and ERA-Interim

Download Report

Transcript and ERA-Interim

Retrospective analysis of ozone at ECMWF Rossana Dragani

ECMWF

Acknowledgements to: D. Tan, A. Inness, E. Hólm, and D. Dee R. Dragani, SPARC/IOC/IGACO, Geneva, Jan 2011 © ECMWF 2011

Overview

Reanalysis activity at ECMWF

Science application for reanalysis data

Suitability to assess long-term variability

Ozone analyses in ERA-40 and ERA-Interim

Conclusions and remarks

Slide 2 R. Dragani, SPARC/IOC/IGACO, Geneva, Jan 2011 © ECMWF 2011

Reanalysis at ECMWF:

Reanalysis is based on analysis methods developed to provide initial states for numerical weather prediction.

It applies a fixed, modern data assimilation system to multi-year sets of observations of different types, resulting in more uniform analysis quality.

ERA-15: ERA-40: ERA-Interim: 1979 – 1993 1957 – mid-2002 1989 onwards ORA-S3: MACC: 1959 onwards 2003 – 2010

ERA-CLIM:

European Reanalysis of Global Climate Observations An EU project to help prepare the next ECMWF reanalysis

Slide 3

ERA-20C: 1900 onwards

R. Dragani, SPARC/IOC/IGACO, Geneva, Jan 2011 © ECMWF 2011

The ERA data base: www.ecmwf.int

Slide 4 ERA-Interim reanalysis is continuing in near real-time

Products are updated monthly R. Dragani, SPARC/IOC/IGACO, Geneva, Jan 2011 © ECMWF 2011

Science applications that rely on reanalysis data

“Observations” for verification and diagnosis

-

Development of forecast model, climate model; calibration of seasonal forecasting systems; use of data assimilation increments for identifying model errors

Input data for model applications

-

for smaller-scales (global

regional; regional

local), ocean circulation, chemical transport, …

Study of short-term atmospheric processes and influences

-

Polar vortex dynamics,…

Providing climatologies

Assessment of the observing system

-

providing feedback on observational quality, bias corrections and a basis for homogenization studies; contributing to data reprocessing activities Slide 5

Study of long-term climate variability and trends R. Dragani, SPARC/IOC/IGACO, Geneva, Jan 2011 © ECMWF 2011

Suitability to assess long-term changes:

ERA-40 + ERA-Interim

Mid 1957 to the present

Analyses are physically coherent and consistent with observations

A realistic model can propagate information in poorly observed areas as well as moved forward in time.

Ozone fc: D+6 from 17 Sep 2002 MIPAS O © ESA, 2002.

3 retrievals: 23 Sep 2002 Ozone analysis: 12Z 23 Sep 2002 Slide 6 Geer, Planet Earth Autumn 2004, www.nerc.ac.uk

R. Dragani, SPARC/IOC/IGACO, Geneva, Jan 2011 © ECMWF 2011

Suitability to assess long-term changes:

From archived weather analyses: From a retrospective analysis:

Reanalysis uses a modern, stable and invariant forecasting /assimilation system to reprocess (re-analyse) past observations:

Remove artificial changes introduced by model upgrades

Changes in the observing system and their error characteristics can also produce shifts and spurious trends.

-

ERA-Interim used VarBC for all radiances Slide 7

-

ERA-Clim will also use VarBC for all L2 products (O 3 , WV) R. Dragani, SPARC/IOC/IGACO, Geneva, Jan 2011 © ECMWF 2011

Ozone reanalyses at ECMWF:

Ozone has been reanalysed in ERA-40 and ERA-Interim

-

MACC also reanalysed ozone for the period 2003-2010.

Long record: ERA-40 until Dec 1988 + ERA-Interim from Jan 1989.

Main differences between ERA-40 (Cy23r4) and ERA-Interim (Cy31r2) :

-

Assimilation scheme: ERA-40 used 3D-Var; ERA-Interim used 4D-Var Data usage ERA-Interim Variarional Bias Correction (VarBC) for radiances

-

Upgrades in the ozone model

d

dt O

3 

c

0 

c

1  

O

3  

O

3  

c

2 

T

T

 

c

3  

O

3  

O

3  

c

4  

EQ

2 

O

3 -

Horizontal resolution: T159 (125km, ERA-40)

T255 (80 km, ERA-Interim)

ERA 40 ozone analyses validated by Dethof and Hólm (2004, QJ). ERA-Interim ozone analyses validated by Dragani (2011, QJ submitted).

R. Dragani, SPARC/IOC/IGACO, Geneva, Jan 2011 © ECMWF 2011

Ozone in ERA-40:

Hilo (1992-1995) JFM JJA Dethof & Hólm (2004) Hohenpeissenberg (1983-1987) JFM JJA Sonde ERA-40 Neumayer (1992-1995) SO Slide 9 R. Dragani, SPARC/IOC/IGACO, Geneva, Jan 2011 © ECMWF 2011

Ozone in ERA-Interim:

TCO validated against

OMI TCO (TOMS-like);

 

TCO from Dobson Spectrometers (WOUDC); TCO climatology created as a 5-year running mean from the NASA merged satellite.

3D O 3

analyses (Jan 89-Dec 08) validated against WOUDC sondes;

Satellite data.

V6.2

SAGE: MLS: HALOE: POAM: V5 V6 V4 V2.2

R. Dragani, SPARC/IOC/IGACO, Geneva, Jan 2011 © ECMWF 2011

Validation of the 3D O

3

reanalyses:

Matching criteria:

 D

t 3 hrs.

ERA-Interim analyses were interpolated at Sat-An Sat the obs locations.

30 hPa

GOME SAGE HALOE MLS POAM Slide 11 R. Dragani, SPARC/IOC/IGACO, Geneva, Jan 2011 © ECMWF 2011

Summary of the comparisons: 1989-2008

Lat 30 - 90 N 30S - 30N 30 - 90 S 5 10 30 65 5 10 30 65 5 10 30 65 Lev (hPa) SAGE HALOE MLS POAM ±5% [-10,+5]%

[0,+20]% [-20,+10]%

±5% ±10%

[0,+20]%

[-20,+30]% [-8,+5]% [-10,+5]%

[0,+20]% [-20,+20]%

[0,+5]% [-5,+1]%

[-2,+20]%

[-2,+10]% ±5% ±5%

[0,+20]% [-5,+20]%

±2% [-8,+1]%

[-2,+20]%

[0,+5]% [-5,+3]%

[0,+20]% [-20,+10]%

±5% [-5,+8]%

[0,+20]%

[+5,+25]% [-8,+5]% [-10,+3]%

[0,+20]% [0,+20]%

[-25,+5]% [-25,+10]%

[-10,+20]% [-20,+10]%

[-40,+1]% [-40,-5]%

[-20,+10]% [-20,+20]%

R. Dragani, SPARC/IOC/IGACO, Geneva, Jan 2011 © ECMWF 2011

ERA-40 vs. ERA-Interim: Jan 1989 - Aug 2002

HALOE UARS MLS

RMS

O

3

SAT

O

3

ERA

Interim

 

Slide 13

RMS

O

3

SAT

O

3

ERA

 40 

R. Dragani, SPARC/IOC/IGACO, Geneva, Jan 2011 © ECMWF 2011

ERA-40 vs. ERA-Interim: Comparisons with ozone sondes

203 soundings 942 soundings 30N – 30S Jan-Feb-Mar 227 soundings 238 soundings 60 – 90 S Sep-Oct

ERA-Interim

ERA-40 Pre-GOME (1989-1995) Slide 14 R. Dragani, SPARC/IOC/IGACO, Geneva, Jan 2011 © ECMWF 2011 GOME (1996-2001)

Conclusions

 ERA-40 O 3 analyses showed general good agreement with observations, but some problems were seen e.g. at mid-latitudes in winter, and at high latitudes in the SH in spring.

 ERA-Interim O 3 analyses compare well with observations, and show departures from SAGE, MLS and HALOE ≤10% in the middle stratosphere, and ≤ 20% in the lower stratosphere.

 ERA-Interim better than ERA-40 in the UTLS region before 1996, and over the whole stratosphere afterwards (GOME assimilation).

 Planned improvements on ozone: -

Use the Variational Bias Correction (VarBC) scheme with L2 data.

-

Revise/improve the assimilation of ozone profiles (e.g. SBUV data)

-

(ozone-sensitive radiances, L2 ozone data not yet used, e.g. those used for validation).

R. Dragani, SPARC/IOC/IGACO, Geneva, Jan 2011 © ECMWF 2011

Remarks:

What can reanalysis deliver?

-

Consistent with observations

-

Physically coherent

-

Complete, with no gaps

-

Comprehensive

-

Accurate variability and trends Meaningful information about uncertainties

Progress towards climate quality requires open access to all input data.

R. Dragani, SPARC/IOC/IGACO, Geneva, Jan 2011 © ECMWF 2011