquid State Machine (LSM) avoids these problems by
construction.
The LSM is a computational concept (its structure is depicted in
Fig. 1):
Liquid State Machine (LSM)


A reservoir of recurrently interacting
nodes is stimulated by the input u(t),
A running or liquid state x(t) is
extracted and a readout function fM
converts the high-dimensional liquid
state x(t) into the desired output y(t)
for the given task.
Liquid State Machine (LSM)

The loops and loops within-loops which occur
in the recurrent connections between the
nodes in the reservoir cause a short-term
memory effect to occur:


The influence of inputs fed into the network
‘resonate’ for a while before dying out.
Hence the name liquid: ripples in a pond also
show the influence of past inputs.

This property is called temporal integration.
Types of liquids


The reservoir or liquid can be any type of
network that has sufficient internal dynamics.
Currently several types of liquids have been
used:




The echo state machine using a recurrent analog
neural network.
A real liquid (water) in a bucket.
A delayed threshold logic network.
A Spiking Neural Network (SNN).

The type of liquid we will be using in this article.
Readout function

The actual identity of the readout function is also not explicitly
specified;



Possible readout functions include linear projection, Fisher
discriminant, a perceptron, a feed forward MLP trained with
backpropagation or even a Support Vector Machine.
Note that the liquid itself is not trained, but chosen a priori:


Indeed, it can be any method of statistical analysis or pattern
recognition.
A heuristic is used to construct ‘interesting’ liquids in a random
manner.
Only the readout function is adapted so that the LSM performs
the required task.
Separation between the
liquid and its readout

The separation between the liquid and its readout
function offers two considerable advantages over
traditional Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN).


First, the readout function is generally far easier to train
than the liquid itself, which is a recurrently connected
network.
Furthermore, the structure of the LSM permits several
different readout functions to be used with the same liquid,
which can each be trained to perform different tasks on the
same inputs—and the same liquid.

This means that the liquid only needs to be computed once,
which gives the LSM an inherent parallel processing capability
without requiring much additional processing power.
Similarity between LSM and SVM

The LSM is a computational model that bears strong
resemblance to another well-known paradigm:



The LSM can be viewed as a variation:


That of the kernel methods and the Support Vector Machine (SVM).
Here, inputs are classified by first using a non-linear kernel function
to project the inputs into a very high-dimensional (often even
infinitely dimensional) feature space, where the separation
between the classes is easier to compute (and can often even be
linearly separable).
Here too, the inputs are non-linearly projected into a highdimensional space (the space of the liquid state) before the
readout function computes the output.
The main difference is the fact that the LSM—contrary to
SVMs—has an inherent temporal nature.
Similarity between LSM and RNN


Another similarity can be found in a the stateof-the-art RNN training algorithm called
Backpropagation Decorrelation presented in
[6], which was derived mathematically.
It has been shown that training a RNN with
this algorithm implicitly also keeps a pool of
connections almost constant and only trains
the connections to the output nodes.

This behavior is very similar to the principle of the
LSM, specifically when using a perceptron as
readout function.
Filter approximation


In [7] it has been shown that any time
invariant filter with fading memory can
be approximated with arbitrary
precision by a LSM, under very
unrestrictive conditions.
In practice, every filter that is relevant
from a biological or engineering point of
view can be approximated.
Article structure







This article is structured as follows:
In Section 2 we first detail the setup used to perform the
experiments.
In Section 3 we briefly introduce and subsequently test three
different speech front ends which are used to transform the
speech into spike trains.
The effects of different types of noise that are commonly found
in real world applications are tested in Section 4.
In Section 5 we make some relevant comparisons with related
isolated word recognition systems.
In Section 6 we draw some conclusions about the speech
recognition capabilities of this computational model.
In Section 7 we point out some possible opportunities for
further research.
Experimental Setup


Matlab LSM toolbox
Liquid is a




recurrent network (contains loops)
of leaky integrate and fire neurons
arranged in a 3D column (pile)
Parameters taken from original LSM
paper
Network structure





Connections between neurons allocated stochastically
D = Euclidean distance between neurons a, b
C = 0.3/EE, 0.2/EI, 0.4/IE, 0.1/II
Lambda = 2
Effectively: mainly local, limited global connectivity
Dataset – subset of TI46


46-word speaker dependant isolated
word speech database
500 samples




5 different speakers
Digits ‘zero’ through ‘nine’
10 different utterances
300 training, 200 test
Readout function

Simple linear projection




y = output
x = liquid state
w = weight matrix
Winner take all selection


Maximal y value taken as result
Recompute every 20ms, take maximum again
Performance metric


WER – Word Error Rate
Fraction of incorrectly classified words as a
percentage of total number of words
Transforming signals to spikes




Voice is an analog signal
Usually even after it is being
preprocessed
SNN liquid needs spike trains
BSA: a heuristic algorithm for deciding
at each timestamp whether a spike
should be emitted
Preprocessing



Common practice in speech recognition
Enhances speech specific features
Used algorithms



Hopfield-Brody
MFCC
Lyon Passice Ear
Hopfield-Brody




FFT the sound
Examine 20 specific frequencies
Look for onset, offset, peak events
Constantly monitor the same 40 events



Each one is considered a spike train
Treat event time as spike
No need for BSA
Hopefield-Brody (cont’)



Not suitable at all
WER first drops
when network size
increases, but then
increases again
Even the best liquids
identified 1 in 5
words correctly
Mel Frequency Cepstral
Coefficients

De-facto standard for speech
preprocessing





Hamming Windowing
FFT the signal
Mel-scale filter the magnitude
Log10 the values
Cosine transform – reduce dimensionality,
enhance speech features
Hamming windowing
Mel Scale
MFCC (cont’)




Result is the so-called ‘cepstrum’: 13
coefficients of processed analog signal
Compute first and second timederivatives: total of 39 coefficients
BSA turns them into 39 spike trains fed
into LSM
Performance: identifies 1 in 2 words
Lyon passive ear
 A model of human inner ear (cochlea), on the name of
Richard F. Lyon.
 Describes the way acoustic energy is transformed and
converted to neural representations.
 Considered to be simple model comparing to others.
Lyon passive ear cont’

Model consists of:
1) filter bank-closely resembles the selectivity of the human ear
to certain frequencies.
2) a series of half-wave rectifies (HWRs) and adaptive
gain controllers (AGCs) both of them modeling the hair cells
response.
3) Each filter output, after detection and AGC, is called a
channel.
The Peripheral Auditory System
Auditory
nerve
Cochlea
Outer
Ear
32
Middle
Ear
Inner
Ear
Performance

Performance results for LPE(WER=word error rate)
Cochleagram

Full time sequence of the outputs of the last stage.
The hall process
Input with noise



To test the robustness robustness of the recognition
performance to noisy environments, a noise is added to the
input.
Different types of noise have been used:
1) speech babble
2) white noise
3) interior noise
The LSM was compared to the best results from one of the
books in the references, which was the “Log Auditory Model”
(LAM) with noise robust front-end.
Input with noise cont’


The LAM designed for noise robustness and it followed by
Hidden Markov Model (HMM).
Here we can see a table that compares LSM to LAM with
different kind of noise, and in levels of 10,20, 30 dB, tested on
single liquid with 1232 neurons, trained on clean speech and
tested on noisy speech.
Comparison to other machines





Sphinx4 is a recent speech recognition system (by Sun
Microsystems) using HMMs and MFCC front end. On the
database TI46 get error rate of 0.168%, compare to 0.5% on
the best LSM from the experiment.
But LSM also have couple of advantages over HMMs:
HMMs tends to be sensitive to noisy inputs.
Usually biased towards a certain speech database.
Do not offer a way to perform additional tasks like speaker
identification or word separation on the same input without
dramatic increase in computational.
Conclusion




The paper have looked the SNN interpretation of the LSM to the
task of isolated word recognition with a limited vocabulary.
Several methods of transforming the sounds into spikes train
have been explored.
The results showed that LSM is well suited for the task, and that
the performance is far better using biological model (LPEM).
LSM also worked well with noise on the input (noise
robustness).
Future work


Find out what causes the big difference between LPE model to
the traditional MFCC methods.
Further research is needed in order to find a hardware
implementation to parallel LSM that could keep the dynamics of
the current LSM.