Transcript PowerPoint
1
State and Federal Accountability Update
2012 Association for Compensatory Educators of Texas
(ACET) Conference
April 11, 2012
Shannon Housson
Ester Regalado
Division of Performance Reporting
Texas Education Agency
2
2012 Accountability
2012 Accountability
3
No State Accountability Ratings
2012 AYP evaluations and 2012-13 SIP statuses will
be released in early August 2012.
2012 AYP
4
2012 AYP Timeline
May/June
Expected USDE approval of requested
amendments to the 2012 Texas AYP
Workbook.
Thursday,
May 24, 2012
TETN Session on Federal AYP Cap
(Event #4851) for ESCs and Districts
May 22 –
June 22, 2012
Campus Priority List for the 2% Federal
Cap available online
2012 AYP
5
2012 AYP Timeline
June
2012 AYP Guide released
Last Week of
July
TEASE release of Preliminary 2012 AYP
Data Tables without AYP/SIP labels for all
districts and campuses.
First Week of
August
Public release of Preliminary 2012
AYP/SIP statuses for all districts and
campuses.
2012 AYP
6
2012 AYP Timeline
First Week of
September
Appeals and Federal Cap Exceptions
Deadline.
November/
December
Final 2012 AYP Status released.
Preview of NCLB Report Card (Part I
only)
January
Public release of the
2011-12 NCLB Report Card.
2012 AYP
7
2012 AYP Performance Standards increase:
87% in Reading/English language arts
83% in Mathematics
Federal regulations require 2012 AYP graduation
rate evaluations of All Students and every
student group.
Participation Rate and Attendance Rate Indicator
standards remain unchanged.
2012 AYP
8
Summary of Texas Amendment Requests
AYP Texas Workbook for 2012 AYP was submitted on
February, 15, 2012.
2012 references to Graduation Rate Goals and
Targets (Sections 1.2 and 7.1)
Graduation Rate Goals and Targets will show
constant targets for 2011 and 2012 AYP.
2012 AYP
9
Summary of Texas Amendment Requests
Evaluate 2012 AYP and School Improvement
Program (SIP) statuses based on:
2011-12 TAKS results for grade 10, and
2011-12 STAAR results for grade 3-8 at the
TAKS proficiency standard.
2012 AYP
10
Summary of the Texas Amendment Requests
In order to provide 2012 AYP results on a timely basis,
Texas will use bridge studies that identify the existing
TAKS performance standards on the new STAAR
assessments for tests of grade 3–8 on which STAAR
performance standards will not yet be available.
The STAAR Bridge Study for AYP was approved by
the USDE on February 17, 2012. The complete study
is posted online at
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/reports
2012 AYP
11
Summary of the Texas Amendment Requests
See Summary of Possible 2012 AYP Components
for detailed listing of TAKS and STAAR assessment
results that will be evaluated for 2012 AYP at
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=2147503684
12
Overview of Accountability System
for 2013 and Beyond
House Bill (HB) 3 Accountability Provisions
13
Focus of district and campus performance is
postsecondary readiness standards
Rigorous standards ensure that Texas performs
among top ten states by 2020
Higher ratings are distinctions based on higher levels
of student performance
House Bill (HB) 3 Accountability Provisions
14
Campuses earn distinctions for student growth
and closing achievement gaps
Campuses earn distinctions for excellence in areas
other than state assessment results
Reports are relevant, meaningful, and easily accessible
State and federal accountability requirements are
aligned to the extent possible
Accountability System for 2013 and Beyond
15
Legislation provides new flexibility as well as constraints
Every aspect of accountability system will be
reevaluated
New system may look very different from current
system, not just variation on former systems used
in Texas
Seamless system of ratings – reporting – monitoring –
interventions
New Accountability Indicators Considered
16
End-of-Course (EOC) cumulative scores for cohorts
of graduates
Four-, five-, and six-year graduation rates
Three-year average performance
New Frameworks Considered
17
Performance Index
Allows more indicators without more hurdles
Rating based on overall performance rather than
lowest performing area
Interventions focus on specific problem areas
New Frameworks Considered
18
Alignment of State/Federal Systems
Broad goals in common
postsecondary readiness,
student progress,
closing performance gaps
Range of options
Develop state system that meets federal
requirements – replace Adequate Yearly
Progress (AYP) with new state system
Separate AYP as component of state system
New Rating Labels
19
Statutory labels removed
Separate district ratings from elementary, middle,
and high schools are possible
Multiple degrees of acceptable/unacceptable statuses
possible
Higher ratings based on postsecondary ready
Separate ratings for status and growth possible
New Progress Measures Developed
20
Multiple measures developed for reporting
Accountability indicators that do not count failing
students as passing
Required Improvement based on student growth
measure possible
Campus distinction designations for growth to
postsecondary ready
Closing performance gaps can be measured across
achievement spectrum (scale scores or percentiles)
New Student Groups
21
New race/ethnicity student group definitions produce
seven groups
Economically disadvantaged and non-economically
disadvantaged in statute
Limited English proficient (LEP) and special education
in AYP blueprint
Gap measures to evaluate student group performance
New Accountability Standards –
New Issues
22
Phase-in of State of Texas Assessments of Academic
Readiness (STAAR) assessments
Phase-in of student passing standard
Phase-in of graduation requirements
Percentiles or rankings versus accountability
standards
23
2013 Accountability
Ratings
24
Based on:
STAAR Level II: Satisfactory Academic Performance
(not Level III: Advanced Academic Performance)
student passing standard
TAKS grade 11 Met Standard
Ratings
25
Rating labels will be acceptable/satisfactory and
unacceptable/unsatisfactory only
Recognized and Exemplary ratings will not be
awarded in 2013
Data
26
Growth measures not available for 2013 ratings
Multiple growth measures being developed
for reporting
Accountability indicators that incorporate growth will
be developed after 2013 results
Graduation/Dropout Rate Indicators
27
Class of 2012 graduation/completion/dropout
rates and 2011-2012 annual dropout rates
released June 2013
The first cohort to graduate under EOC are the grade
10 students in the 2012-13 school year (most have
not taken English III, Algebra II, Physics, U.S. History)
Distinction Designations
28
Campus Academic Distinctions
Developed via committees
Reading/ELA and mathematics awarded in 2013
likely based on:
Grades 3-8 STAAR advanced performance
High school measures of college-readiness
other than EOC
Science and Social Studies will be phased in
Distinction Designations
29
New Areas for Recognition
Developed via committees
21st Century Workforce Development Program
scheduled to be awarded in 2013
Additional areas that will be phased in:
fine arts,
physical education, and
second language acquisition program
Distinction Designations
30
Additional distinctions for campuses based on top
25% in growth and closing performance gaps will not
be awarded in 2013
These distinctions will likely be based on growth
measures and the Level III: Advanced Academic
Performance student passing standard that will not be
evaluated until 2014.
Alternative Education Accountability
(AEA) Options
31
No separate system
Same system for all in 2013, separate AEA
procedures in 2014
Same system, different standards and/or
growth measures
2013 and 2014 Accountability – Summary
32
(Campuses & Districts)
2014
STAAR Level II Performance
STAAR Level III Performance
TBD
STAAR Growth Measures
TBD
TBD
8/8
8/8
Not Awarded
Acceptable/
Unacceptable*
2013
Improvement Feature
Release Date Deadline
Distinction Designations
for Recognized &
Exemplary
(Campuses & Districts)
*
Labels to be determined.
STAAR Level III Performance
STAAR Growth Measures
Release Date Deadline
TBD
8/8
2013 and 2014 Accountability – Summary
33
Distinction Designations
for Academic
Achievement
(1 of 5 committees)
(Campuses Only)
2014
Not Awarded
Distinction Designations
for Top 25% in:
• Student Growth
• Closing Gaps
(Campuses Only)
2013
TBD
STAAR Level III Performance
(Gr. 3-8)
Reading/ELA & Mathematics Only
STAAR Growth Measures
TBD
Other College-Readiness HS
Indicators
Reading/ELA & Mathematics Only
Release Date Deadline
8/8
8/8
STAAR Level III Performance
STAAR Growth Measures
Release Date Deadline
8/8
34
Accountability Development Process
Development Calendar
35
Beginning of 18-month accountability system
development process
First advisory committee meeting March 5 - 6, 2012
Advisory committees meet about every three months
through February/March 2013
Final decisions will be released by the commissioner in
March/April 2013
Website for Accountability Development
36
Post status reports, issue documents, presentations,
and advisory group recommendations.
Opportunity for structured input from broad
constituency
New web pages and FAQ added to Division of
Performance Reporting website at:
http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2013/index.html
Advisory Groups
37
Accountability Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC)
Accountability Policy Advisory Committee (APAC)
Advisory Groups – ATAC
38
Duties
Consider complex, technical issues
Work with TEA staff and national experts to develop
recommendations including:
overall framework,
integration of state and federal systems,
assessment indicators,
progress measures,
completion indicators,
student groups,
minimum size criteria,
alternative education accountability (AEA), and
distinction designations.
Advisory Groups – ATAC
39
Expectations
Attend up to five meetings at TEA offices in Austin
between March 2012 and spring 2013;
Actively and constructively participate during meetings;
Solicit input from peers within their geographic region;
Participate in at least one small work group that will
meet between the ATAC meetings with TEA staff.
Advisory Groups – ATAC and APAC
40
Process
The smaller work groups will present their proposals at
the main ATAC meetings.
The ATAC committee’s final proposals will be reviewed
by the Accountability Policy Advisory Committee
(APAC).
The APAC will provide feedback on the ATAC proposals
to the commissioner of education. The commissioner
will make final accountability decisions in spring 2013.
AYP Resources
41
For more information on AYP, see the 2011 AYP Guide,
accessible at http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/ayp
Texas AYP Workbook, as of October 12, 2011, is located at
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index4.aspx?id=2147497077
FAQs about AYP are located at
http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/ayp/faq/faq.html
USDE information is available at www.ed.gov/nclb/
Contact the Division of Performance Reporting by email
at [email protected] or phone at
(512) 463-9704.
Accountability Resources
42
Division of Performance Reporting email
[email protected]
Division of Performance Reporting telephone number
(512) 463-9704
ESC Accountability Contacts
Online at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/