Transcript Status of the PLATO project and goals of the next Study phases
PLATO
PLATO TOU KO MEETING
H. Rauer (DLR PF) H. Kinter/A. Salado (Kayser-Threde)
Activities
•
Mission selection in Feb. 2014
•
Payload industrial management is being assigned for “bridging period” and B1 Phase to Kayser-Threde
•
Status of payload teams, PDC, PSPM is reviewed
•
„Kick-off“ Phase B1: July 16/17
2
PLATO Camera Management Support Overview
Image Copyright: Mark A. Garlick. Science Credit: Carole Haswell & Andrew Norton (The Open University)
Agenda
•
KT Team Organization and responsibilities
•
Main Phase B1 Preparation Activities
•
B1 Schedule Overview:
•
KT Questions to TOU team
PLATO Payload Management Key Personnel Name Function
Richard Haarmann PIPM Bernd Schulz Alejandro Salado Hilda Kinter Valery Mogulsky PA/QA Manager Payload Sys. Engineering (PTC) Camera Project Manager (CPM) PIPM Deputy Camera Systems Engineering Roberto Montedori Payload AIV Manager (PAM) Gisbert Peter DPS Project Manager (DLR)
Main Phase B1 Preparation Activities Phase B1 Planning
• Detail roadmap until KO Phase B1 and beyond Synchronization of all partner activities • Major Milestones for the Phase B1
Date
15.-16. July 2014 March 2015 October 2015 November - December 2015 March 2016 April 2016 January 2024
Event
Phase B1 Kick-Off PLATO Design Consolidation Review (PDCR) PLATO B1 data package delivery for SRR PLATO System Requirements Review (SRR) Mission Adoption & IPC approval Kick-off Phase B2/C/D PLATO Launch
Main Phase B1 Preparation Activities Preparation B1 Kick-Off Data Package
Establish an updated Specification Tree to define the interrelation between the single PLATO P/L component specifications Basis for the traceability of single requirements and interface management Definition of all required documents for the B1 Kick-Off Comparison with existing documentation to identify necessary inputs Completion / annotation of existing specifications Utilization as applicable documents for the B1 work upon PDCR
Phase B1
• • •
1 st P/L Meeting has been on 06./07.05.2014
– Bring P/L consortium together – Start to resume P/L teams
Phase B1 KO is scheduled for 16./17.07.2014
– Official Start of Phase B1 – All work packages are already defined – Tasks to be done between KO and 2 nd Meeting will be defined P/L Consortium
2 nd P/L Meeting proposed Fall 2014
– All specifications and belonging annotations/supplements are available as basis for the B1 development work
PLATO Phase B1 Schedule
Meeting
KO
Overview of major Phase B1 Deliverables Date Deliverables
2nd P/L Meeting 16.07.14
15.09.14
* Drafts of TOU Requirements Specification, Camera Development & Verification Plan, List of Deliverables, * First issue of above documents PM1 PM2 PDCR delivery PM3 PM4 PM5 SRR delivery 18.11.14
20.01.15
02.03.15
12.05.15
21.07.15
22.09.15
02.11.15
Progress report + specified deliverables Progress report + specified deliverables Progress report + specified deliverables Progress report + specified deliverables Progress report + specified deliverables Progress report + specified deliverables Camera Reports, models, Camera URDs and I/F documents * drafts to be prepared by KT Specified deliverables defined in the List of Deliverables, which may include Camera Reports (design, budgets, performance, straylight, thermal, structural, risk assessment), MAIV plan, Management Plan, mathematical models
Communication between TOU team and KT
List of all deliverables to be defined and finalised by 2 nd P/L Meeting PMs to be held at TOU site or by Webex. Required documents and Progress Reports including status of AIs to be delivered at least five working days before the meeting Regular bi-weekly telecons between TOU lead team and KT: brief discussion of working progress, identified problems, needed inputs etc the traceability of single requirements and interface management Meeting when necessary with other Camera/Payload/PLATO teams by Webex (organised by KT). For critical topics, like I/F discussions, face to face meeting are preferable
• • •
Payload Camera Subsystem Status Summary: Goals Phase B1
• consolidating the
requirements
on system and subsystem level and their traceability
Goals Phase B1:
To achieve a sufficient level of • consolidating
internal interfaces
, assessing requirements for
external interfaces
technical maturity to ensure a successful SRR.
system requirements for the • • consolidating
performance models
consolidating and defining
operational modes
of the payload and its various subsystems and components.
selected architectures successfully validated • validating the set of
system and subsystem requirements
system requirements derived confidence on the readiness • Establish a
verification strategy
consistent with programmatic limitations and required scientific value.
levels of various technologies.
• Develop
technology maturation programs
in order to achieve the required TRL levels at SRR
Telescope Optical Unit (TOU)
Status Summary:
• • •
Team?
Several Institutions (INAF, Univ. Bern, Stockolm Obs., Univ. Firenze) + Industrial Partners (Selex , Medialario-Sagem, Seso, RUAG, APCO Technologies) led by INAF (Interface to Camera team)
Current Status?
– Optical
Design
+ options available –
Breadboard/Prototypes:
TOU AIV procedure already performed (TOU Optical and Thermal Performance) –
Further Breadboard
with AIV and thermal behavior identified
AIV
procedures under development with serial production in mind
Next Steps
?
– Answer
MEMO questions
Issues/questions to the TOU Team
Image Copyright: Mark A. Garlick. Science Credit: Carole Haswell & Andrew Norton (The Open University)
Main Phase B1 Preparation Activities Questions to/inputs from TOU team:
– List of TOU team including percentage allocation for PLATO – Is there a Central point for Camera document collection? – List of available technical documents: – List of MEMO Questions • Component I/Fs • Operational modes, states, and transitions • Performance models or simulators • Behavioural models or simulators • Performance wrt requirements • Model philosophy • Assumptions employed in analyses • Requirement specification • Open issues and decisions • Current risks and their mitigation strategies