Transcript Georgia`s College and Career Ready Performance Index (CCRPI)

Georgia’s College and Career Ready
Performance Index (CCRPI)
and ESEA Flexibility
Presented to Superintendents and School Leadership
Hosted by the RESAs
March, 2012
Georgia’s Call to Action
•
•
GaDOE is committed to the creation of a
comprehensive school improvement,
accountability, and communication platform
for our state’s schools and educational
leaders that will enable all Georgia public
school students to be college and career
ready.
The successful implementation of the CCRPI is
highly critical to “Making Education Work for
All Georgians.”
Immediate Advantages of Georgia’s
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Approval
• Continue development and refinement of the College and Career Ready
Performance Index (CCRPI) during 2012;
• Identify Reward, Priority, and Focus Schools as prescribed by US ED;
• Identify Alert Schools, which are unique to Georgia, and provide greater
emphasis on subgroup performance and issues;
• Use all state assessments in the identification of Priority, Focus, and Alert
Schools;
• Set Performance Targets to trigger Performance Flags (Performance Targets
replace the Annual Measurable Objectives, AMOs, under AYP;
• Exercise greater flexibility with federal funding;
• Authorize districts to provide Flexible Learning Programs (FLPs) in lieu of
Supplemental Education Services (SES) providers;
Immediate Advantages of Georgia’s
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Approval
• Follow state law (O.C.G.A. 20-2-2130 – 20-2-2131) relative to school
choice;
• Include Reward, Priority, Focus, and Alert status on the CCRPI public
reporting structure;
• Implement Teacher Keys Evaluation System (TKES) and Leader Keys
Evaluation System (LKES) statewide;
• Provide initial CCRPI report to systems by December 2012;
• Submit refined CCRPI for US ED review in March 2013 (US ED deadline for
submittal is May 24, 2013); and
• Implement CCRPI (which includes the continuation of Reward, Priority,
Focus, and Alert Schools designations) as Georgia’s Single Statewide
Accountability System in 2013.
Reward, Priority, Focus, and Alert
Schools
School designations based on 2010-2011 assessment
and graduation rate data
Reward Schools
Highest Performing
• Based on: CRCT – Reading, ELA, and Mathematics
CRCT-M – Reading, ELA, and Mathematics
GAA – ELA and Mathematics
EOCTs – 9th Grade Literature and Composition, American
Literature and Composition, Math I, Math II,
Algebra, Geometry
• 5% of Title I schools (78 Schools)
• Highest progress in performance for the “All Students” group (n size
> 30) over 3 years
• High schools with the highest graduation rates
• May not be identified as a Priority School or a Focus School
Reward Schools
High Progress
• Based on: CRCT – Reading, ELA, and Mathematics
CRCT-M – Reading, ELA, and Mathematics
GAA – ELA and Mathematics
EOCTs – 9th Grade Literature and Composition, American
Literature and Composition,
Math I, Math II, Algebra, Geometry
• 10% of Title -1 schools (156 schools)
• Highest progress in performance for the “All Students” group (n size
> 30) over 3 years
• High schools that are making the most progress in increasing
graduation rates
• May not be identified as a Priority School or a Focus School
Priority Schools
• Three ways to be identified:
– SIG Schools – 1003 (g)
– Graduation Rate less than 60% over 2 years (proxy rate)
– Achievement of “All Students” group (n size > 30) and a lack of
progress on achievement over 3 years
• Based on 2011 composite of :
– CRCT: Reading, ELA, Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies
– CRCT-M: Reading, ELA, and Mathematics
– GAA: ELA, Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies
– EOCT: 9th Grade Literature and Composition, American Literature and
Composition, Algebra I, Geometry, Mathematics I,
Mathematics II, Biology, Physical Science, U S History, and Economics
• 5% of Title I schools – lowest achieving (78 schools)
Focus Schools
• 2 ways to be identified:
– Grad rate less than 60% over 2 years (proxy rate) and not identified as a
Priority School
– Largest within-school gaps between highest achieving subgroup and the
lowest achieving subgroup
• Based on the n size > 30
• Based on 2011 composite of :
– CRCT: Reading, ELA, Mathematics, Science and Social Studies
– CRCT-M: Reading, ELA and Mathematics
– GAA: ELA, Mathematics, Science and Social Studies
– EOCT: 9th Grade American Literature and Composition, American
Literature and Composition, Algebra I, Geometry, Mathematics I,
Mathematics II, Biology, Physical Science, U S History, and Economics
• 10% of Title I schools (156 schools)
Alert Schools
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
3 ways to be identified:
– Graduation Alert
– Subgroup Alert
– Subject Alert
Based on minimum n size > TBD
Title I and Non-Title I schools
Graduation Alert: graduation rate is below 3 standard deviations from the mean of the state’s
subgroups’ graduation rate (based on 9 ESEA subgroups)
Subgroup Alert: achievement rate is below 3 standard deviations from the mean of the state’s
subgroups’ meets and exceeds rate (based on 9 ESEA subgroups)
Subject Alert: subject achievement is below 3 standard deviations from the mean of the state’s meets
and exceeds rate for each subject
Based on 2011 composite of :
– CRCT: Reading, ELA, Mathematics, Science and Social Studies
– CRCT-M: Reading, ELA, and Mathematics
– GAA: ELA, Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies
– EOCT: 9th Grade Literature and Composition, American Literature and Composition, Mathematics I,
Mathematics II, Biology, Physical Science, U S History, and Economics
Does not include Priority Schools and Focus Schools
Philosophical Shift
Identification of the lowest
performing schools
Three year commitment of support
Complex issues
Dr. John D. Barge, State School
Superintendent
“Making Education Work for All Georgians”
www.gadoe.org
District Effectiveness
Identification of Priority Schools, Focus
Schools, and Alert Schools
Development of Memorandum of
Agreement
District Effectiveness Plan
District Review
Dr. John D. Barge, State School
Superintendent
“Making Education Work for All Georgians”
www.gadoe.org
Projected Timeline for Announcements
(Priority, Focus, and Alert Schools)
•
•
•
•
Priority Schools – week of March 5th
Focus Schools – week of March 12th
Alert Schools – week of April 2nd
Dr. Reichrath will email notification of impending
availability of school lists.
• School lists will be available within the GaDOE
portal.
Timeline
Spring
Identification of Priority Schools, Focus Schools,
and Alert Schools
Assignment of school improvement specialist
Development of Memorandum of Agreement
Summer
School Improvement Grant Awards
Announcement of Reward Schools
Dr. John D. Barge, State School
Superintendent
“Making Education Work for All Georgians”
www.gadoe.org
Next Generation Accountability: CCRPI
• The CCRPI has enormous potential as a model of
innovation on the national reform stage.
• February 2012 – Fall 2012, continue the development of
CCRPI calculations utilizing stakeholder and TAC input.
• By December 2012, publish CCRPI reports.
• Implement CCRPI (which includes the continuation of
Reward, Priority, Focus, and Alert Schools designations) as
Georgia’s Single Statewide Accountability System in 2013.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
“Making Education Work for All of Georgia’s Students”
College and Career Ready Performance Index,
High School Model Grades 9 - 12
DRAFT
GRADUATION RATE
Cohort Graduation Rate (%)
POST HIGH SCHOOL READINESS
Percent of graduates completing 3 or more Pathway Courses
Percent of CTAE Pathway Completers earning a CTAE Industry-Recognized Credential
Percent of graduated students entering Technical College System of Georgia technical colleges and/or University System of Georgia 2 or
4 year colleges and universities NOT requiring remediation or support courses
Percent of graduates earning high school credit(s) for accelerated enrollment via Accel, Dual HOPE Grant, Move On When Ready, Early
College, Gateway to College, Articulated Credit, Advanced Placement or International Baccalaureate courses
Percent of graduates earning 2 or more high school credits in the same world language
Percent of AP exams receiving scores of 3 or higher and/or percent of IB exams receiving scores of 4 or higher
Percent of tested graduates scoring a minimum of 22 on the ACT (out of 36) or scoring a minimum of 1550 on the SAT (out of 2400)
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds on the Georgia High School Writing Test
Student Attendance Rate (%)
CONTENT MASTERY (END of COURSE TESTS in some areas to be REPLACED by COMMON CORE ASSESSMENTS, 2014-15, )
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds on the Ninth Grade Literature End of Course Test
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds on the American Literature End of Course Test
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds on the Mathematics I (transitioning to CCGPS Coordinate Algebra) End of Course Test
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds on the Mathematics II (transitioning to CCGPS Analytic Geometry) End of Course Test
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds on the Physical Science End of Course Test
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds on the Biology End of Course Test
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds on the US History End of Course Test
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds on the Economics End of Course Test
Georgia Department of Education
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
February 23, 2012 • Page 1
DRAFT
Factors for Success
a companion to the
College and Career Ready Performance Index for High Schools
In addition to the eighteen (18) items within the College and Career Ready Performance Index, high schools
may earn additional points for these supplemental indicators.
1. Percent of graduates completing three credits in the same world language
2. Percent of graduates taking the SAT or ACT
3. Percent of graduates earning credit in a physics course
4. Percent of students in grade nine earning 4 Carnegie Unit Credits in 4 core content areas
5. Percent of graduated students qualifying for the Zell Miller Scholarship as awarded through
legislative guidelines managed by the Georgia Student Finance Commission
6. School has earned a Georgia Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Program
Certification
7. School or LEA-defined innovative practice accompanied by documented data supporting
improved student achievement
To Be Considered at a Later Date for inclusion on the mandatory indicators or the Factors for Success:
Percent of tested students scoring at a proficient level on a Soft Skills Assessment
Percent of tested students earning an AFQT score of 35 or higher on the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery
Percent of tested students scoring ‘College Ready’ on the COMPASS examination
School’s average score on the Georgia Teacher Effectiveness Measurement
School’s average score on the Georgia Leader Effectiveness Measurement
Percent of students participating in the PLAN examination or the PSAT
Percent of graduates completing Work Based Learning or a Senior Project
Georgia Department of Education
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
February 23, 2012 • Page 2
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
“Making Education Work for All of Georgia’s Students”
College and Career Ready Performance Index,
Middle School Model Grades 6 - 8
DRAFT
CONTENT MASTERY AND PREPARATION FOR HIGH SCHOOL
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds in ELA
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds in reading
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds in mathematics
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds in science
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds in social studies
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds on the Grade Eight Writing Assessment
Percent of students in grade eight achieving a Lexile measure greater than 1050
Student Attendance Rate (%)
SUPPORTS AND INTERVENTION
Percent of English Learners with positive movement from one Performance Band to a higher Performance Band
Percent of Students With Disabilities served in general education environments greater than 80% of the school day
Percent of students in grade eight passing at least four courses in core content areas
CAREER EXPLORATION
Percent of students in grade eight with a complete Individual Graduation Plan documented in GaCollege411 or GCIS
Percent of students completing 3 or more Career Interest Inventories from a preferred Career Interest System within
GaCollege411, GCIS, or Career Cruising
Georgia Department of Education
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
February 23, 2012 • Page 3
DRAFT
Factors for Success
a companion to the
College and Career Ready Performance Index for Middle Schools
In addition to the thirteen (13) items within the College and Career Ready Performance Index, middle schools
may earn additional points for these supplemental indicators.
Percent of students in grade eight scoring proficient/advanced on the 21 st Century Skills Technology Assessment
Percent of students in grades six and seven with a fully documented Fitnessgram assessment
Percent of students in grade eight scoring at exceeds in science
Percent of students successfully completing three years of courses in the fine arts and/or one world
language and/or career exploratory
5. Percent of students in grade eight scoring at exceeds in mathematics
6. Percent of students in grade eight scoring at exceeds in social studies
7. Percent of eighth grade students earning at least one high school credit
8. Percent of eight grade students scoring at exceeds in reading
9. School has earned a Georgia Science,Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Program Certification
10. Percent of students in grades six through eight advancing to above grade level subject acceleration
11. School or LEA-defined innovative practice accompanied by documented data supporting improved student
achievement
1.
2.
3.
4.
To Be Considered at a Later Date for inclusion on the mandatory indicators or the Factors for Success:
School’s average score on the Georgia Teacher Effectiveness Measurement
School’s average score on the Georgia Leader Effectiveness Measurement
Georgia Department of Education
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
February 23, 2012 • Page 4
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
“Making Education Work for All of Georgia’s Students”
College and Career Ready Performance Index,
Elementary School Model Grades K - 5
DRAFT
CONTENT MASTERY AND PREPARATION FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds in ELA
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds in reading
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds in mathematics
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds in social studies
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds in science
Percent of students scoring at meets or exceeds on the Grade Five Writing Assessment
Percent of students in grade three achieving a Lexile measure greater than 650
Percent of students in grade five achieving a Lexile measure greater than 850
Student Attendance Rate (%)
SUPPORTS AND INTERVENTION
Percent of English Learners with positive movement from one Performance Band to a higher Performance Band
Percent of Students With Disabilities served in general education environments greater than 80% of the school day
CAREER AWARENESS
Percent of students completing ten Career Awareness Lessons by the end of grade five
Percent of fifth grade students with a Career Portfolio in GaCollege411 or GCIS
Georgia Department of Education
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
February 23, 2012 • Page 5
DRAFT
Factors for Success
a companion to the
College and Career Ready Performance Index for Elementary Schools
In addition to the thirteen (13) items within the College and Career Ready Performance Index, elementary
schools may earn additional points for these supplemental indicators.
1. Percent of students enrolled in world language courses
2. Percent of students enrolled in fine arts courses
3. Percent of students in grades one through five with documented data for the Fitnessgram assessment
4. Percent of students in grade five scoring at exceeds in science
5. Percent of students in grade three scoring at exceeds in mathematics
6. Percent of students in grade five scoring at exceeds in reading
7. Percent of students in grade five scoring at exceeds in social studies
8. School has earned a Georgia Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Program Certification
9. Percent of students in grades one through five advancing to above grade level subject acceleration
10. School or LEA-defined innovative practice accompanied by documented data supporting improved student
achievement
To Be Considered at a Later Date for inclusion on the mandatory indicators or the Factors for Success:
School’s average score on the Georgia Teacher Effectiveness Measurement
School’s average score on the Georgia Leader Effectiveness Measurement
Georgia Department of Education
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent
February 23, 2012 • Page 6
TKES and LKES
Alignment of expectations
Students
Teachers
Leaders
Dr. John D. Barge, State School
Superintendent
“Making Education Work for All Georgians”
www.gadoe.org
DRAFT
DRAFT
Performance Flag Legend
DRAFT
CCRPI Scoring Sheet Continued
% Index
Points Achieved
Total Index Points Possible
Total Index
Points Earned
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
% Index
Points Achieved
Total Index Points Possible
Total Index
Points Earned
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
% Index
Points Achieved
Total Index Points Possible
Total Index
Points Earned
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
% Index
Points Achieved
Total Index Points Possible
Total Index
Points Earned
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Achievement
Graduation Rate
Student Attendance
Post-High School Readiness
Content Mastery
Total: Achievement
Achievement Gap Closure
Gap Closure: State
Gap Closure: School
Total: Achievement Gap Closure
Progress
Graduation Rate
Student Attendance
Post-High School Readiness
Content Mastery
Total: Progress
Factors for Success
Factors for Success Composite Score
Total: Factors for Success
Met or Not
Participation
TBD
Student Record Data Elements Crucial to CCRPI Calculations
One data element touches multiple CCRPI calculations.
Once the LEA Superintendent signs off on Student Record in
June, GaDOE will not be able to make data corrections.
The following student demographic elements should be reviewed for all students:
• Student Grade Level
* Students who are eligible for Free or
• Race/Ethnicity
Reduced Priced Meal.
• Economically Disadvantaged (ED) Status *
** Students who are coded as receiving
special education services at anytime during
• Student With Disability (SWD) Status **
the school year.
• English Learner (EL) ***
*** Students who are identified as EL
• Days Absent (Excused and Unexcused)
or have exited the program and are being
monitored for two years.
• Days Present
• Latest Withdrawal Date
• Latest Withdrawal Reason Code
Next Steps for CCRPI
• Refinement of the CCRPI
• Communication of CCRPI progress
• Incorporation of Priority, Focus, Alert, and Reward
designations into CCRPI reporting structure for
accountability purposes in 2013
Urgency of Timeline
• Submit refined CCRPI for US ED review in
March 2013 (US ED deadline for submittal is
May 24, 2013).
• If denied, ESEA flexibility for Georgia will
expire at the end of the 2012-2013 school
year and Georgia and its districts will be
required to immediately resume complying
with all ESEA requirements.
US ED Mandates Relative to Choice and Waiver
• During 2011-2012 school year, a student who is already taking advantage of public
school choice must be permitted to remain at his or her school until he or she has
completed the highest grade in that school. The responsibility and cost of
transportation of the student to and from the school will be assumed by the
parent.
• Beginning with school year 2012 – 2013, public school choice will be governed by
Georgia Law O.C.G.A. 20-2-2130 – 20-2-2131.
– By July 1 of each year, the local school system shall notify parents
which schools have available space and to which of these schools parents may
choose to request a transfer.
– The responsibility and cost of transportation of the student to and
from the school will be assumed by the parent.
• SES will be replaced with the Flexible Learning Program (FLP), which will be
provided at the school level.
Georgia’s CCRPI and ESEA Flexibility
Presentation Feedback
• Be aware that you will be receiving an online
survey opportunity regarding today’s
presentation.
• Feedback obtained from survey responses will
inform the refinement of future presentations.
GaDOE Contact Information
Martha R. Reichrath, Ph.D. Deputy State Superintendent
(404) 656-2804 / [email protected]
Avis King, Deputy State Superintendent
(404) 651-7277 / [email protected]
Barbara Lunsford, Associate Superintendent, School Improvement
(404) 463-4156 / [email protected]
Joanne Leonard, Director of Accountability
(404) 463-1538 / [email protected]
Becky Chambers, Program Manager for College Readiness
(404) 463-5098 / [email protected]
Please direct questions, concerns, or input related to the CCRPI to your GaDOE
Accountability Specialist identified at the following link:
http://archives.doe.k12.ga.us/DMGetDocument.aspx/Accountability%20Special
ists%20List%2012.15.11.pdf?p=6CC6799F8C1371F6A3166B63F6EDD613405729
80934DF54CDECEA9B1B6C19E7F&Type=D