Fundamentals of Law (BL502)
Download
Report
Transcript Fundamentals of Law (BL502)
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Revision
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Acceptance
Final & Unqualified
Communication of acceptance
Postal Rule
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Consideration
What is it?
Privity of Contract
Value of consideration
Past Consideration
Part Payment of a debt
Promise to perform an existing contract
Certainty
Courts will uphold a bargain if possible
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Terms of the Contract
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
What are the Terms
Terms can be
Express
In writing
Oral
Partly in writing and partly oral
Implied
By the Courts
By legislation
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Express Terms
The terms of the contract are ascertained by
examining the evidence
Not all pre-contractual statements become
terms of the contract
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Express Terms (cont.)
Meaning of the terms may not be clear
Where the parties have used language that is
incapable of any precise meaning the
contract may be void for uncertainty
It is not the role of the Court to make a
bargain for people
However, the Courts are reluctant to destroy
a bargain
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Pre-Contract Representations
An oral statement can be a term
Only promissory statements become terms
All other statements are mere representations
A statement does not have to be in the form of a
promise to be promissory
Remedies
Term of contract – Remedy for breach of contract
Representation – law of misrepresentation
Mere puff – no remedy
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Reasonable Bystander Test
Which statements and representations would
a reasonable bystander, aware of the
circumstances of the case, regard as
promissory?
The test is objective
Parties actual intention is irrelevant
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Reasonable Bystander Test (cont)
Guidelines
Was the representation included in a written
document
When, in the negotiations, was the representation
made
Did the representation sound promissory
How objectively important is the representation to
the whole deal
Did either party have special knowledge about the
subject matter of the representation
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Was There a Written Document?
If the statement was included in a document drawn
up by the parties then this is good evidence that the
parties regarded the statement as sufficiently
important to be a term
Alternatively, if it is left out, that indicates that the
parties did not intend it to be a term.
State Rail Authority of NSW v Heath Outdoor Pty
Ltd (S&OR p131)
This is not conclusive of itself, it is merely one matter
to be considered
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
When was the statement made?
How much time elapsed between the
representation and the making of the
contract?
Statements made only once early in
negotiations are less likely to become terms.
Van Den Esschert v Chappel (S&OR p132)
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
How Important was the Statement
Must be judged in the context of the
negotiations
Van Den Esschert v Chappel (S&OR p132)
Hospital Products v United States Surgical
(S&OR p134)
What words were used
The more precise the language, the more
likely it is a term
Ross v Allis-Chalmers Australia (S&OR
p133)
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Did a Party have Special Knowledge?
Did one party rely on the other’s expertise or
special knowledge rather than form its own
judgement
Oscar Chess v William (S&OR p130)
Esso Petroleum v Mardon (S&OR p134)
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Parol Evidence Rule
Courts presume that written formal contracts
that appear to be a complete record of the
agreement, contain the whole agreement
Courts will not let a party ‘subtract from, add
to or contradict the language of the written
agreement’
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Implied Terms
Terms implied by Statute
Terms implied by the Courts
Implied as a matter of law
Trade Custom
Implied as a matter of fact
Business efficacy
Past Dealings
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Terms Implied by the Courts
Cannot conflict with express terms
Must not be unreasonable or unjust in the
circumstances
Implied as a matter of law
Common situations which are so settled that
terms “go without saying”
Implied as a matter of fact
Arise out of the particular facts of the case
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Terms Implied as a Matter of Law
Professionals and Clients
Professional must use reasonable care and skill
Service Contracts
Provider must take reasonable care and skill in
providing the service
Service must be reasonably fit for the purpose for
which it was acquired
Costa Vraca v Berrigan Weed & Pest Control (S&O
p159)
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Terms Implied as a Matter of Law (cont.)
Work and Materials
Contractor must use reasonable care
Services must be fit for the purpose for which
they were acquired
Materials must be of good quality
Reg Glass v Rivers Locking Systems (S&O
p158)
Helicopter Sales v Rotor Work (S&O p158)
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Terms Implied as a Matter of Law (cont.)
Hire Contracts
Goods are reasonably fit for the purpose for
which they are hired
Landlord & Tenant
Landlord must give the tenant ‘quiet
enjoyment’ of the premise
Tenant must
Pay rent
Act in “tenant-like” manner
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Terms Implied as a Matter of Law (cont.)
Employment Contracts
Employer must
Provide a safe system of work
Not require employee to do an unlawful act
Employee must:
Obey reasonable instructions
Use reasonable level of skill and competence
Act in good faith to employer
Keep employer’s trade secrets confidential
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Terms Implied as a Matter of Fact
Past dealings
Custom or trade usage
To make the contract effective
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Past Dealings
Term is clearly identifiable
Previous dealings are numerous and consistent
Present dealing fits into the course of dealing
No conflict between implied term and an express
term
Henry Kendall v William Lillico (S&O p181)
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Custom or Trade Usage
Can state term with precision
Custom is so well known & widespread that all
contracts can be said to have the term
Custom is reasonable
No conflict with an express term
British Crane Hire v Ipswich Plant Hire (S&O
p161)
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
To Make a Contract Effective
Term is capable of clear and precise expression
The term is necessary to make the contract
effective not just reasonable
The term is obvious (“officious bystander test”)
The term is fair & equitable to both parties
No conflict with an express term
The Moorcock (S&O p162)
Codelfa Constructions v State Rail Authority
(S&O p163)
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Exemption Clauses
A clause that limits or excludes the
consequences of a breach of a party’s
obligations
Courts are biased against them
Bias is less noticeable in commercial
contracts
Courts adopt a 2 step process
Has the exemption clause become a term
of the contract?
If so, does it cover the breach in question?
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Is It a term of the contract?
Essentially the same test as for all terms
An exclusion clause cannot be incorporated after the
contract has been made (e.g. parking ticket)
Past dealings may imply an exemption clause but the
Courts are reluctant to do this
Signed documents will usually be binding even if the
party was unaware of the term unless
Signed document could not reasonably be
regarded as likely to contain contractual terms
Estoppel exists
Exemption clause has been misrepresented
See Curtis v Chemical Cleaning Co (S&OR p142)
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Is It a term of the contract?
Unsigned exemption clauses will be binding if
The innocent party was aware of it; or
reasonable notice of it has been given to
the innocent party
before the contract is made.
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
What is reasonable notice (cont)
What is reasonable notice depends on:
The nature of the document;
The nature of the transaction; and
The nature of the exemption clause.
Would it be reasonable to expect the
document to contain an exemption clause
(e.g. a receipt)
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
What is reasonable notice
Is the transaction one where you would
expect an exemption clause to exist
The wider the exemption the greater the
steps to be taken to bring it to the attention of
the other party
Cases
Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking (p144)
Parker v South Eastern Railway (p126)
Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping v Fay (p127)
DJ Hill & Co v Walter H Wright Pty Ltd (p124)
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Does the Clause Cover the Breach?
Courts will examine the clause carefully to determine
its effect and limit its scope where possible
Generally, the Courts will give effect to the parties
intentions as evidenced by the natural and ordinary
meaning of the words
There are 3 rules that courts use to limit exemption
clauses:
The Contra Preferendum rule
Negligence Clauses
The Four Corners Presumption
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Contra Preferendum Rule
Any ambiguities in the exemption clause will
be construed against the party seeking to rely
on the clause
Andrews Bros v Singer Car Co (S&OR
p145)
Alex Kay v General Motors Acceptance
Corp & Hartford Fire Insurance (S&OR
p145)
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
The Negligence Rule
Liability for negligence may be expressly or impliedly
excluded but if the words could reasonably be
applied to protect against some ground of liability
other than negligence, then liability for negligence will
not be excluded
White v John Warick & Co (S&OR p146)
To exclude liability for negligence, clear words are
required
Tech Pacific v Air Pacific (S&OR p146)
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
The 4 Corners Presumption
The exemption clause will only cover matters within
the 4 corners of the contract
Whether an event falls outside the contract depends
on the reasonable person test – would a reasonable
person aware of the terms of the contract conclude
that the parties must have had the relevant event in
mind in drawing up the contract.
Sydney Corporation v West (S&OR p148)
TNT v May & Baker (S&OR p149)
Darlington Futures v Delco Australia (S&OR p149)
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE
Statutory Reforms
In many cases, it is Illegal to attempt to
exclude terms implied by statute e.g. Trade
Practices Act
Attempting to exclude statutory liability (where
not permitted) may be misleading and
deceptive conduct contrary to section 51 of
the Trade Practices Act