Models and Frameworks - Cross Cultural Health Care Conference

Download Report

Transcript Models and Frameworks - Cross Cultural Health Care Conference

Cross Cultural Health Care Conference Community Collaborations and Interventions: Models of Community Engagement

October 8, 2011 Angela Sy, DrPH Assistant Professor Office of Public Health Studies UH John A. Burns School of Medicine

Background and Rationale Community members have an extensive set of skills, strengths, and resources which can be harnessed to address the social determinants of health and to promote good health Complex health and social problems ill-suited to “outside experts”

Background and Rationale

Enhance the effectiveness of public health interventions

Tailored to the concerns and cultures

Include participants in all aspects of intervention design, implementation & evaluation

Holistic focus on broader social & structural determinants of health

Background and Rationale

“It is a powerful vehicle for bringing about environmental and behavioral changes that will improve the health of the community and its members” (CDC, 1997)

Definition of Community Engagement

CDC, 1997: “ The process of working collaboratively with and through groups of people affiliated by geographic proximity, special interest, or similar situations to address issues affecting the well-being of those people.

Definition of “ Community ” A group of people: Linked by social ties Sharing common perspectives or interests Who may or may not share a geographic location

Definition of “ Community ” Common designations: Culture or ethnic heritage Where we live Similar age Speak the same language Religion

Concepts of Community Engagement Culture: Kieffer, 2007 Community organizing: Minkler, 1990 Community participation: Butterfoss, 2006; Wandersman et al , 1987 Capacity building: Eng et al., 1994 Community empowerment: Maton, 2008 Coalition building: Cohen, 2002

Benefits of Community Engagement Agenda Implementation design, delivery and change:

Relevance

– –

Feasibility Sustainability Community involvement and goodwill:

Competence

– –

Capital Capacity

Benefits of Community Engagement Co-learning:

– – – – –

Academic Community organizations Research participants Community members General public

Models and Frameworks Social Ecological Model: Stokols, 1996

CDC, 2007

Models and Frameworks Social Ecological Model: Stokols, 1996

Constructing Social, 2009

Models and Frameworks

Association of Alaska School Boards

Models and Frameworks

International Association of Public Participation

Models and Frameworks

International Association of Public Participation

Models and Frameworks ABLe Change Framework – Engaging Community Toward Systems Changes

Foster-Fishman & Watson, 2011

Community-Based Participatory Research

Brings together researchers and communities

  

Share power Address community identified needs Foster co-learning Cultural humility

 

Vis a vis cultural competence Professionals cannot master another’s culture What it is and isn’t

 

An approach involving empowerment, social justice values—health disparities Applied to influence equitable change in community health, norms, systems, programs, policies

Models and Frameworks CBPR Trajectory

Co-Option Compliance Consultation Cooperation Co-Learning Collective Action ON Parkes, 2001 FOR FOR/WITH WITH WITH/BY (CPPR) BY Community sets research agenda and mobilizes

with or without

outside facilitation

Models and Frameworks Ripple Model for Growing Effective CPP Researchers community Cultural safety training Strengthening communities on community’s terms

Burke, 2011

Models and Frameworks

Routes of Transformation Cultural safety training

Burke, 2011

Models and Frameworks CBPR Conceptual Model

Minkler et al., 2008

Principles of Community Engagement (CDC,2011)

Be clear about the purposes or goals of the engagement effort, and the populations and/or communities you want to engage.

Become knowledgeable about the community in terms of its economic conditions, political structures, norms and values, demographic trends, history, and experience with engagement efforts. Learn about the community’s perceptions of those initiating the engagement activities.

Principles of Community Engagement (CDC,2011)

Go into the community, establish relationships, build trust, work with the formal and informal leadership, and seek commitment from community organizations and leaders to create processes for mobilizing the community.

Remember and accept that community self determination is the responsibility and right of all people who comprise a community. No external entity should assume it can bestow on a community the power to act in its own self-interest.

Partnering with the community is necessary to create change and improve health.

Principles of Community Engagement (CDC,2011)

All aspects of community engagement must recognize and respect community diversity. Awareness of the various cultures of a community and other factors of diversity must be paramount in designing and implementing community engagement approaches. Community engagement can only be sustained by identifying and mobilizing community assets, and by developing capacities and resources for community health decisions and action.

Principles of Community Engagement (CDC,2011)

An engaging organization or individual change agent must be prepared to release control of actions or interventions to the community, and be flexible enough to meet the changing needs of the community.

Community collaboration requires long-term commitment by the engaging organization and its partners.

Questions?

Examples of Community Engagement and Culture in the Clinic: Drs. Susana Helm, Dale Fryxell, Bradley Chun, Darryl Salvador